Faculty Bibliography

Background:Dual mobility (DM) bearings for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been proposed to reduce the risk of instability in high-risk patients; however, their utility in primary THA remains relatively unexplored. No previous reports have described whether surgical approach influences outcomes associated with DM implant systems. This study aims to compare patient reported outcomes and post-operative groin pain between patients undergoing anterior approach versus posterior approach following primary THA with DM implants. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA and received a DM implant between 2011-2021. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior approach). Primary outcomes included the presence of substantial postoperative groin pain as well as readmission and revision rates. Demographic differences were assessed using chi-square and independent sample t-tests. Outcomes were compared using multilinear and logistic regressions. Results:Of the 495 patients identified, 55 (11%) underwent THA via the anterior approach and 440 (89%) via the posterior approach. Surgical time (100.24 vs. 109.42 minutes, p=0.070), length of stay (2.19vs.2.67 days,p=0.072), discharge disposition (p=0.151), and significant postoperative groin pain (1.8%vs.0.7%,p=0.966) did not statistically differ between the cohorts. 90-day readmission (9.1%vs.7.7%,p=0.823) and revision rate (0.0%vs.3.0%,p=0.993) did not significantly differ as well. Specifically, readmission (p=0.993) and revision (p=0.998) for instability did not significantly differ between the cohorts. We found no statistical difference in HOOS, JR (p=0.425), VR-12 PCS (p=0.718), and VR-12 MCS (p=0.257) delta score improvement from preoperative to 1-year follow-up between the two groups. Conclusion:.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to evaluate post-operative health care quality and patient satisfaction. The Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) question gathers a single PRO to measure how patients appraise their joint. This study compares PJP to the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 21-months post-operation to assess its value. METHODS:A retrospective review was performed at an orthopedic specialty hospital for patients who completed both PJP and FJS questionnaires in 2020-2021 and underwent either a unilateral elective primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) or Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Spearman's correlation coefficients and p-values were calculated to determine external validity of PJP. Floor and ceiling effects were analyzed and considered significant if ≥15% of patients achieved the worst or best score (0-4 for PJP and 0-100 for FJS). RESULTS:In total, 534 patients (327 THA and 207 TKA) were surveyed at 21 months post-operation. External validity against FJS was assessed for both TKA (r=0.66, p<0.01) and THA (r=0.69, p<0.01). For TKA, the floor and ceiling effects were 0.97% and 25.12% for PJP and 3.86% and 4.83% for FJS, respectively. For THA, the floor and ceiling effects were 0.92% and 50.46% for PJP and 2.47% and 20.50% for FJS, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:PJP was correlated with FJS moderately for both TKA and THA and can be collected with less burden. However, ceiling effects were significantly higher in both TKA and THA for PJP compared with FJS. Further studies are needed to investigate the questionnaires at additional timepoints and to evaluate the implications of high ceiling effects.

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) tool designed to assess artificial prosthesis awareness during daily activities following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is the minimum cut-off value that corresponds to a patient's satisfactory state-of-health. Despite the validity and reliability of the FJS-12 having been previously demonstrated, the PASS has yet to be clearly defined. This study aims to define the PASS of the FJS-12 following primary THA. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary elective THA from 2019 to 2020, and answered both the FJS-12 and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) questionnaires one-year postoperatively. HOOS, JR score was used as the anchor to estimate the PASS of FJS-12. Two statistical methods were employed: the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve point, which maximized the Youden index; and 75th percentile of the cumulative percentage curve of patients who had the HOOS, JR score difference larger than the cut-off value. RESULTS:This study included 780 patients. The mean one-year FJS-12 score was 65.42 (SD 28.59). The mean one-year HOOS, JR score was 82.70 (SD 16.57). A high positive correlation between FJS-12 and HOOS, JR was found (r = 0.74; p<0.001), making the HOOS, JR a valid external anchor. The threshold score of the FJS-12 that maximized the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a PASS was 66.68 (area under the curve = 0.8). The cut-off score value computed with the 75th percentile approach was 92.20. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS: 2022;3(4):307-313.

The direct anterior approach (DAA) to the hip was initially described in the nineteenth century and has been used sporadically for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, recent increased interest in tissue-sparing and small incision arthroplasty has given rise to a sharp increase in the utilization of the DAA. Although some previous studies claimed that this approach results in less muscle damage and pain as well as rapid recovery, a paucity in the literature exists to conclusively support these claims. While the DAA may be comparable to other THA approaches, no evidence to date shows improved long-term outcomes for patients compared to other surgical approaches for THA. However, the advent of new surgical instruments and tables designed specifically for use with the DAA has made the approach more feasible for surgeons. In addition, the capacity to utilize fluoroscopy intraoperatively for component positioning is a valuable asset to the approach and can be of particular benefit for surgeons during their learning curve. An understanding of its limitations and challenges is vital for the safe employment of this technique. This review summarizes the pearls and pitfalls of the DAA for THA in order to improve the understanding of this surgical technique for hip replacement surgeons.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs often have stringent selection criteria. Some patients deemed ineligible may nonetheless be discharged the day of surgery. This study compares outcomes between patients enrolled in our SDD TJA program who were SDD to those who did not participate in the program but were also SDD. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were SDD following TJA from 2015-2020. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they were formally enrolled in our institution's SDD TJA program. Propensity-score matching was performed to limit confounding and independent sample t-tests or Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to compare outcomes of interest between the matched groups. RESULTS:Of the 1,778 patients included, 1,384(78%) completed the SDD TJA program and 394(22%) were SDD but did not participate in the SDD TJA program. Upon 1:1 propensity-score matching, a total of 550 patients were matched for comparison. Surgical time was significantly longer for patients who did not participate in the SDD TJA program compared to those who participated in the program (109.39vs.87.29 minutes; p<0.001). Discharge disposition(p=0.999), 90-day ED-visit (p=0.476), 90-day all-cause readmissions(p=0.999), 90-day all-cause revisions(p=0.563), as well as HOOS,JR and KOOS,JR scores at all time-points did not significantly differ. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Enrollment in a formal SDD TJA program may not be a necessary precursor to achieving similar outcomes following TJA for patients that are SDD without formally enrolling. Therefore, a formal program may no longer be needed at an institution with well-established evidence-based protocols with strong success and experience with value-based care.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Traditionally, most efforts have focused on readmission rates while little has been reported on emergency department (ED) presentation. This study aims to analyze the difference between same-day discharge (SDD) and non-SDD primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) cases to determine the rate and reasons associated with 90-day ED presentations. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA and TKA between 2011-2021. The patients were separated into two cohorts: 1.)SDD;2.)required a longer length-of-stay(LOS). The primary outcome was an ED visit within 90-days of the index operation. Secondary outcomes included reasons for ED visits and readmission rates. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare the two groups while accounting for significant demographic variables. RESULTS:Of the 24,933 patients included, 1,725(7%) were SDD and 23,208(93%) required a longer LOS. The overall rate of 90-day ED visits was significantly lower for patients who were SDD compared to non-SDD (1.6%vs.4.0%,p=0.004). However, when stratified based on the reason for ED visit, no single cause was significant between the two cohorts. The most commonly reported reasons were pain (32.1%vs.26.7%,p=0.064) and other non-orthopedic related medical issues (25.0%vs.29.5%,p=0.206). Among those who presented to the ED, the readmission rate did not statistically differ (25.0%vs.23.4%,p=0.131). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients that underwent SDD were less likely to present to the ED within 90-days following their surgery compared to non-SDD. Approximately three-fourths of the patients in both cohorts that visited the ED did not require readmission. Future efforts should focus on developing interventions to reduce the burden of these visits on the healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Preoperative anemia (POA) is a significant predictor for adverse outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current literature has studied POA stratified by severity. This study aims to find a threshold preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) value for increased risk of adverse outcomes in THA. METHODS:This was a retrospective analysis of primary THA patients with preoperative Hb values from 2014-2021 from an academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Demographics, surgical data, and post-operative outcomes were collected. Patients without preoperative Hb values within the electronic health record (EHR) system or values acquired >30 days preoperatively were excluded. Patients were grouped based on POA severity using WHO criteria. Secondary analysis using discrete preoperative Hb values was performed. P-values were calculated using ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square/Fisher's exact testing with p<0.05 considered significant. RESULTS:A total of 1,347 patients were included, 771(57.2%) patients with POA and 576(42.8%) with normal pre-operative Hb. In the POA group, 292(37.9%) were mild, 445(57.7%) moderate, and 34(4.4%) severe. Increased length of stay (LOS) was seen in moderate (3.9+4.3vs.2.4+2.1,p<0.001) and severe (5.0+3.4vs.2.4+2.1,p<0.0001) groups compared to control. The severe group had higher 90-day readmission and revision rates compared to control. Analysis by discrete Hb values showed increased LOS in Hb values <11g/dL and a greater proportion of patients with Hb values <12g/dL were discharged to skilled nursing facilities. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients with preoperative Hb <12g/dL should be assessed for other risk factors that may predispose them to post-operative complications. Further investigation is warranted to develop more robust perioperative management strategies for POA patients undergoing THA.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:As more centers introduce same-day discharge (SDD) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs, it is vital to understand the factors associated with successful outpatient TJA and whether outcomes vary for those that failed SDD. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients that are successfully discharged home the day of surgery to those that fail-to-launch (FTL) and require a longer in-hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who enrolled in our institution's SDD TJA program from 2015 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they were successfully SDD or FTL. Outcomes of interest included discharge disposition, 90-day readmissions, 90-day revisions, surgical time, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as assessed by the FJS-12 (3 months, 1 year, and 2 years), HOOS, JR, and KOOS, JR (preoperatively, 3 months, and 1 year). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Outcomes were compared using multilinear regressions, controlling for demographic differences. RESULTS:A total of 1491 patients were included. Of these, 1384 (93%) were successfully SDD while 107 (7%) FTL and required a longer length-of-stay. Patients who FTL were more likely to be non-married (p = 0.007) and ASA class III (p = 0.017) compared to those who were successfully SDD. Surgical time was significantly longer for those who FTL compared to those who were successfully SDD (100.86 vs. 83.42 min; p < 0.001). Discharge disposition (p = 0.100), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.897), 90-day revisions (p = 0.997), and all PROM scores both preoperatively and postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results support the notion that FTL is not a predictor of adverse outcomes as patients who FTL achieved similar outcomes as those who were successfully SDD. The findings of this study can aid orthopedic surgeons to educate their patients who wish to participate in a similar program, as well as patients that have concerns after they failed to go home on the day of surgery. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess the outcomes of patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) with cannulated screws for treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture (DFNF) as they were deemed too high risk to undergo hemiarthroplasty (HA). DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:One urban academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Sixteen patients treated with CRPP and 32 risk-level-matched patients treated with HA. INTERVENTION/METHODS:CRPP for patients with DFNFs who were deemed too ill to undergo HA. The concept being that CRPP would aid in pain control and facilitate mobilization and if failed, the patient could return electively after medical optimization for conversion to arthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Complications, readmissions, mortality, inpatient cost, and functional status. RESULTS:The CRPP cohort had a greater incidence of exacerbations of chronic medical conditions or new onset of acute illness and an elevated mean American Society of Anesthesiologist score. There were no differences in discharge location, length of stay, major complication rate, ambulation before discharge, or 90-day readmission rate. Patients undergoing CRPP were less likely to experience minor complications including a significantly decreased incidence of acute blood loss anemia. Three patients (18.7%) in the CRPP cohort underwent conversion to HA or THA. There was no difference in inpatient, 30-day, or 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In the acutely ill patients with DFNFs, "damage control" fixation with CRPP can be safely performed in lieu of HA to stabilize the fracture in those unable to tolerate anesthesia or the sequelae of major surgery. Patients should be followed closely to evaluate the need for secondary surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To identify factors associated with the need for reoperations in patients treated surgically for fracture nonunion. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:One urban Level 1 trauma center and an orthopaedic specialty hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:This study included 365 patients who did not and 95 patients who did undergo a reoperation after nonunion repair. INTERVENTION/METHODS:All patients who underwent fracture nonunion repair were identified. Baseline demographic, injury, and surgical information were collected. These factors were compared between patients who did and did not require an unplanned reoperation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:An unplanned reoperation after index fracture nonunion surgery. RESULTS:When compared with patients who did not undergo a reoperation after their index fracture nonunion surgery, patients who underwent at least 1 reoperation had a greater proportion of those who sustained an open fracture, a high-energy injury, initial neurologic or vascular injuries, the need for a flap or soft tissue graft at initial treatment, and lower extremity injuries with univariate analysis. Unplanned reoperation was also associated with diagnosis of "infected" nonunion at initial nonunion surgery. Multivariate analysis confirmed initial nerve or vascular injuries and positive infection status were statistically significant predictors of a reoperation. CONCLUSIONS:Initial injury characteristics such as nerve or vascular injury at initial injury and positive infection status at the index nonunion surgery were associated with the need for a secondary surgery after nonunion repair. Appropriate care of these patients should be aimed at adjusting expectations of unplanned reoperation in the future and potentially enhanced treatment strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.