Faculty Bibliography

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a procedure in which amputated nerves are transferred to motor branches of functionally expendable muscles, which can then serve as "biological amplifiers" of neurologic information. It is a technique that was developed with the primary intent of improving myoelectric prosthesis control in high level upper extremity amputees. Over time, TMR has been shown to confer significant benefits in terms of both residual and phantom limb pain and as such has become a powerful tool in neuroma management in amputees and non-amputees. This review first discusses general principles of amputation management in the upper extremity, including the different types of prosthetics that are available for these patients. The history, rationale, and evolution of TMR will then be outlined, followed by several relevant surgical principles. Finally, the current evidence for and against TMR will be reviewed. Robust data on the functional benefits are still needed, and future studies will continue to clarify its role in both upper and lower extremity amputees.

Restoration of upper extremity function poses a unique surgical challenge. With considerations ranging from ensuring appropriate skeletal support and musculotendinous and ligamentous anatomy, restoring adequate vascularity and innervation, and providing sufficient soft tissue coverage, upper extremity injuries present a diverse range of reconstructive problems. Recent history has been marked by an expansion of novel techniques for addressing these complex issues. Sophisticated modalities, such as targeted muscle reinnervation, free functional muscle transfer, and vascularized composite allotransplantation, have become some of the most powerful tools in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. This review article aims to define the distinguishing features of each of these modalities and reviews some of their unique advantages and limitations.

Regional blocks are being increasingly utilized for anesthesia for various orthopedic procedures. Several studies have shown that regional anesthesia has fewer side effects and improved postoperative pain relief compared to general anesthesia, but regional blocks are not without risks. We present case reports of 2 patients who experienced posterior shoulder instability, one of whom had a posterior shoulder dislocation, immediately in the postanesthesia care unit after undergoing hand surgery with regional anesthesia. This paper highlights the importance of being aware that patients might be at increased risk of shoulder instability after upper extremity regional anesthesia, and appropriate perioperative precautions should be taken.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used in carpal tunnel syndrome; however, recent literature has demonstrated risk of postoperative infection associated with preoperative CSIs in other orthopedic fields. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of CSIs and postoperative infection following carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS:A single-center retrospective review was conducted from 2010 to 2019 to identify patients who underwent CTR with subsequent antibiotic prescription for chart-documented wound infection. A demographically-matched cohort of 100 patients was identified for comparison. Information on patient demographics, comorbidities, injection history, and presence of postoperative infection was collected. RESULTS:Thirty-nine patients (0.67% of all CTR patients) were identified with postoperative infections, 3 of which (0.05% of all CTR patients) were deep infections. In the infection cohort, 16 of 39 (41%) patients received an injection prior to surgery, whereas 16 of 100 (16%) patients in the control cohort received an injection. History of CSI was significantly more common in patients with postoperative infection, and patients in the infection cohort had a significantly shorter average time from injection to surgery by approximately 55 days. CONCLUSIONS:Corticosteroid injections in the preoperative period are associated with postoperative infection after CTR. Proximity of injection to time of surgery plays a role, although comorbidities, the corticosteroid dose, and frequency of injection require further study to determine risk contribution. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic III.

BACKGROUND:Given the current national conundrum of decreasing microsurgery case volume performed by hand surgery fellows despite interest, program directors were surveyed to evaluate opinions of exposure gaps in training and to determine the current state of microsurgery training in 2020. METHODS:Anonymous national surveys were distributed to hand surgery fellowship program directors by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Subgroups were compared by training location and size of the fellowship program. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education public national data on graduate case log procedures by hand surgery fellows were reviewed. RESULTS:Eighty-eight surveys were distributed by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand to hand surgery fellowship program directors with a 44% (n = 39) response rate. Hand surgery fellowship programs from 19 US states participated. Most program's fellows had previous orthopedic surgery residency training with 41.03% of programs surveyed having 100% orthopedic surgery-trained fellows. The average number of weekly vascular microsurgical cases ranged from 25% of fellowships having no microsurgery cases per week, 46.2% having 1 per week, and only 7.7% having 5 or more cases per week. However, 60.5% of program directors prioritized a microvascular surgery case as the most valuable educational opportunity for fellows. Most program directors agreed (79.5%) that a 1-year hand surgery fellowship is sufficient to train a competent hand surgeon, who is proficient in microsurgery. In contrast, the majority disagreed (53.8%) that hand surgery microsurgery skills after a 1-year hand surgery fellowship are equivalent among graduates, regardless of a prior plastic surgery or orthopedic surgery residency training. There was a statistically significant difference in program directors' responses by geographic location regarding prior residency background impacting microsurgical skills (Kendall Ï„, -0.439; P = 0.001). Graduate case log data revealed an increasing trend in the number of microsurgery procedures performed by orthopedic hand surgery fellows until 2014, with a decline in cases per year and stagnating trend at 7% thereafter. CONCLUSIONS:In 2020, most hand surgery fellowship program directors highly value and prioritize microsurgery exposure for their hand surgery fellows' education despite the decrease in case volume for hand surgery fellows.

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:To describe the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes in patients with complex region pain syndrome (CRPS) following shoulder surgeries. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Three patients were diagnosed with CRPS according to the Budapest criteria. Patients were followed up prospectively at regular intervals for a minimum of 2 years. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, physical examination findings, treatment received, and outcomes were collected and reported. Results/UNASSIGNED:The minimum time interval between surgery and diagnosis was 3 weeks (average, 8 weeks). The index procedures included 2 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and 1 open Latarjet. Neurologic pain, muscle spasms, hand and wrist swelling, and joint stiffness were seen in the shoulder, wrist, and hand, but the elbow was spared in all patients. Despite the use of multimodal treatment modalities, the symptoms were refractory to treatment for prolonged periods (range, 6-12 months). Hand and wrist symptoms took an average of 4 months longer than shoulder symptoms to improve. At the latest follow-up (range, 24-26 months), varying degrees of residual hand dysfunction, pain, and inability to make a fist or fully extend the fingers were noted in all 3 patients. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:CPRS type 1 following shoulder surgery is a disabling condition with a long-protracted clinical course. CRPS can present as early as few weeks after shoulder surgery, with symptoms of neuropathic pain, spasm, and stiffness affecting the entire upper-extremity joints except the elbow. CRPS symptoms resolve earlier in the shoulder compared with the wrist and hand, with pain improving first, followed by recovery of motion and function. Residual stiffness affecting grip function is last to recover and can present up to 2 years after onset of symptoms. Although prompt recognition and multimodal approach are considered the mainstay of treatment, there is no gold standard treatment modality that can reproducibly alter the natural history of CRPS. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:IV, therapeutic case series.