Faculty Bibliography

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Depressive symptoms, even without a clinical diagnosis of depression, are common in kidney failure patients and may be a barrier to completing the complex process of kidney transplant (KT) evaluation. We assessed depressive symptom burden and association between depressive symptoms and access to KT waitlist by age. Methods/UNASSIGNED:In a prospective cohort of 3728 KT patients (aged 18-88 years), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale was used to measure depressive symptoms at evaluation. Depressive symptom severity was defined as follows: none: 0; minimal: 1 to 15; mild: 16 to 20; moderate: 21 to 25; severe: 26 to 60. Hazard ratios (HRs) of active listing within 1 year after evaluation were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for clinical and social factors. Results/UNASSIGNED: < 0.001). After adjustment, every 5-point higher CES-D score (more depressive symptoms) was associated with a 13% lower chance of listing (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.85-0.90); the strongest association was found among patients aged ≥70 years (adjusted HR [aHR] = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.86). Furthermore, minimal (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79), mild (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44-0.72), moderate (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39-0.71), and severe (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34-0.57) depressive symptoms were all associated with a lower chance of listing. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Older candidates were less likely to report depressive symptoms at KT evaluation. Regardless of age, candidates who did report depressive symptoms, and even minimal symptoms, had a lower chance of listing. Transplant centers should routinely screen patients for depressive symptoms and refer the affected patients to mental health services to improve access to KT.

BACKGROUND:Among adult kidney transplant (KT) candidates, 21% are frail and 55% have cognitive impairment, increasing the risk of pre- and post-KT mortality. Centers often assess frailty status and cognitive function during transplant evaluation to help identify appropriate candidate. Yet, there are no ethical guidelines regarding the use of frailty and cognitive function during this evaluation. We seek to develop a clinical consensus on balancing utility and justice in access to KT for frail and cognitively impaired patients. METHODS:Twenty-seven experts caring for ESRD patients completed a two-round Delphi panel designed to facilitate consensus (> 80% agreement). RESULTS:Experts believed that denying patients transplantation based solely on expected patient survival was inequitable to frail or cognitively impaired candidates; 100% agreed that frailty and cognitive impairment are important factors to consider during KT evaluation. There was consensus that health related quality of life and social support are important to consider before waitlisting frail or cognitively impaired patients. Experts identified important factors to consider before waitlisting frail (likely to benefit from KT, frailty reversibility, age, and medical contraindications) and cognitively impaired (degree of impairment and medication adherence) patients. CONCLUSIONS:Clinical experts believed it was ethically unacceptable to allocate organs solely based on patients' expected survival; frailty and cognitive impairment should be measured at evaluation when weighed against other clinical factors. Ethical guidelines regarding the use of frailty and cognitive function during KT evaluation ought to be developed.

BACKGROUND:Elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels have been reported as a potential risk factor for cognitive impairment. Compared to the general population, older adults with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are frequently affected by secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) are at increased risk of developing dementia. The main objective of our study was to evaluate if the risk of dementia in older (age ≥ 65) ESRD patients differed if they were treated for SHPT. METHODS:Using the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) and Medicare claims, we identified 189 433 older adults without a diagnosis of dementia, who initiated dialysis between 2006-2016. SHPT treatment was defined as use of vitamin D analogs, phosphate binders, calcimimetics, or parathyroidectomy. We quantified the association between treated SHPT and incident dementia during dialysis using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability weighting, considering SHPT treatment as a time varying exposure. RESULTS:Of 189 433 older ESRD adults, 92% had a claims diagnosis of SHPT, and 123 388 (65%) were treated for SHPT. The rate of incident dementia was 6 cases per 100 person-years among SHPT treated patients compared to 11 cases per 100 person-years among untreated patients. Compared to untreated SHPT patients, the risk of dementia was 42% lower (aHR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.56-0.59) among SHPT treated patients. The magnitude of the beneficial effect of SHPT treatment differed by sex (pinteraction = 0.02) and race (pinteraction ≤ 0.01) with females (aHR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.54-0.58) and those of Asian (aHR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.46-0.57) or Black race (aHR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.48-0.53) having greatest reduction in dementia risk. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Receiving treatment for SHPT was associated with a lower risk of incident dementia among older patients with ESRD. This work provides additional support for treatment of SHPT in older ESRD patients.

Background:Humoral responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are attenuated in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), necessitating additional booster vaccinations. The Omicron variant demonstrates substantial immune evasion, and it is unknown whether additional vaccine doses increase neutralizing capacity versus this variant of concern (VOC) among SOTRs. Methods:Within an observational cohort, 25 SOTRs with low seroresponse underwent anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike and receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin (Ig)G testing using a commercially available multiplex ELISA before and after a fourth COVID-19 vaccine dose (D4). Surrogate neutralization (percent angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 inhibition [%ACE2i], range 0%-100% with >20% correlating with live virus neutralization) was measured against full-length spike proteins of the vaccine strain and 5 VOCs including Delta and Omicron. Changes in IgG level and %ACE2i were compared using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results:Anti-receptor-binding domain and anti-spike seropositivity increased post-D4 from 56% to 84% and 68% to 88%, respectively. Median (interquartile range) anti-spike antibody significantly increased post-D4 from 42.3 (4.9-134.2) to 228.9 (1115.4-655.8) World Health Organization binding antibody units. %ACE2i (median [interquartile range]) also significantly increased against the vaccine strain (5.8% [0%-16.8%] to 20.6% [5.8%-45.9%]) and the Delta variant (9.1% [4.9%-12.8%] to 17.1% [10.3%-31.7%]), yet neutralization versus Omicron was poor, did not increase post-D4 (4.1% [0%-6.9%] to 0.5% [0%-5.7%]), and was significantly lower than boosted healthy controls. Conclusions:Although a fourth vaccine dose increases anti-spike IgG and neutralizing capacity against many VOCs, some SOTRs may remain at high risk for Omicron infection despite boosting. Thus, additional protective interventions or alternative vaccination strategies should be urgently explored.