Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Rome III incorporates changes in the definition of functional gastrointestinal disorder that involve a 3-month recall time for symptoms, rather than 1-year. AIM/OBJECTIVE:To validate a new version of the Talley-Bowel Disease Questionnaire (Talley-BDQ) and assess the impact of recall time period on the prevalence of symptoms. METHODS:A sample of community residents were randomly mailed a survey using 1-year (n = 396) or 3-month recall period (n = 374). We evaluated the reliability and the concurrent validity of the two versions of the questionnaire. The proportions of subjects reporting symptoms in the two versions were compared. RESULTS:The median (IQR) kappa on symptom-related questions was 0.70 (0.57-0.76) from the 1-year version and 0.66 (0.56-0.77) from the 3-month version. A median kappa of 0.39 (0.19-0.70) and 0.58 (0.39-0.73) was observed for concurrent validation of the 1-year and 3-month versions respectively. Except for gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, no differences were observed on the prevalence of clinically relevant symptoms. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The revised Talley-BDQ is reliable, with excellent reproducibility and validity. There were few differences in reported symptom rates between the 3-month and 1-year recall time versions of the questionnaire. A 1-year recall time may more efficiently capture infrequent or subtle symptoms.

BACKGROUND:Individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) report abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea, symptoms similar to those in celiac disease. Studies suggest that the prevalence of celiac disease is increased in individuals with IBS; however, evidence is conflicting, and current guidelines do not always recommend screening for celiac disease in these individuals. METHODS:We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate prevalence of celiac disease in unselected adults who met diagnostic criteria for IBS. MEDLINE (1950 to May 31, 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to May 31, 2008) were searched. Case series and case-control studies that used serologic tests for celiac disease were eligible for inclusion. Prevalence of positive serologic indications of celiac disease and biopsy-proved celiac disease were extracted and pooled for all studies and were compared between cases and controls using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS:Fourteen studies were identified comprising 4204 individuals, of whom 2278 (54%) met diagnostic criteria for IBS. Pooled prevalence of positive IgA-class antigliadin antibodies, either positive endomysial antibodies or tissue transglutaminase, and biopsy-proved celiac disease were 4.0% (95% confidence interval, 1.7-7.2), 1.63% (0.7-3.0), and 4.1% (1.9-7.0), respectively. Pooled odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for positive IgA-class antigliadin antibodies, either positive endomysial antibodies or tissue transglutaminase, and biopsy-proved celiac disease in cases meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS compared with controls without IBS were 3.40 (1.62-7.13), 2.94 (1.36-6.35), and 4.34 (1.78-10.6). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Prevalence of biopsy-proved celiac disease in cases meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS was more than 4-fold that in controls without IBS.

GOALS/OBJECTIVE:To report the use of pH-impedance testing in evaluating patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with atypical symptoms. BACKGROUND:Although the role of acid reflux in causing atypical GERD symptoms is generally accepted, the role, if any, of nonacid reflux is controversial, largely because until recently it has not been possible to detect nonacid reflux. The advent of intraluminal combined pH impedance testing (MII-pH), to detect nonacid reflux has heightened interest in its possible contribution to atypical symptoms. STUDY/METHODS:Fifty consecutive patients referred for MII-pH testing to evaluate the cause of atypical symptoms presumed due to GERD were evaluated. The symptoms were either refractory to acid inhibition therapy or so atypical that further work up was desired by the referring physician. Patients underwent MII-pH testing to determine whether reflux was present, and, if so, if it was due to acid, nonacid, or gas. RESULTS:Only 16%, 22%, and 2% patients were found to have symptoms due to acid reflux, nonacid reflux, or both, respectively. Ten percent of these patients had gas reflux. MII-pH testing was useful in redirecting the management of patients who did not have reflux as the cause of their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:MII-pH testing is useful in determining whether gastroesophageal reflux is present in patients with atypical symptoms that have not responded to proton pump inhibitor therapy. It also distinguishes between reflux due to acid, nonacid, and gas, with consequences for management.

The role of acid in the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is extensively studied and well accepted. The role of nonacid reflux is poorly understood and its diagnosis is elusive. It has been postulated that the nonacid component of refluxate may play a significant role in causing esophageal mucosal damage and extra esophageal manifestations of GERD. We report a patient with severe nonacid reflux causing recurrent pneumonias and choking episodes resulting in serious morbidity and extensive utilization of health care resources. The diagnosis was established by combined intraluminal pH-impedance testing. Medical management with prokinetic agents and proton pump inhibitors failed. The patient's symptoms were ultimately controlled by a permanent jejunostomy. This patient illustrates the combined challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of nonacid reflux, particularly as it relates to larnyngopharyngeal and pulmonary manifestations.