Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:veithf01

Total Results:

1089


New technique to facilitate renal revascularization with use of telescoping self-expanding stent grafts: VORTEC

Lachat, Mario; Mayer, Dieter; Criado, Frank J; Pfammatter, Thomas; Rancic, Zoran; Genoni, Michele; Veith, Frank J
This article describes a new, less invasive prosthetic graft anastomotic technique that uses self-expanding stent grafts that are 'telescoped' into aortic branches. This method, the VORTEC (Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique), obviates the need for potentially difficult complete vessel exposure and graft anastomoses, thereby reducing the duration of flow interruption and simplifying the performance of complex aortic reconstructions and so-called debranching procedures requiring reconstruction of major branches such as renal arteries. Minimal exposure of one surface of the renal artery allowed introduction and deployment of a self-expanding Viabahn (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) device using the Seldinger technique. The Viabahn devices used were 5 to 8 mm in diameter and 5 to 15 cm in length depending on individual anatomy (assessed by preoperative computed tomographic angiography). Overall, 82 renal arteries have been revascularized in 58 patients using the VORTEC. The technical success rate was 100%, with all of the stent grafts implanted as intended with maintenance of flow. The patency rates were 97% after 30 days and 96% after a mean follow-up of 18 months (range 1-38 months). The VORTEC allows performance of safe and expeditious revascularization of renal arteries. This new technique may represent significant improvement over the standard approach of surgical exposure and sutured anastomosis
PMID: 18377834
ISSN: 1708-5381
CID: 79499

Colon ischemia following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic repair - Discussion [Editorial]

Veith, F; Becquemin; Gloviczki, P; Greenberg, R; Hobson, RW; Lumsden, AB
ISI:000252685000004
ISSN: 0741-5214
CID: 80073

The case for anticoagulation in patients with acute type B aortic dissection [Editorial]

Lachat, Mario; Criado, Frank J; Veith, Frank J
PMID: 18254680
ISSN: 1526-6028
CID: 79500

Early clinical results of a tissue (peritoneal) lined stent grafts for superficial femoral artery occlusive disease [Meeting Abstract]

Kramer, A; Galvagni, P; Mertens, R; Valdes, F; Marine, L; Veith, F; Zarins, C; Bannazadeh, M; Clair, DG; Sarac, TP
ISI:000250393900295
ISSN: 0002-9149
CID: 80074

Gender differences in blood flow velocities after carotid angioplasty and stenting

Timaran, Carlos H; Berdejo, George L; Ohki, Takao; Timaran, David E; Veith, Frank J; Rosero, Eric B; Modrall, J Gregory
Gender differences have been demonstrated in blood flow velocities by duplex ultrasonography (DU) in patients with carotid stenosis. Currently, DU is the most widely used method of follow-up monitoring after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). To identify possible gender differences in carotid flow velocities, we analyzed our experience with DU obtained before and immediately after CAS. In a series of 47 CAS procedures over a 2.5-year period performed in 31 men and 15 women, carotid angiograms and duplex flow velocities were obtained preoperatively and within 24 hr after CAS. Carotid velocity profiles were compared with the angiographic degree of carotid stenosis. Gender differences in blood velocities were assessed using parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. Overall, women had median blood velocities 5-10% higher than men, although the differences were not statistically significant. DU obtained immediately after CAS revealed that median blood flow velocities were very similar among men and women (P > 0.4). In conclusion, although women have higher carotid blood flow velocities than men do, gender differences are notably absent on follow-up DU after carotid stenting. Our data indicate that similar criteria should be used after CAS for interpreting carotid velocity profiles in both women and men
PMID: 17532603
ISSN: 0890-5096
CID: 79503

The incidence of pulmonary embolism in open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass

Gargiulo, Nicholas J 3rd; Veith, Frank J; Lipsitz, Evan C; Suggs, William D; Ohki, Takao; Goodman, Elliot; Vemulapalli, Pratt; Gibbs, Karen; Teixeira, Julio
Obesity independently increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). We compare a superobese population (body mass index [BMI] > 55 kg/m(2)) undergoing open gastric bypasses (OGBs) with a similarly matched group of laparoscopic gastric bypasses (LGB) to see if the incidence of PE differs. We included all patients undergoing OGB (n = 193, average BMI = 51 kg/m(2)) at our institution by a single surgeon between July 1999 and April 2001. Thirty-one patients were superobese (BMI > 55 kg/m(2)). LGB was started at our institution in April 2001. Since that time 213 patients (average BMI = 52 kg/m(2)) have undergone the procedure. One hundred and nine patients were superobese. Pre- and postoperative prophylaxis included sequential compression stockings and subcutaneous heparin. Postoperatively, patients who developed signs of hypoxia, tachypnea, or tachycardia underwent a chest X-ray and spiral computed tomography. In addition, all patients who expired in the 30-day postoperative period underwent postmortem examination. Data were analyzed using the chi-squared test. In the OGB group, four patients (2.1%) developed PE. All occurred in superobese patients with a BMI > 55 kg/m(2). Three were fatal PEs and one was nonfatal. None of these patients had a prior history of deep vein thrombosis, PE, venous stasis disease, or pulmonary hypertension. In the LGB group, one patient (0.9%) had a nonfatal PE. This patient had a history of deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of PE was statistically higher in the superobese OGB group (P < 0.01). Despite the theoretical hindrance to venous return and vena caval compression observed with pneumoperitoneum, fewer PEs occurred in the laparoscopic group. Our data, however, suggest that patients with a BMI > 55 kg/m(2) might be at an increased risk for PE independent of operative approach
PMID: 17823038
ISSN: 0890-5096
CID: 79501

Endovascular aortic repair should be the gold standard for ruptured AAAs, and all vascular surgeons should be prepared to perform them

Veith, Frank J; Gargiulo, Nicholas J
When ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are not treated, they cause death. In addition, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) have high mortality (35%-70%) and morbidity rates when treated by standard open surgical methods. These high perioperative mortality and morbidity rates have not been substantially reduced despite the introduction of many improvements in open operative technique or perioperative care. Endovascular approaches to treat AAAs introduced in the early 1990s provided an opportunity to substantially alter treatment outcomes when rupture occurred. This article details how these endovascular approaches, which include endovascular stented grafts, can be applied to the treatment of RAAAs, and what advantages these new catheter-based approaches to treatment offer
PMID: 17911555
ISSN: 1531-0035
CID: 75656

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with the highest risk and in-hospital mortality in the United States

Timaran, Carlos H; Veith, Frank J; Rosero, Eric B; Modrall, J Gregory; Arko, Frank R; Clagett, G Patrick; Valentine, R James
BACKGROUND: A randomized clinical trial from the United Kingdom (EVAR trial 2) comparing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with no intervention found no advantage for EVAR in patients with high risk. This finding was predominantly caused by the substantial in-hospital mortality after EVAR (9%). HYPOTHESIS: The nationwide in-hospital mortality for patients with the highest risk undergoing EVAR in the United States is lower than that reported in EVAR trial 2. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. SETTING: The 2001-2004 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample identified EVAR procedures for nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Risk stratification was based on comorbidities and the Charlson comorbidity index, a validated predictor of in-hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysms repairs. Weighted univariate and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between comorbidity measures and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: During the 4-year period, 65 502 EVARs were performed with an in-hospital mortality of 2.2%. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates ranged from 1.2% to 3.7%. Stratified analyses, including only elective EVAR procedures, revealed that in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with the most severe comorbidities (1.7%) vs those with lower comorbidity (0.4%; P<.001). Patients with high risk had only a 1.6-fold increased risk of adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.2) compared with patients with low risk. CONCLUSIONS: The EVAR procedure is currently being performed in the United States with low in-hospital mortality, even in patients with the highest risk. Therefore, EVAR should not be denied to high-risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States on the basis of the level I evidence from the United Kingdom study
PMID: 17576887
ISSN: 0004-0010
CID: 79502

Carotid screening guidelines--overvalued [Editorial]

Veith, Frank J
PMCID:1924991
PMID: 17435654
ISSN: 1531-0132
CID: 72713

Commentary on "Treatment of failing lower extremity arterial bypasses under ultrasound guidance" [Comment]

Veith, Frank J
PMID: 17437977
ISSN: 1531-0035
CID: 72540