Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), computer-assisted navigation (N-TKA) and robotic-assisted methods (RA-TKA) are intended to increase precision of mechanical and component alignment. However, the clinical significance of published patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) differences in comparison to conventional TKA (C-TKA) is unknown. METHODS:A systematic review was performed to identify all studies reporting perioperative PROMs for either primary N-TKA or RA-TKA with a C-TKA comparison cohort with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Relative improvements in PROMs for the two cohorts were compared to published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values. RESULTS:After systematic review, 21 studies (N = 3,214) reporting on N-TKA and eight studies (N = 1,529) reporting on RA-TKA met inclusion criteria. Eighteen of 20 studies (90%) reported improved radiographic outcomes with N-TKA relative to C-TKA; five of five studies reported improved radiographic outcomes with RA-TKA relative to C-TKA. Five of 21 studies (24%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in clinical PROMs for N-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas only two (10%) achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. One of 8 studies (13%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in PROMs for RA-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas none achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. No studies reported a significant difference in revision rates. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While most studies comparing RA-TKA and N-TKA with C-TKA demonstrate improved radiographic alignment outcomes, a minority of studies reported PROM differences that achieve clinical significance. Future studies should report data and be interpreted in the context of clinical significance to establish patient and surgeon expectations for emerging technologies.

The recent removal of total hip and knee arthroplasty from the Medicare inpatient-only list, COVID-19 pandemic, decreasing reimbursements, and bundled payment programs have all had tremendous impact on the practice of arthroplasty. Surgeons and practices must adapt to these challenges to achieve the ideal triad of quality patient care, low cost to payors, and sustainable financial margins for stakeholders. Here, we review institutional data and present our experience with the changing arthroplasty practice landscape. With the principle of demand matching, arthroplasty surgeons and practices can risk-stratify and shuttle patients in the appropriate operative and rehabilitation setting to optimize quality and efficiency.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Aseptic loosening remains one of the most common indications for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the demographic shift to a younger and more active TKA patient population, some surgeons have revisited noncemented fixation given its potential for lower rates of long-term aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was to compare the demographics and complications between patients undergoing noncemented and cemented TKA. METHODS:Using the MKnee subset of the PearlDiver database, diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients who had undergone cemented or noncemented TKA for osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Propensity score matching was done to compare risk-adjusted medical and surgical complication profiles at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. RESULTS:Of 203,574 patients identified, 3.2% underwent noncemented TKA and 96.8% underwent cemented TKA. Using propensity-matched analysis, there was no difference in 90-day medical complications. Noncemented TKA was associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic joint infection throughout the study (90-day odds ratio [OR] 1.34, 1-year OR 1.27, 2-year OR 1.27, P < 0.05). Noncemented TKA was associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic fracture at 1 year and 2 years (1 year OR 2.19, 2 years OR 1.89, P < 0.05). No notable difference was observed in risk of aseptic loosening between the two groups. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Noncemented TKA is associated with a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic fracture. Additional studies are needed to compare long-term rates of aseptic loosening between noncemented and cemented TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

INTRODUCTION:Metaphyseal bone defects seen at revision total knee replacement (TKA) have traditionally been treated with bone graft or cement. Recently, metal augments have surfaced as viable alternatives to conventional methods previously used in these patients. Newer 3D-printed metal cones offer better biological fixation as a means of improving construct stability. This study aimed to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of the novel 3D-printed titanium cone augments for femoral and tibial metaphyseal bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective review was undertaken of 72 patients who underwent revision TKA with metaphyseal cones (Stryker) and stemmed implants from 2015-2017. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS Jr) and VR/SF-12 scores were recorded. Knee Society radiographic scores were calculated at latest follow up to evaluate for radiolucency and biological fixation. Loosening noted on radiographs and reoperation for any reason were the endpoints to determine survivorship. RESULTS:A total of 68 patients with 78 cones (58 tibial, 20 femoral) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow up was 3.4 years (range 2-5.4 years). The average KOOS Jr score increased from 38 preoperatively to 66 at two years. The average VR/SF-12 PH score increased from 33 preoperatively to 37 at two years. The average VR/SF-12 MH score increased from 46 preoperatively to 54 at two years. Twelve percent of tibial implants and 10% of femoral implants with cones were found to have lucency in at least one radiographic zone. Overall survivorship at latest follow up was 93% with two patients requiring revision for infection, two revised following mechanical complications, and one patient who underwent polyethylene exchange after experiencing mechanical complications. When considering only aseptic loosening, survivorship was 100%. CONCLUSION:This 3D-printed titanium femoral and tibial cone augment system showed excellent survivorship, biological fixation, clinical outcomes, and radiographic outcomes in the setting of TKA. Further studies are needed for assessment of long-term survivorship.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Tibial shaft fractures are a relatively common injury in orthopaedic surgery, with management options including intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plate osteosynthesis. Using a large national database, we sought to compare the prevalence and timing of short-term complications following either IMN or ORIF for tibial shaft fractures. METHODS:The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients undergoing IMN or ORIF for the treatment of tibial shaft fracture between 2012 and 2018. Multivariate Poisson hurdle regression models were utilized to determine predictors of postoperative complications as well as the timing of postoperative complications. RESULTS: < .001). There was no difference between ORIF and IMN with regard to probability or timing of subsequent blood transfusion, major complications, or return to the operating room. Many patient factors, such as higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, congestive heart failure, and hypertension, were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative complications within 30 days are common after the surgical treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The risk of developing specific complications and the timing of these complications vary depending on numerous factors, including potentially modifiable risk factors such as the method of fixation or operative time, as well as nonmodifiable risk factors such as medical comorbidities.

BACKGROUND:Arthroscopic-assisted meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has become a viable and effective treatment option for young active patients with postmeniscectomy pain. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is imperative to evaluate the clinical significance of surgical interventions and inform clinical practice guidelines in orthopaedic surgery. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To perform a systematic review of clinical outcome studies of patients undergoing MAT and compare postoperative improvement with established MCID thresholds. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS:A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. A meta-analysis was performed using data obtained from studies reporting patient-reported outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing isolated lateral MAT using fresh-frozen grafts. Weighted mean postoperative improvements in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain) were calculated and compared with MCID values to determine if they met the MCID threshold. RESULTS:A total of 35 studies were identified, including 1658 unique patients. Weighted mean postoperative score improvements exceeded MCID thresholds for the VAS pain, IKDC, and Lysholm. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing isolated lateral fresh-frozen MAT demonstrated postoperative improvements exceeding the MCID for the Lysholm and VAS pain. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Evaluating postoperative PROMs with respect to the MCID is crucial to evaluate the effect of MAT on functional improvement. The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that postoperative improvements after MAT are clinically meaningful as reflected by PROMs exceeding the MCID threshold for the IKDC, Lysholm, and VAS pain.

OBJECTIVE:Successful clinical outcomes following cartilage restoration procedures are highly dependent on addressing concomitant pathology. The purpose of this study was to document methods for evaluating concomitant procedures of the knee when performed with articular cartilage restoration techniques, and to review their reported findings in high-impact clinical orthopedic studies. We hypothesized that there are substantial inconsistencies in reporting clinical outcomes associated with concomitant procedures relative to outcomes related to isolated cartilage repair. DESIGN:A total of 133 clinical studies on articular cartilage repair of the knee were identified from 6 high-impact orthopedic journals between 2011 and 2017. Studies were included if they were primary research articles reporting clinical outcomes data following surgical treatment of articular cartilage lesions with a minimum sample size of 5 patients. Studies were excluded if they were review articles, meta-analyses, and articles reporting only nonclinical outcomes (e.g., imaging, histology). A full-text review was then used to evaluate details regarding study methodology and reporting on the following variables: primary cartilage repair procedure, and the utilization of concomitant procedures to address additional patient comorbidities, including malalignment, meniscus pathology, and ligamentous instability. Each study was additionally reviewed to document variation in clinical outcomes reporting in patients that had these comorbidities addressed at the time of surgery. RESULTS:All studies reported on the type of primary cartilage repair procedure, with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) noted in 43% of studies, microfracture (MF) reported in 16.5%, osteochondral allograft (OCA) in 15%, and osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT) in 8.2%. Regarding concomitant pathology, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (24.8%) and meniscus repair (23.3%) were the most commonly addressed patient comorbidities. A total of 56 studies (42.1%) excluded patients with malalignment, meniscus injury, and ligamentous instability. For studies that addressed concomitant pathology, 72.7% reported clinical outcomes separately from the cohort treated with only cartilage repair. A total of 16.5% of studies neither excluded nor addressed concomitant pathologies. There was a significant amount of variation in the patient reported outcome scores used among the studies, with the majority of studies reporting International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) in 47.2% and 43.6% of articles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:In this study on knee cartilage restoration, recognition and management of concomitant pathology is inadequately reported in approximately 28% of studies. Only 30% of articles reported adequate treatment of concomitant ailments while scoring their outcomes using one of a potential 18 different scoring systems. These findings highlight the need for more standardized methods to be applied in future research with regard to inclusion, exclusion, and scoring concomitant pathologies with regard to treatment of cartilage defects in the knee.

BACKGROUND:Postoperative blood product transfusions in elderly hip fracture patients cause concern for morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors and short-term sequelae of postoperative transfusion following geriatric hip fracture surgery. METHODS:We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) to identify geriatric (⩾65 years) patients who sustained operative femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric hip fractures in 2016. Multivariate regression was used to determine risk-adjusted odds ratios (OR) of associated perioperative risk factors and sequelae of postoperative transfusion. RESULTS: < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative transfusion is a common occurrence in geriatric fragility hip fractures with multiple risk factors. Careful preoperative planning and multidisciplinary management efforts are warranted to reduce use of postoperative transfusions.

BACKGROUND:In revision total knee arthroplasty, osteolysis, mechanical abrasion, and infection may leave patellar bone stock severely attenuated with cavitary and/or segmental rim deficiencies that compromise fixation of patellar implant pegs. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the use of cortical "rebar" screws to augment cement fixation in revision patelloplasty. METHODS:From 2006 to 2018, dorsal patellar rebar technique was used for patellar reconstruction in 128 of 1037 revision total knee arthroplasty cases (12.3%). Follow-up was achieved with serial radiographs and prospective comparison of Knee Society Scores (KSSs) for clinical outcome. Complications and implant failures requiring reoperation or modified rehabilitation were also assessed. RESULTS:Of the 128 patellar revisions performed using the rebar technique, 69 patients were women and 59 patients were men. The average age of the group was 69.5 years (range, 32-83 years). The mean follow-up of the cohort was 37 months (range, 13-109 months). The most common causes for revision were kinematic conflict, periprosthetic joint infection, and aseptic loosening. The median number of rebar screws used was 5 (range, 1-13). Preoperative KSSs for the study cohort averaged 50 (range, 0-90) At latest follow-up, mean KSS was 85 (range, 54-100). There were 4 patellar-related complications (3.1%) with no implant failures at study conclusion. Retrieval analysis revealed rigid fixation of the reconstructed patellar component in all cases. CONCLUSIONS:Patellar rebar screw augmentation is a useful technique when there are significant cavitary deficiencies and limited segmental rim deficiencies. This technique allows the surgeon to extend indications for patellar revision arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Among surgical patients, utilization of institutional-based postacute care (PAC) presents a notable financial burden and is associated with increased risk of complications and mortality rates when compared with discharge home. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of postdischarge disposition to PAC in geriatric patients after surgical fixation of native hip fractures. METHODS:We have done a query of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify geriatric (≥65 years) patients who sustained surgical femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric hip fractures in 2016. Multivariate regression was used to compute risk factors for discharge to and prolonged stay (>30 days) in PAC. RESULTS:Eight thousand one hundred thirty-three geriatric hip fracture patients with sufficient follow-up data were identified. Of these, 6,670 patients (82.0%) were initially discharged to PAC after their hip fracture episode of care, and 2,986 patients (36.7%) remained in PAC for >30 days. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [1.05 to 1.08], P < 0.001), partial (OR 2.41 [1.57 to 3.71], P < 0.001) or total dependence (OR 3.03 [1.92 to 4.46], P < 0.001) for activities of daily living, dementia (OR 1.62 [1.33 to 1.96], P < 0.001), diabetes (OR 1.46 [1.14 to 1.85], P = 0.002), hypertension (OR 1.32 [1.10 to 1.58], P = 0.002), and total hospital length of stay (OR 1.04 [1.01 to 1.08], P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for discharge to PAC. Age (OR 1.05 [1.04 to 1.06], P < 0.001), partial (OR 2.86 [1.93 to 3.79], P < 0.001) or total dependence (OR 3.12 [1.45 to 4.79], P < 0.001) for activities of daily living, American Society of Anesthesiologist's classification (OR 1.27 [1.13 to 1.43], P < 0.001), dementia (OR 1.49 [1.28 to 1.74], P < 0.001), and total hospital length of stay (OR 1.10 [1.08 to 1.13], P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for prolonged PAC stay >30 days. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Discharge to PAC is the norm among patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Provider foreknowledge of risk factors may help improve hip fracture outcomes and decrease healthcare costs.