Faculty Bibliography

Background: Survival outcomes for older patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are disproportionally inferior to those of younger patients. While differences in tumor biology may play a role, older patients are often frail with comorbidities, polypharmacy, and use potentially inappropriate medications (PIM).
Method(s): Using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models, we retrospectively analyzed all aggressive NHL patients age 60 and older diagnosed and treated at our institution from 2009-2014 to examine the effect of polypharmacy and PIM use on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatmentrelated toxicities.
Result(s): We included 141 patients with evaluable data after excluding patients with incomplete record. The median age was 71 years. At the time of diagnosis, 44% of patients used more than 4 medications and 47% used at least one PIM. During first-line treatment, only 43% of patients received chemotherapy of adequate relative dose intensity (>85% scheduled dose), and 63% experienced grade 3 or greater toxicities. Age, International Prognostic Index, and PIM use correlated with each other. Number of medications (p = 0.005) and PIM use (p < 0.001) were associated with shortened PFS by log-rank test, and PIM use remained a strong independent predictor of PFS in multivariable analysis (HR 1.84, p = 0.005). Number of medications (p = 0.003) and PIM use (p = 0.009) were also associated with shortened OS by log-rank test, although only albumin level predicted OS in multivariable analysis. Most importantly, PIM use was strongly associated with grade 3 or greater toxicities in multivariable analysis (OR 7.4, p = 0.001).
Conclusion(s): We report here for the first time adverse impacts of polypharmacy and PIM use in older patients with aggressive lymphoma. We suggest that drug-drug interactions may significantly impair the delivery of adequate chemotherapy dosage and increase toxicities thus resulting in inferior survival outcome. Our findings support the use of evidence-based geriatric and palliative care principles to guide meticulous medication management to eliminate outcome disparity in older lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND:The objective of this study is to describe the use of targeted therapies for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and overall survival (OS) among patients in clinical practice in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS:A retrospective cohort of 286 patients from 24 VHA Medical Centers diagnosed with advanced clear cell RCC between Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 and FY2014 was followed through September 30, 2016. Among patients who received targeted therapy, we described the medications taken, duration of therapy, and overall survival. We also assessed the effect of the first therapy received on overall survival using Cox Proportional Hazards models. RESULTS:There were 66 patients who did not receive therapy for their advanced RCC. Of the 220 treated patients, the mean (sd) number of medications received was 1.9 (1.1). The medications most commonly used first were sunitinib (61.8%), pazopanib (17.3%), and temsirolimus (10.9%). The median duration of first-line therapy was 86 days (interquartile range [IQR] 42, 210). Median total duration of therapy was 159 days (IQR 58, 397). 62.3% of patients had ≥ 1 dose of therapy held or reduced, mainly due to an adverse drug event (ADE). Median survival from the start of treatment to death was 1.08 years (IQR 0.80, 1.31). Finally, receipt of temsirolimus vs sunitinib (HR 1.95 [95%CI 1.09,3.47]) as the first targeted therapy was independently associated with an increased hazard of death. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our analysis of targeted therapies for advanced RCC in VHA suggests duration of treatment is shorter in a real-world setting than in clinical trials, and dose reductions and ADEs are more common.

BACKGROUND:Despite a wealth of preclinical and observational data, prospective data regarding the use of metformin in lung cancer is extremely limited. METHODS:We pooled individualized data from two prospective trials evaluating metformin plus platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, in non-diabetic patients with untreated advanced NSCLC. In addition to reporting on clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, we also explored metformin's activity in key molecular cohorts. RESULTS:33 patients were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 70% were current or previous smokers. 82% had standard tissue molecular testing results available. KRAS, EGFR, and LKB1 mutation prevalence was 48%, 26%, and 8.3%, respectively. Composite median PFS was 6 months for all patients (95% CI: [1.36, 7.96]), 7.2 months for KRAS mutants (95% CI: [1.18, 9.21]), and 6.6 months for EGFR mutants (95% CI: [1.18, 15.29]). Composite median OS was 14.8 months for all patients (95% CI: [8.25, 19.99]), 17.5 months for KRAS mutants (95% CI: [8.86, 26.96]), and 13.3 months for EGFR mutants (95% CI: [2.60, 25.86]). Lymphopenia was the most common grade 3 AE (12%), followed by leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, and hypertension (9% each). There were 2 grade 4 AEs, neutropenia (21%) and sepsis (3%), and 1 grade 5 AE (colonic perforation) attributed to bevacizumab. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results confirm the previously shown efficacy and tolerability of metformin in combination with chemotherapy and highlight encouraging activity in key molecular cohorts. Future efforts should build on this work by prospectively studying metformin in these molecular subgroups.

BACKGROUND/AIM/OBJECTIVE:National guidelines offer little guidance on the use of PSA progression (PSA increase as defined below) as a clinical endpoint in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the study was to examine treatment patterns/outcomes with abiraterone (abi)/enzalutamide (enza) throughout PSA progression and near the end of life (EOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Cases of mCRPC treated with abi or enza from the New York Veterans Affairs (VA) from 6/2011-8/2017 were reviewed. Regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with continuation of abi/enza treatment up to the EOL, and survival. RESULTS:Of 184 patients, 72 received abi alone, 28 received enza alone, and 84 received both. Treatment was changed for PSA progression alone in 39.1% (abi) and 25.7% (enza) of patients. A total of 37 patients (20%) received abi/enza within 1 month before death, 30% of whom were receiving hospice services. Older patients and black patients were less likely to receive abi/enza up to the EOL. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Abi/enza are frequently discontinued for PSA progression alone and continued at EOL. The clinical benefit of these practices warrants additional study.

Background Clinical reasoning (CR) is a core competency in medical education. Few studies have examined efforts to train faculty to teach CR and lead CR curricula in medical schools and residencies. In this report, we describe the development and preliminary evaluation of a faculty development workshop to teach CR grounded in CR theory. Methods Twenty-six medicine faculty (nine hospitalists and 17 subspecialists) participated in a workshop that introduced a framework to teach CR using an interactive, case-based didactic followed by role-play exercises. Faculty participated in pre- and post-Group Observed Structured Teaching Exercises (GOSTE), completed retrospective pre-post assessments (RPPs), and made commitment to change statements (CTCs). Results In the post-GOSTE, participants significantly improved in their use of problem representation and illness scripts to teach CR. RPPs revealed that faculty were more confident in their ability and more likely to teach CR using educational strategies grounded in CR educational theory. At 2-month follow-up, 81% of participants reported partially implementing these teaching techniques. Conclusions After participating in this 3-h workshop, faculty demonstrated increased ability to use these teaching techniques and expressed greater confidence and an increased likelihood to teach CR. The majority of faculty reported implementing these newly learned educational strategies into practice.

Although histology still plays a critical role in diagnosing diffuse gliomas, additional ancillary testing is an essential tool for VA pathology laboratories.