Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Scoliosis Research Society established appropriateness criteria for surgery for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) in order to improve and unify clinical decision making. Though utilized and validated in various cohorts, an appropriateness criteria has yet to be developed in a cervical deformity (CD) population. PURPOSE: To modify the DLS Appropriateness criteria to be utilized in a CD cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a single-surgeon CD database PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 100 CD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Appropriateness criteria.
METHOD(S): CD patients>18yrs were included. Each patient was scored based upon the SRS-appropriateness criteria, comprised of clinical or radiographic characteristics and was modified for a cervical deformity cohort: (1) Severity of Symptoms [NDI], (2) Severity of Myelopathy[mJOA.], (3) Progression of Deformity, (4) Global Sagittal Malalignment [Schwab modifiers], (5) Severity of Risk Factors, (6) Degree of the T1S-CL curvature. For the category 'progression', radiographs were only available at one preoperative time point, and we were unable to include this in the total score. Based upon certain combinations of criteria, patients were stratified into Appropriate and Not Appropriate.
RESULT(S): A total of 100 patients were included (61yrs, 62% F, 29.5kg/m²). Assessment of the categories of Appropriateness of CD surgery: (1) Symptoms: 6% None to Mild, 94% Moderate to Severe; (2) Myelopathy: 16% None to Mild, 45% Moderate, 39% Severe; (3) All were grouped No Progression in the present study; (4) 19% demonstrated Global Malalignment (+/++Schwab), 81% did not; (5) Risk Factors: 27% had None to Mild, 63% Moderate, 10% Severe; (6) Curvature TS-CL demonstrated 88.6% of patients Severe (>20degree). Not Appropriate: None to Mild (NDI <28), with (1) None to Moderate myelopathy (mJOA >12) and Severe Risk Factors (2) None to Mild myelopathy (15-18) and No Progression or Imbalance (3) Moderate myelopathy (mJOA 12-15) and None to Moderate Risk Factors and no Progression, or imbalance and TSCL <25degree. Appropriate: Moderate to Severe Symptoms (NDI >=30), with (1) Severe myelopathy (mJOA<12) and Any Risk Factors (2) Moderate myelopathy and None to Moderate Risk Factors (3) Moderate myelopathy with Severe Risk Factors, Progression AND Imbalance (4) None to Mild myelopathy and None to Moderate Risk Factors and Progression OR imbalance (5) None to Mild myelopathy with None to Moderate Risk Factors and TSCL >25degree. In the present cohort, 94% were deemed Appropriate for surgery, 6% Not Appropriate. Less Appropriate patients demonstrated higher rates of postop dysphagia complications (17% vs 2%), met MCID for NDI less (0% vs 30.9%), and had more occurrences of DJK (16.7% vs 6.4%) by 2 years, p<0.05.
CONCLUSION(S): In light of the heterogeneity and uncertainty surrounding CD, this study developed CD appropriateness criteria, using established methodology, for surgeons to consider in the preoperative decision-making that correlate well with major postop occurrences. Application of the appropriateness criteria for CD may optimize patient selection and reduce the incidence of unwarranted surgery, although future validation is necessary. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP) is increasingly utilized in minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) in order to increase rate of fusion by promoting bone growth through the induction of osteoblast differentiation, awhile reducing morbidity related to iliac crest autograft. Despite these benefits, BMP use is still controversial due to its pro-inflammatory mechanism of action and potential to cause radiculitis. PURPOSE: To assess whether BMP is a risk factor for postoperative radiculitis in TLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 397 TLIFs from June 2012 to December 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative clinical characteristics, post-operative risk of radiculitis and complication, and future reoperation rates.
METHOD(S): Patients >= 18 years-old undergoing elective single-level TLIFs from 2012 to 2018 were included. Outcome measures included perioperative clinical characteristics, postoperative risk of radiculitis and complication, and future reoperation rates. Radiculitis was defined the delayed onset of radicular symptoms postoperatively in patients whom had initial resolution of radicular symptoms immediately postoperatively, in the absence of persistent neurological compression on postoperative imaging. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and chi-square analysis. Propensity score matching was utilized to control for demographic differences between the groups. Independent predictors for post-operative radiculitis were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Significance set at p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 397 cases were included in the study (59.33 +/- 13.49 mean age, 28.98 +/- 6.29 mean BMI, 52.90% female, 2.29 +/- 1.92 average Charleston comorbidity Index). There were 223 open procedures and 174 MIS. For the entire cohort, 238 cases utilized BMP and 159 did not, with 102 MIS pairing with BMP use. The MIS TLIFs had a higher percentage of BMP use than open TLIFs (58.6% vs 25.7%, p<0.001), lower estimated blood loss (212.28 +/- 193.79 mL vs 410.91 +/- 337.98 mL, p<0.001) higher fluoroscopy dosage (52.43 +/- 48.61mGy vs 16.77 +/- 27.84mGy, p<0.001), and a lower length of stay (3.20 +/- 2.55 days vs 4.11 +/- 2.52 days, p<0.001). There were no other differences in perioperative clinical characteristics. There was a significantly higher rate of postoperative radiculitis in the MIS TLIFs compared to open (12.6% vs 6.8%, p=0.046) and use of BMP compared to no BMP (13.2% vs 6.7%, p=0.029). There was a 15.7% radiculitis rate when MIS was paired with BMP use. There were no other notable differences in complication rates or rates of reoperation. Individually, MIS had a 12.6% radiculitis rate (p=0.046) and BMP use had a 13.2% rate (p=0.029). Propensity score match controlled for the significant difference in CCI between the MIS and open groups (N=168 each). Multivariate regression indicated that MIS (p=0.314) and BMP (p=0.109) were not independent predictors individually when controlling for age, gender, and BMI. When technique was paired with biologic use the regression revealed MIS + BMP is a risk factor of post-operative radiculitis (2.265(4.753-1.079), p=0.031).
CONCLUSION(S): While BMP and MIS technique were not independent risk factors for postoperative radiculitis, there is an increased risk of radiculitis when using BMP in MIS TLIF. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Amidst a current US opioid epidemic, it is important to understand factors that contribute to long-term or sustained opioid use after elective spine surgery. Recent reports have reported up to 25% of opioid-naive patients are taking opioids at 2-year follow-up after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. This suggests ASD surgery, or at least the postoperative course, could be a significant factor contributing to long-term or sustained opioid use. ln Asian countries, opioids are rarely prescribed for postoperative pain. Potentially, there is a significant cultural difference that can play a role in patient expectations in the postoperative period leading to long-term opioid use. PURPOSE: To compare long-term or sustained (2-years) opioid use after ASD surgery between American and Japanese Cohorts STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Propensity-matched comparison of American and Japanese ASD patients PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients from two (United States vs Japanese) prospective, multicenter ASD databases were compared OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and 2-year opioid use and SRS-22 domains were compared METHODS: We propensity matched 127 JPN to 619 US ASD patients based on age, sex, BMI, 3-column osteotomy, pelvic fixation, number of levels fused and preoperative SVA. Pre-op and 2-year postoperative opioid use was determined using responses to SRS22R Q11 and grouped into 3 categories (none, weekly, or daily). We have previously validated the use of SRS22R Q11 as an accurate measure for opioid use by comparing to a prospective study specifically designed to study opioid use and postoperative outcomes in ASD.
RESULT(S): From each cohort, 34 cases were successfully matched, with no difference in baseline parameters, including baseline opioid use (p=0.095), between the cohorts. The relatively low numbers in each cohort arise from difficulty matching a lower BMI and lower baseline opioid use in the JPN cohort. At 2-years postop, 22 US (65%) vs 31 JPN (91%) reported no opioid use, 1 US (3%) vs 0 JPN (0%) reported weekly use, and 11 US (32%) vs 3 JPN (9%) reported daily use (p=0.009). There was no difference in 2-year SRS-22 Self-image and Mental Health between the two groups while US patients had better Satisfaction (4.29 vs 3.84, p=0.032) but lower Function scores (3.52 vs 3.90, p=0.029).
CONCLUSION(S): In propensity-matched ASD cohorts, 35% of US patients were still using opioids 2 years after surgery compared to 9% of JPN patients, with the most taking opioids daily. Further studies are needed to identify sources of this variability. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Following cervical deformity (CD) corrective surgery, durability remains a challenge and distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) is an important risk for a surgeon to consider. DJK is the result from fixation failure, adjacent level fracture or spondylolisthesis. The timing of DJK onset has yet to be investigated. PURPOSE: To determine the timing of DJK development following CD corrective surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 139 CD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Early/Late DJK Development, Severe DJK, Symptomatic DJK.
METHOD(S): Included: surgical CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb>10degree, CL>10degree, cSVA>4cm, or CBVA>25degree) without preop DJK. DJK angle was defined as the change in kyphosis between lower-most instrumented vertebra (LIV) and LIV-2 from preop to postop (<-10). X2 analysis and post-hoc testing assessed annual and overall incidence of early (3M follow-u) and late (DJK development at 6M, 1Y, 2Y) DJK development among operative patients. Differences between early and late DJK (development after 3 months) were assessed. Pearson correlations determined significant variables associated with development of early versus late DJK. Severe DJK was defined as DJK angle <-20degree. DJK was considered symptomatic if associated with reoperation or the previously published thresholds of NDI>24 or mJOA<14. The natural progression of the disease was predicted with the use of a Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis.
RESULT(S): A total of 139 patients without preop DJK were included (16 re-op) (61.8yrs, 62.3%F, 29.1kg/m2). Surgical characteristics: 20.1% anterior approach, 42.4% posterior, 36.7% combined (levels fused: 7.6). Incidence of DJK from 2013-2018: 23%. Early: 9.4%, late: 10.1% (6M delayed: 3.6%, 1Y delayed: 6.5%, 2Y delayed: 2.2%). No differences were observed between op and reop for development of early or late DJK at all f/u (p>0.050). Presence of upgoing plantar response at baseline neuro exam, C2-C7 angle, T1-C2 angle, CBVA and combined approach correlated with development of early DJK. For late DJK: history of tumor and pulmonary disease, pelvic incidence, T10-L2 angle, and L4 pelvic angle. Apex of the secondary driver was significantly lower in the Late group (mean early: T2/3; late: T10; p=0.023). 3M radiographically, Early DJK patients had greater TK (-57.9degree vs -40degree, p=0.024, while L4PA remained larger in the late DJK group (14.5degree, p=0.009). Between early and late groups, 41.7% of early DJK patients met criteria for severe DJK, while 0% of Late DJK patient were severe(p=0.010); symptomatic DJK between the two groups was not significant (p=0.941). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis determined patients within the cohort to have a 91.1% cumulative probability of maintaining non-DJK status by 3-month follow-up, 85.9% at 6-month, 80% at 1-year, and 77.0% by 2-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION(S): Patients undergoing CD corrective surgery have incidence of early and incidence of late DJK. While the majority of DJK development occurs within the first 6 months, late DJK occurs and differs in presentation and etiologic factors. Early DJK occurrence is more likely to be severe radiographically, associated with neurological decline, and is more strongly related to biomechanical factors such as use of a combined approach at the time of surgery. Contrarily, although equally likely to be symptomatic as reflected in loss of clinical gains from surgery, late DJK is more likely mild radiographically and associated with suboptimal cervical realignment and lack of addressing secondary drivers, likely related to negative compensatory mechanisms. Customized prophylactic approaches for both occurrences is mandated. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Traditionally, adult spinal deformity (ASD) has been treated with long segment fusions with the goal of restoring sagittal and coronal alignment. Long segment fusions can be associated with high rates of complications and morbidity. Some patients are reluctant to undergo large procedures. Others have comorbidities excluding them as good surgical candidates for long fusions. PURPOSE: To compare baseline and postoperative HRQL and radiographic outcomes and revisions and complications in small vs longer fusions for ASD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter database PATIENT SAMPLE: Surgical ASD patients OUTCOME MEASURES: ODI, SF36-PCS, SRS22, NRS back and leg pain.
METHOD(S): A prospective database of operative ASD patients who completed two year follow up was analyzed. Prior thoracolumbar fusions were excluded. Patients were divided into short fusions (SF: 3 levels) and long fusions (LF: 36 levels). LF and SF patients were compared in baseline alignment. Propensity matching (PSM) controlling for baseline alignment (TPA and maximum coronal cobb) was performed to compare SF and LF in HRQL improvement, postop alignment and complications. Subanalysis of SF identified which patients were more likely to have successful surgery. The level of significance was p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 298 patients met inclusion criteria (SF n=20, mean levels fused 2.13; LF n=275, mean fusion levels 12.33). Prior to PSM, LF had greater PT, coronal cobb, and TPA. Following PSM, LF had better improvements in PILL (20.8 vs 3.37), PT (8.57 vs 0.21), TPA (8.68 vs 2.07), and coronal cobb (17.3 vs 5.33) all p<0.005. There were no differences in 2y HROL improvement, satisfaction or reoperations. SF had fewer complications (OR 0.15, p=0.018). In the SF group, the deformities were 15% sagittal, 40% coronal, and 45% combined. In the sagittal group, 67% of surgery aimed at deformity correction but 67% of these required revision long fusion surgery. In the coronal group, 38% of surgery aimed at deformity correction with no revisions. In the combined group. 67% of surgery aimed at deformity correction but 11% of these required revision long fusion surgery.
CONCLUSION(S): This study shows that a more limited fusion could be an alternative to the more traditional long segment fusion in carefully selected patients with adult spinal deformity since there were fewer complications but similar short-term (2-year) satisfaction rates and HRQL improvements. Patients undergoing long fusions had better improvements in alignment. The majority of sagittal only deformities undergoing short fusions required revision surgery. The durability of short fusions in the setting of ASD needs to be investigated with long term studies. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior studies have demonstrated potential benefits of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, but less outcomes data exist for operative ASD patients with severe scoliotic curves (thoracic [TH] curve >=75degree, thoracolumbar [TL] curve >=50degree, or lumbar [LL] curve >=50degree). Also, the surgical complication profile is less clear for this subset of patients with severe scoliotic deformity and warrants focused investigation. PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to assess treatment outcomes and complication rates associated with ASD surgery in patients with severe scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive case registry PATIENT SAMPLE: Enrollment required: age >=18 yrs, scoliosis >=20degree, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >=5cm, pelvic tilt >=25degree, and/or thoracic kyphosis >=60degree. OUTCOME MEASURES: Standard coronal and sagittal spinopelvic deformity measurements and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes, which included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) scores.
METHOD(S): Using a prospective multicenter database, we identified surgically treated ASD patients with severe scoliosis (TH Cobb >=75degree or TL/LL Cobb >=50degree) and minimum 2-yr follow-up. Demographic data, surgical characteristics, radiographic alignment measurements, HRQL outcomes and associated complications were analyzed.
RESULT(S): Of 178 patients, 146 (82%, mean age 54 yrs, 92% women, 88 TL, 50 LL, 8 TH) had minimum 2-yr follow-up (mean=3.1 yrs). Almost 30% had prior spine fusion, 6% were active or past smokers, 16% had osteoporosis and 77% had at least 1 comorbidity. Surgical details included: posterior-only (58%) or anterior-posterior approach (42%), SPO (65%), 3CO (14%), TLIF (23%), ALIF (37%), sacropelvic fixation (76%), upper thoracic UIV (64%) and mean posterior fusion length of 13.2 levels. Postoperative coronal alignment improved significantly for all patients (global coronal alignment 3.8 to 2.8 cm, p< 0.001; TH Cobb 38degree to 24degree, p<0.001; TL Cobb 61degree to 30degree, p<0.001; LL Cobb 50degree to 24degree, p<0.001; Fractional Cobb 20degree to 7degree, p<0.001). Overall sagittal alignment also improved significantly (p<0.05), most notably for severe lumbar curves (C7-S1 SVA 6.7 to 2.5 cm, p<0.001; PI-LL 18degreeto 3degree, p<0.001). Overall HRQL improved significantly, including ODI (39 to 26, p<0.001), SF-36 PCS (35 to 41, p<0.001) and SRS-22r (2.9 to 3.8, p<0.001). A total of 191 complications were reported (92 minor/99 major), and 94 (64%) patients had at least one complication. The most common complications included dural tear (12%), pleural effusion (12%), rod fracture (11%), radiculopathy (8%) and proximal junctional kyphosis (7%). 34 reoperations were performed in 27 (18%) patients, with most common indications of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis (8), deep wound infection (6) and neurological deficit (5).
CONCLUSION(S): Surgery for severe adult scoliosis is associated with significant improvement in radiographic alignment and HRQL measures. Although associated complication rates are high, these appear to be comparable to reports of less severe scoliosis. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND:As of May 4, 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected >3.5 million people and touched every inhabited continent. Accordingly, it has stressed health systems worldwide, leading to the cancellation of elective surgical cases and discussions regarding health care resource rationing. It is expected that rationing of surgical resources will continue even after the pandemic peak and may recur with future pandemics, creating a need for a means of triaging patients for emergent and elective spine surgery. METHODS:Using a modified Delphi technique, a cohort of 16 fellowship-trained spine surgeons from 10 academic medical centers constructed a scoring system for the triage and prioritization of emergent and elective spine surgeries. Three separate rounds of videoconferencing and written correspondence were used to reach a final scoring system. Sixteen test cases were used to optimize the scoring system so that it could categorize cases as requiring emergent, urgent, high-priority elective, or low-priority elective scheduling. RESULTS:The devised scoring system included 8 independent components: neurologic status, underlying spine stability, presentation of a high-risk postoperative complication, patient medical comorbidities, expected hospital course, expected discharge disposition, facility resource limitations, and local disease burden. The resultant calculator was deployed as a freely available Web-based calculator (https://jhuspine3.shinyapps.io/SpineUrgencyCalculator/). CONCLUSIONS:We present the first quantitative urgency scoring system for the triage and prioritizing of spine surgery cases in resource-limited settings. We believe that our scoring system, although not all encompassing, has potential value as a guide for triaging spine surgical cases during the COVID pandemic and post-COVID period.

STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort study of prospective patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar fusion at a single academic institution. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To assess differences in perioperative outcomes between primary and revision MIS (minimally invasive surgical) lumbar interbody fusion patients and compare with those undergoing corresponding open procedures. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Patients ≥18 years old undergoing lumbar interbody fusion were grouped by surgical technique: MIS or open. Patients within each group were propensity score matched for comorbidities and levels fused. Patient demographics, surgical factors, and perioperative complication incidences were compared between primary and revision cases using means comparison tests, as appropriate. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< .05). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Clinical outcomes of revision MIS lumbar interbody fusion were similar to those of primary surgery. Additionally, MIS techniques were associated with less EBL, shorter LOS, and fewer perioperative complications than corresponding open revisions.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:Patients with severe cervical deformity (CD) often have profound deficits in numerous activities of daily living. The association between health status and post-operative radiographic goals is difficult to quantify. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to investigate the radiographic characteristics of patients who achieved optimal health related quality of life scores following surgery for CD. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients with spinal deformity. PATIENT SAMPLE/METHODS:One hundred and fifty-three patients with cervical deformity OUTCOME MEASURES: Common health-related quality of life scores (HRQOLs) measurements were taken for patients treated operatively for cervical deformity including neck disability index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) for myelopathy and numeric rating scale for neck pain (NRS-neck), METHODS: Surgical patients with severe (can you define severe?) CD were isolated based upon a previously presented discriminant analysis which outlined a combination of preoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, maximum focal kyphosis in extension, C2 slope in extension, and number of kyphotic levels in extension. Those with available preoperative and 1-year postoperative HRQL data were included. Based on a previous study, patients were grouped into 3 distinct sagittal morphotypes of CD: focal deformity (FD), flatneck (FN=large TS-CL and lack of compensation), or cervicothoracic (CT). Post-operative outcomes were defined as "good" if a patient had ≥2 of the 3 following criteria (1) NDI <20 or meeting MCID, (2) mild myelopathy (mJOA≥14), and (3) NRS-Neck ≤5 or improved by ≥2 points from baseline. Within each distinct deformity group, patients with good outcomes were compared to those with poor outcomes (i.e. not meeting the criteria for good) for differences in demographics, HRQL scores, and alignment, via Chi-squared or student's t-tests. RESULTS:Overall, 83 of 153 patients met the criteria of severe CD and 40 patients had complete 1-year follow-up of clinical/radiographic data. Patient breakdown by deformity pattern was: CT (N=13), FN (N=17), and FD (N=17), with 7 patients meeting criteria for both FD and FN deformities. Within the FD cohort, maximal focal kyphosis (i.e. kyphosis at one level) was better corrected in patients with a "good" outcome (p = 0.03). In the FN cohort, patients with "good" outcomes presented pre-operatively with worse horizontal gaze (McGregor Slope 21° vs 6°, p=0.061) and cSVA (72mm vs 60mm, p=0.030). "Good" outcome FN patients showed significantly greater postop correction of horizontal gaze (-25° vs -5°, p = 0.031). In the CT cohort, patients with "good" outcomes had superior global alignment both pre- (SVA: -17mm vs 108mm, p <0.001) and post-operatively (50mm vs 145mm, p=0.001). CT patients with "good" outcomes also had better postop cervical alignment (cSVA 35mm vs 49mm, p=0.030), and less kyphotic segments during extension (p=0.011). In the FD cohort, there were no differences between "good" and "poor" outcomes patients in preoperative alignment; however, "good" outcome patients showed superior changes in postoperative focal kyphosis (-2° vs 5°, p=0.030). Within all three deformity pattern categories, there were no differences between "good" and "poor" outcome patients with respect to demographics or surgical parameters (levels fused, surgical approach, decompression, osteotomy, all p>0.050). CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study show each CD patient's unique deformity must be carefully examined in order to determine the appropriate alignment goals to achieve optimal HRQOLs. In particular, the recognition of the sagittal morphotype can help assist surgeons to aim for specific alignment goals for CT, FN and FD. Distinct deformity specific intra-operative goals include obtaining proper sagittal global/cervical alignment for cervicothoracic patients, correcting maximal focal kyphosis in focal deformity patients, and correcting horizontal gaze for flatneck patients.

STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Single-center retrospective review. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:The cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) is typically difficult to visualize using traditional radiographs. Whole-body stereoradiography (EOS) allows for imaging of the entire axial skeleton in a weightbearing position without parallax error and with lower radiation doses. In this study we sought to compare the visibility of the vertebra of the CTJ on lateral EOS images to that of conventional cervical lateral radiographs. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Two fellowship-trained spine surgeons evaluated the images of 50 patients who had both lateral cervical radiographs and EOS images acquired within a 12-month period. The number of visible cortices of the vertebral bodies of C6-T2 were scored 0-4. Patient body mass index and the presence of spondylolisthesis >2 mm at each level was recorded. The incidence of insufficient visibility to detect spondylolisthesis at each level was also calculated for both modalities. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:On average, there were more visible cortices with EOS versus XR at T1 and T2, whereas visible cortices were equal at C6 and C7. Patient body mass index was inversely correlated with cortical visibility on XR at T2 and on EOS at T1 and T2. There was a significant difference in the incidence of insufficient visibility to detect spondylolisthesis on EOS versus XR at C7-T1 and T1-2, but not at C6-7. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:EOS imaging is superior at imaging the vertebra of the CTJ. EOS imaging deserves further consideration as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with cervical deformity given its ability to produce high-quality images of the CTJ with less radiation exposure.