Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Open abdomen treatment (OAT) is considered a lifesaving procedure in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) after endovascular or open intervention for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA). Standardized treatment methods and algorithms for its use are still lacking. The high, published mortality rates may reflect difficulties in detecting and treating ACS, especially in patients treated by emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR). Presented are standardized algorithms for OAT, including a new technique using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system developed during 10 years of experience with eEVAR for RAAA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with RAAA treated by eEVAR from January 1998 to April 2008. Abdominal decompression was done when intravesical pressure >20 mm Hg or when abdominal perfusion pressure was <50 to 60 mm Hg and concomitant organ deterioration occurred. OAT was initially done with a subcutaneously sutured plastic bag or with a nonsutured zipper drape combined with a VAC device (VAC/ETHIZIP; KCI International Inc, Amstelveen, The Netherlands; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). All patients were switched to VAC/ETHIZIP as soon as possible. Dressings were generally changed every 3 to 5 days. Intra-abdominal pressure was monitored until stability was observed after delayed direct abdominal closure. RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality for eEVAR was 13% (13 of 102); 8% (7 of 82) for patients without ACS and 30% (6 of 20) for those with ACS. Decompression for ACS was needed in 20 patients (20%) primarily during the intervention (n = 14) or secondarily in the intensive care unit (n = 6). Six of 20 (30%) patients requiring OAT died <or=30 days (4 primary, 2 secondary). A mean of 3.6 (range, 1-12) planned second-look interventions were done per patient at an interval of 3 to 5 days. No bowel lesions were observed. Four patients required antibiotic therapy for abdominal infection, and all infections resolved. Delayed abdominal wall closure (direct closure, 11; closure with polypropylene mesh, 3; bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap, 1) was achieved after a median of 6 days (range, 1-47 days). CONCLUSION: The use of standardized novel techniques and a treatment protocol and algorithm for OAT after eEVAR for RAAA were feasible and safe. It decreased the workload of the medical and nursing staff, enhanced patient comfort because the need for dressing changes was minimized, and likely contributed to lower overall mortality in RAAA patients. Delayed direct fascial closure was possible in most patients

A floating thrombus within the aortic arch is a rare condition that is generally detected after cerebral, visceral, or peripheral embolization. Endovascular exclusion of such mobile thrombus has been described but exclusively involved the descending aorta, or debranching of the supra-aortic trunk was done by open surgical bypass procedure. We present a case with a floating thrombus that extended throughout the whole aortic arch and involved all of the supra-aortic trunks. The pathology was treated by debranching the supra-aortic trunks using a new nonsutured Viabahn-based (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) technique (Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique [VORTEC]) for revascularization of the left common carotid artery and performing an antegrade endograft implantation from the ascending aorta, distal to the origin of the feeding graft for debranching, to the descending aorta in one procedure

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a potential alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the management of carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this article is to provide an evaluation and critical overview of the trials comparing the early and later results of CAS with CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The CochraneControlled Trials Register, PubMed/Medline, and EMBASE databases were searched up to February 1, 2009, to identify trials comparing the long-term outcomes of CAS with CEA. The MeSH terms used were 'carotid artery stenting,' 'carotid endarterectomy,' 'symptomatic carotid artery stenosis,' 'treatment,' 'clinical trial,' 'randomized,' and 'long-term results,' in various combinations. One single-center and three multicenter randomized studies reporting their long-term results from the comparison of CAS with CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis were identified. All four studies independently reached the conclusion that CAS may not provide results equivalent to those of CEA for the management of symptomatic carotid stenosis. A higher incidence of recurrent stenosis and peri- and postprocedural events accounted for the inferior results reported for CAS compared with CEA. Current data from randomized studies indicate that CAS provides inferior long-term results compared with CEA for the management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. However, it can be argued that all of these trials were performed when both CAS equipment and CAS operators had not evolved to their current status. Given that current equipment and mature experience are required for CAS before comparing it with the current 'gold standard' procedure (CEA), the results of soon-to-be reported trials (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial [CREST], International Carotid Stenting Study [ICSS], or others) may alter the current impression that CAS is inferior to CEA for the treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis

This article describes a new, less invasive prosthetic graft anastomotic technique that uses self-expanding stent grafts that are 'telescoped' into aortic branches. This method, the VORTEC (Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique), obviates the need for potentially difficult complete vessel exposure and graft anastomoses, thereby reducing the duration of flow interruption and simplifying the performance of complex aortic reconstructions and so-called debranching procedures requiring reconstruction of major branches such as renal arteries. Minimal exposure of one surface of the renal artery allowed introduction and deployment of a self-expanding Viabahn (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) device using the Seldinger technique. The Viabahn devices used were 5 to 8 mm in diameter and 5 to 15 cm in length depending on individual anatomy (assessed by preoperative computed tomographic angiography). Overall, 82 renal arteries have been revascularized in 58 patients using the VORTEC. The technical success rate was 100%, with all of the stent grafts implanted as intended with maintenance of flow. The patency rates were 97% after 30 days and 96% after a mean follow-up of 18 months (range 1-38 months). The VORTEC allows performance of safe and expeditious revascularization of renal arteries. This new technique may represent significant improvement over the standard approach of surgical exposure and sutured anastomosis

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the frequency and nature of incidental findings seen on computed tomography (CT) scans during preoperative and postoperative follow-up in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Between January 1, 2000, and March 1, 2006, 176 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included in the study if all preoperative and postoperative surveillance CT scans were performed at our institution. Eighty-two patients, 26 women (32%) and 56 men (68%), met this criterion. Their mean age was 76 years (range, 51-103 years). Official CT scan reports were reviewed. Findings were considered primary incidental if they were noted on preoperative CT scans and secondary incidental if they appeared on surveillance CT scans but not on the preoperative study. Primary and secondary incidental findings were considered either benign (eg, gallstones, diverticulosis) or clinically significant if they warranted further workup (eg, suspicious masses or changes suggestive of malignancy, internal or diaphragmatic hernias, and diverticulitis). The median follow-up was 29 months (range, 3-60 months). Each incidental finding was counted only once, on the first scan in which it appeared. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients, 73 (89%) had at least one primary incidental finding, and 14 (19%) of these were clinically significant. Secondary incidental findings, many of which were clinically significant, continued to appear throughout the follow-up period. The most common clinically significant primary incidental finding was the presence of a lung mass (n = 4). The most common clinically significant secondary incidental findings were lung mass (n = 6), liver mass (n = 6), and pancreas mass (n = 3). There was a significant difference in the proportion of men to women in the group with clinically significant incidental findings vs the group without clinically significant incidental findings (P = .03959). Differences between the groups with respect to age or aneurysm size were not significant. CONCLUSION: CT scans yielded surprisingly large numbers of both primary and secondary incidental findings, many of which were clinically significant. Primary incidental findings were more common than secondary incidental findings; however, clinically significant findings were found at a consistent rate throughout the study period

Prosthetic graft seromas is a rare complication that has been traditionally managed with open methods using partial graft replacement and open drainage. We report the first two cases of hemodialysis graft seromas successfully treated with a covered stent. Both patients underwent arteriovenous graft placement from the brachial artery to the axillary vein using a standard wall, tapered 4 to 7 mm polytetrafluoroethylene graft, but developed a seroma at the arterial end of the graft. Unsuccessful attempts were made to treat these seromas with percutaneous and open drainage. In both patients, an 8 mm x 50 mm Wallgraft (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) was retrogradely deployed 'bareback' at the arterial end of the graft allowing for complete resolution of the graft seromas

OBJECTIVES: Lower extremity embolization occurs during aortoiliac aneurysm repair and may require major amputation when distal arteries are occluded. Because nonoperative treatments are often ineffective, we evaluated an aggressive operative approach. METHODS: In the past 11 years, we performed 328 endovascular and 350 open aortoiliac aneurysm repairs. Excluding cases of embolization to iliac, femoral, popliteal, and more proximal tibial vessels, which were treated in a standard fashion, foot ischemia severe enough to produce cadaveric, pregangrenous, or gangrenous skin changes occurred from more distal embolization after seven endovascular and three open aortoiliac aneurysm repairs. Six of these 10 patients underwent thromboembolectomies of both their dorsalis pedis and perimalleolar posterior tibial arteries </=4 hours of their original operation. In the other four patients, treatment was delayed 7 to 10 days. Because of progressive foot ischemia, arteriography was performed. From these results, four bypasses (3 autologous vein, 1 polytetrafluoroethylene graft) were performed to the transverse metatarsal arch, dorsalis pedis, perimalleolar peroneal artery, or perimalleolar anterior tibial artery. RESULTS: Patency and limb-salvage rates for both thromboembolectomy and bypass procedures were 100% at a mean follow-up of 3.0 years (range, 5 months-8 years). CONCLUSIONS: Perimalleolar and foot artery thromboembolectomy and bypasses to arteries as distal as the metatarsal arch can be effective treatment for distal embolization from aortoiliac aneurysm repair. Even when cadaveric, pregangrenous, or gangrenous lesions are present, distal arteriography and operative treatment (thromboembolectomy or bypass) may be indicated to successfully salvage the foot