Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The appropriate use criteria for revascularization of stable ischemic heart disease have not been evaluated using randomized data. Using data from the randomized ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches; July 2012 to January 2018, 37 countries), the health status benefits of an invasive strategy over a conservative one were examined within appropriate use criteria scenarios. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Among 1833 participants mapped to 36 appropriate use criteria scenarios, symptom status was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 at 1 year for each scenario and for each of the 6 patient characteristics used to define the scenarios. Coronary anatomy and SYNTAX(Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and cardiac surgery) scores were measured using coronary computed tomography angiography. Treatment effects are expressed as an odds ratio for a better health status outcome with an invasive versus conservative treatment strategy using Bayesian hierarchical proportional odds models. Differences in the primary clinical outcome were similarly examined. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The mean age was 63 years, 81% were male, and 71% were White. Diabetes was present in 28% and multivessel disease in 51%. Most clinical scenarios favored invasive for better 1-year health status. The benefit of an invasive strategy on Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency scores was reduced for asymptomatic patients (odds ratio [95% credible interval], 1.16 [0.66-1.71] versus 2.26 [1.75-2.80]), as well as for those on no antianginal medications. Diabetes, number of diseased vessels, proximal left anterior descending coronary artery location, and SYNTAX score did not effectively identify patients with better health status after invasive treatment, and minimal differences in clinical events were observed. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Applying the randomization scheme from the ISCHEMIA trial to appropriate clinical scenarios revealed baseline symptoms and antianginal therapy to be the primary drivers of health status benefits from invasive management. Consideration should be given to reducing the patient characteristics collected to generate appropriateness ratings to improve the feasibility of future data collection. REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01471522.

BACKGROUND:Women with chronic coronary disease have more frequent angina and worse health status than men, despite having less coronary artery disease (CAD). We examined whether perceived stress and depressive symptoms mediate sex differences in angina, and whether this relationship differs in the setting of obstructive CAD or ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). METHODS:We analyzed the association between sex, stress (Perceived Stress Scale-4) and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) on angina-related health status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]) at enrollment in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial and CIAO-ISCHEMIA (Changes in Ischemia and Angina Over 1 Year Among ISCHEMIA Trial Screen Failures With No Obstructive CAD on Coronary CT [Computed Tomography] Angiography) ancillary study. RESULTS:=0.012). Higher stress and depressive symptoms were associated with worse angina in both cohorts. Female sex, Perceived Stress Scale-4 score, and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 score were each independently associated with lower SAQ summary score, but CAD versus INOCA cohort was not. There was no interaction between sex and stress (-0.39 [95% CI, -1.01 to 0.23]) or sex and depression (-0.00 [95% CI, -0.53 to 0.53]) on SAQ summary score. CONCLUSIONS:High stress and depressive symptoms were independently associated with worse angina and poorer health status, without interaction with sex with or without obstructive CAD. Factors other than stress or depression contribute to worse health status in women with obstructive CAD or INOCA. REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT02347215, NCT01471522.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is critical end-organ hypoperfusion attributable to reduced cardiac output. Acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with CS (AMI-CS) has high mortality. Clinical research is challenging in such patients as they often cannot provide consent, lack available legal representatives, and require initiation of therapy. Multiple trials have enrolled patients with AMI-CS outside the United States under deferred consent. Trials in the United States have enrolled patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest under exception from informed consent (EFIC). However, AMI-CS has a longer therapeutic window to initiate treatment than out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and more patients or their representatives can engage in treatment decisions. We provide a rationale for how a trial enrolling patients with AMI-CS could qualify for conduct using EFIC by meeting each criterion specified in US human subject regulations. AMI-CS is a life-threatening situation, available treatments are unsatisfactory, and collection of valid evidence is necessary. Obtaining informed consent is often not feasible, and trial participation could benefit subjects. Only enrolling consented patients is impracticable and could reduce the study's generalizability. We propose a therapeutic window of 30 minutes within the study intervention must be initiated, with consent sought within 15 minutes, respecting any refusal or objection to enrollment, and otherwise enrollment under EFIC. A trial could enroll patients with AMI-CS under EFIC and can involve both patients and their representatives. Successful use of EFIC in trials of other interventions in patients with CS or enrolling patients with other acute cardiovascular conditions could increase the available evidence base to improve care.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Elevated perceived stress is associated with adverse outcomes following myocardial infarction (MI) and may account for poorer recovery among women vs men. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:This randomized controlled trial tested effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on stress levels among women with MI. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Women with elevated stress (Perceived Stress Scale [PSS-4]≥6) at least 2 months after MI were enrolled from 12 hospitals in the United States and Canada and via community advertising. Participants were randomized to a remotely delivered mindfulness intervention (MBCT-Brief) or heart disease education, both 8 weeks long. Follow-up was 6 months. Changes in stress (PSS-10; primary outcome) and secondary outcomes (depressive symptoms, anxiety, quality of life, disease-specific health status, actigraphy-assessed sleep) were compared between groups. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:MBCT-Brief was associated with greater 6-month reductions in stress than an active control among adherent participants. More frequent mindfulness practice was associated with greater improvements in psychological outcomes. Strategies to engage women with MI in mindfulness training and support regular home practice may enhance these effects.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Reported results of clinical trials assessing higher-dose anticoagulation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have been inconsistent. PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:To estimate the association of higher- versus lower-dose anticoagulation with clinical outcomes. DATA SOURCES/UNASSIGNED:Randomized trials were identified from the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov with no restriction by trial status or language. STUDY SELECTION/UNASSIGNED:Eligible randomized trials assigned patients hospitalized for COVID-19 to higher- versus lower-dose anticoagulation. DATA EXTRACTION/UNASSIGNED:20 eligible trials provided data in a prospectively agreed format. Two further studies were included based on published data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding. DATA SYNTHESIS/UNASSIGNED: = 0%; 10 trials, 3897 patients, 2935 receiving no or low oxygen at randomization) for intermediate- versus prophylactic-dose anticoagulation. Treatment effects appeared broadly consistent across predefined patient subgroups, although some analyses were limited in power. Higher- compared with lower-dose anticoagulation was associated with fewer thromboembolic events, but a greater risk for major bleeding. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Therapeutic-dose compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation reduced 28-day mortality. Mortality was similar for intermediate-dose compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation and higher for therapeutic-dose compared with intermediate-dose anticoagulation, although this comparison was not estimated precisely. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE/UNASSIGNED:No direct funding. (PROSPERO: CRD42020213461).

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Among older adults with ischemic heart disease, participation in traditional ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains low. While mobile health CR (mHealth-CR) provides a novel opportunity to deliver care, age-specific impairments to technology use may limit uptake, and efficacy data are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To test whether mHealth-CR improves functional capacity in older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:The RESILIENT phase 2, multicenter, randomized clinical trial recruited patients aged 65 years or older with ischemic heart disease (defined as a hospital visit for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization) from 5 academic hospitals in New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts between January 9, 2020, and April 22, 2024. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:Participants were randomized 3:1 to mHealth-CR or usual care. mHealth-CR consisted of commercially available software delivered on a tablet computer, coupled with remote monitoring and weekly exercise therapist telephone calls, delivered over a 3-month duration. As RESILIENT was a trial conducted in a routine care setting to inform decision-making, participants in both arms were also allowed to receive traditional CR at their cardiologist's discretion. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was change from baseline to 3 months in functional capacity, measured by 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes were health status (12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]), residual angina, and impairment in activities of daily living. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 400 participants (median age, 71.0 years [range, 65.0-91.0 years]; 291 [72.8%] male) were randomized to mHealth-CR (n = 298) or usual care (n = 102) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Of those, 356 participants (89.0%) returned in person for 6MWD assessment at 3 months. For the primary outcome, there was no adjusted difference in 6MWD between participants receiving mHealth-CR vs usual care (15.6 m; 95% CI, -0.3 to 31.5 m; P = .06). Among subgroups, there was an improvement in 6MWD among women (36.6 m; 95% CI, 8.7-64.4 m). There were no differences in any secondary outcomes between groups (eg, adjusted difference in SF-12 physical component scores at 3 months: -1.9 points; 95% CI, -3.9 to 0.2 points). Based on inverse propensity score weighting, there was no effect of mHealth-CR on 6MWD among those who did not attend traditional CR (25.7 m; 95% CI, -8.7 to 60.2 m). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this randomized clinical trial of mHealth-CR vs usual care, mHealth-CR did not significantly increase 6MWD or result in improvements in secondary outcomes. The findings suggest the older adult population may require more age-tailored mHealth strategies to effectively improve outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03978130.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The relationship between the extent and severity of stress-induced ischemia and the extent and severity of anatomic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with obstructive CAD is multifactorial and includes the intensity of stress achieved, type of testing used, presence and extent of prior infarction, collateral blood flow, plaque characteristics, microvascular disease, coronary vasomotor tone, and genetic factors. Among chronic coronary disease participants with site-determined moderate or severe ischemia, we investigated associations between ischemia severity on stress testing and the extent of CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Clinically indicated stress testing included nuclear imaging, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, or nonimaging exercise tolerance test. Among those with preserved renal function who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography, we examined relationships between ischemia and CAD by coronary computed tomography angiography, overall, and by stress test modality, regardless of subsequent randomization. Core laboratories categorized ischemia as severe, moderate, mild, or none, while the extent and severity of anatomic CAD were categorized based on the modified Duke prognostic index. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 3601 participants with interpretable stress tests and coronary computed tomography angiography, ischemia severity was weakly associated with CAD extent/severity (r=0.27), with modest variability in strength of association by modality: nuclear (n=1532; r=0.40), echocardiography (n=827; r=0.15), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (n=108; r=0.31), and exercise tolerance test (n=1134; r=0.18). The extent of infarction on nuclear imaging and echocardiography was weakly associated with CAD extent/severity. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Overall, ischemia severity on stress testing showed weak to moderate associations with the anatomic extent of CAD in this cohort with moderate or severe ischemia on local interpretation and controlled symptoms. REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01471522.

AbstractIn response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute launched five multisite clinical trials testing candidate host tissue-directed medical interventions to hasten recovery, improve function, and reduce morbidity and mortality. Speed, flexibility, and collaboration were essential. This article from the Steering and Executive committees describes the Collaborating Network of Networks for Evaluating Covid-19 and Therapeutic Strategies (CONNECTS) research program that enrolled 6690 participants and evaluated 18 intervention strategies using 10 molecular agents across the care continuum (outpatient, inpatient, and post discharge), and reports lessons learned from this initiative. Successes include rapid trial execution through collaboration and adaptive platform designs. Challenges that impeded efficiency included time required to execute subcontracts, constraints on clinical research workforce, and limited research infrastructure in nonacademic settings.