Faculty Bibliography

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Operative hip fractures are known to cause a loss in functional status in the elderly. While several studies exist demonstrating the association between age, pre-injury functioning, and comorbidities related to this loss of function, no studies have predicted this using a validated risk stratification tool. We attempt to use the Score for Trauma Triage for Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) tool to predict loss of ambulatory function and need for assistive device use. Materials and Methods/UNASSIGNED:Five hundred and fifty-six patients ≥55 years of age who underwent operative hip fracture fixation were enrolled in a trauma registry. Demographics, functional status, injury severity, and hospital course were used to determine a STTGMA score and patients were stratified into risk quartiles. At least 1 year after hospitalization, patients completed the EQ-5D questionnaire for functional outcomes. Results/UNASSIGNED:Two hundred and sixty-eight (48.2%) patients or their family members responded to the questionnaire. Of the 184 patients alive, 65 (35.3%) reported a return to baseline function. Eighty-nine (48.4%) patients reported a loss in ambulatory status. Patients with higher STTGMA scores were older, had more comorbidities, reported greater need for help with daily activities, increased difficulty with self-care, and a reduction in return to activities of daily living (all p ≤ 0.001). Patients with lower STTGMA scores were more likely to never require an assistive device while those with higher scores were more likely to continue needing one (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001). Patients in the highest STTGMA risk groups were 1.5x more likely to have an impairment in ambulatory status (need for ambulatory assistive device or decreased ambulatory capacity) (p = 0.004). Discussion/UNASSIGNED:Patients in higher STTGMA risk quartiles were more likely to experience impairment after hip fracture surgery. The STTGMA tool can predict loss of ambulatory independence following hip fracture. At-risk populations can be targeted for enhanced physiotherapy and rehabilitation services for optimal return to prior functioning.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:This study sought to investigate whether a validated trauma triage tool can stratify hospital quality measures and inpatient cost for middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients with isolated proximal and midshaft humerus fractures. Materials and Methods/UNASSIGNED:Patients aged 55 and older who sustained a proximal or midshaft humerus fracture and required inpatient treatment were included. Patient demographic, comorbidity, and injury severity information was used to calculate each patient's Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA). Based on scores, patients were stratified to create minimal, low, moderate, and high risk groups. Outcomes included length of stay, complications, operative management, ICU/SDU-level care, discharge disposition, unplanned readmission, and index admission costs. Results/UNASSIGNED:Seventy-four patients with 74 humerus fractures met final inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight (78.4%) patients presented with proximal humerus and 16 (21.6%) with midshaft humerus fractures. Mean length of stay was 5.5 ± 3.4 days with a significant difference among risk groups (P = 0.029). Lower risk patients were more likely to undergo surgical management (P = 0.015) while higher risk patients required more ICU/SDU-level care (P < 0.001). Twenty-six (70.3%) minimal risk patients were discharged home compared to zero high risk patients (P = 0.001). Higher risk patients experienced higher total inpatient costs across operative and nonoperative treatment groups. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:The STTGMA tool is able to reliably predict hospital quality measures and cost outcomes that may allow hospitals and providers to improve value-based care and clinical decision-making for patients presenting with proximal and midshaft humerus fractures. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:Prognostic Level III.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:The Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) is a validated mortality risk score that evaluates 4 major physiologic criteria: age, comorbidities, vital signs, and anatomic injuries. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of ASA physical status classification system to the STTGMA tool would improve risk stratification of a middle-aged and elderly trauma population. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A total of 1332 patients aged 55 years and older who sustained a hip fracture through a low-energy mechanism between October 2014 and February 2020 were included. The STTGMA and STTGMAASA mortality risk scores were calculated. The ability of the models to predict inpatient mortality was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) by DeLong's test. Patients were stratified into minimal, low, moderate, and high risk cohorts based on their risk scores. Comparative analyses between risk score stratification distribution of mortality, complications, length of stay, ICU admission, and readmission were performed using Fisher's exact test. Total cost of admission was fitted by univariate linear regression with STTGMA and STTGMAASA. Results/UNASSIGNED:There were 27 inpatient mortalities (2.0%). When STTGMA was used, the AUROC was 0.742. When STTGMAASA was used, the AUROC was 0.823. DeLong's test resulted in significant difference in predictive capacity for inpatient mortality between STTGMA and STTGMAASA (p = 0.04). Risk score stratification yielded significantly different distribution of all outcomes between risk cohorts (p < 0.01). STTGMAASA stratification produced a larger percentage of all negative outcomes with increasing risk cohort. Total hospital cost was statistically correlated with both STTGMAASA (p < 0.01) and STTGMA (p = 0.02). Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Including ASA physical status as a variable in STTGMA improves the model's ability to predict inpatient mortality and risk stratify middle-aged and geriatric hip fracture patients.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Despite the recommendation for postoperative orthopedic follow-up after a hip fracture in elderly patients, many patients do not return for these visits. In this study, we attempt to determine if early follow-up (<4 weeks post-discharge) changes orthopedic post-operative management. Materials and Methods/UNASSIGNED:1232 patients aged > 55 years old who underwent operative fixation for hip fractures were enrolled into an orthopedic trauma registry and followed from hospitalization through one year. Demographics, comorbidities, injury severity, and hospital course data were collected. Need for readmission and orthopedic follow-up were ascertained through chart review. Results/UNASSIGNED:417 patients (33.8%) patients did not return for any follow-up and 30 (2.4%) patients died <30 days from discharge. 370 (45.5%) patients had early orthopedic follow-up ≤28 days after discharge. 317 (38.9%) patients were seen ≥29 days after discharge (late follow-up). 127 (15.6%) patients returned for isolated non-orthopedic care. There were 23 (6.2%) readmissions in the early group, 17 (5.4%) in the late group, and 24 (18.9%) in the no follow-up group (p < 0.001). Patients discharged home were more likely to present for early follow-up compared to those with late and non-orthopedic follow-up (p = 0.002), however there was no difference in readmission rates between those discharged home vs. SNFs/SARs. Discussion/UNASSIGNED:Patients who received isolated non-orthopedic follow-up within 4 weeks of surgery experienced more hospital readmissions than those with follow-up in that time period; however, these readmissions were primarily due to medical issues. There was no difference in orthopedic-related readmissions and changes in orthopedic management between groups. Patients discharged to SNFs/SARs did not present for early orthopedic as often as those discharged home. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Early orthopedic follow up after hip fracture care does not change post-operative management in these patients and has implications for value-based care. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:Prognostic Level III.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Orthopedic surgeons use radiographs to determine degrees of fracture healing, guide progression of clinical care, and assist in determining weight bearing and removal of immobilization. However, no gold standard exists to determine the progression of healing of humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively. Purpose/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to determine whether a scale comparable to the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial (RUST) fractures applied to non-operatively treated humeral shaft fractures can increase interobserver reliability in determining fracture healing. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective review was undertaken by three orthopedic traumatologists and one musculoskeletal radiologist, who evaluated 50 sets of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, presented at random, of non-operatively treated humeral shaft fractures at various stages of healing from 17 patients. The radiographs were scored using a modified RUST scale called the Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM). Observers were blinded to the time from injury. After a 4-week washout period, observers again scored the same radiographs. Observers classified each fracture as either healed or not healed based on the combination of radiographs. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the RHUM were determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interobserver reliability of determining a healed fracture was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics. A receiver operator characteristic curve was conducted to determine the RHUM score predictive of a fracture being considered healed. Results/UNASSIGNED:ICC demonstrated almost perfect interobserver reliability (ICC, 0.838; ICC 95% CI, 0.765 to 0.896) and intraobserver reliability (ICC range, 0.822 to 0.948) of the RHUM. κ demonstrated substantial agreement between observers in considering a fracture healed (κ = 0.647). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated that a RHUM of 10 or higher is an excellent predictor of the observer considering the fracture healed (area under the ROC curve = 0.946, specificity = 0.957, 95% CI specificity, 0.916 to 0.979). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:This cortical scoring system has excellent interobserver reliability in humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively. Consistent with previous cortical scoring systems, a RHUM score of 10 or above can be considered radiographically healed.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term functional status of patients treated surgically for a clavicular nonunion using patients treated either op-eratively or non-operatively for an acute clavicle fracture as a comparison group. METHODS:Twenty consecutive patients treated by a single surgeon for a clavicle fracture nonunion were identified. For comparison of outcomes, acute clavicle fractures were identified from an electronic medical record (EMR) query of the same orthopedic surgeon. Ninety acute clavicle fracture patients were identified and 27 (30%) patients were available for long-term follow-up. Clavicular nonunions were compared to acute clavicle fracture patients in a univariate analysis then a multivariate analysis to analyze clavicle nonunion patients against operative and non-operative acute clavicle fracture patients. The main outcome measures were time to bony union, postoperative complications, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) scores at long-term follow-up. RESULTS:There was no difference in time to healing or functional outcomes as assessed by SMFA and VAS pain scores between clavicle nonunion and acute fracture patients. Postoperative complications also did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who are treated surgically for clavicular nonunions ultimately regain a similar functional status as patients who are treated either operatively or non-operatively for an acute clavicle fracture and heal acutely.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Burnout is an occupational hazard for physicians at all stages of training and medical practice. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether residency factors, with the use of an activity monitor, including the amount of exercise, have any impact on burnout among orthopaedic surgery residents in varying years of training. METHODS:Orthopaedic residents at a single institution were recruited immediately before beginning a new clinical rotation and followed for four weeks. On enrollment, the participants were given a wrist-worn activity monitor (Fitbit Flex) and instructed on its use for tracking physical activity. REDCap was used to collect burnout levels (as assessed by using the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9), which were completed a total of five times, once at enrollment and weekly during the study period. RESULTS:Twenty-seven residents were enrolled, including 13 junior residents (interns and second years) and 14 senior residents (third, fourth, and fifth years). Seven residents were on fracture rotations, whereas 20 were not. As measured by using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, juniors were more emotionally exhausted (P = 0.01) and depersonalized (P = 0.027). No difference in the objective physical activity data as measured by using the Fitbit Flex and no difference in the self-reported hours of sleep were observed. Residents on orthopaedic trauma rotations also reported significantly higher rates of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization (P < 0.001) than other residents and were more physically active on average (P < 0.030). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although depersonalization and depression are common symptoms seen among orthopaedic surgery residents, this study demonstrated that quality of life improves markedly as they progress through their residency training. Residents on orthopedic trauma rotations have greater levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. This pilot study suggests that burnout prevention programs should begin at the start of training to provide residents with strategies to combat and then reinforced while on orthopaedic trauma rotations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III Diagnostic Study.

INTRODUCTION:Urinary tract infection (UTI) complications are often attributed to the inappropriate use of urinary catheters. PURPOSE:We sought to examine the effectiveness of a hospital-wide policy aimed at reducing the use of indwelling Foley catheters. METHODS:We completed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 577 hip and femur fracture patients aged 55 years and older who were operatively treated at a Level 1 trauma center between October 2014 and March 2019. New standard-of-care guidelines restricting the use of indwelling Foley catheters were implemented starting January 2018, and we compared perioperative outcomes between cohorts. RESULTS:Over a 50% absolute reduction in indwelling Foley catheter use and a near 30% relative reduction in hospital-acquired UTI were achieved. Postpolicy cohort patients without indwelling Foley catheters experienced lower odds of hospital-acquired UTI, higher odds of home discharge, as well as decreased time to surgery, shorter length of stay, and lower total inpatient cost compared with those with indwelling Foley catheters. CONCLUSIONS:The policy of restricting indwelling Foley catheter placement was safe and effective. A decrease in indwelling Foley catheter use led to a decrease in the rate of hospital-acquired UTI and positively affected other perioperative outcomes.

Olecranon osteotomy allows for improved visualization of the distal humeral articular surface. This study compared the clinical outcomes of 2 methods of olecranon repair following olecranon osteotomy as part of distal humerus fracture repair. This was a retrospective review of distal humerus fractures treated via a transolecranon approach during a 9-year period. In each case, the olecranon osteotomy was fixed with either tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF). Patient demographics, injury information, and surgical management were recorded. Measured outcomes included elbow motion, time to osteotomy union, and postoperative complications. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) scores were obtained for all patients. Forty-eight patients were included. All patients had intra-articular AO type 13-C2 or 13-C3 distal humerus fractures and underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with olecranon osteotomy. Mean documented follow-up was 20.5 months. Twenty-seven patients had fixation of the olecranon osteotomy with TBW, and 21 with PF. Clinically, there were no differences in osteotomy time to union, elbow motion, or MEPI score at final follow-up. However, patients fixed with TBW had greater elbow extension at both 6-month and final follow-up. Complication rates did not differ. Patients undergoing TBW or PF for repair of an olecranon osteotomy following ORIF of intra-articular distal humerus fractures have similar outcomes. Patients undergoing osteotomy PF may experience less terminal elbow extension when compared with those fixed with TBW. Given their similar clinical outcomes, either modality may be considered when selecting a construct for olecranon osteotomy repair as part of comminuted distal humerus fracture repair. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(x):xx-xx.].

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine whether a validated trauma triage tool can identify which middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients with tibial shaft and plateau fractures are at risk for costly admissions and poorer hospital quality measures. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:64 patients over the age of 55 hospitalized with isolated tibial shaft or plateau fractures. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Patients with either isolated tibial plateau fractures or tibial shaft fractures over a three year period were prospectively enrolled in an orthopedic trauma registry. Demographic information, injury severity, and comorbidities were assessed and incorporated into the STTGMA score, a validated trauma triage score that calculates inpatient mortality risk upon admission. Patients were then grouped into tertiles based on their STTGMA score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Length of stay, complications, discharge location, and direct variable costs. RESULTS:64 patients met inclusion criteria. 33 (51.6%) patients presented with tibial plateau fractures and 31 (48.4%) with tibial shaft fractures. The mean age was 66.7 ± 10.2 years. Mean length of stay was significantly different between risk groups with a mean of 6.8 ± 4 days (p<0.001). While 19 (90.5%) of minimal risk patients were discharged home, only 7 (33.3%) and 5 (22.7%) of moderate and high-risk patients were discharged home, respectively (p<0.001). Higher risk patients experienced a significantly greater number of complications during hospitalization but had no differences in the need for ICU level care (p=0.027 and p=0.344, respectively). The total cost difference between the lowest and highest risk group was nearly 50% ($14070 ± 8056 vs $25147 ± 14471, mean difference $11077; p=0.022). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Application of the STTGMA triage tool allows for prediction of key hospital quality measures and cost of hospitalization that can improve clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III.