Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify whether repeat positron emission tomography scan after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer predicted a complete response. METHODS: A retrospective study using a prospective database was performed. Patients had esophageal cancer and underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, an initial and repeat positron emission tomography, endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (at the same institution), and Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with lymph node resection. RESULTS: There were 221 patients who underwent Ivor Lewis, 86 of whom had their initial and repeat positron emission tomography scans performed at the same center. Of these, 37 patients (43%) were complete responders. The median maximum standardized uptake value of esophageal cancer decreased by 72% in the 37 patients who were complete responders, by 58% in the 31 patients who were partial responders, and by 37% in the 18 patients who had a minimal pathologic response. When the maximum standardized uptake value decreased by more than 64%, the patient was likely to be a complete responder (P = .003, area under the curve = 0.75). CONCLUSION: When initial and repeat positron emission tomography scans are performed at the same center at least 30 days after the completion of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, the percent change in the maximum standardized uptake value is a predictor of the response to chemoradiotherapy by a patient with esophageal cancer. When the maximum standardized uptake value decreases by 64% or more, it is likely that the patient is a complete responder. These data may help guide neoadjuvant therapy and identify patients for a future randomized study that compares observation with surgical resection in patients with esophageal cancer who appear to be complete responders.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of the pylorus during esophagogastrectomy is unknown. Pyloromyotomy and pyloroplasty cause early edema and risk long-term bile reflux; however, the lack of pyloric drainage might risk early aspiration. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study with a prospective database on patients with esophageal cancer or high-grade dysplasia who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy. All had one surgeon and similar stomach tubularization, hand-sewn anastomoses, nasogastric tube duration, and postoperative prokinetic agents. Outcomes of postoperative gastric emptying, aspiration, and swallowing symptoms were compared. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and June 2008, there were 221 patients. Seventy-one patients had a pyloromyotomy, and gastric emptying judged on postoperative day 4 was delayed in 93% (52% had any morbidity and 14% had respiratory morbidity). Fifty-four patients had no drainage procedure, and gastric emptying was delayed in 96% (59% had any morbidity and 22% had respiratory morbidity). Twenty-eight patients underwent pyloroplasty, and 96% had delayed gastric emptying (50% had any morbidity and 32% had respiratory morbidity). Sixty-eight patients had botulinum toxin injection into the pylorus. Gastric emptying was delayed in only 59% (P = .002, 44% had any morbidity and 13% had respiratory morbidity). Hospital length of stay (P = .015) and operative times (P = .037) were shorter in the botulinum toxin group. Follow-up (mean, 40 months) showed symptoms of biliary reflux to be lowest in the botulinum toxin group (P = .024). CONCLUSION: Injection of the pylorus with botulinum toxin at the time of esophagogastrectomy is safe and decreases operative time when compared with pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy. In addition, it can improve early gastric emptying, decrease respiratory complications, shorten hospital stay, and reduce late bile reflux. A prospective multi-institutional randomized trial is needed.

Air leaks are one of the most common complications after pulmonary resection and they are the most frequent cause of prolonged hospital stay, increased cost and patient dissatisfaction. The management of chest tubes in patients with air leaks is optimized when the air leak is scientifically evaluated. The traditionally used analogue classification system, the Robert David Cerfolio Classification System (or RDC named after my father) has inherent subjectivity to it and may be interpreted differently by different bedside observers. More recently, several companies have developed digital pleural drainage systems that are able to quantify the size of air leaks in ml/min or in ml/breath. This eliminates the subjectivity. This affords better interpretation of chest tube setting changes and of air leak healing. These units also provide recordings of the air leak and of the pleural pressure. In this multimedia chapter, we report the different methods of measuring air leaks.

OBJECTIVES: With the exception of one retrospective survey, there are currently no prospectively published data about the frequency of cervical esophageal perforation at the time of endoscopic ultrasound (CEP-EUS). We prospectively investigated the frequency of CEP-EUS and the outcomes and management of patients sustaining CEP-EUS. METHODS: All patients that underwent upper EUS by a single experienced endosonographer over a 7-year period were enrolled. All indications and immediate complications encountered, the baseline demographics, indication of the procedures, surgical interventions, length of hospital stay, and the final outcomes of the patients were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: A total of 5,225 EUS procedures were performed. Lower gastrointestinal tract EUS procedures (n=331) were excluded from the analysis, and thus 4,894 upper EUSs constitute this study. The mean age of the patients was 59.7 years (s.d. 14.3 years); 54% patients were men and 79% were white. Indications for EUS included pancreaticobiliary (58%), esophageal (14%), mediastinal (14%), gastric (9%), celiac blocks (1%), and other (4%). Of 4,894 patients, 3 (0.06%, exact 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.18) suffered CEP-EUS. The curvilinear echoendoscope was used in all three patients. All patients were octogenarians and women. All perforations were suspected at the time of intubation. Esophagogram confirmed contained perforation in all patients. All patients were immediately admitted and underwent surgical repair with a neck incision and recovered completely. The length of hospital stay was 6, 11, and 23 days respectively. All patients resumed swallowing without complications. One patient died from progressive pancreatic cancer 6 months after Whipple's procedure. The two other patients remained alive and well 12 and 22 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: CEP-EUS is rare but a potentially devastating event for the patient and the treating physician. Although rare, the incidence is 2- to 3-fold higher than what has been reported in the survey literature. Early recognition and treatment is crucial for prompt intervention and complete recovery from CEP-EUS. These data can be used by endosonographers to counsel their patients about frequency, management, and outcomes of CEP-EUS.

Recent studies have shown that patients who are down-staged via neoadjuvant therapy and undergo resection have a significant increased 5-year survival rate (as high as 40%-50%) when compared with patients who have residual N2 disease. The identification of patients who are N2 negative after the completion of their neoadjuvant therapy is a critical component of proper patient selection for thoracotomy. Some may even argue that it is a necessary step before resection. In this article we review the best ways to restage patients with N2 disease after they have completed their neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Stage IIIA non-small cell lung (NSCLC) from N2 disease is common, but represents a heterogeneous group of patients. Predictors of who completes their neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and undergoes subsequent surgical resection are unknown. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a prospective database. Patients who had biopsy-proven, nonbulky N2 disease underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and were restaged or resected, or both. RESULTS: There were 402 patients, and 326 (81%) completed their neoadjuvant therapy. Only 198 (50%) returned for definitive pathologic restaging, and 149 (37%) underwent thoracotomy for attempted resection. Predictors of who returned to the surgical arena were age (< 70), multiple node involvement, and response to neoadjuvant therapy. The 5-year survival was 8% for the 253 patients who did not return for restaging but was 47% for the 149 patients who underwent thoracotomy (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival for selected subgroups of patients who underwent complete resection was 42% for the 14 patients who had unsuspected recalcitrant N2 disease, 49% for the 65 patients who had a partial response, and 53% for the 34 patients who had a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Only 37% of patients with favorable, nonbulky, biopsy-proven N2 disease actually complete their neoadjuvant therapy, undergo restaging, and then return for attempted resection. Only 28% undergo complete resection. However, in this highly selected subset of patients, the 5-year survival is 47% or better if partial or complete pathologic response is achieved. Therefore, surgical resection remains a viable treatment for selected patients with favorable N2 NSCLC.