Faculty Bibliography

Bilateral prophylactic mastectomies (BPM) in young previvors with high-risk mutations are rising; however, little data on management, therapy timing, and outcomes exist. BRCA+ patients under 30 undergoing BPM from 2006 to 2018 were reviewed. Twenty-two patients aged 23-29 underwent mastectomy 4.2 years after genetic diagnosis. Twelve patients completed surveys, most often citing personal decisions (50%) for undergoing mastectomy and plastic surgeons' recommendations (83.3%) for reconstruction. About 73% of patients completely understood risks/benefits of mastectomy and 63.6% of reconstruction. Patients reported high BREAST-Q Satisfaction and Well-Being scores. Continued educational resource development will optimize shared decision-making in the reconstructive process.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The omentum provides abundant lymphatic tissue with reliable vascular anatomy, representing an ideal donor for vascularized lymph node transfer without risk for donor site lymphedema. We describe a novel, robotically assisted approach for omental flap harvest. Methods/UNASSIGNED:All patients undergoing robotically assisted omentum harvest for vascularized lymph node transfer from 2017 to 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. Results/UNASSIGNED:, respectively. Indications for lymph node transfer were upper extremity lymphedema following mastectomy, radiation, and lymphadenectomy (60.0%); congenital unilateral lower extremity lymphedema (20.0%); and bilateral lower extremity/scrotal lymphedema following partial penectomy and bilateral inguinal/pelvic lymphadenectomy (20.0%). Four patients (80.0%) underwent standard robotic harvest, whereas 1 patient underwent single-port robotic harvest. The average number of port sites was 4.4. All patients underwent omentum flap transfer to 2 sites; in 2 cases, the flap was conjoined, and in 3 cases, the flap was segmented. The average overall operative time was 9:19. The average inpatient hospitalization was 5.2 days. Two patients experienced cellulitis, which is resolved with oral antibiotics. There were no major complications. All patients reported subjective improvement in swelling and softness of the affected extremity. The average follow-up was 8.8 months. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Robotically assisted omental harvest for vascularized lymph node transfer is a novel, safe, and viable minimally invasive approach offering improved intra-abdominal visibility and maneuverability for flap dissection.

BACKGROUND:Optimizing outcomes and assessing appropriate candidates for breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy is an ongoing goal for plastic surgeons. METHODS:All patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy from 2006 to June of 2018 were reviewed and randomly divided into test and validation groups. A logistic regression model calculating the odds ratio for any complication from 12 risk factors was derived from the test group, whereas the validation group was used to validate this model. RESULTS:The test group was composed of 537 nipple-sparing mastectomies (50.2 percent), with an overall complication rate of 27.2 percent (146 nipple-sparing mastectomies). The validation group was composed of 533 nipple-sparing mastectomies (49.8 percent), with an overall complication rate of 22.9 percent (122 nipple-sparing mastectomies). A logistic regression model predicting overall complications was derived from the test group. Nipple-sparing mastectomies in the test group were divided into deciles based on predicted risk in the model. Risk increased with probability decile; decile 1 was significantly protective, whereas deciles 9 and 10 were significantly predictive for complications (p < 0.0001). The relative risk in decile 1 was significantly decreased (0.39; p = 0.006); the relative risk in deciles 9 and 10 was significantly increased (2.71; p < 0.0001). In the validation group, the relative risk of any complication in decile 1 was decreased at 0.55 (p = 0.057); the relative risk in deciles 9 and 10 was significantly increased (1.89; p < 0.0001). In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.668 (p < 0.0001), demonstrating diagnostic meaningfulness of the model. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The authors establish and validate a predictive risk model and calculator for nipple-sparing mastectomy with far-reaching impact for surgeons and patients alike.

Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction have devastating consequences; however, individual risk assessment remains challenging. We seek to develop an intraoperative assessment tool to assist in estimating risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND:Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with large, ptotic breasts is a reconstructive challenge. Staged breast reduction before prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy has been shown to decrease complications; however, a direct comparison of outcomes between staged and nonstaged techniques is lacking. METHODS:A retrospective review of all patients that underwent staged breast reduction before nipple-sparing mastectomy was conducted. Staged cases were matched to nonstaged nipple-sparing mastectomy cases according to known risk factors for complications. Individual staged cases with appropriate matches in all these categories were then each paired to two nonstaged cases according to the nearest higher and lower mastectomy weight. Staged and nonstaged cohorts were compared with regard to demographics, operative characteristics, and reconstructive outcomes. RESULTS:Eighteen staged breast reductions were identified, performed at an average of 5.0 months before nipple-sparing mastectomy. Staged reductions were matched to 36 prophylactic nonstaged reductions. Average combined mastectomy weight (breast reduction and mastectomy weight) in the staged group was significantly higher than in the nonstaged group (992.6 g versus 640 g; p = 0.0004), although isolated mastectomy weights were comparable (607.1 g versus 640.0 g, respectively; p = 0.6311). Major mastectomy flap necrosis rates were significantly lower in the staged cohort than in the nonstaged cohort (0 percent versus 22.2 percent, respectively; p = 0.0415). Rates of minor mastectomy flap necrosis, partial nipple necrosis, and explantation trended lower in the staged cohort. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In patients with large breast size, staged breast reduction before nipple-sparing mastectomy had significantly lower rates of major flap necrosis compared with nonstaged cases after controlling for other known risk factors for complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic, III.

Fat grafting during primary breast augmentation has the ability to address the limitations of soft tissue coverage of breast implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current evidence on patient selection, surgical techniques, and assessment of outcomes with composite breast augmentation.

Immediate breast reconstruction relies on healthy mastectomy flaps for success. Tissue perfusion of these mastectomy flaps is dependent on multiple patient-, operative-, and surgeon-specific factors, which must be optimized. Unfortunately, tissue perfusion is also notoriously difficult to accurately assess and investigate. In this review, we discuss the importance of tissue perfusion in successful reconstructive breast surgery with an emphasis on perfusion assessment and techniques to ensure that anatomic mastectomy flap perfusion is maintained for immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Preoperative and patient-specific factors should be considered with operative plans modified to minimize ischemic risk. Intraoperatively, incision planning and mastectomy dissection will dictate skin flap perfusion. Most importantly, mastectomy dissection in a plane at the breast capsule will maximize preservation of the subdermal plexus and subcutaneous perforators that supply the breast skin envelope while also maximizing oncologic parenchymal resection. Such anatomic dissection has been demonstrated to decrease risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction. Postoperatively, any potential or actual areas of impaired perfusion and ischemia must be diagnosed appropriately and managed proactively to ensure a successful reconstruction. It is also important for surgeons to be aware of imaging modalities and adjunctive technologies that can help promote and assess optimal mastectomy flap tissue perfusion. Plastic surgeons and breast surgeons must actively and collaboratively work together to ensure their mutual goals are met, and optimal outcomes are attained for patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

BACKGROUND:Oncologic outcomes with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) continue to be established. We examine oncologic trends, outcomes, and risk factors, including tumor-to-nipple distance (TND), in therapeutic NSMs. METHODS:Demographics, outcomes, and overall trends for all NSMs undertaken for a therapeutic indication from 2006 to 2017 were analyzed. Oncologic outcomes were investigated with specific focus on recurrence and associated factors, including TND. RESULTS:A total of 496 therapeutic NSMs were performed with average follow-up time of 48.25 months. The most common tumor types were invasive carcinoma (52.4%) and ductal carcinoma in situ (50.4%). Sentinel lymph node sampling was performed in 79.8% of NSMs; 4.1% had positive frozen sentinel lymph node biopsies while 15.7% had positive nodal status on permanent pathologic examination. The most common pathologic cancer stage was stage IA (42.5%) followed by Stage 0 (31.3%).Per NSM, the rate of local recurrence was 1.6% (N=8); the rate of regional recurrence was 0.6% (N=3). In all, 171 NSMs had magnetic resonance imaging available to assess tumor-to-nipple distance (TND). NSMs with TND ≤1 centimeter (25.0% versus 2.4%, p=0.0031/p=0.1129) and ≤2 centimeters (8.7% versus 2.0%; p=0.0218/p=0.1345) trended to higher rates of locoregional recurrence. In univariate analysis, TND ≤1 centimeter was the only significant risk factor for recurrence (OR=13.5833, p=0.0385). No factors were significant in regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS:In this group of early stage and in situ breast carcinoma, therapeutic NSM appears oncologically safe with a locoregional recurrence rate of 2.0%. Tumor-to-nipple distances of ≤1 centimeter and ≤2 centimeters trended to higher rates of recurrence.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Mastectomy flap and nipple-areola complex (NAC) ischemia can be devastating complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). Predictors of reconstructive failure with major skin envelope ischemia and implications for decision-making remain to be fully elucidated. Methods/UNASSIGNED:All cases of implant-based reconstruction after NSM from 2006 to June 2018 with mastectomy flap necrosis or NAC necrosis requiring debridement were reviewed. Data on patient demographics, operative characteristics, additional complications, and the nature and management of ischemic complications were collected and analyzed. Results/UNASSIGNED:= 0.0494). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:NSM cases with major ischemia requiring explantation had a lower body mass index and significantly higher rate of preoperative radiation, immediate implant placement, use of acellular dermal matrix/mesh, and concomitant major infection. These variables should be taken into account when discussing risks with patients preoperatively and assessing the quality of mastectomy flaps and subsequent reconstructive choices intraoperatively.