Faculty Bibliography

Lung transplant recipients (LTR) with Covid-19 may have higher mortality than non-lung solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), but direct comparisons are limited. Risk factors for mortality specifically in LTR have not been explored. We performed a multicenter cohort study of adult SOTR with Covid-19 to compare mortality by 28-days between hospitalized LTR and non-lung SOTR. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess comorbidity-adjusted mortality among LTR vs. non-lung SOTR and to determine risk factors for death in LTR. Of 1,616 SOTR with Covid-19, 1,051 (65%) were hospitalized including 117/159 (74%) LTR and 934/1457 (64%) non-lung SOTR (p=0.02). Mortality was higher among LTR compared to non-lung SOTR (24% vs. 16%, respectively, p=0.035) and lung transplant was independently associated with death after adjusting for age and comorbidities (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.6, p=0.05). Among LTR, independent risk factors for mortality included single lung transplant (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.7, p=0.04) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.0-12.4, p=0.05), but not age >65 years, heart failure, or obesity. Among SOTR hospitalized for Covid-19, LTR had higher mortality than non-lung SOTR. In LTR, single lung transplant and chronic allograft dysfunction were independently associated with mortality.

Purpose: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the preferred agent for pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) and bone marrow transplant (BMT); however, adverse effects may lead to the use of alternative agents. We sought to characterize the rate and reason for using alternative agents for PJP prophylaxis in SOT and BMT recipients over an 18-month period at a single institution to guide stewardship.
Method(s): SOT and BMT patients between 2/1/2018 and 8/1/2019 were included. 455 SOT and 126 BMT patients were identified and included in the final analysis; 1 SOT and 2 BMT patients were excluded due to expiration prior to initiation of PJP prophylaxis. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for initial PJP prophylaxis choice, change of initial prophylaxis, and reason for change.
Result(s): Among 454 SOT and 124 BMT recipients, most (90.1%) patients received initial prophylaxis with TMP-SMX, followed by atovaquone (9.9%). In SOT recipients, the primary reason for an initial or subsequent switch to an alternative regimen was elevated creatinine or potassium. In BMT recipients, the primary reason was cytopenias. Among patients who were switched to an alternate regimen, 34 (41%) SOT recipients and 3 (12%) BMP recipients were switched back to TMP-SMX. Among patients who were initiated on an alternate regimen, 28 (59.6%) SOT recipients and 1 (9.1%) BMT recipient were switched to TMP-SMX. Mean number of days to TMP-SMX regimen interruption was 42 days in SOT recipients and 107 days in BMT recipients (p=0.005).
Conclusion(s): While most SOT and BMT recipients received TMP-SMX for PJP prophylaxis, alternate agents were used primarily in the setting of concern for renal and hematologic adverse effects. Patients should be monitored for recovery of renal function and cell counts to evaluate the appropriateness of switching back to TMP-SMX

Purpose: The presentation of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ranges from mild illness to severe respiratory failure. Disease progression may differ in immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent hosts. Therefore, we aim to characterize COVID-19 clinical presentation and outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) to identify initial clinical factors that may predict COVID-19 associated mortality.
Method(s): We prospectively reviewed baseline demographic and clinical characteristics among adult kidney, pancreas, liver, heart and lung transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and May 5, 2020 at our transplant center in New York City. A series of chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were conducted to investigate the relationship between several predictor variables (baseline characteristics, symptoms at presentation, and baseline immunosuppression regimen) and 30-day mortality.
Result(s): 73 SOTRs (53 kidney, 8 liver, 7 heart, 3 lung, 2 heart/kidney) with SARSCoV-2 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 were included in the final analysis. Median age was 59 years (IQR 54-68) and 34.2% were female. Median time since transplant was 21 months (IQR 13-46.5). All patients were on baseline immunosuppresion as shown in table 1. The majority of patients were diagnosed in the Emergency Department. Most common presenting symptoms were cough (68.5%), gastrointestinal symptoms (54.8%) and dyspnea (45.2%) with median of 5 days from symptom onset to hospitalization. All patients had elevated inflammatory markers at time of diagnosis (median CRP 54 mg/L, median ferritin 704 ng/mL, median procalcitonin 0.11 ng/mL, median D-dimer 311 ng/mL). 84.1% of patients required supplemental oxygen, including intubation in 19.7%. 13 of 63 (21%) hospitalized patients died. Dyspnea on presentation was the only baseline or presenting patient factor found to be predictive of death (p =.004). When stratified by initial chest X-ray findings, dyspnea combined with abnormal chest X-ray predicted mortality (p=.021) while dyspnea with normal chest X-ray did not.
Conclusion(s): Presenting symptoms of dyspnea and radiographic signs of pneumonia on initial imaging predicted mortality among SOTRs with COVID-19 in our cohort. These findings can inform allocation of limited resources in COVID-19 management, including the triage and timing of COVID-19 directed therapies early in the illness course among different patient populations

HIV-positive donor to HIV-positive recipient (HIV D+/R+) transplantation is permitted in the United States under the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act. To explore safety and the risk attributable to an HIV+ donor, we performed a prospective multicenter pilot study comparing HIV D+/R+ vs HIV-negative donor to HIV+ recipient (HIV D-/R+) kidney transplantation (KT). From 3/2016 to 7/2019 at 14 centers, there were 75 HIV+ KTs: 25 D+ and 50 D- (22 recipients from D- with false positive HIV tests). Median follow-up was 1.7 years. There were no deaths nor differences in 1-year graft survival (91% D+ vs 92% D-, P = .9), 1-year mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (63 mL/min D+ vs 57 mL/min D-, P = .31), HIV breakthrough (4% D+ vs 6% D-, P > .99), infectious hospitalizations (28% vs 26%, P = .85), or opportunistic infections (16% vs 12%, P = .72). One-year rejection was higher for D+ recipients (50% vs 29%, HR: 1.83, 95% CI 0.84-3.95, P = .13) but did not reach statistical significance; rejection was lower with lymphocyte-depleting induction (21% vs 44%, HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.87, P = .03). In this multicenter pilot study directly comparing HIV D+/R+ with HIV D-/R+ KT, overall transplant and HIV outcomes were excellent; a trend toward higher rejection with D+ raises concerns that merit further investigation.

Disseminated strongyloidiasis and hyperinfection syndrome can cause significant morbidity and mortality after transplantation. Screening and treatment prior to transplantation can reduce or prevent this disease. Targeted screening of transplant candidates, based on assessed risk, fails to identify all who would benefit. We implemented universal serology-based screening for Strongyloides at our transplant center, located in a non-endemic area. Of 200 transplant candidates who were evaluated for cardiothoracic transplant from January 2018 to June 2019, 169 were screened serologically and 21 (12.4%) were seropositive. Among seropositive patients, 57% reported travel to an endemic region, 38% were born outside the USA, 38% had eosinophilia, 5% had history of gram-negative bacteremia. We estimate that universal screening for strongyloidiasis could identify an average of 17 additional candidates for preventive treatment for every 200 transplant candidates.

BACKGROUND:Transplant recipients with HIV may have worse outcomes with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to impaired T-cell function coupled with immunosuppressive drugs. Alternatively, immunosuppression might reduce inflammatory complications and/or antiretrovirals could be protective. METHODS:Prospective reporting of all cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection was required within the HOPE in Action Multicenter Consortium, a cohort of kidney and liver transplant recipients with HIV who have received organs from donors with and without HIV at 32 transplant centers in the United States. RESULTS:Between March 20, 2020 and September 25, 2020, there were 11 COVID-19 cases among 291 kidney and liver recipients with HIV (4%). In those with COVID-19, median age was 59 y, 10 were male, 8 were kidney recipients, and 5 had donors with HIV. A higher proportion of recipients with COVID-19 compared with the overall HOPE in the Action cohort were Hispanic (55% versus 12%) and received transplants in New York City (73% versus 34%, P < 0.05). Most (10/11, 91%) were hospitalized. High-level oxygen support was required in 7 and intensive care in 5; 1 participant opted for palliative care instead of transfer to the intensive care unit. HIV RNA was undetectable in all. Median absolute lymphocyte count was 0.3 × 103 cells/μL. Median CD4 pre-COVID-19 was 298 cells/μL, declining to <200 cells/μl in 6/7 with measurements on admission. Treatment included high-dose steroids (n = 6), tocilizumab (n = 3), remdesivir (n = 2), and convalescent plasma (n = 2). Four patients (36%) died. CONCLUSIONS:Within a national prospective cohort of kidney and liver transplant recipients with HIV, we report high mortality from COVID-19.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients are at risk of significant morbidity and mortality from infection, including those circulating in the community from unexpected outbreaks. In late 2018-summer of 2019, a measles outbreak occurred in the New York City area, with a total of 649 cases reported. We developed a systematic three-part approach to address measles risk in our adult SOT program through: 1) identification of non-immune adults living in outbreak ZIP codes, 2) education focused on risk reduction for patients from outbreak ZIP codes and 3) risk reduction for non-immune patients. All waitlisted or previously transplanted patients residing in outbreak areas received a measles patient education handout. The electronic medical record of patients born in or after 1957 was reviewed for serologic evidence of measles immunity. Measles immunity testing was performed in patients without documentation of immunity. Patients who tested non-immune were offered MMR vaccination or intravenous immunoglobulin depending on their transplant phase and risk profile. Thus, we demonstrate successful implementation of a systematic risk assessment during a large measles outbreak to identify and protect at-risk SOT patients. As vaccine hesitancy persists, our strategies may be increasingly relevant to transplant centers and those caring for immunocompromised patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected transplant center activity in areas with high number of cases such as New York City and prompted reevaluation of patients awaiting organ transplant diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. To resume safe transplantation at our center, we found it necessary to (1) identify transplant candidates with possible exposure to or history of COVID-19 infection, (2) outline a clinical and laboratory assessment to determine adequate clinical recovery from COVID-19 for transplantation, and (3) determine whether the possibility of perioperative COVID-19 transmission from the patient to staff would pose unacceptable risk. Here, we describe our center's approach to proceeding with transplantation in a SARS-CoV-2 seropositive living donor kidney transplant recipient and describe early posttransplant outcomes.