Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate factors influencing slide in statically-locked single lag screw cephalomedullary nail (CMN) constructs for reverse obliquity (RO) fractures. METHODS:Design: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING/METHODS:A multi-center academic urban hospital system (4 hospitals). PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients with an RO fracture (OTA/AO 31A3) treated with a CMN (Gamma or TFNA) and statically-locked single lag screw from 2014 to 2024, with at least one follow-up radiograph (minimum three months or documentation of healing). OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:Lag screw sliding was measured as the difference in screw position between immediate postoperative imaging and final follow-up radiographs. Tip-to-head distance (ΔTHD) and screw protrusion ratio (ΔPR) were recorded. Patients were grouped as <5mm, 5-10mm, or >10mm slide. Comparisons included fracture subtype, nail brand, angle, and length. Bivariate analyses tested associations with slide. RESULTS:Of the 219 patients identified with a 31A3 type fracture, 85 (38.8%) met inclusion criteria. The average age was 81.0 (±9.3) years with 65 (76.5%) females. Mean radiographic follow-up was 19.9 months, with a follow-up range of 74-2,576 days. The mean slide was 7.8mm (±5.2mm). 74 patients (87.1%) had slide >2mm. ΔTHD was negligible (-0.1 ± 7.0mm), and ΔPR 0.2 (±0.1) significantly exceeded zero (p < 0.001). Neither nail length (Short: 9.4 ± 5.3mm vs. Long: 7.1 ± 5.0mm, p = 0.083), nail angle, (125°: 8.0 ± 5.4mm vs 130°: 6.5 ± 4.0mm; p = 0.286), nor nail brand had a significant effect (Gamma: 7.6 ± 5.1mm vs TFNA: 9.1 ± 6.2mm; p = 0.921). Fracture subtype (31A3.1: 9.1 ± 6.1mm vs 31A3.2: 10.4 ± 5.1mm vs 31A3.3: 6.9mm ± 4.6mm; p = 0.114) and demographic factors (p > 0.05) were not significantly associated with slide severity. CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons should expect some degree of lag screw slide and subsequent proximal fragment displacement when a Gamma nail or TFNA nail cephalomedullary nail is used for a reverse obliquity fracture, even when statically locked. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate revision and removal rates of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for elbow trauma using modern press-fit modular implants. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Urban academic medical center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients who underwent RHA (2012-2024) for isolated comminuted radial head fractures, combined head-neck fractures, terrible triad injuries, or Monteggia variants (OTA 2R1) were study eligible. Inclusion criteria consisted of treatment with press-fit modular implants and ≥1 year of clinical follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:Demographics, injury patterns, elbow range of motion, and postoperative complications-including fracture-related infection, nerve injury, periprosthetic fracture, implant resection, and non-resection procedures-were assessed. Implant survivorship was evaluated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS:250 patients were included (mean age 52.2 ± 17.8 years, range 18.1-88.3 years; mean length of follow up 43.8 ± 35.2 months, range 12.0-128.0 months, BMI 28.7 ± 6.3 kg/m2, 56.8% female). Common indications for RHA included Monteggia fractures (38.0%), isolated radial head fractures (23.6%), and terrible triad injuries (19.2%).Post-index surgery iatrogenic nerve injury occurred in 7.2%, most commonly involving the ulnar nerve. Fracture related infection occurred in 2.8% post index surgery, and one nonoperative periprosthetic fracture (0.4%) was observed.The resection rate was 7.2% (18/250), with 33.3% (6/18) of implant resection surgeries occurring within one year (mean length of follow up 43.8 ± 35.2 months, range 12.0-128.0 months). Common resection indications included postoperative stiffness (n=5), infection (n=4), and neuropathy (n=3). One-year implant survival was 97.6%, with mean survivorship of 8.5 ± 1.0 years (95% CI, 7.1-9.8).In total, 24 patients (9.6%) underwent additional non-resection procedures including nerve decompressions, elbow contracture releases with excision of heterotopic ossification, and manipulations under anesthesia.At final follow-up (mean 43.8 ± 35.2 months), mean range of motion was 125.4° flexion, -14.9° extension, 73.5° pronation, and 79.3° supination. No significant difference in length of follow-up was observed between patients with post-operative nerve injury (52.4 ± 38.2 months) and those without (42.5 ± 34.8 months, p = 0.16). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With a 7.2% resection rate and one-year implant survival of 97.6%, contemporary press-fit modular RHA demonstrated durable elbow trauma outcomes.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of autogenous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) compared with other graft types in achieving successful fracture nonunion repair. METHODS:An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on a consecutive series of patients surgically treated for fracture nonunions at an academic medical center between September 10, 2004, and August 20, 2023. Patients were analyzed based on which bone graft type-ICBG versus alternative graft types-used during their nonunion repair. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical history were compared. Outcomes included radiographic healing, time to union, postoperative complications, and revision rate. Cohorts were compared using an independent sample Student t-test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons assessed differences across treatment strategy groups. RESULTS:Five hundred fifty-six patients were treated surgically for a fracture nonunion using standard internal fixation and a "bone graft" for biologic stimulation. 57.4% of these patients were treated with autogenous ICBG; 42.6% received alternative grafts (iliac crest aspirate, allograft, bone morphogenetic, reamer-irrigation aspirator, and/or demineralized bone matrix, without autogenous cancellous iliac crest). Compared with the alternative cohort, the ICBG cohort showed greater healing success after a single nonunion surgery (95.6% ICBG versus 86.9% alternative, P < 0.001) and faster healing times (4.8 ± 2.4 months versus 7.1 ± 4.9 months, P < 0.001). Complications at the ICBG harvest site included wound infections/hematomas and iliac wing fracture. No notable differences were found in positive cultures at the time of surgery, postoperative fracture-related infection, implant failure, or neurovascular injury. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Using autogenous ICBG in the surgical repair of fracture nonunions was associated with higher healing rates compared with alternative graft types, supporting its continued role in enhancing bone healing outcomes, even in the face of infected nonunion.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect that associated glenohumeral dislocations have on outcomes following surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:This IRB-approved study reports on 301 patients, who underwent operative treatment for proximal humerus fractures at an academic medical center from January 2006 to January 2023. Fractures were classified according to the Neer system. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on whether a glenohumeral dislocation was present at the time of initial injury. Outcomes measured included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, shoulder range of motion (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), readmission rates, complications, hardware removal, and need for revision surgery. Independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analysis were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the influence of these factors on complication rate. RESULTS:230 patients sustained an isolated fracture (PHF) and 71 sustained a fracture-dislocation (FD). Significant differences were observed between the FD and PHF groups in all measured outcomes. The FD group had a poorer DASH score (24.38 ± 19.09 vs 10.54 ± 13.67; P < 0.001) and reduced range of shoulder motion in forward elevation (114° ± 40° vs 162° ± 19°; P < 0.001), external rotation (40° ± 19° vs 66° ± 19°; P < 0.001), and internal rotation (57° ± 26° vs 82° ± 21°; P < 0.001). Readmission rates were higher in the FD group (0.28 ± 0.85 vs 0.05 ± 0.28; P < 0.001). The FD cohort also had a higher rate of complications (25.35% vs 6.52%; P < 0.001), need for removal of hardware (14.08% vs 3.04%; P = 0.002), and overall revision surgery (11.27% vs 1.30%; P < 0.001). The FD cohort demonstrated a greater incidence of AVN (12.68% vs 4.35%; P = 0.012). No significant difference was observed regarding rates of fracture healing and recurrent dislocation. Multivariate analysis in the form of binary logistic regression indicated that fracture-dislocation significantly increased the complication risk (OR = 3.310, 95% CI = 1.42-7.70; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Proximal humerus fracture-dislocations are associated with worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates compared to those without dislocations. These findings highlight the potential need for specialized treatment strategies to mitigate the impact of dislocation on recovery.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the rate at which abstracts accepted for the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) Annual Meeting from 2019 to 2024 utilized the Fracture-related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group's definition for infection. METHODS:Data Sources: The data sources for this study included the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) Annual Meeting Programs from 2019-2024 and the "abstract search" portion of OTA Website. STUDY SELECTION/METHODS:All podium and poster abstract presentations that utilized keywords for infection ("fracture-related infection," "infection," or "SSI") in the title. DATA EXTRACTION/METHODS:All abstracts were reviewed, and grouped into one of the four following categories based on the methodologic descriptors used to define infection characteristics: 1) Utilized Consensus Group Definition, 2) Utilized CDC Definition [deep, superficial, organ/space, or SSI terminology], 3) Utilized an Author Specific Definition, 4) Did Not Utilize Any Definition. DATA SYNTHESIS/RESULTS:Univariate statistics were conducted to determine yearly and overall percentages of abstracts that utilized the Consensus Group's definition as compared to the other 3 definition categories. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine if the use of Consensus Group's definition varied from 2019-2024. RESULTS:52 podium abstracts and 59 poster abstracts were included. Among the podium abstracts, 4 (7.7%) utilized the Consensus Group's definition of FRI, 37 (71.2%) utilized language from the CDC definition, 4 (7.7%) used an author specific definition, and 7 (13.5%) abstracts did not utilize any definition of descriptors of infection. Poster abstracts demonstrated similar utilization of methodical infection descriptors, as 5 (8.5%) utilized the Consensus Group's definition of FRI. The number of abstracts that utilized the Consensus Group's Definition did not vary from 2019-2024 (p=0.952 for podiums, p=0.451 for posters). CONCLUSIONS:Adoption of the FRI Consensus Group's definition among accepted OTA 2019-2024 Annual Meeting abstracts was low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:IV.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Delays in time to surgery (TTS) for patients with a hip fracture negatively affect patient outcomes, including mortality. Surgery within 24 to 48 hours of admission for a hip fracture markedly reduces these risks; however, attempts at improving TTS after hip fracture have had mixed results. Drivers of delays in TTS across different settings in the United States are not well described. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify drivers of delays in TTS for patients with a hip fracture from different settings to inform where patient- and context-specific improvements in TTS may be implemented. METHODS:Semistructured interviews were completed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were completed with stakeholders involved in hip fracture care between June 2023 and October 2023. Transcripts were analyzed iteratively through a combined inductive and deductive approach. The data were analyzed to synthesize overarching themes related to drivers of delays of TTS. RESULTS:A total of 25 stakeholders, 24 orthopaedic surgeons, and 1 nurse practitioner, from 22 different hospital systems across the United States participated in semistructured interviews. Eight themes of drivers of delayed TTS emerged: (1) patient health; (2) structural drivers of health; (3) care coordination; (4) prioritization; (5) improvement climate; (6) availability; (7) incentive structure; and (8) empowerment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Eight major themes related to drivers in TTS for patients with a hip fracture were identified across hospital systems. These findings inform the process of identifying site-specific drivers of delayed TTS at individual health systems and implementing targeted improvement programs for TTS for patients with a hip fracture.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare hospital quality and patient outcomes of hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) based on the subspecialty training of the treating surgeon: orthopaedic trauma (OT) versus adult reconstruction (AR) fellowship training. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted on 1,008 elderly patients treated for an FNF with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty between 2014 and 2024. Patients were grouped by their surgeon's subspecialty training (OT versus AR). Outcomes analyzed included length of stay, complications, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, dislocations, infections, and 30-day mortality. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS:Baseline patient demographics were similar between groups, except for a higher proportion of women in the AR cohort (P = 0.008) and Black patients in the OT cohort (P = 0.016). Although age-unadjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was significantly higher in the AR group (P = 0.046), Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA) scores, which take CCI and other health factors into account, were not significantly different (P = 0.59). In-hospital outcomes, including length of stay (P = 0.89) and minor and major complication rates (P = 0.38, P = 0.38), demonstrated no significant differences between groups. Post-discharge outcomes, including readmissions (30-day: P = 0.52, 90-day: P = 0.16), infections (P = 0.25), dislocations (P = 0.89), and 30-day mortality (P = 0.14), were also similar. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:No differences were identified in any of the outcomes analyzed between OT-trained and AR-trained surgeons in our study. This suggests that when FNFs are treated at high-volume academic institutions, subspecialty training may not substantially influence the short-term results of FNFs treated with hip arthroplasty. These findings highlight the importance of timely surgical intervention rather than waiting for a particularly trained surgeon to be available.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using superiorly applied low-profile locking plates for the operative fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs). STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:This was a retrospective analysis performed at an academic institution. RESULTS:Eighty-three patients who presented with displaced, shortened MCFs were treated operatively by a single surgeon at our institution over a 10-year period. All patients received a precontoured low-profile locking plate applied in the superior position. A displaced midshaft clavicle fracture was fixed operatively using a precountered low-profile 2.7/3.5 mm locking plate applied in the superior position. Data were analyzed to evaluate time to union, final shoulder range of motion, incidence of hardware removal, and rate of postoperative complications. The cohort was 66.2% male with an average age at initial injury of 36.5 ± 14.1 years. At a mean of 3.6 ± 1.9 months, 99% of patients had united their fracture. At an average of 7.37-month follow-up, mean range of motion was 174° forward elevation, 173° abduction, 82° external rotation, and internal rotation to T7. Using the short musculoskeletal functional assessment (SMFA), the mean functional outcome index score was 4.12, bothersome index was 1.94, activity index was 1.55, emotion index was 2.51, arm and hand index was 1.14, mobility index was 0.68, and total index was 1.56. Ninety-two percent of patients had retained their hardware. There was 1 incidence of each of the following complications: infection, nonunion, hardware failure, and deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Superior clavicle plating using precontoured low-profile locking plates is an acceptable treatment modality for displaced MCF. This method yields excellent results regarding time to union, shoulder range of motion, incidence of hardware removal, and the rate of postoperative complications. Patients considering operative fixation of displaced MCF should be counseled accordingly.

BACKGROUND:Acute blood loss anemia is a common complication of hip fractures. Due to this complication, the rate of allogenic blood transfusions remains high in this patient population. More recently, surgeons have utilized intraoperative tranexamic acid as a strategy to minimize blood loss. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors and associated outcomes of blood transfusions in hip fracture patients. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:A trauma database from one academic medical center was queried for hip fracture patients (OTA/AO 31A or 31B). Demographic, clinical, quality, and cost data were obtained for each patient. A Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA), a validated risk predictive and matching tool, was calculated for each patient. Patients receiving blood transfusions during their hospitalization were identified. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors for transfusion during admission. Patients receiving transfusions were matched to patients not receiving a transfusion based on STTGMA. Comparative analyses of matched cohorts were performed. RESULTS:In total, 1,344 hip fracture patients (29.8% male and 70.2% female) with mean age 81.04 ± 10.18 were identified. Four hundred ninety-nine (37.1%) patients received a transfusion during their admission. Risk factors for transfusion included higher STTGMA scores (P = .006), lower hemoglobin levels on admission (P < .001), anticoagulation or antiplatelet use on admission (P = .019), and fracture repair with a long cephalomedullary nail (P = .005). Trauma risk score-matched cohort outcomes show transfusions correlated with increased mortality, complications, readmission, and longer, more costly hospital stays. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Surgeons should be cognizant of transfusion risk factors such as repair with long cephalomedullary nail and poorer matched outcomes correlated with patients receiving transfusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level 3.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to assess whether language affects patient time to surgery following hip fractures. METHODS:Patients >55 years who underwent operative hip fracture repair between 2014 and 2021 were reviewed for demographics, language, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were split into English (E) or non-English (NE) cohorts based on their primary language. RESULTS:A total of 1880 patients (1477 E, 403 NE) were included. The E cohort was younger, had lower body mass index, and lower American Society of Anesthesiology Score (P < .01). The E cohort had more White patients (P < .01), whereas the NE cohort had more Hispanic, Asian, and patients with unknown backgrounds (P < .01 for all). At baseline, the E cohort patients were more likely to be community ambulators (P < .01). There were no differences in time to surgery or length of stay (P > .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite poorer baseline medical conditions, NE speaking patients received similar care to English speakers highlighting the importance of an effective standardized protocol with readily available translation services. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III, Retrospective cohort study.