Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Supracondylar humerus fractures account for two thirds of all hospitalizations for elbow injuries in children. A prevailing assumption exists regarding whether treatment quality varies by surgeon training background. This study compares radiographic outcomes of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated by fellowship trained pediatric orthopedists (PO) and non-pediatric orthopedists (adult traumatologists, AT) with regard specifically to ability to obtain and maintain an operative closed reduction. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients between 2007 and 2013 operatively treated for closed extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures. Inclusion criteria included skeletally immature patients with Gartland classification type II and III fractures. Eighty-five cases were included with 37 fractures treated by four fellowship trained adult traumatologists at a level I trauma center and 48 fractures treated by five fellowship trained pediatric orthopedists at a tertiary referral center. Radiographs were analyzed for Baumann's angle and shaft-condylar angle, then statistical comparisons were performed to compare preoperative and postoperative measurements. RESULTS:There was no difference in age, gender, laterality, fracture classification, use of medial pins, or neurovascular injuries between PO and AT (p > 0.05). Change in Baumann's angle (p = 0.61) or shaft-condylar angle (p = 0.87) did not differ between PO and AT. There was no significant difference in operative and postoperative Baumann's angle (p = 0.18 and p = 0.59, respectively) and shaft-condylar angle measurements (p = 0.05 and p = 0.09, respectively) between PO and AT. There was no difference in loss of reduction between the two groups (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS:Radiographic analysis of supracondylar humerus fractures showed no significant difference in alignment or loss of reduction when treated by pediatric orthopedists compared to non-pediatric orthopedists. Though it seems that the trend is to send pediatric fracture care to tertiary referral centers it may not be necessary for simple fracture management.

BACKGROUND:Resident burnout-the state of exhaustion, maladaptive detachment, and low sense of accomplishment-is a widely documented phenomenon that affects between 27% and 75% of residents in the United States. To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the relationship between resident burnout and performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). The current investigation sought to evaluate whether an association exists between indices of orthopaedic surgery resident burnout as assessed by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and performance on the OITE. METHODS:In a cross-sectional study of the orthopaedic surgery residents at a single large academic institution, the MBI was completed by all trainees in May 2016. The results of the 2016 OITE were documented for each resident, including the percentage of correctly answered questions and OITE percentile ranking. To control for individual test-taking skills, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 and Step-2 scores also were documented for each resident. The relationship between the MBI subscale scores and OITE performance was evaluated. RESULTS:The analysis included 100% of the 62 orthopaedic surgery residents in training at our institution. Sixteen (25.8%) of the residents experienced at least moderate emotional exhaustion, while 32 (51.6%) of the residents experienced at least moderate depersonalization and 8 (12.9%) of the residents experienced a moderate sense of impaired personal accomplishment. Postgraduate year (PGY)-2 residents had the highest emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scores compared with residents in other years of training. Each of the 3 MBI indices of burnout was associated with worse OITE performance when controlling for general test-taking ability. CONCLUSIONS:In this study of orthopaedic surgery residents at a large academic training program, burnout was present among residents in all PGYs of training; it was most prevalent during the second year of training. Increased levels of the 3 components of burnout were associated with worse performance on the OITE. While there is a lack of consensus in the existing literature, this study provides additional evidence that burnout is negatively associated with 1 aspect of overall resident performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Orthopaedic surgery residency training is challenging; residents are tasked to acquire a considerable amount of knowledge, develop complex surgical skills, and hone critical clinical thinking in a relatively short period of time. Identifying modifiable contributors to resident burnout and the development of strategies to promote resident wellness during training are important as we strive toward developing the next generation of capable, competent, and well-balanced orthopaedic surgeons.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Investigate the efficacy of a novel geriatric trauma risk assessment tool (STTGMA) designed to predict inpatient mortality to risk stratify measures of hospital quality and cost of care in middle-aged and geriatric orthopaedic trauma patients. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study SETTING:: Academic medical center PATIENTS:: 1592 patients aged 55 and older who were evaluated by orthopaedic surgery in the emergency department between 10/1/2014-9/30/2016. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Calculation of inpatient mortality risk score (STTGMA) using each patient's demographics, injury severity, and functional status. Patients were stratified into minimal, low, moderate, and high-risk cohort groups based on risk of <0.9%, 0.9-1.9%, 1.9-5%, and >5%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:length of stay, complications, disposition, readmission, and cost RESULTS:: 1278 patients (80.3%) sustained low-energy injuries and 314 patients (19.7%) sustained high-energy injuries. The average age was 73.8 ± 11.8 years. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.2 days with a significant difference between the STTGMA risk groups. This risk stratification between groups was also seen in complication rate, need for ICU/SDU care, percentage of patients discharged home, and readmission within 30-days. The mean total cost of admission for the minimal risk group was less than one-third that of the high-risk cohort. CONCLUSIONS:the STTGMA tool is able to risk stratify hospital quality outcome measures and cost. Thus, it is a valuable clinical tool for health care providers in identifying high-risk patients in efforts to continue to provide high-quality resource conscious care to orthopaedic trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level II.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Autogenous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is considered the benchmark graft for nonunion repair. However, ICBG harvest is invasive and may provide reduced benefit to elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of ICBG use in fixation of fracture nonunions between elderly and nonelderly patients. METHODS:Over a 13-year period, 242 patients who underwent operative repair of a long bone fracture nonunion and received autogenous ICBG were enrolled in a prospective research registry and followed. Data collected included patient demographics, injury information, and nonunion management. All patients had a minimum of 12 months of postoperative follow-up. Patients at least 65 years of age were classified as elderly, whereas younger patients were classified as nonelderly. Functional outcomes were evaluated at routine intervals postoperatively using the short musculoskeletal function assessment (SMFA) and visual analog scale pain scores. Bony union was determined radiographically. All postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS:Of the 242 patients included, 44 were elderly and 198 were nonelderly. No differences were found between groups with respect to postoperative pain scores or SMFA scores. Furthermore, time to union, rate of union, and postoperative complication rate did not differ between groups. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that older age was not associated with time to union, postoperative pain scores, or postoperative SMFA scores after controlling for possible confounding variables. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The use of ICBG in nonunion repair among elderly patients is as effective as use in younger patients with a long bone nonunion. Concerns of increased postoperative complications and decreased rate of union in elderly patients receiving ICBG for treatment of fracture nonunion should be alleviated. ICBG remains the benchmark graft for nonunion repair among all age groups.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To propose a previous implant fractures (PIFs) classification system with good interobserver reliability. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective classification. SETTING/METHODS:Four academic medical centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:A retrospective review of PIFs treated at 4 academic medical centers over 10 years was performed. Data collected included initial implant and PIF radiographs. There were 103 PIFs in 96 patients during the study period. Seventy-three (70.9%) were about plate/screw (PS) constructs and 30 (29.1%) were about intramedullary (IM) devices. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Assignment of PIF classification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:PIFs were classified based on initial implant (PS or IM) and fracture location with respect to the initial implant (proximal or distal to the implant, at the tip of the construct, or within the construct). Reliability of this scheme was assessed among 5 observers using Fleiss' kappa tests. RESULTS:Of PIFs about plate/screw constructs, 26.0% were proximal/distal to the implant (classification: PS1), 57.5% involved bone between the most proximal/distal screw and the same end of the plate (classification: PS2), and 16.4% involved only bone between the most proximal and distal screws (classification: PS3). Of PIFs about IM, 43.3% were distal to the device (classification: IM1), 46.7% involved bone between the most proximal/distal locking bolt and the same end of the device (classification: IM2), and 10.0% involved only bone between locking bolts (classification: IM3). Interobserver reliability for the classification system was excellent between observers, κ = 0.839, P < 0.0005. CONCLUSIONS:The proposed system offers a simple method to classify and describe fractures that occur about a previously implanted fracture device. Development of a classification system will allow for comparison of treatment modalities between injury types.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:(1) To assess the correlation of psychosocial factors and long-term outcomes of proximal humerus fractures all in surgical repair; (2) to identify specific psychosocial factors with favorable and unfavorable outcomes; and (3) to assess the correlation between DSM-V mental health diagnoses and long-term Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients were screened and identified on presentation to the emergency department or in the clinical office for inclusion in an institutional review board-approved registry. One hundred eighty-five proximal humerus fractures of 247 met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:All patients were prospectively followed up and assessed for clinical and functional outcomes at latest follow-up visit (mean = 24.8 months) using the DASH questionnaires along with ranges of motion and pain level. Psychosocial factors at 3 months were obtained from the DASH survey. RESULTS:Concomitant diagnosis of depressed mood (P = 0.001), anxiety (P < 0.0005), low energy level (P = 0.003), and fatigue (P = 0.001) correlated significantly with poorer outcome. All 6 psychosocial factors correlated directly and significantly with pain at latest follow-up (P < 0.0005). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictor of the overall DASH score was the extent of interference with social life (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Analysis demonstrated that psychological and social factors at 3 months postoperatively have a strong correlation with negative long-term (>1 year) outcomes after proximal humerus fixation. Clinicians may offer psychological support and encourage social support to these patients postoperatively to improve pain and treatment outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND:The importance of research in resident education has been emphasized in the orthopaedic surgery community, and a number of residency programs have incorporated a year or more of protected research time into their training. However, limited information exists as to what programs are looking for in applicants to research-track residency programs or the perceived benefits of completing such a program. METHODS:We identified orthopaedic surgery programs that have tracks involving at least 1 year of protected research time and sent surveys to their program directors and to the 2012 through 2016 research-track graduates. RESULTS:Twenty-three programs with research tracks were identified, and 19 program directors (83%) responded to the survey. The survey revealed that only 2 (11%) of these program directors were willing to accept lower scores and grades among applicants to their research track compared with their primary clinical (categorical) track. While most of the program directors (14 [74%]) preferred that applicants have an interest in academics, only a few (3 [16%]) considered it a failure if their research-track residents did not pursue academic careers. We obtained the e-mail addresses of 82 research-track graduates, and 66 (80%) responded to the survey. The survey revealed that those who went into academic careers were more likely than those who went into private practice to view completing a research track as beneficial for fellowship (73% versus 35%, respectively) and job (73% versus 22%, respectively) applications, believed that the income lost from the additional year of residency would be compensated for by opportunities gained from the research year (50% versus 17%, respectively), and said that they would pursue a research-track residency if they had to do it over again (81% versus 39%, respectively; all p values <0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The majority of program directors preferred that applicants to their research-track program have an interest in academics, although most did not consider it a failure if their research-track residents entered nonacademic careers. Graduates of research-track residency programs who entered academics more frequently viewed the completion of a research track as being beneficial compared with those who went into private practice.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Monteggia fractures are rare, although complex elbow injuries. Bado II Monteggia fractures are characterized by posterior dislocation of the radial head and concurrent fracture of the proximal or middle third of the ulna. This video demonstrates the open reduction and internal fixation of a complex Bado II Monteggia fracture dislocation. METHODS:The patient is a 65-year-old woman with a Bado II Monteggia fracture after a low-energy fall from standing height. Given the extent of comminution and the instability of the elbow, the patient was indicated for surgical fixation. RESULTS:This video demonstrates a locking plate technique for repair of a comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. Anatomical reduction of ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar joints and stable fixation with bone grafting of the fracture are achieved with a medial 2.0/2.4-mm plate and a dorsal precontoured variable-angle locking plate. Demonstration of radial head arthroplasty is provided as an alternative for utilization in cases with a radial head fracture. CONCLUSIONS:Anatomical reduction and fixation of complex Monteggia fracture dislocations can be achieved with adherence to standard aspects of bony reconstruction. In this video we present the case of a Bado II Monteggia fracture surgically repaired with a locking plate construct.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Periprosthetic fracture nonunions represent a rare problem in orthopaedic practice, although their incidence has increased with the increased frequency of joint replacement surgery. This video demonstrates the use of a linked nail-plate construct to repair a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunion. METHODS:The patient is a 93-year-old woman who is 1-year status-post a left distal femoral periprosthetic fracture with known delayed healing. She presents with a low energy trauma and hardware failure. The patient was indicated for operative fixation using a linked nail-plate construct given the patient's previous hardware failure, advanced age, and poor bone quality. RESULTS:This video demonstrates the linked nail-plate technique for the repair of a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunion. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation with bone graft was performed with excellent results. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications and no issues related to metallurgy. CONCLUSIONS:In this video, we present the case of an atrophic distal femoral periprosthetic nonunion treated with a linked nail-plate construct with autologous bone graft. Although femoral periprosthetic fracture nonunions are a rare occurrence, they can be successfully treated with operative intervention aimed at compression plating with supplemental bone grafting.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes after operative repair of nonunited lower extremity fractures initially repaired outside the developed Western world. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:From September 2004 through February 2017, 227 patients who underwent operative repair of a lower extremity fracture nonunion were prospectively enrolled in a research registry. All patients underwent previous fracture surgery and had at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Repair of lower extremity fracture nonunion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Postoperative complications, reoperation rate, time to union, and functional outcomes were assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and Visual Analog Scale pain scores. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the differences in patients who underwent initial fracture repair outside the developed Western world as opposed to within the United States. RESULTS:Twenty-one patients (9.3%) underwent initial fracture repair outside the developed Western world. These patients had a greater incidence of infected nonunions (47.6% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.015) and failure of a previous implant at the time of presentation (52.4% vs. 22.8%; P = 0.003) than those initially managed within the United States. This cohort also experienced a greater rate of postoperative complications after nonunion repair (23.8% vs. 6.3%; P = 0.016). The geographic location of initial fracture repair was not associated with postoperative Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores or Visual Analog Scale pain scores after controlling for possible confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who present with a nonunited lower extremity fracture initially repaired outside the developed Western world experience a high rate of postoperative complications after fracture nonunion repair but can expect good short- and long-term functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.