Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ideal strategy to prevent infections in patients with external ventricular drains (EVDs) is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of members of the Neurocritical Care Society on infection prevention practices for patients with EVDs between April and July 2015. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 52 individuals (5% response rate). Catheter selection, use of prolonged prophylactic systemic antibiotics (PPSAs), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection policies, location of EVD placement, and performance of routine EVD exchanges varied. Antibiotic-impregnated catheters (AICs) and conventional catheters (CCs) were used with similar frequency, but no respondents reported routine use of silver-impregnated catheters (SICs). The majority of respondents were either neutral or disagreed with the need for PPSA with all catheter types (CC: 75%, AIC: 85%, and SIC: 87%). Despite this, 55% of the respondents reported PPSAs were routinely administered to patients with EVDs at their institutions. The majority (80%) of the respondents reported CSF collection only on an as-needed basis. The EVD placement was restricted to the operating room at 27% of the respondents' institutions. Only 2 respondents (4%) reported that routine EVD exchanges were performed at their institution. CONCLUSION: Practice patterns demonstrate that institutions use varying strategies to prevent ventriculostomy-related infections. Identification and further study of optimum care for these patients are essential to decrease the risk of complications and to aid development of practice standards.

We describe two unusual cases of cardiopulmonary death in mechanically ventilated patients in the neurological intensive care unit. After cardiac arrest, both patients were pulseless for a protracted period. Upon extubation, both developed agonal movements (gasping respiration) resembling life. We discuss these cases and the literature on the ethical and medical controversies associated with determining time of cardiopulmonary death. We conclude that there is rarely a single moment when all of a patient's physiological functions stop working at once. This can pose a challenge for determining the exact moment of death.

Introduction Physicians often struggle with the intricacies of brain death determination and communication about end-of-life care. In an effort to remedy this situation, we introduced an educational initiative at our medical school to improve student comprehension and comfort dealing with brain death. Methods Beginning in July 2017, students at our medical school were required to attend a 90-minute brain death didactic and simulation session during their neurology clerkship. Students completed a test immediately before and after participating in the initiative. Results Of the 145 students who participated in this educational initiative between July 2016 and June 2017, 124 (86%) consented to have their data used for research purposes. Students correctly answered a median of 53% of questions (IQR 47-58%) on the pretest and 86% of questions (IQR 78-89%) on the posttest (p<0.001). Comfort with both performing a brain death evaluation and talking to a family about brain death improved significantly after this initiative (18% of students were comfortable performing a brain death evaluation before the initiative and 86% were comfortable doing so after the initiative, p<0.001; 18% were comfortable talking to a family about brain death before the initiative and 76% were comfortable doing so after the initiative, p<0.001). Conclusions Incorporation of simulation in undergraduate medical education is high-yield. At our medical school, knowledge about brain death and comfort performing a brain death exam or talking to a family about brain death was poor prior to development of this initiative, but awareness and comfort dealing with brain death improved significantly after this initiative. This initiative was clearly a success and can serve as a model for brain death education at other medical schools

Introduction Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) frequently present with hypertension. It is unclear whether this is due to preexisting hypertension (prHTN) causing the bleed, an effect of the bleed, or both. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a single-institution cohort of ICH patients presenting between 2013 and 2016. Data included home antihypertensive use; aSBP; TTE, and EKG and imaging results; and nicardipine administration. The primary objective was to assess the relationship between prHTN and aSBP, while the secondary objectives were to assess the relationship between prHTN, imaging and acute antihypertensive requirements. Results 112 ICH patients met inclusion criteria. In our assessment for prHTN, we found that 46% of patients were on antihypertensives, 16% had LVH on EKG, and 15% had LVH on TTE. There was a significant relationship between LVH on TTE and LVH on EKG (p<0.001), but not between home antihypertensive use and presence of LVH using either modality. aSBP was higher for all patients with markers of pHTN, but this was only significant for patients with LVH on TTE (181mmHg, IQR 153-214 vs. 152mmHg, IQR 137-169, p < 0.001) and patients with LVH on EKG (195 mm Hg, IQR 155-216 vs. 147 mm Hg, IQR 129- 163, p<0.001). All patients with markers of prHTN were more likely to require nicardipine, but this was only significant for patients with LVH on TTE (94% vs. 64%, p=0.016) and patients with LVH on EKG (83% vs. 52%, p=0.018). All patients with markers of prHTN were more likely to have deep bleeds (p=0.017 for patients with LVH on EKG vs. those without LVH on EKG). There was no relationship between any markers of prHTN and the presence of a spot sign. Conclusions In patients with ICH, prHTN is related to higher aSBP, deep bleed location, and increased acute antihypertensive requirements

Introduction Postoperative antibiotics (PA) are often administered to patients after instrumented spinal surgery until all drains are removed to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). This practice is discouraged by numerous medical society guidelines, so our institutional Neurosurgery Quality Improvement Committee decided to discontinue use of PA for this population. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data for patients who had instrumented spinal surgery at our institution for seven months before and after this policy change and compared the frequency of SSI and development of antibiotic related complications in patients who received PA to those who did not (non- PA). Results We identified 188 PA patients and 158 non-PA patients. Discontinuation of PA did not result in an increase in frequency of SSI (2% of PA patients vs. 0.6% of non-PA patients, p=0.4). Growth of resistant bacteria was not significantly reduced in the non-PA period in comparison to the PA period (2% vs. 1%, p=1). The cost of antibiotics for PA patients was $5,499.62, whereas the cost of antibiotics for the non- PA patients was $0. On a per patient basis, the cost associated with antibiotics and resistant infections was significantly greater for patients who received PA than for those who did not (median of $26.32 with IQR $9.87-$46.06 vs. median of $0 with IQR $0-$0; p<0.0001). Conclusions After discontinuing PA for patients who had instrumented spinal procedures, we did not observe an increase in the frequency of SSI. We did, however, note that there was a non-significant decrease in the frequency of growth of resistant organisms. These findings suggest that patients in this population do not need PA, and complications can be reduced if PA are withheld

Objective The death of Marlise Munoz, a pregnant woman who suffered an anoxic brain injury in November 2013, highlights the social, ethical, legal, and medical controversies associated with brain death in pregnancy. We sought to evaluate whether institutions in the United States have policies in place for situations in which a pregnant woman is declared brain dead. Study Design Institutional brain-death protocols from hospitals in the United States were obtained in cooperation with local and regional organ procurement agencies. Each protocol was reviewed to determine if and how it addressed brain death in pregnancy. Results We reviewed 317 unique brain-death protocols. In eight protocols (2.5%), it was noted that a pregnant patient could not be evaluated for brain death if the fetus could be preserved. Of the protocols that permitted brain-death evaluation, 289 (93.8%) did not include guidance about fetal management after maternal brain death and 305 (99%) did not indicate who was responsible for making decisions for the fetus. Conclusion Very few institutional brain-death policies address the issue of pregnancy. The creation of guidelines on management of the social and ethical challenges associated with brain death in pregnancy may be helpful.

People die either when their heart and respiration stop or when their brain irreversibly stops functioning. This latter mode of death by neurologic criteria (also called brain death) emerged after the development of ventilators and intensive care units in the late 1950s and 1960s. Brain death is universally accepted as a modern entity, but the complex process for declaring a patient brain dead is not uniformly followed across country and state lines or even hospital policies, creating unacceptable variability and risks for falsely pronouncing a patient dead. If, however, the declaring physician has expertise and diligently follows the steps that have been published in guidelines, this risk is mitigated. In this article, the authors describe the steps for brain death declaration, discuss how to avoid pitfalls, and examine the modern controversies regarding this medical reality.