Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Preoperative anemia (POA) is a significant predictor for adverse outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current literature has studied POA stratified by severity. This study aims to find a threshold preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) value for increased risk of adverse outcomes in THA. METHODS:This was a retrospective analysis of primary THA patients with preoperative Hb values from 2014-2021 from an academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Demographics, surgical data, and post-operative outcomes were collected. Patients without preoperative Hb values within the electronic health record (EHR) system or values acquired >30 days preoperatively were excluded. Patients were grouped based on POA severity using WHO criteria. Secondary analysis using discrete preoperative Hb values was performed. P-values were calculated using ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square/Fisher's exact testing with p<0.05 considered significant. RESULTS:A total of 1,347 patients were included, 771(57.2%) patients with POA and 576(42.8%) with normal pre-operative Hb. In the POA group, 292(37.9%) were mild, 445(57.7%) moderate, and 34(4.4%) severe. Increased length of stay (LOS) was seen in moderate (3.9+4.3vs.2.4+2.1,p<0.001) and severe (5.0+3.4vs.2.4+2.1,p<0.0001) groups compared to control. The severe group had higher 90-day readmission and revision rates compared to control. Analysis by discrete Hb values showed increased LOS in Hb values <11g/dL and a greater proportion of patients with Hb values <12g/dL were discharged to skilled nursing facilities. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients with preoperative Hb <12g/dL should be assessed for other risk factors that may predispose them to post-operative complications. Further investigation is warranted to develop more robust perioperative management strategies for POA patients undergoing THA.

The direct anterior approach (DAA) to the hip was initially described in the nineteenth century and has been used sporadically for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, recent increased interest in tissue-sparing and small incision arthroplasty has given rise to a sharp increase in the utilization of the DAA. Although some previous studies claimed that this approach results in less muscle damage and pain as well as rapid recovery, a paucity in the literature exists to conclusively support these claims. While the DAA may be comparable to other THA approaches, no evidence to date shows improved long-term outcomes for patients compared to other surgical approaches for THA. However, the advent of new surgical instruments and tables designed specifically for use with the DAA has made the approach more feasible for surgeons. In addition, the capacity to utilize fluoroscopy intraoperatively for component positioning is a valuable asset to the approach and can be of particular benefit for surgeons during their learning curve. An understanding of its limitations and challenges is vital for the safe employment of this technique. This review summarizes the pearls and pitfalls of the DAA for THA in order to improve the understanding of this surgical technique for hip replacement surgeons.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess the outcomes of patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) with cannulated screws for treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture (DFNF) as they were deemed too high risk to undergo hemiarthroplasty (HA). DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:One urban academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Sixteen patients treated with CRPP and 32 risk-level-matched patients treated with HA. INTERVENTION/METHODS:CRPP for patients with DFNFs who were deemed too ill to undergo HA. The concept being that CRPP would aid in pain control and facilitate mobilization and if failed, the patient could return electively after medical optimization for conversion to arthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Complications, readmissions, mortality, inpatient cost, and functional status. RESULTS:The CRPP cohort had a greater incidence of exacerbations of chronic medical conditions or new onset of acute illness and an elevated mean American Society of Anesthesiologist score. There were no differences in discharge location, length of stay, major complication rate, ambulation before discharge, or 90-day readmission rate. Patients undergoing CRPP were less likely to experience minor complications including a significantly decreased incidence of acute blood loss anemia. Three patients (18.7%) in the CRPP cohort underwent conversion to HA or THA. There was no difference in inpatient, 30-day, or 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In the acutely ill patients with DFNFs, "damage control" fixation with CRPP can be safely performed in lieu of HA to stabilize the fracture in those unable to tolerate anesthesia or the sequelae of major surgery. Patients should be followed closely to evaluate the need for secondary surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To identify factors associated with the need for reoperations in patients treated surgically for fracture nonunion. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:One urban Level 1 trauma center and an orthopaedic specialty hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:This study included 365 patients who did not and 95 patients who did undergo a reoperation after nonunion repair. INTERVENTION/METHODS:All patients who underwent fracture nonunion repair were identified. Baseline demographic, injury, and surgical information were collected. These factors were compared between patients who did and did not require an unplanned reoperation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:An unplanned reoperation after index fracture nonunion surgery. RESULTS:When compared with patients who did not undergo a reoperation after their index fracture nonunion surgery, patients who underwent at least 1 reoperation had a greater proportion of those who sustained an open fracture, a high-energy injury, initial neurologic or vascular injuries, the need for a flap or soft tissue graft at initial treatment, and lower extremity injuries with univariate analysis. Unplanned reoperation was also associated with diagnosis of "infected" nonunion at initial nonunion surgery. Multivariate analysis confirmed initial nerve or vascular injuries and positive infection status were statistically significant predictors of a reoperation. CONCLUSIONS:Initial injury characteristics such as nerve or vascular injury at initial injury and positive infection status at the index nonunion surgery were associated with the need for a secondary surgery after nonunion repair. Appropriate care of these patients should be aimed at adjusting expectations of unplanned reoperation in the future and potentially enhanced treatment strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND:The use of technology such as navigation and robotic systems may improve the accuracy of component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but its impact on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate the association between the use of intraoperative technology and PROMs in patients who underwent primary THA. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2020 and answered PROM questionnaires. Patients were separated into 3 groups depending on intraoperative technology utilization: computer-assisted navigation, robotic-assisted, or no technology (conventional) THA. Forgotten Joint Score-12 and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacemen scores were collected at various time points. Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and analysis of variance. Mean scores between groups were compared using univariate analysis of covariance, controlling for all significant demographic differences. RESULTS:Of the 1960 cases identified, 896 used navigation, 135 used robotics, and 929 used no technology. There were significant statistical differences in one-year Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement scores (85.23 vs 85.95 vs 86.76, respectively; P = .014) and two-year Forgotten Joint Score-12 scores (64.72 vs 73.35 vs 74.63, respectively; P = .004) between the 3 groups. However, these differences did not exceed the mean clinically important differences. Length of stay was statistically longest for patients who underwent conventionally performed THA versus navigation and robotics (2.22 vs 1.46 vs 1.91, respectively; P < .001). Surgical time was significantly longer for cases performed using robotics versus navigation and conventionally (119.61 vs 90.35 vs 95.35, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Statistical differences observed between all modalities are not likely to be clinically meaningful with regard to early patient-reported outcomes. Although intraoperative use of technology may improve the accuracy of implant placement, these modalities have not yet translated into improved early reported functional outcomes. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort.

We investigated whether a novel, real-time fluoroscopybased navigation system optimized component positioning and leg length in fluoroscopically aided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (DAA-THA). We retrospectively reviewed 75 fluoroscopically assisted DAA-THA performed by a single surgeon: 37 procedures used the software intraoperatively to overlay anteversion, inclination, and leg length information over the existing fluoroscopic radiograph with the aim of enhancing component positioning. The control group consisted of 38 procedures from the single surgeon's patient pool who had undergone non-navigated fluoroscopic assisted DAA-THA 1 month prior to the system's trial. Our results demonstrate that the navigation group measurements were significantly closer to the target numbers with less variation. The mean difference from target value were as follows: for anteversion (control: -4.68°, navigated: -01.0°), inclination (control: -1.87°, navigated: 0.8°), and leg length discrepancy (control: -2.59°, navigated: -0.98°). In addition, surgical time was shorter in the navigation group (75.7 vs. 74 minutes; p = 0.001). The real-time feedback and calculations provided by the navigation software provided a reproducible precision for component positioning and leg length measurement during DAA-THA.

BACKGROUND:Obesity is a growing public health concern. This study aims to identify the association of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS:):<30 (nonobese) and ≥30 (obese). FJS-12 scores were collected postoperatively at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and independent sample t-tests. Mean scores between the groups were compared using multilinear regression analysis, controlling for demographic differences. RESULTS:Of the 2130 patients included, 1378 were nonobese, and 752 were obese. Although obese patients reported lower FJS-12 scores all time periods, there were no statistical differences between the two groups at 3 months (53.61 vs 49.62;P = .689), 1 year (68.11 vs 62.45; P = .349), and 2 years (73.60 vs 65.58; P = .102). A subanalysis comparing patients who were of normal BMI (<25), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obese (≥30) followed a similar inverse trend in scores but showed no statistical differences at all postoperative time points (3m:P = .612,1y:P = .607,2y:P = .253). Mean improvement in FJS-12 scores from 3 months to 1 year (14.50 vs 12.83; P = .041), 1 year to 2 years (5.49 vs 3.13; P = .004), and from 3 months to 2 years (20.00 vs15.96; P < .001) were significantly greater for nonobese patients compared to obese patients. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While obesity trended toward lower FJS-12 scores, the differences in scores were not statistically significant compared to nonobese patients. BMI did not influence overall FJS-12 scores; however, obese patients achieved a slightly smaller statistical improvement during the first 2 years, though this may not be clinically significant. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether preoperative opioid use had any effect on clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) before and after primary, elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). The authors retrospectively reviewed 793 patients who underwent primary THA from November 2018 to March 2020 with available PROMs. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether or not they were taking opioids preoperatively. Demographics, clinical data, and PROMs (Forgotten Joint Score-12 [FJS-12], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement [HOOS, JR], and Veterans RAND 12 [VR-12] Physical Component Score [PCS] and Mental Component Score [MCS]) were collected at various time periods. Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and independent sample t tests. Clinical data and PROMs were compared using multilinear regressions. Seventy-five (10%) patients were preoperative opioid users and 718 (90%) were not. Preoperative opioid users had a longer stay (1.37 vs 1.07 days; P=.030), a longer surgical time (102.44 vs 90.20 minutes; P=.001), and higher all-cause postoperative emergency department visits (6.7% vs 2.1%; P=.033) compared with patients not taking opioids preoperatively. Preoperative HOOS, JR (46.63 vs 51.26; P=.009), VR-12 PCS (27.79 vs 31.53; P<.001), and VR-12 MCS (46.24 vs 49.33; P=.044) were significantly lower for preoperative opioid users, but 3-month and 1-year postoperative scores were not statistically different. At 3 months and 1 year, FJS-12 scores did not differ significantly. Mean improvement preoperatively to 1 year in HOOS, JR values exceeded the minimal clinically important difference, with preoperative opioid users experiencing a greater improvement (36.50 vs 33.11; P=.008). Preoperative opioid users had a longer stay, a longer surgical time, and higher all-cause emergency department visits compared with preoperatively opioid naïve patients. Although preoperative opioid users reported significantly lower preoperative PROMs, they did not statistically differ postoperatively, which indicates a larger delta improvement and similar benefits following THA. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):77-84.].

BACKGROUND:The direct anterior approach (DAA) for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has recently increased in popularity. Recent evidence has raised concerns about whether use of the DAA is associated with increased rates of superficial and deep infection. The aim of this study was to systematically assess the literature and comparatively evaluate the rate of superficial and deep infection following primary THA using the DAA and non-direct anterior (non-DAA) approaches. METHODS:This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Primary outcome measures evaluated were rates of superficial and deep infection in patients undergoing DAA and non-DAA primary THA. RESULTS:A total of 1,872 studies were identified in the original search, of which 15 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Our analysis evaluated 120,910 primary THAs, including 14,908 DAA and 106,002 non-DAA. The rate of superficial infection was 1.08% for DAA compared with 1.24% for non-DAA (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 1.30, p = 0.921). The rate of deep infection was 0.73% for DAA compared with 0.51% for non-DAA (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.32, p = 0.831). CONCLUSIONS:This study found no difference in the rate of superficial or deep infection after primary THA using the DAA versus other surgical approaches. Our results suggest that comparative infection risk need not be a primary driver in the choice of surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The majority of hip arthroplasties in the United States utilize cementless acetabular and femoral components. Despite their similarities, stem geometry can still differ. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results of two wedge-type stem designs. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective study of patients who underwent primary THA utilizing a direct anterior approach between January 2016 and January 2017. Two cohorts were established based on femoral stem design implanted. Descriptive patient characteristics and surgical and clinical data was extracted which included surgical time, length of stay (LOS), presence of pain (categorized as groin, hip, or thigh pain) at the latest follow-up, and revisions. Immediate postoperative radiographs were compared with the latest follow-up radiographs to assess limb length discrepancies, stem alignment, and stem subsidence. Results/UNASSIGNED:A total of 544 patients were included. 297 patients received the Group A stem (morphometric) and 247 patients received the Group B stem (flat-tapered). A significantly higher proportion of Group B stems subsided ≥3 mm and were in varus alignment than the Group A design. Additionally, a significantly greater number of patients who received the Group B stem reported postoperative hip and thigh pain. The logistic regression found that the Group B stem was 2.32 times more likely to subside ≥3 mm than the Group A stem. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Our study suggests modestly improved radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer instances of thigh pain, subsidence, and varus alignment in the patients who received the Group Ahip stem. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term significance.