Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP) is increasingly utilized in minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) in order to increase rate of fusion by promoting bone growth through the induction of osteoblast differentiation, awhile reducing morbidity related to iliac crest autograft. Despite these benefits, BMP use is still controversial due to its pro-inflammatory mechanism of action and potential to cause radiculitis. PURPOSE: To assess whether BMP is a risk factor for postoperative radiculitis in TLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 397 TLIFs from June 2012 to December 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative clinical characteristics, post-operative risk of radiculitis and complication, and future reoperation rates.
METHOD(S): Patients >= 18 years-old undergoing elective single-level TLIFs from 2012 to 2018 were included. Outcome measures included perioperative clinical characteristics, postoperative risk of radiculitis and complication, and future reoperation rates. Radiculitis was defined the delayed onset of radicular symptoms postoperatively in patients whom had initial resolution of radicular symptoms immediately postoperatively, in the absence of persistent neurological compression on postoperative imaging. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and chi-square analysis. Propensity score matching was utilized to control for demographic differences between the groups. Independent predictors for post-operative radiculitis were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Significance set at p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 397 cases were included in the study (59.33 +/- 13.49 mean age, 28.98 +/- 6.29 mean BMI, 52.90% female, 2.29 +/- 1.92 average Charleston comorbidity Index). There were 223 open procedures and 174 MIS. For the entire cohort, 238 cases utilized BMP and 159 did not, with 102 MIS pairing with BMP use. The MIS TLIFs had a higher percentage of BMP use than open TLIFs (58.6% vs 25.7%, p<0.001), lower estimated blood loss (212.28 +/- 193.79 mL vs 410.91 +/- 337.98 mL, p<0.001) higher fluoroscopy dosage (52.43 +/- 48.61mGy vs 16.77 +/- 27.84mGy, p<0.001), and a lower length of stay (3.20 +/- 2.55 days vs 4.11 +/- 2.52 days, p<0.001). There were no other differences in perioperative clinical characteristics. There was a significantly higher rate of postoperative radiculitis in the MIS TLIFs compared to open (12.6% vs 6.8%, p=0.046) and use of BMP compared to no BMP (13.2% vs 6.7%, p=0.029). There was a 15.7% radiculitis rate when MIS was paired with BMP use. There were no other notable differences in complication rates or rates of reoperation. Individually, MIS had a 12.6% radiculitis rate (p=0.046) and BMP use had a 13.2% rate (p=0.029). Propensity score match controlled for the significant difference in CCI between the MIS and open groups (N=168 each). Multivariate regression indicated that MIS (p=0.314) and BMP (p=0.109) were not independent predictors individually when controlling for age, gender, and BMI. When technique was paired with biologic use the regression revealed MIS + BMP is a risk factor of post-operative radiculitis (2.265(4.753-1.079), p=0.031).
CONCLUSION(S): While BMP and MIS technique were not independent risk factors for postoperative radiculitis, there is an increased risk of radiculitis when using BMP in MIS TLIF. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction involves complex, invasive procedures. However, it is unknown how metabolic syndrome affects the cost efficiency of ASD surgery. PURPOSE: Investigate the differences in ASD surgery cost for metabolic syndrome patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a single center ASD database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 557 ASD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications, revisions and costs.
METHOD(S): ASD patients (scoliosis >=20degree, SVA>=5cm, PT >=25degree, or TK >=60degree) >=18, undergoing >=4 level fusions were included. Descriptive analysis assessed mean baseline demographic, radiographic and surgical data were assessed. Patients diagnosed with: BMI >30, diabetes mellitus, and HTN were classified metabolic syndrome patients (MetS). Independent samples T-tests assessed baseline differences in SVA, PT, PI-LL, and levels fused between MetS and non-MetS patients. Total surgery costs for MetS and non-MetS ASD patients were compared. Costs were calculated using the PearlDiver database, which reflects both private insurance and Medicare reimbursement claims. Complications and comorbidities (CC) and major complications and comorbidities (MCC) were assessed according to CMS.gov manual definitions.
RESULT(S): A total of 557 patients met inclusion criteria. Baseline demographics and surgical details: age 60.8 +/- 13.2, 67.5% female, BMI 28.3 +/- 6.67, 6.2% anterior approach, 81.0% posterior approach, 12.8% combined approach, 10.4 +/- 3.9 levels fused, op time 423.5 +/- 166.4 minutes, EBL 2061.4 +/- 1631.5 cc, LOS 7.6 +/- 5.4 days. 11 MetS patients were included. There was no significant difference in BL SVA (54.2degree vs 70.3degree), PT (26.7degree vs 23.7degree), PI-LL (16.4degree vs 21.2degree), or levels fused between groups (10.5 vs 10.6) (all p>0.05). Twenty-seven percent of MetS patients experienced a CC or MCC, with 18% undergoing revisions within 90 days (vs 13.2% and 3.2% for non-MetS, p<0.05). The average costs of surgery for MetS patients was $68,004.06 vs $48,726.40 for non-MetS patients (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION(S): Metabolic syndrome is a growing concern among health care providers. In metabolic syndrome patients undergoing corrective adult spinal deformity surgery, the total costs of surgery was 28.4% higher for metabolic syndrome patients ($68,004.06 vs $48,726.40). Optimizing modifiable factors like diabetes or BMI in preoperative patients may have an impact on cost effectiveness. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Due to inherent patient and surgical factors, some adult spinal deformity patients are at higher risk of larger blood loss. This is associated with increased risk of complications, coagulopathy, and higher requirements for blood component replacement intraoperatively. The medical team should be aware of expected blood loss in order to adequately plan patient monitoring and blood product requirements. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop and validate a model based on patient characteristics and surgical strategies to predict which patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery are at greater risk of massive intra-operative blood loss. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective database. PATIENT SAMPLE: Surgical ASD patients undergoing long fusions (>5 levels). OUTCOME MEASURES: Massive intraoperative blood loss (>7% of a patient's ideal body weight), ICU stay, complications.
METHOD(S): Surgical adult spinal deformity patients undergoing long fusions (> 5 levels) were analyzed. Massive blood loss was defined as an intraoperative blood loss over 7% of a patients' ideal body weight, in accordance to the anesthesia literature. The impact of mEBL on complications and ICU stay was assessed through multivariate poisson and logistic regression, adjusting for baseline patient demographics and magnitude of surgery. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to build a prediction model of mEBL. Potential predictors were identified using univariate analysis. The model was built using a combination of backward elimination and bootstrap selection. Model fit was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the ROC curve. Split sample internal cross-validation was performed.
RESULT(S): A total of 1,205 patients met inclusion criteria, and mEBL occurred in 7.8% (94/1205) of cases. In this cohort, mEBL was an independent risk factor for major complications (IRR 2.89, p=0.0001), and postoperative ICU stay (OR 4.68, p=0.001). Predictors of mEBL included: revision surgery (OR 1.66, p=0.05), performing a three-column osteotomy (OR 2.65, p=0.0001), number of levels fused (OR 1.19, p=0.0001), number of levels decompressed (OR 1.15, p=0.004), and number of LLIF interbodies (OR 0.69, p=0.066). The predictive model had a good discrimination (ROC curve 0.76), and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.39), which held true when performing split-sample cross-validation.
CONCLUSION(S): We built and validated a model to predict massive intra operative blood loss in ASD surgery. In this model, baseline patient demographics and elements of the surgical strategy are used to predict which patients are at greater risk for massive blood loss. This tool would be of particular help to the anesthesia team, allowing to identify preoperatively which patients are at greater risk and plan intraoperative care and fluid management accordingly. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Many different risk factors for PJK have been identified in those having surgery for ASD. The presence of CF prior to thoracolumbar fusion as a risk factor in this patient population has not been investigated. PURPOSE: To investigate if prior cervical fusion would be a risk factor for PJK when upper thoracic UIV was selected. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospective multicenter database. PATIENT SAMPLE: Inclusion: age >18 and one of the following inclusion criteria was queried: PI-LL >10, PT >20, Max Cobb>10, SVA > 5 cm. OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of PJK; HRQOL include NRS back and leg, ODI, SRS-22, EQ5D METHODS: Inclusion: age >18 and one of the following inclusion criteria was queried: PI-LL >10, PT >20, Max Cobb>10, SVA > 5 cm. 1023 patients were identified and grouped as CF (prior CF; n=101) and NoCF (n=922). Patients with 5 or fewer levels of CF and those without further cervical spine surgery at final follow-up were included (cASD= 86; ASD= 910). After initial analysis propensity matching was performed controlling for: age, BMI, pre-op alignment (PI, PI-LL, TPA, SVA), change in alignment (PI-LL), and UIV/LIV.
RESULT(S): Among 996 patients the CF group was older (64 v 60; p<0.000), higher BMI (29.7 v 28; p<0.014), with equal gender distribution. PJK at 1 year was 34.9% (n=30) in CF and 34.7% (n=316) in NoCF. All patients included had a minimum of four segments unfused between CF and TL fusion. No differences were found between groups when stratifying by UIV (UT=upper thoracic; LT=Lower thoracic; L=lumbar). Radiographically CF had worse preop deformity (PI-LL 21.3 v 17.2; TPA 27.3 v 23.6; SVA 90.6 v 68.5; p<0.05), with no difference in postop alignment between groups. CF was more likely to have LT UIV (61.6% v 46%; p=0.045) and fusion to the ilium (93% v 81%; p=0.005). After propensity matching 79 patients were included in each group. CF had 68 patients with ACDF, 5 patients with PSF, and 6 patients with A/PSF. There was no difference in the rate of PJK (39.2 v 34.2%), PJK magnitude (13.4 v 13.7) or change in PJK angle (10.1 v 10.4). PJK rate and magnitude are not different by UT or LT as UIV.
CONCLUSION(S): The presence of CF is not associated with the development of PJK or PJK magnitude in this propensity matched cohort. All CF patients had a minimum of four segments unfused between the CF and the TL fusion which may act as a buffer and be protective of PJK. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: As the field of corrective cervical deformity (CD) surgery progresses, surgeons continue to take on more challenging cases. In order to minimize suboptimal postoperative outcomes it is important to develop a tool that allows for proper preoperative risk stratification. PURPOSE: Develop individualized predictive models for identification of risk-factors that lead to the development of major complications, revisions, and unplanned reoperation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of a prospective adult cervical deformity database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 105 CD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Major complications (prolonged hospitalization, invasive intervention, prolonged or permanent morbidity, death within 1 year[1Y]), unplanned revision or reoperation after CD surgery within 1Y, HRQOL (NDI, mJOA, EQ5D).
METHOD(S): CD patients (cervical kyphosis >10degree, coronal scoliosis >10degree, cSVA >4cm, TS-CL >10degree, or CBVA >25degree) >=18 years old with complete baseline (BL), 1Y HRQoL and radiographic data. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their outcome from surgery: revision (Rev) and major complication (MC). Descriptive analysis identified cohort demographics, radiographic parameters and surgical details. Univariate analysis of preoperative and surgical factors was conducted to determine associations with any of the two outcomes. Stepwise logistic regressions identified surgical, radiographic, and HRQL factors that were associated with Rev or MC. Decision tree analysis established cut-offs for predictive variables.
RESULT(S): A total of 105 CD patients were included (61.6yrs, 67%F, BMI: 28.4kg/m2, CCI: 0.96+/-1.3). Surgical details: 7.6+/- 3.7 levels fused; mean EBL of 816 mL. By surgical approach, 45.71% had a posterior approach, 35.24% combined approach, and 19.05% anterior approach. Radiographically at baseline, patients presented with: PT: 18.9+/- 11.3; PI: 53.0+/-11.2; PI-LL: -0.45+/-17.2; SVA: -4.3+/-66.8, TS-CL: 37.9 +/-20.2; cSVA: 38.4+/-19.9. Postoperatively, 20 patients experienced a MC and 17 patients underwent a subsequent rev. instrumentation location (LIV: 1.1[1.0-1.3] and UIV: 1.5[1.1-2.1]) was significantly associated with undergoing a rev after index surgery (all p<0.05). The development of a postoperative MC was significantly associated with BL radiographic pelvic parameters (all <0.05). Predictive modeling incorporating preoperative and surgical factors identified development of a Rev to include: UIV>C3, LIV>T3, C2-T3 SVA<46.7degree, C2-C7 SVA>57.6degree, CTPA>7.8degree, and C2S<60.4 (AUC:0.80). For developing a MC, a model consisting of preoperative and surgical factors included BL EQ5D-VAS<30, TS-CL>59.2degree, C2-C7 SVA > 69.1degree, C2-T3 SVA < 18.6, Apex C2-C7 SVA >4.25, surgical invasiveness and posterior osteotomies (AUC:0.83).
CONCLUSION(S): Major adverse events were not uncommon following adult cervical deformity correction. Risk stratification models were developed to predict with high accuracy the occurrence of these common significant postoperative events. Revisions were predicted with an accuracy of 80% using a predominance of radiographic variables, while the occurrence of other major complications was also predicted with high reliability utilizing additional baseline HRQoL data and surgical factors. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior literature has demonstrated that correction of sagittal plane deformity in adult patients has resulted in improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes. In the absence of sagittal plane pathology, the effects of coronal malalignment under-correction in patients with spinal deformity have not been fully investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of coronal malalignment correction on HRQOL outcomes in adult spinal deformity. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a multicenter database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 522 ASD patients had preoperative coronal malalignment greater than 40 mm. We excluded anyone who had SVA greater than 50 mm in order to control for patients without severe sagittal deformities. OUTCOME MEASURES: Our outcome measures included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS), and several other SF-36 and SRS-22r health domains scores.
METHOD(S): Using a prospective, multicenter database, we identified 1560 surgical patients. Of these, 522 patients had preoperative coronal malalignment greater than 40 mm. We excluded anyone who had SVA greater than 50 mm in order to control for patients who only had coronal plane deformity. We only included patients undergoing primary surgery. We then compared 2-year post HRQOL outcomes in patients that had their coronal malalignment corrected (CVA < 40mm) vs not.
RESULT(S): Mean age of patients was 54 +/- 15 years, 91% females. 79 patients were identified with only a coronal plane deformity undergoing a primary ASD surgery. Of these, 38 (48%) were under-corrected and 41 (52%) had their coronal alignment corrected to <40mm. Compared to the corrected group, the uncorrected group had a higher ODI (26.0+/- 2.9 vs 14.7+/- 2.5; p=0.002) and lower SRS-22r Activity (3.6+/- 0.14 vs 4.2+/- 0.11; p=002), SRS-22r Appearance (3.3+/- 0.16 vs 3.9+/- 0.12, p=.001), SRS-22r total (3.6+/- 0.12 vs 4.1+/- 0.11, p=.004), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (40.8+/- 1.3 vs 46.8+/- 1.6; p=.005), SF-36 Physical Function (40.5+/- 1.7 vs 46.0+/- 1.5, p=.01), SF-36 Bodily Pain (41.7+/- 1.6 vs 47.8+/- 1.5, p=.006), SF-36 General Health (47.2+/- 1.8 vs 52.2+/- 1.4, p=.03), SF-36 Social Functioning (45.9+/- 2.1 vs 51.7+/- 1.4, p=.03), SF-36 Mental Health (48.9+/- 1.9 vs 54.2+/- 1.8, p=.048) 2 years following index surgery.
CONCLUSION(S): Patients with coronal malalignment and little sagittal plane deformity experience worse improvement in pain and disability, with under-correction of their coronal plane deformity. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Operative treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be very challenging with high complication rates. Despite these challenges it's well established that pts benefit from such treatment. However, the surgical outcomes for pts with mild scoliosis and age appropriate sagittal alignment have not been reported. PURPOSE: To determine if patients (pts) with mild scoliosis and age appropriate sagittal alignment have favorable outcomes following surgical correction. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter ASD database. PATIENT SAMPLE: ASD patients: operative pts age>=18, and all preoperartive pelvic tilt (PT), mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) within established age adjusted parameters with minimum 2-year follow up. A subanalysis for pts with max coronal cobb angle 10-30degree (mild scoli) was done. OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short form-36(SF36), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS22), back/leg pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID)/substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Radiographic values: max coronal cobb angle, coronal C7 plumb line, PT, PI-LL, thoracic kyphosis (TK), SVA. Demographic, frailty, surgical and complications data were collected.
METHOD(S): Two-year and baseline HRQOL/radiographic data were compared.
RESULT(S): A total of 103 pts were included from 667 operative patients (89.3% female, avg age 59.8+/-13.1yrs). Of the 103 pts, 29 (28.2%) had max preop coronal cobb angle 10-30degree. Two-year max coronal cobb angle and C7 coronal plumb were significantly improved compared to baseline (p<0.001 for both the overall cohort and mild scoli). All 2yr HRQOL measures were significantly improved compared to baseline(p<0.001) for both groups. 33.3-81.5%% of mild scoli pts met either MCID/SCB for all HRQOL. In mild scoli pts, 62.1% had min one complication, 27.6% had a major complication with 24.1% requiring a revision.
CONCLUSION(S): Pts with mild scoliosis and sagittal alignment within age appropriate parameters benefit from surgical correction at 2 years postop both radiographically and clinically including 81.5% meeting MCID for SRS pain despite having high complication rates. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Frailty is an increasingly recognized characteristic that has been validated across many studies as influencing operative risk. Utilization of frailty indices can allow for its identification of which spine patients may be too high risk for surgical intervention. This may be especially useful when it comes to surgeries that are minimally invasive and are supposed to have decrease perioperative outcomes. PURPOSE: Identify MIS techniques effects in postoperative outcomes in TLIF patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospective database. PATIENT SAMPLE: TLIF spine patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL).
METHOD(S): Pts that underwent a lumbar spine procedure in a single-center Comprehensive Spine Quality Database. Pts were stratified based on procedural approach (Open [OP] and Minimally invasive Surgery [MIS]). Frailty was then calculated for each resultant group by using 30 variables with a validated method. Based on these scores, pts were categorized no frailty [NF]: <0.09, frail [F]: 0.09-0.18, and severe frailty [SF] >0.18. Groups were then controlled for surgical invasiveness. Chi-squared tests identified the relationship between complications and length of stay among various frailty states given surgical approach (OP vs MIS). These patients were propensity score matched for levels fused. Hospital acquired complications (HACs) were identified based on frailty groups through the use of chi-squared and t-tests for other surgical factors. A logistic regression analysis identified the association between frailty status and surgical, regarding postoperative (postop) outcomes.
RESULT(S): A total of 1,300 TLIF spine patients were isolated (59yrs, 29.3kg/m2). After PSM for levels fused, there were 338 pts for both MIS and OP. MIS pts were older (56.1 vs 53.3; p<0.05) than Op pts and had similar BMI's (29.1 vs 29.7; respectively). However, OP received more posterior approaches and less anterior approaches than MIS pts (p<0.05). By surgical factors: MIS and OP patients had similar LOS (3 vs 2.9days) and EBL (282.8 vs 251.5cc) but differed by Op time (195.7 vs 247.1; p<0.05) respectively. Further breakdown by frailty displayed statistical significance between MIS and OP patients with MIS pts having more F (16% vs 12%) and SF pts (4.3% vs 1.9%) than OP (all p<0.05). FMIS patients had lower postop neurologic complications as compared to FOP pts (4.63% vs 14.8%). However, SFMIS patiens had more post-operative complications than SFOP pts (55.2% vs 23.1%) and increased a pt's likelihood of being SFMIS by 5.4x's (all p<0.05).
CONCLUSION(S): This study displays that when frailty status is taken into account, TLIF MIS patients benefit from this procedure type when analyzed against neurologic complications. However, these patients were seen to suffer more from postop complications but did not differ on any other specific complications or surgical variables. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Age and pelvic incidence (PI) optimal alignment has been shown to minimize mechanical complications such as PJK. Low PI patients may be susceptible to overcorrection because PI specific alignment is not always prioritized. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of over-correction in low PI ASD patients undergoing surgical intervention, and to quantify the impact of over-correction on radiographic PJK in this patient population. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter database. PATIENT SAMPLE: Surgical ASD patients with low pelvic incidence. OUTCOME MEASURES: PJK defined as 1) proximal junctional angle (PJA, U

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) provides indirect decompression of the neural elements while minimizing the potential vascular complications associated with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Posterior fixation may be applied through various techniques such as conventional minimally invasive surgery (CMIS), requiring the patient to be repositioned prone to provide access to both pedicles. Conversely, robot-assisted navigation (RAN) of pedicle screws can be utilized from a single position without flipping the patient. RAN is theorized to reduce patient surgical time, radiation, and blood loss due to positioning and workflow effects. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of robot-assisted navigation in comparison to CMIS methods in terms of surgical time, radiation exposure, and pedicle screw accuracy. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cadaveric study. PATIENT SAMPLE: N/A OUTCOME MEASURES: N/A METHODS: Twelve unembalmed human torsos were implanted with 2-level static LLIF cages, followed by posterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation using either CMIS (n=6) or RAN (n=6). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) RAN workflow utilized CT scans of the specimen taken offsite and transferred to the robotic system during setup. Screw planning was performed using these CT scans, and then was merged with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Surgical times, surgeon radiation exposure, and screw accuracy were measured. Patient flip time from a consecutive patient series was included.
RESULT(S): Significant differences in surgical times and radiation dosages were found between groups. Surgical time for preoperative RAN and CMIS was 64.7 min+/-4.1 min and 123.0 min+/-13.7 min, respectively. Time per screw for RAN and CMIS workflows was 2.7+/-0.6 min and 4.3+/-1.3 min, respectively. RAN was significantly different for total operative time and time per screw in comparison to CMIS (p<0.05). Radiation dosages and times were separated into interbody and posterior fixation procedures separately, and sorted by imaging workflow. RAN and CMIS radiation dosages during posterior fixation were 0.4+/-0.2 rad and 2.7+/-1.6, respectively (p<0.05). Screw accuracy was as follows: CMIS resulted in 4 breaches (11% breach rate), while RAN resulted in a single breach (3% breach rate).
CONCLUSION(S): Significant differences were found in both surgical time and radiation exposure between CMIS and RAN, with RAN resulting in shorter surgical times and less radiation exposure to the surgeon than CMIS. Consideration should be given to single-position LLIF procedures that utilize RAN to instrument the spine with bilateral pedicle screws. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright