Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The importance of research in resident education has been emphasized in the orthopaedic surgery community, and a number of residency programs have incorporated a year or more of protected research time into their training. However, limited information exists as to what programs are looking for in applicants to research-track residency programs or the perceived benefits of completing such a program. METHODS:We identified orthopaedic surgery programs that have tracks involving at least 1 year of protected research time and sent surveys to their program directors and to the 2012 through 2016 research-track graduates. RESULTS:Twenty-three programs with research tracks were identified, and 19 program directors (83%) responded to the survey. The survey revealed that only 2 (11%) of these program directors were willing to accept lower scores and grades among applicants to their research track compared with their primary clinical (categorical) track. While most of the program directors (14 [74%]) preferred that applicants have an interest in academics, only a few (3 [16%]) considered it a failure if their research-track residents did not pursue academic careers. We obtained the e-mail addresses of 82 research-track graduates, and 66 (80%) responded to the survey. The survey revealed that those who went into academic careers were more likely than those who went into private practice to view completing a research track as beneficial for fellowship (73% versus 35%, respectively) and job (73% versus 22%, respectively) applications, believed that the income lost from the additional year of residency would be compensated for by opportunities gained from the research year (50% versus 17%, respectively), and said that they would pursue a research-track residency if they had to do it over again (81% versus 39%, respectively; all p values <0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The majority of program directors preferred that applicants to their research-track program have an interest in academics, although most did not consider it a failure if their research-track residents entered nonacademic careers. Graduates of research-track residency programs who entered academics more frequently viewed the completion of a research track as being beneficial compared with those who went into private practice.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes after operative repair of nonunited lower extremity fractures initially repaired outside the developed Western world. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:From September 2004 through February 2017, 227 patients who underwent operative repair of a lower extremity fracture nonunion were prospectively enrolled in a research registry. All patients underwent previous fracture surgery and had at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Repair of lower extremity fracture nonunion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Postoperative complications, reoperation rate, time to union, and functional outcomes were assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and Visual Analog Scale pain scores. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the differences in patients who underwent initial fracture repair outside the developed Western world as opposed to within the United States. RESULTS:Twenty-one patients (9.3%) underwent initial fracture repair outside the developed Western world. These patients had a greater incidence of infected nonunions (47.6% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.015) and failure of a previous implant at the time of presentation (52.4% vs. 22.8%; P = 0.003) than those initially managed within the United States. This cohort also experienced a greater rate of postoperative complications after nonunion repair (23.8% vs. 6.3%; P = 0.016). The geographic location of initial fracture repair was not associated with postoperative Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores or Visual Analog Scale pain scores after controlling for possible confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who present with a nonunited lower extremity fracture initially repaired outside the developed Western world experience a high rate of postoperative complications after fracture nonunion repair but can expect good short- and long-term functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Partial articular fractures involving the capitellum represent an injury to the lateral column of the distal humerus. Capitellum open reduction and internal fixation restores this portion of the distal humerus articular surface and biomechanical integrity to the lateral column. This video demonstrates open reduction and internal fixation of a type I capitellar fracture with headless compression screws through an extensile lateral approach.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Monteggia fractures are rare, although complex elbow injuries. Bado II Monteggia fractures are characterized by posterior dislocation of the radial head and concurrent fracture of the proximal or middle third of the ulna. This video demonstrates the open reduction and internal fixation of a complex Bado II Monteggia fracture dislocation. METHODS:The patient is a 65-year-old woman with a Bado II Monteggia fracture after a low-energy fall from standing height. Given the extent of comminution and the instability of the elbow, the patient was indicated for surgical fixation. RESULTS:This video demonstrates a locking plate technique for repair of a comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. Anatomical reduction of ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar joints and stable fixation with bone grafting of the fracture are achieved with a medial 2.0/2.4-mm plate and a dorsal precontoured variable-angle locking plate. Demonstration of radial head arthroplasty is provided as an alternative for utilization in cases with a radial head fracture. CONCLUSIONS:Anatomical reduction and fixation of complex Monteggia fracture dislocations can be achieved with adherence to standard aspects of bony reconstruction. In this video we present the case of a Bado II Monteggia fracture surgically repaired with a locking plate construct.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Periprosthetic fracture nonunions represent a rare problem in orthopaedic practice, although their incidence has increased with the increased frequency of joint replacement surgery. This video demonstrates the use of a linked nail-plate construct to repair a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunion. METHODS:The patient is a 93-year-old woman who is 1-year status-post a left distal femoral periprosthetic fracture with known delayed healing. She presents with a low energy trauma and hardware failure. The patient was indicated for operative fixation using a linked nail-plate construct given the patient's previous hardware failure, advanced age, and poor bone quality. RESULTS:This video demonstrates the linked nail-plate technique for the repair of a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunion. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation with bone graft was performed with excellent results. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications and no issues related to metallurgy. CONCLUSIONS:In this video, we present the case of an atrophic distal femoral periprosthetic nonunion treated with a linked nail-plate construct with autologous bone graft. Although femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunions are a rare occurrence, they can be successfully treated with operative intervention aimed at compression plating with supplemental bone grafting.

Tibial plateau fracture is an injury commonly seen by those who treat trauma around the knee and/or sports-related injuries. In this video article, we present our protocol for surgical treatment of a tibial plateau fracture, which includes definitive fixation with use of a plate-and-screw construct, addressing of all associated soft-tissue injuries at the time of the surgical procedure, filling of any residual voids with bone cement, and early rehabilitation with weight-bearing beginning at 10 to 12 weeks postoperatively. The major steps of the procedure are (1) preoperative planning with digitally templated plates and screws, (2) patient positioning and setup, (3) anterolateral approach toward the proximal aspect of the tibia, (4) submeniscal arthrotomy, (5) booking open of the proximal aspect of the tibia at the fracture site, (6) tagging of the meniscus, (7) fracture reduction and placement of the Kirschner wire, (8) confirmation of reduction with C-arm image intensification, (9) internal fixation with a plate-and-screw construct, and (10) closure.

There are number of significant issues outside of the bone and/or fracture that are important to consider in the treatment of orthopaedic trauma. Joint contractures, heterotopic bone formation, managing a traumatized soft-tissue envelope or substantial soft-tissue defects represent a few of these important issues. This article reviews these issues, including the best available evidence on how to manage them.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the ability of a validated geriatric trauma risk prediction tool to stratify hospital quality metrics and inpatient cost for middle-aged and geriatric patients admitted from the ED for operative treatment of an ankle fracture. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study SETTING:: Single Academic Medical Center PATIENTS:: Patients aged 55 and older who sustained a rotational ankle fracture and were treated operatively during their index hospitalization INTERVENTION:: Calculation of validated trauma triage score, Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA), using patient's demographic, injury severity, and functional status. Patients were stratified into groups based on scores to create a minimal-, low-, moderate-, and high-risk cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:length of stay, complications, need for ICU/SDU level care, discharge location, and index admission costs RESULTS:: Fifty ankle fracture patients met inclusion criteria. Mean length of stay was 7.8 ± 5.2 days with a significant difference among the four risk groups (4.6 day difference between low and high risk). 73.1% of minimal risk patients were discharged home compared to 0% of high-risk patients. There was no difference in complication rate or in need for ICU level care between groups. However, high-risk patients had a mean total inpatient cost two times greater than that of minimal risk patients. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The STTGMA tool is able to meaningfully stratify older ankle fracture patients requiring operative fixation with regards to hospital quality metrics and cost. This information may allow for efficient targeted reductions in costs while optimizing outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic, Level III.