Faculty Bibliography

Background: Current literature does not provide conclusive evidence on whether routine pathologic examination of femoral heads from total hip arthroplasty is indicated or cost-effective. As a result, there is substantial variation in opinion among surgeons related to this issue. Our study aim was to determine factors that impact surgeon propensity to order pathologic examination of femoral heads. Methods: A 12-question survey was created to evaluate surgeon practices, indications, and patient care implications surrounding routine pathologic examination of femoral heads. The email survey was distributed to all members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (n = 2598). Results: There were 572 survey respondents. Out of all respondents, 28.4% always send femoral heads to pathology, and 27.6% reported an institutional requirement to do so. Of the 572 surgeons, 73.6% report femoral head pathology has never resulted in a change in patient disease course. Factors that increase the likelihood of surgeons ordering femoral head pathologic examination include institutional requirements, medicolegal concern, and prior experience with femoral head pathologic examination changing patients' disease course (P <.001). Cost concern decreases the likelihood of surgeons ordering femoral head pathologic examination (P =.0012). Conclusions: A minority of surgeons routinely send femoral heads from total hip arthroplasty for pathologic examination, mostly because of institutional requirement. The majority of surgeons feel that femoral head pathologic examination never changes patient management, although others have infrequently detected malignancy and infection. Institutional policy, concern for litigation, and prior experience with discordant pathologic diagnoses increase femoral head pathologic examinations, while cost concern decreases them.

BACKGROUND:Girdlestone resection arthroplasty is a salvage procedure for hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) that controls infection and reduces chronic pain, but may result in limited postoperative joint function. The aim of this study was to assess physical function and mental health after Girdlestone. METHODS:This was a multicenter, prospective study evaluating patients with Girdlestone. The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global physical health and mental health surveys were administered postoperatively via telephone. The PEQ consists of four scales (ie, ambulation, frustration, perceived response, and social burden) with scores ranging from 0 to 10. The PROMIS measures generated T-scores (mean: 50, standard deviation: 10) that enable comparison to the general population. RESULTS:Thirty-five patients completed all surveys. The average time from procedure to survey completion was 6 years (range, 1 to 20). The median scores for the ambulation, frustration, perceived response, and social burden scales of the PEQ were 0.0 [interquartile range: 0-4.1], 6.0 [3.0-9.3], 9.0 [7.2-10.0], and 7.5 [4.3-9.5]. The median raw scores of the PROMIS global physical health and mental health were 11.91 [interquartile range: 9-14] and 14.0 [10.0-16.0]. These corresponded to average T scores of 39.7 (standard error : 4.3) for physical health and 46.1 (standard error: 3.8) for mental health, which were 10.3 points and 3.9 points below the average score in the United States general population, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Girdlestone can have a substantial negative impact on physical functions; however, mental health and social interaction may be only moderately affected. These outcomes can be used to guide patient expectations, as this procedure may be necessary in certain salvage scenarios.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The effect of vaping on outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and its prevalence in this patient population remain unclear. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the trends of vaping in TJA patients compared with patients who underwent routine physical examination and (2) to examine the influence vaping has on outcomes after TJA. METHODS:Patients were classified as never vaped, former vape users, or whether they reported current vaping (CV). TJA patients were further classified based on whether they had no exposure to tobacco or vaping (NTNV), tobacco only (TO), both tobacco and vaping (BTV), or vaping only (VO). RESULTS:The TJA group exhibited a steady trend of patients with CV status (P = 0.540) while patients in the routine physical examination cohort demonstrated a significant upward trend in CV status (P = 0.015). Subanalysis of TJA patients revealed that those in the VO category had significantly higher mean surgical time (P < 0.001), length of stay (P = 0.01), and rates of readmission (P = 0.001) compared with all other subgroups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We found steady or increasing trends of electronic cigarette exposure in both groups over time. Additional efforts should be made to document electronic cigarette exposure for all patients.

BACKGROUND:Metabolic syndrome (MetS) includes interrelated conditions such as insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. This study sought to determine the association of MetS in morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40) on complications and clinical outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS:A retrospective review was performed to include all morbidly obese patients who underwent primary elective TKA for osteoarthritis at a single academic institution. Patients who did and did not have MetS were propensity-matched 1:1 based on baseline characteristics. A total of 391 patients who did and 935 who did not have MetS were included having a mean body mass index of 44.2 (range, 40.0 to 68.9). RESULTS:The MetS patients had longer lengths of stay (LOS) (3.5 ± 2.4 versus 3.0 ± 1.5 days, P = .001) and were more likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facilities (23.8 versus 15.3%, P = .007). At 90 days postoperatively, major (P = .756) and minor (P = .652) complication rates and readmissions (P = .359) were similar. Revision rates as well as improvements in KOOS-JR, and VR-12 mental and physical component scores from preoperative to 1 year (P = .856, P = .524, and P = .727, respectively) postoperatively did not significantly differ between groups. MetS and non-MetS patients had similar 5-year freedom from all-cause revision (90.2 versus 94.2%, P = .791). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Morbidly obese patients who have MetS had longer LOS and higher discharges to skilled nursing facilities. The 90-day complications, readmissions, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes were similar, suggesting that resource allocation should be focused on perioperative protocols that can help optimize LOS and discharge dispositions in morbidly obese MetS patients undergoing TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Femoral stem cementation provides excellent implant longevity with a low periprosthetic fracture rate among patients with compromised bone quality or abnormal anatomy. We radiologically evaluated the quality of the femoral cement mantle in patients undergoing THA to examine whether cementation quality improved with increased institutional experience. METHODS:A retrospective study of 542 primary elective THAs performed using cemented stems from 2016 to 2021 at a high-volume orthopedic specialty center was conducted. Immediate post-operative anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were evaluated to assess cement mantle quality based on the Barrack classification. Cement mantles were deemed satisfactory (Barrack A and B) or unsatisfactory (Barrack C and D). Regression was performed to identify predictors of unsatisfactory cementation quality. RESULTS:The annual cemented primary THA volume increased throughout the study period from 14 cases in 2016 to 201 cases in 2021. Overall, the majority of cement mantles were deemed satisfactory; 91.7% on AP radiographs and 91.0% on lateral radiographs. Satisfactory cementation on AP radiograph achievement rates improved during the study period, which coincided with greater annual volume (p < 0.001). No association was found between posterior and direct anterior surgical approaches and satisfactory cementation quality on both AP and lateral radiographs. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Majority of femoral stems had satisfactory cementation quality. Higher institutional annual cemented THA volume was associated with improved cementation quality. Residency and fellowship training programs should place greater emphasis on the importance of femoral stem cementation for appropriately indicated patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III, retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Arthrofibrosis remains a common cause of patient dissatisfaction and reoperation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Losartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with inhibitory effects on transforming growth factor beta, previously implicated in tissue repair induced fibrosis, and has been studied to prevent stiffness following hip arthroscopy. This study aimed to evaluate pre- and postoperative range of motion (ROM) and the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following primary TKA in patients taking Losartan preoperatively for hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective review of 170 patients from 2012 to 2020 who underwent a primary, elective TKA and were prescribed Losartan at least three months prior to surgery. All patients who were prescribed Losartan and had a preoperative and postoperative ROM in their chart were included and were matched to a control group of patients who underwent TKA and had no Losartan prescription. ROM, MUA, readmissions, reoperations, and revisions were assessed using chi-square and independent sample t tests. RESULTS:Seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative ROM was similar between patients on Losartan and the control group (103.59° ± 16.14° vs. 104.59° ± 21.59°, respectively; p = 0.745). Postoperative ROM and ΔROM were greater for patients prescribed Losartan (114.29° ± 12.32° vs. 112.76° ± 11.65°; p = 0.429 and 10.57° ± 14.95° vs. 8.17° ± 21.68°; p = 0.422), though this difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in readmission, rate of manipulation for stiffness, or all-cause revision rates. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this study, we found that the use of Losartan did not significantly improve postoperative ROM, reduce MUA or decrease revision rates. Further prospective studies using Losartan are required to elucidate the potential effects on ROM and incidence of arthrofibrosis requiring MUA. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study.

Mucopolysaccharidosis encompasses multiple lysosomal storage disorders that are relevant to the orthopedic surgeon as they lead to disruption in bone and cartilage development. These patients may present with early-onset joint pain, including end-stage hip arthritis warranting total hip replacement. The altered hip anatomy in this disorder is of specific importance to the arthroplasty surgeon as it presents challenges when reconstructing the proximal femur and acetabulum and informs implant choice. We present a 17-year-old patient with end-stage bilateral hip arthritis who underwent staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty. We discuss technical considerations in surgical technique and the consequences of acetabular and femoral deformity on implant selection.

BACKGROUND:As value-based reimbursement models mature, understanding the potential trade-off between inpatient lengths of stay and complications or need for costly post-acute care becomes more pressing. Understanding and predicting a patient's expected baseline length of stay may help providers understand how best to decide optimal discharge timing for high-risk total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of 37,406 primary total hip (17,134, 46%) and knee (20,272, 54%) arthroplasties performed at two high-volume, geographically diverse, tertiary health systems during the study period. Patients were stratified by 3 binary outcomes for extended inpatient length of stay: 72+ hours (29%), 4+ days (11%), or 5+ days (5%). The predictive ability of over 50 sociodemographic/comorbidity variables was tested. Multivariable logistic regression models were created using Institution #1 (derivation), with accuracy tested using the cohort from Institution #2 (validation). RESULTS:During the study period, patients underwent an extended length of stay with a decreasing frequency over time, with privately-insured patients having a significantly shorter length of stay relative to those with Medicare (1.9 vs 2.3 days, p < 0.0001). Extended-stay patients also had significantly higher 90-day readmission rates (p < 0.0001), even when excluding those discharged to post-acute care (p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression models created from the training cohort demonstrated excellent accuracy (area under the curve (AUC): 0.755, 0.783, 0.810), and performed well under external validation (AUC: 0.719, 0.743, 0.763). Many important variables were common to all 3 models, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index, marital status, bilateral case, insurance type, and 13 comorbidities. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:An online, freely-available, pre-operative clinical decision tool accurately predicts risk of extended inpatient length of stay after TJA. Many risk factors are potentially modifiable, and these validated tools may help guide clinicians in pre-operative patient counseling, medical optimization, and understanding optimal discharge timing.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The International Classification of Diseases-10 Procedure Code System (ICD-10-PCS) introduced oxidized zirconium and niobium (OxZi) procedural codes to the types of femoral head bearing surfaces in 2017. These codes aimed to increase procedural specificity in coding and improve data collection through administrative claims databases. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ICD-10-PCS coding for femoral head bearing surfaces (cobalt chrome/metal, ceramic, and OxZi) in hip procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:, 2021 at a large, urban academic hospital was conducted. Operative reports and implant logs were queried to determine the femoral head bearing surface, which was used during the THA. These results were then compared to the ICD-10-PCS codes in the billing records. Coding accuracy was subsequently determined and statistical differences between the three groups were evaluated. RESULTS:ICD-10-PCS coding was accurate for 90.8% (5634/6204) of cases. Coding accuracy for ceramic femoral heads (95.4%, 4171/4371) was significantly greater than that of both cobalt chrome/metal (73.7%, 606/822; p<0.001) and OxZi (84.8%, 857/1011; p<0.001) femoral heads. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While coding for ceramic femoral heads was very accurate, OxZi and cobalt chrome/metal femoral heads were miscoded at a rate of approximately 20%. These inaccuracies call for further evaluation of the ICD-10-PCS coding process to ensure that conclusions drawn from clinical research performed through administrative claims databases are not subject to error.

BACKGROUND:Supervised machine learning techniques have been increasingly applied to predict patient outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the applications of supervised machine learning techniques to predict patient outcomes after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. METHODS:A comprehensive literature search using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted in July of 2021. The inclusion criteria were studies that utilized supervised machine learning techniques to predict patient outcomes after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. RESULTS:Search criteria yielded n = 30 relevant studies. Topics of study included patient complications (n = 6), readmissions (n = 1), revision (n = 2), patient-reported outcome measures (n = 4), patient satisfaction (n = 4), inpatient status and length of stay (LOS) (n = 9), opioid usage (n = 3), and patient function (n = 1). Studies involved TKA (n = 12), THA (n = 11), or a combination (n = 7). Less than 35% of predictive outcomes had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the excellent or outstanding range. Additionally, only 9 of the studies found improvement over logistic regression, and only 9 studies were externally validated. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Supervised machine learning algorithms are powerful tools that have been increasingly applied to predict patient outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty. However, these algorithms should be evaluated in the context of prognostic accuracy, comparison to traditional statistical techniques for outcome prediction, and application to populations outside the training set. While machine learning algorithms have been received with considerable interest, they should be critically assessed and validated prior to clinical adoption.