Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Frailty is common and associated with poor outcomes among kidney transplant (KT) recipients. While frailty improves in the first 3 months post-KT with restored kidney function, longer-term trajectories are likely to plateau/decline due to aging and other stressors (eg, immunosuppression). We evaluated longer-term post-KT trajectories of the physical frailty phenotype (PFP) and its components in adult patients at 2 centers. METHODS:PFP components were measured at admission, 1, 3, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter post-KT. We used adjusted mixed-effects models to describe repeated measures of continuous components (weight, gait speed, grip strength, activity) and generalized estimating equations to quantify longitudinal, binomial response patterns (PFP; exhaustion). RESULTS:Among 1 336 recipients (mean age = 53) followed for a median of 1.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.1-3.2), likelihood of frailty declined in the first 2.5 years post-KT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95, 0.98), but increased after 2.5 years post-KT (aOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05). In the first 2.5 years post-KT, recipients demonstrated increases in weight (0.4 lbs/month, 95% CI: 0.3, 0.5), grip strength (0.2 kg/month, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.2), and activity (23.9 kcal/month, 95% CI: 17.5, 30.2); gait speed remained stable (-0.01 s/month, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.003). Additionally, likelihood of becoming exhausted declined post-KT (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.00). After 2.5 years post-KT, recipients demonstrated decreased grip strength (-0.07 kg/month, 95% CI: -0.12, -0.01) and activity (-20 kcal/month, 95% CI: -32.3, -8.2); they had stable weight (-0.003 lbs/month, 95% CI: -0.17, 0.16), gait speed (-0.003 s/month, 95% CI: -0.02, 0.01), and likelihood of becoming exhausted (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.02). CONCLUSION:Despite frailty improvements in the first 2.5 years, recipients' frailty worsened after 2.5 years post-KT. Specifically, they experienced gains in strength, activity, and exhaustion in the first 2.5 years post-KT, but declined in strength and activity after 2.5 years post-KT while experiencing persistent slowness. Clinicians should consider monitoring recipients for worsening frailty after 2.5 years despite shorter-term improvements.

BACKGROUND:Secondary hyperparathyroidism affects nearly all patients with renal failure on dialysis. Medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism has considerably evolved over the past 2 decades, with parathyroidectomy reserved for severe cases. The primary objective of our study was to understand how trends in medical treatments affected parathyroidectomy rates in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism on dialysis. METHODS:We used the United States Renal Data System to identify 379,835 adult patients (age ≥18) who were on maintenance dialysis in the United States between 2006 and 2016 with Medicare as the primary payor and ascertained treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Adjusted rate ratios for rates of parathyroidectomy were calculated using multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression. RESULTS:Of 379,835 secondary hyperparathyroidism patients, 4,118 (1.1%) underwent parathyroidectomy, 39,835 (10.5%) received cinacalcet, 243,522 (64.1%) received phosphate binders, 17,571 (4.6%) received vitamin D analogs, and 86,899 (22.9%) received no treatment during the 10 years of follow-up. Over the entire study period, there was a 3.5-fold increase in the use of calcimimetics and a 3.4-fold increase in rates of parathyroidectomy. Compared to 2006 through 2009, utilization of parathyroidectomy increased 52% (adjusted rate ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.39-1.65) between 2010 and 2013 and by 106% (adjusted rate ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.90-2.24) between 2014 and 2016. The greatest increase in parathyroidectomy utilization occurred in younger patients (age 18-64 years), Black patients, female patients, those living in higher poverty neighborhoods, those listed for kidney transplant, and those who live in the Southern region of the United States. CONCLUSION:Despite the evolution of medical treatments and an increase in the use of calcimimetics to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroidectomy rates have been steadily increasing among dialysis patients with Medicare coverage.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Disorders of bone and mineral metabolism frequently develop with advanced kidney disease, may be exacerbated by immunosuppression after kidney transplantation, and increase the risk of fractures. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective database study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States captured in US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after kidney transplantation. OUTCOMES/UNASSIGNED:The development of fractures, as ascertained using diagnostic codes on Medicare billing claims. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/UNASSIGNED:We used multivariable Cox regression with inverse propensity weighting to compare the incidence of fractures >3 months-to-3 years after kidney transplantation associated with various immunosuppression regimens compared to a reference regimen of antithymocyte globulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse probability treatment weighting. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: < 0.001]). Induction with TMG or ALEM and the avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids significantly reduced the risk of fractures in younger (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73) and older (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94) patients. The avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids with any induction was associated with a reduced risk of fractures in women. LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:This was a retrospective study which lacked data on immunosuppression levels. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Fractures after kidney transplantation are associated with significantly increased mortality risk and costs. The early avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids after induction with TMG or ALEM reduces the risk of fractures after kidney transplantation and should be considered for patients at high-risk of this complication, including older adults and women.

INTRODUCTION:Loneliness, "a subjective feeling of being isolated", is a strong predictor of adverse health. We characterized loneliness in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting liver transplantation (LT). METHODS:We surveyed loneliness in ambulatory ESLD adults awaiting LT at 7 U.S. sites using the validated UCLA Three-Item Loneliness Scale, May2020-Jan2021; "lonely"=total ≥5. Liver Frailty Index (LFI) assessed frailty; "frail"=LFI≥4.4. Logistic regression associated loneliness and co-variables. RESULTS:Of 454 participants, median MELDNa was 14 (IQR 10-19) and 26% met criteria for "lonely". Compared to those not lonely, those lonely were younger (57 v. 61y), more likely to be female (48% v. 31%) or frail (21 v. 11%), and less likely to be working (15% v. 26%) or in a committed partnership (52% v. 71%). After multivariable adjustment, frailty (OR=2.24, 95%CI=1.23-4.08), younger age (OR=1.19, 95%CI=1.07-1.34), female sex (OR=1.83, 95%CI=1.14-2.92), not working (OR=2.16, 95%CI=1.16-4.03), and not in a committed partnership (OR=2.07, 95%CI=1.29-3.32) remained significantly associated with higher odds of loneliness. CONCLUSION:Loneliness is prevalent in adults awaiting LT, and independently associated with younger age, female sex and physical frailty. These data lay the foundation to investigate the extent to which loneliness impacts health outcomes in LT, as in the general population. Clinical Trial Registry Website: https://clinicaltrials.gov Trial Number: NCT03228290.

BACKGROUND:Despite the societal benefits of live kidney donation, Black donors may be more likely than White donors to develop hypertension (HTN) and chronic kidney disease after donation. Among live kidney donors diagnosed with post-donation HTN, little is known about potential racial/ethnic differences in HTN self-care behaviors and perceived susceptibility to developing kidney disease. METHODS:We ascertained electronic medical records and phone survey data from live donors enrolled in the multi-center Wellness and Health Outcomes of LivE Donors (WHOLE-Donor) Hypertension Care Study between May 2013 and April 2020. Using multivariable logistic regression models performed January through June 2021, we examined potential associations of donor race/ethnicity with perceived susceptibility to kidney disease and self-care behaviors (ie, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System measure assessing self-reported actions to control high blood pressure). RESULTS:The study included 318 US-based live kidney donors who developed post-donation HTN (57.6% female; 78.9% White; 18.6% Black; and mean age 46.7 years at donation). Black donors were equally as likely as White donors to report being moderately or strongly concerned about developing kidney disease (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 1.27, 95%CI: .66, 2.14, P=.57). Donors with diabetes were more likely than those without diabetes (aOR: 2.43, 95%CI: 1.03, 5.01, P=.04), while donors aged >50 years were less likely than younger donors (aOR: .39, 95%CI: .18, .85, P=.02) to report being moderately or strongly concerned about kidney disease. Overall, 87% of donors reported taking at least one action to help control blood pressure, with no significant differences by sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSIONS:We found no substantial differences in perceived susceptibility to kidney disease among Black and White donors, despite published evidence that Black donors may experience greater risk of developing kidney disease than White donors. Behavioral interventions to enhance knowledge about future disease risk, attitudes, and self-care strategies among living kidney donors may be beneficial.

Racial and ethnic disparities persist in access to the liver transplantation (LT) waiting list; however, there is limited knowledge about underlying system-level factors that may be responsible for these disparities. Given the complex nature of LT candidate evaluation, a human factors and systems engineering approach may provide insights. We recruited participants from the LT teams (coordinators, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers, dieticians, pharmacists, leadership) at two major LT centers. From December 2020 to July 2021, we performed ethnographic observations (participant-patient appointments, committee meetings) and semistructured interviews (N = 54 interviews, 49 observation hours). Based on findings from this multicenter, multimethod qualitative study combined with the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 (a human factors and systems engineering model for health care), we created a conceptual framework describing how transplant work system characteristics and other external factors may improve equity in the LT evaluation process. Participant perceptions about listing disparities described external factors (e.g., structural racism, ambiguous national guidelines, national quality metrics) that permeate the LT evaluation process. Mechanisms identified included minimal transplant team diversity, implicit bias, and interpersonal racism. A lack of resources was a common theme, such as social workers, transportation assistance, non-English-language materials, and time (e.g., more time for education for patients with health literacy concerns). Because of the minimal data collection or center feedback about disparities, participants felt uncomfortable with and unadaptable to unwanted outcomes, which perpetuate disparities. We proposed transplant center-level solutions (i.e., including but not limited to training of staff on health equity) to modifiable barriers in the clinical work system that could help patient navigation, reduce disparities, and improve access to care. Our findings call for an urgent need for transplant centers, national societies, and policy makers to focus efforts on improving equity (tailored, patient-centered resources) using the science of human factors and systems engineering.