Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials. METHODS:A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale. RESULTS:Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2. CONCLUSIONS:This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a neuroendocrine skin cancer with a high rate of mortality. While still relatively rare, the incidence of MCC has been rapidly rising in the US and around the world. Since 2017, two immunotherapeutic drugs, avelumab and pembrolizumab, have been FDA-approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC and have revolutionized outcomes for MCC. However, real-world outcomes can differ from clinical trial data, and the adoption of novel therapeutics can be gradual. We aimed to characterize the treatment practices and outcomes of patients with metastatic MCC across the US. A retrospective cohort study of adult cases of MCC in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019 was performed. Multivariable logistic regressions to determine the association of a variety of patient, tumor, and system factors with likelihood of receipt of systemic therapies were performed. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox survival regressions were performed. We identified 1017 cases of metastatic MCC. From 2017 to 2019, 54.2% of patients received immunotherapy. This increased from 45.1% in 2017 to 63.0% in 2019. High-volume centers were significantly more likely to use immunotherapy (odds ratio 3.235, p = 0.002). On univariate analysis, patients receiving systemic immunotherapy had significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.001). One-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 47.2% (standard error [SE] 1.8%), 21.8% (SE 1.5%), and 16.5% (SE 1.4%), respectively, for patients who did not receive immunotherapy versus 62.7% (SE 3.5%), 34.4% (SE 3.9%), and 23.6% (SE 4.4%), respectively, for those who did (Fig. 1). In our multivariable survival regression, receipt of immunotherapy was associated with an approximately 35% reduction in hazard of death (hazard ratio 0.665, p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.548-0.808). Our results demonstrate that the real-world survival advantage of immunotherapy for metastatic MCC is similar to clinical trial data. However, many patients with metastatic disease did not receive this guideline-recommended therapy in our most recent study year, and use of immunotherapy is higher at high-volume centers. This suggests that regionalization of care to high-volume centers or dissemination of their practices, may ultimately improve patient survival.

BACKGROUND:Lymphocyte activation-gene 3 (LAG-3) is an emerging next-generation immune checkpoint molecule. We aim to define the expression pattern of LAG-3 in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) as a first step to understand the role of LAG-3 in cSCC prognosis and therapy. OBJECTIVE:To define the expression pattern of LAG-3 in cSCC as a first step to understand the role of LAG-3 in cSCC prognosis and therapy. METHODS:To test whether LAG-3 is expressed on cSCC infiltrating lymphocytes, we isolated CD8 + T lymphocytes from three SCC tumors using flow cytometry and performed single-cell RNA sequencing for LAG-3 and programmed cell death protein -1 (PD-1). In addition, we evaluated LAG-3 mRNA expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue using NanoString technology. RESULTS:Single-cell RNA sequencing showed that LAG-3 is expressed more than PD-1 in CD8 + tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (50.8% vs 35.2%, respectively). Quantifying LAG-3 mRNA expression showed that compared with normal skin, LAG-3 mRNA is approximately 8 fold higher in immunocompetent associated SCC tumors and approximately 2 fold higher in transplant associated SCC tumors ( p -values <.05). In addition, LAG-3 mRNA was expressed 7.2 fold higher in T2a SCC tumors compared with normal skin ( p -value <.05). CONCLUSION:Lymphocyte activation-gene 3 is expressed on SCC infiltrating T lymphocytes at a higher percentage than PD-1. In addition, LAG-3 mRNA expression is significantly higher in SCC tumors. Ongoing studies will be performed to define its role as an immune-related biomarker and as a therapeutic target.