Faculty Bibliography

Socioeconomic pressures on medicine have redefined traditional relationships between physicians and patients, researchers and regulatory bodies, and consultants and device companies. Physicians are disheartened that the public perception of medicine, reinforced by the media, is often negative. Ethical lapses are frequently the focus of criticism. A recent example that received considerable attention is the inextricable link between physicians and medical device companies. Although both groups have clear codes defining the ethical interaction between them, expediency and loose adherence to those guidelines has been problematic. In a climate of skepticism, the house of medicine needs to reverse and not feed that skepticism.

PURPOSE: The extensor digitorum communis (EDC) splitting approach is a direct lateral approach that can provide greater visualization of the proximal radius than the posterolateral approach to the elbow. The purposes of this study were to identify the anatomic relationships of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) during the EDC splitting approach to the proximal radius and to determine its safe zone. METHODS: A fellowship-trained attending hand surgeon performed the EDC splitting approach on 15 cadaveric arms, exposing the EDC origin from the lateral epicondyle and dissecting distally to expose the supinator muscle. Calipers were used to measure the distance from the PIN to the radiocapitellar joint and to the lateral epicondyle in neutral position, full supination, and full pronation. The depth of the nerve from the most superficial aspect of the EDC was recorded for each cadaver. RESULTS: The average distances from the radiocapitellar joint to the PIN in neutral, supination, and pronation were 44.5 +/- 7.9, 40.8 +/- 8.1, and 48.2 +/- 7.9 mm, respectively. The average distances from the lateral epicondyle to the PIN in neutral, supination, and pronation were 61.7 +/- 10.9, 57.6 +/- 9.1, and 64.7 +/- 11.5 mm, respectively. The shortest distance measured from the radiocapitellar joint to the PIN in pronation was 29 mm; the shortest distance measured from the lateral epicondyle to the nerve was 42 mm. The average depth of the nerve from the most superficial aspect of the EDC was 10.2 +/- 2.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The PIN is generally safe when dissecting up to 29 mm from the radiocapitellar joint and up to 42 mm from the lateral epicondyle with the forearm in pronation.

PURPOSE: Steroid injections are commonly performed by hand surgeons for relief of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of the needle to the median nerve within the carpal tunnel and to the palmar cutaneous branch, using 2 injection techniques. METHODS: Simulated carpal tunnel injections were performed on 15 cadaveric arms using 2 methods. The first injection used a widely accepted approach in which the needle is inserted at the wrist crease, just ulnar to the palmaris longus, and directed at a 30 degrees angle to the horizontal. In the second method, the needle is positioned just ulnar to the palpable ulnar border of flexor carpi radialis and angled 30 degrees to the horizontal. Specimens were dissected using an open carpal tunnel release. Calipers measured the distance from each needle to the median nerve within the carpal tunnel and to the palmar cutaneous branch. RESULTS: Using the first injection method, the needle pierced the median nerve in 4 specimens, and its mean distance from the nerve measured 1.34 mm +/- 1.83 mm. With the second injection method, the median nerve was pierced in 1 specimen, and the needle averaged a distance of 4.79 mm +/- 3.96 mm from the nerve. In the first approach, the needle averaged 9.47 mm +/- 4.11 mm from the palmar cutaneous branch, compared to 1.74 mm +/- 1.59 mm with the second technique. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians must exercise caution when performing carpal tunnel injections to avoid intraneural injection. The needle was a statistically significant shorter distance to the median nerve with the traditional injection method; however, the alterative method risks injury to the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve.

PURPOSE: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is a reliable technique for treating 2- and 3-part distal radius fractures. There are currently no data that demonstrate the proximity of at-risk nerves and tendons during percutaneous placement of 5 commonly used K-wires. Whereas the previous literature notes the risk of superficial radial nerve injury with K-wire insertion into the radial styloid, the current study provides specific distances, not only to the superficial radial nerve (SRN) but also to the tendons of the first through fifth extensor compartments during K-wire insertion. METHODS: K-wires (1.5 mm or 0.059 in) were placed percutaneously into the distal radius of 15 cadaver specimens, simulating fixation of a distal radius fracture. After dissection, the distance from the K-wires to the extensor tendons and branches of the SRN were measured and tabulated. RESULTS: The volar radial styloid K-wire was an average distance of 1.47 mm +/- 1.7 from the closest branch of the SRN. One penetrated a branch of the SRN. The dorsal radial styloid K-wire was an average distance of 0.35 mm +/- 0.64 from the closest branch of the SRN. No tendons in the first compartment were found penetrated by or touching the K-wires. The transverse radial K-wire was an average distance of 1.07 mm +/- 1.57 from the branches or trunk of the SRN. One K-wire was found piercing the volar branch of the SRN, and 1 K-wire was found piercing the abductor pollicis longus. The dorsal rim K-wire was an average of 2.94 mm +/- 2.11 from the ulnar aspect of the extensor pollicis longus and an average of 1.44 mm +/- 1.65 from the radial aspect of the extensor digitorum communis. The dorsoulnar K-wire was an average distance of 1.88 mm +/- 1.6 ulnar or radial to the extensor digiti quinti proprius and penetrated it in three specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The volar radial styloid, transverse radial, and dorsoulnar K-wires all penetrated either tendons or nerves. It is therefore prudent to make a small incision to identify and protect the underlying structures prior to placement of K-wires used for the fixation of distal radius fractures. Also, care must be taken not to place the dorsal K-wires more than 5 mm ulnar to Lister's tubercle to avoid extensor digitorum communis injury.

This study compared patients with basal joint arthritis who underwent either ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) or trapeziometacarpal interposition arthroplasty (TMIA). Twenty-two consecutive LRTI and 22 TMIA procedures were compared. Arthritis was graded using the staging system of Eaton. In the LRTI group, 1 patient (4.5%) had stage II, 3 patients (13.6%) had stage III, and 14 patients (15 LRTI procedures; 68.1%) had stage IV disease; 3 patients had previous silicone implants (13.6%). In the TMIA group, 3 patients (13.6%) had stage II and 19 patients (86.4%) had stage III disease. Mean age was 62.5 years in LRTI patients and 54.7 years in TMIA patients (P=.005). Mean follow-up was 48 months for both groups. Thumb shortening was determined using preoperative lateral and follow-up pinch lateral radiographs. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Pinch strength averaged 8.1 lb for LRTI and 12.6 lbs for TMIA patients; this difference was significant (P<.002). Patients in both groups had high overall satisfaction rates, with scores averaging 8.5 for LRTI patients and 9.2 for TMIA patients. Thumb metacarpal proximal migration was 20.5% in the LRTI group, and 6.5% in the TMIA group; this difference was significant (P=.0006). There was no statistically significant linear correlation between proximal migration and pinch strength (R=0.32, P=.13). Five TMIA patients required revision to LRTI. Patients in both groups reported high satisfaction. Pinch strength was greater in TMIA patients, and proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal was greater in LRTI patients. There was no correlation between proximal metacarpal migration and pinch strength. Increased pinch strength with TMIA may not be sufficiently advantageous to outweigh the risk for revision surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the long-term outcomes of patients with distal radius fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 54 patients with 55 AO type A2, A3, C1, or C2 distal radius fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The average age of the patients was 57 years. All patients returned for follow-up examination at an average of 59 months, with a minimum of 22 months. Measurements included active range of motion, grip strength, pain assessment, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, and final radiographic assessment. The paired t-test was used to determine significant differences. RESULTS: All fractures healed within 6 weeks. Active range of motion and grip strength of the injured wrist were statistically equal to those of the uninjured wrist for each of the parameters except wrist flexion and forearm supination. However, the difference in wrist flexion was 5 degrees and the difference in supination was 4 degrees , both of which are of little clinical importance. Eighty-five percent of patients were pain free. Radiographic parameters comparing the immediate postoperative view with the views taken at final follow-up showed no significant differences. One patient required reoperation for loss of reduction after a fall in the preoperative period, and 3 others had minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for distal radius fractures had excellent range of motion, normal Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, and no significant differences in the radiographic parameters between fracture fixation and fracture healing. Complications were few. Pinning is an efficacious, low-cost treatment option for 2- and 3-part distal radius fractures with excellent long-term results. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

PURPOSE: Radial collateral ligament (RCL) injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint are much less common than ulnar collateral ligament injuries. Cast or splint immobilization is recommended for treating grade I and grade II tears; however, there is no consensus for treating grade III (complete) tears of the RCL. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of repair of acute grade III tears of the RCL and evaluate the efficacy of late reconstruction for chronic instability. METHODS: From 1986 to 2001 there were 26 patients (16 in the repair group, 10 in the reconstruction group) who were reviewed retrospectively and examined clinically after either repair or reconstruction of the RCL of the thumb. The repair group had surgery at a mean of 2.5 weeks after injury and was evaluated at a mean follow-up time of 4.6 years. The reconstruction group had surgery at a mean of 6.8 months after injury and was evaluated at a mean follow-up time of 5.0 years. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 59 months, there were no statistically significant differences in MCP or interphalangeal joint motion, grip or pinch strength, or MCP joint stability between the 2 groups. Based on a newly developed grading system there were 12 excellent and 3 good results in the repair group and 8 excellent and 2 good results in the reconstruction group. Overall satisfaction was excellent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the repair of acute grade III RCL injuries and reconstruction of chronic grade III RCL tears of the thumb MCP joint to prevent the development of a painful unstable thumb and possibly to prevent the development of MCP joint arthritis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV.

The neurovascular and muscular anatomy about the humerus precludes the use of a truly "safe" fully extensile approach. Working around a spiraling radial nerve at the posterior midshaft requires either a transmuscular dissection or a triceps-avoiding paramuscular technique. To gain maximal exposure, the radial nerve must be mobilized at the spiral groove. For exposure of only the proximal humeral shaft, many surgeons prefer the anterolateral approach because it uses the internervous plane between the axillary and deltoid nerves proximally and the radial and musculocutaneous nerves distally. Proximally, the deltopectoral approach to the shoulder continues to be the most widely used. However, the lateral deltoid-splitting approach is a viable, less invasive approach for both rotator cuff repair and fixation of valgus-impacted proximal humeral fractures. Distally, intra-articular exposure is dependent on triceps mobilization, either by olecranon osteotomy or triceps release; this exposure can be coupled with either a triceps-splitting or a paratricipital approach for proximal extension.