Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:What patient characteristics and injury factors predict decreased knee range of motion (ROM) following operative management of tibial plateau fractures? DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Over 11 years, tibial plateau fractures at a single academic institution were prospectively followed. A total of 266 patients were included in this study. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical repair of tibial plateau fractures and secondary interventions due to arthrofibrosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) and range of motion (ROM) at 3-month, 6-month and long-term follow-up. Secondary outcomes were considered as the need for a subsequent procedure due to arthrofibrosis. RESULTS:At 3-month follow-up, the mean ROM was 113°. By long-term follow-up (mean=17 months), the mean ROM improved to 125°. Independent predictors of decreased knee ROM were the following: At 3-month follow-up, open fractures (P=0.047), application of a knee spanning external fixator (P=0.026), orthopaedic poly trauma (P=0.003), and tibial spine involvement (P=0.043). At long-term follow-up, non-Caucasian ethnicity (P=0.003), increasing age (P=0.003), and a deep infection (P=0.002). Ten patients (3.7%required a secondary procedure for arthrofibrosis. There was a significant improvement in the knee ROM (P<0.001) and functional outcomes (P=0.004) following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS:At long-term follow-up, independent predictors of decreased knee ROM were non-Caucasian ethnicity, increasing age, and sustaining a post-operative complication of a deep infection. Secondary interventions were reliable treatments for arthrofibrosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic level III.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the effect of osteonecrosis (ON) on the clinical and functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Over a 12-year period, patients were screened and identified on presentation to the emergency department or in the clinical office for inclusion in an institutional review board-approved registry. One hundred sixty-five patients with 166 proximal humerus fractures met inclusion criteria. Eight patients developed radiographic evidence of ON (4.8%). INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:Patients were divided into 2 cohorts; 1 cohort being those diagnosed with ON and the other cohort being those who were not. All patients were prospectively followed and assessed for clinical and functional outcomes at the latest follow-up visit (mean = 22.9 months) using the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand survey along with ranges of motion of the injured extremity. RESULTS:Average postoperative forward elevation for patients with ON was worse than those without ON (P = 0.002). Additionally, there was a significant difference in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at the latest follow-up between the 2 groups (P = 0.026). There was no difference in external rotation or mean length of follow-up between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the negative effects of ON after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Those who develop ON have poorer functional and clinical outcomes as compared with patients without ON. Consequently, the development of ON can be used as a predictor of poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Determine if a novel inpatient mortality risk assessment tool designed to be calculated in the emergency department (ED) setting can risk stratify patient reported functional outcomes and mortality at one year. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort SETTING:: Academic level one trauma center PATIENTS:: 685 patients >55 years old who were orthopaedic surgery consults or trauma surgery consults in the ED between 10/1/2014 and 9/30/2015. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Calculation of validated trauma triage score (STTGMA) using each patient's demographics, injury severity, and functional status MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: mortality, EQ-5D questionnaire, and percent return to baseline function since their hospitalization at one-year post hospitalization. RESULTS:45 (6.6%) patients died within the year following hospitalization. Of remaining 639 patients available for follow-up, 247 (38.7%) were successfully contacted. There was no observed difference between patients who were successfully contacted and those who were not. The mean STTGMA score was 2.1 ± 3.6%. Patients reported on average a 76.4 ± 27.5% return to baseline function. When comparing patients between risk groups, there was a significant difference in EQ-5D scores and percent return to baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows that high risk patients had pronounced decreased survival within the initial days after discharge compared to other cohorts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that patients identified with the STTGMA tool as having an increased risk of inpatient mortality following trauma correlate with poorer functional outcomes at one year. The STTGMA risk score is also a valuable tool to stratify risk of mortality up to one year following discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV, Prognostic.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Analyze the effectiveness of a BPCI (Bundle Payments for Care Improvement) initiative for patients who would be included in a future potential Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) bundle. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort SETTING:: Single Academic Institution PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:: Patients discharged with operative fixation of a hip or femur fracture (DRG codes 480-482) between 1/2015-10/2016 were included. A BPCI initiative based upon an established program for BPCI Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) was initiated for patients with hip and femur fractures in January 2016. Patients were divided into non-bundle (care before initiative) and bundle (care with initiative) cohorts. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Application of BPCI principles MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Length of stay, location of discharge, readmissions RESULTS:: 116 patients participated in the "institutional bundle," and 126 received care prior to the initiative. There was a trend towards decreased mean length of stay, (7.3 ± 6.3 days vs. 6.8 ± 4.0 days, p=0.457) and decreased readmission within 90 days (22.2% vs. 18.1%, p=0.426). The number of patients discharged home doubled (30.2% vs. 14.3%, p=0.008). There was no difference in readmission rates in bundle vs. non-bundle patients based on discharged home status; however, bundle patients discharged to SNF trended towards less readmissions than non-bundle patients discharged to SNF (37.3% vs. 50.6%, p=0.402). Mean episode cost reduction due to initiative was estimated to be $6,450 using Medicare reimbursement data. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the potential success of a BPCI initiative at one institution in decreasing post-acute care facility utilization and cost of care when used for a hip and femur fracture population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:To aid implementing an ethics curriculum in an orthopaedic residency program, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) created 14 ethics scenarios. Because delivery of this curriculum could be burdensome, an online module-based curriculum might be optimal. METHODS:Two cohorts of orthopaedic residents participated: cohort I completed 14 online ethics modules converted from the 14 AAOS ethics scenarios. For each module, we gave a multiple-choice assessment immediately before the module, immediately afterward, and 3 months afterward. Cohort II completed only the 14-module assessments at similar time intervals without any educational content. RESULTS:Cohort I demonstrated improvement in 3-month postmodule assessment scores in 11 of the 14 modules, 3 of which had statistical differences in baseline scores for cohort I and cohort II. We observed no statistical difference in scores within cohort II on repeat testing. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that 11 of the 14 AAOS ethics scenarios, converted to online modules, teach ethical concepts to orthopaedic residents. Orthopaedic residency programs may find it valuable to engage their residents in the ethics scenarios created by the AAOS to complement their ethics curriculum.

The aim of this investigation was to examine graduating orthopedic resident case logs to evaluate trends in performing pediatric orthopedic procedures and compare pediatric orthopedic case volume among residents in the 90th, 50th, and 10th percentiles (by case volume) to identify caseload variation. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education orthopedic resident case logs were examined for graduating years 2007-2013. Linear regression analyses were carried out to assess temporal trends in pediatric orthopedic case volume. Subgroup analyses were carried out to assess trends in cases by anatomic location. Comparisons of the number of pediatric cases performed by the 90th, 50th, and 10th percentiles of graduating residents were also performed. Pediatric orthopedic case volume increased significantly per graduating resident (295.9-373.2; P<0.001) from 2007 to 2013. Graduating residents in the 90th (494-573; P=0.001), 50th (264-334; P<0.001), and 10th (144-216; P=0.003) percentiles of case volume all sustained significant increases in the number of pediatric orthopedic cases performed. Subgroup analyses showed significant increases in pediatric orthopedic shoulder (4.8-7.3; P<0.001), humerus/elbow (25.9-32.7; P<0.001), forearm/wrist (28.6-40.4; P<0.001), hand/finger (15-16.9; P=0.005), femur/knee (44.5-51.9; P=0.002), leg/ankle (39.4-41.1; P=0.004), and spine case volume (24.9-33.6; P<0.001). On average, graduating residents in the 90th, 50th, and 10th percentiles performed 524, 302, and 169 cases, respectively. The current investigation shows significant growth in the number of pediatric orthopedic cases performed by graduating residents, particularly among upper extremity procedures. However, considerable variation in pediatric orthopedic case volume exists among residents. Although the educational effects of this case volume variation are incompletely understood, the current investigation may be beneficial in efforts to improve pediatric orthopedic educational quality.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:1) Demonstrate that a validated trauma triage score for middle-aged and geriatric patients could identify those at high risk for mortality within the first two days of hospitalization and 2) determine the cost of care for this cohort of patients DESIGN:: Prospective cohort study SETTING:: Single Level 1 Trauma Center PATIENTS:: Patients 55 years and older who were evaluated in the emergency department setting by Orthopaedics or who met American College of Surgeons Tier 1-3 criteria INTERVENTION:: Calculation of validated trauma triage score, Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA), using patient's demographic, injury severity, and functional statusMain Outcome Measurements: length of stay, inpatient mortality, time between presentation and time of death, and direct variable costs of hospitalization RESULTS:: A total of 1470 consecutive patients (mean age of 72.2±11.9 years) were enrolled in this study, 17 of whom expired within 48 hours of presentation to the emergency department. These patients had a significantly higher trauma triage score than the rest of the cohort with a score of 50.9%±37.2% vs. 3.3%±9.5%, p<0.001 indicating that they had a mean risk of inpatient mortality of over 50%. Mean total cost/day was much higher in the cohort of patients who died within 48 hours of admission compared to all other trauma patients ($49,367±$79,057 vs. $3,966±$2,897 (p=0.031)). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:To achieve value-based care in this high-risk cohort, targeted cost-savings while improving patient outcomes and/or expediting goals-of-care and end-of-life goals is necessary and the STTGMA score allows for stratification of these patients in both mortality risk and cost profile. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic, Level III.

INTRODUCTION: Much has been studied with reference to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) colonization and associated outcomes and comorbidities. In the area of Orthopedic surgery, literature predominantly comes from the field of arthroplasty. Little is known about outcomes of fracture and Orthopedic trauma patients in the setting of S. aureus colonization. We believe that MRSA/MSSA colonization in and of itself may be a weak marker for generally poor protoplasm, potentially with complex medical history including previous hospitalization or rehab placement. This milieu of risk factors may or may not contribute to poorer outcomes after fracture and fracture nonunion surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if nasal swabbing for S. aureus (MRSA or MSSA) carriage can predict operative culture, complications, or outcomes following fracture nonunion surgery. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients undergoing surgery for fracture nonunion were prospectively followed. Data analyses were performed using grouped MRSA and MSSA carriers (Staphylococcus carriers: SC). Outcomes analyzed included time to healing, need for additional surgery, and persistent nonunion. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of patients (16/62) were identified as MSSA carriers, an additional 6.5% (4/62) carried MRSA. Follow-up of at least 12-months was obtained on 90% (56/62) of patients. White blood cell counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values did not differ between SCs and non-carriers pre-operatively. Carriers were just as likely as non-carriers to culture positively for any pathogen at the time of surgery. Although SC's were three times as likely as non-carriers to grow S. aureus (15% vs. 5%), this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.3). Post-operative wound complications, antibiotic use, pain at follow-up and progression to healing did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, pre-operative nasal swabbing for S. aureus is a simple and non-invasive diagnostic tool with prognostic implications in patients undergoing fracture nonunion surgery. This study found that MRSA and MSSA colonized patients with fracture nonunion of long bones do not have an increased association with positive cultures or a predisposition towards greater post-operative infectious complications.

Sharps-related injuries represent a significant occupational hazard to orthopedic surgeons. Despite increased attention and targeted interventions, evidence suggests that the majority of incidents continue to go unreported. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence, attitudes, and factors that affect the reporting of sharps injuries among orthopedic surgery residents at a large academic teaching hospital in an effort to increase reporting rates and design effective interventions. This study administered an anonymous cross-sectional survey regarding intraoperative sharps exposures to current orthopedic house staff, with an 87% (54/62) response rate. Overall, 76% of surveyed residents (41/54) had at least one sharps exposure during residency. The majority of these incidents (55%) were never reported. The most common reason cited for not reporting was a "perception of low risk." Residents whose exposures were witnessed by others on the surgical team were more likely to report the incident (57% vs. 23%, p = 0.043), suggesting that peer pressure acts to improve reporting rates. While the implementation of a "needlestick hotline" and increased education has led to improved reporting rates at our institution, further improvements aimed at reducing unwitnessed incidents, and therefore unreported incidents, could comprise an increased emphasis on surgical team vigilance, positive peer pressure, the incorporation of sharps-specific surgical debriefing statements and anonymous tip lines.