Faculty Bibliography

Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis presents a challengingproblem. Surgical interventions include resectionarthroplasties, such as the Darrach procedure and hemiresectionarthroplasty, the Sauve-Kapandji procedure, andmore recently prosthetic replacement for either the ulnarhead or the entire DRUJ. Resection arthroplasties have beenassociated with complications, including instability andradioulnar convergence. The prosthetic replacements havebeen designed in an attempt to restore more normal DRUJkinematics. This paper provides a review of the anatomy andbiomechanics of the DRUJ and discusses the outcomes of theavailable surgical options for symptomatic DRUJ arthritis.The arthritic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is a difficultproblem. Many of the surgical interventionsdeveloped for this condition are associated with complications,such as instability and radioulnar convergence.Recently, prosthetic replacement of either the ulnar heador the entire DRUJ has been advocated in order to betterrestore the kinematics of the joint. A review of the anatomyand biomechanics of the DRUJ and a discussion of thenumerous surgical options and their outcomes is provided.

PURPOSE: To determine whether specific anatomic lesions of the scapholunate supporting structures are associated with the grades of scapholunate instability according to the Geissler classification. METHODS: Six fresh frozen cadaveric limbs underwent serial arthroscopic sectioning of the scapholunate supporting ligaments. To simulate a progressive scapholunate injury based on the current literature, sectioning occurred as follows: volar scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL), membranous SLIL, dorsal SLIL, radioscaphocapitate, long radiolunate, dorsal radiocarpal, dorsal intercarpal, and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid ligaments. We performed arthroscopic examination of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints after each ligamentous sectioning and recorded the appearance of the scapholunate interval. RESULTS: There was a progressive increase in Geissler grade with sequential sectioning of the scapholunate supporting ligaments. In all specimens, Geissler grade 2 injury was associated with sectioning of intrinsic ligaments only. Geissler grade 3 injury first appeared with sectioning through the dorsal SLIL and continued through sectioning of the volar extrinsic ligaments. Geissler grade 4 injury did not occur until the dorsal extrinsic ligaments were sectioned. Statistical analysis indicated a linear relationship between ligament sectioned and Geissler grade, with deeper sections associated with a higher Geissler grade. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric model, arthroscopically determined Geissler grade was associated with specific anatomic lesions of the scapholunate supporting ligaments. Sequential sectioning of the ligaments showed a progressive increase in Geissler grade. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the association of Geissler grade with pathoanatomy may aid the surgeon in deciding which reconstructive method is best.

PURPOSE: To describe the features of displaced intra-articular fractures confined to the volar rim of the distal radius and compare outcomes after their operative fixation to complete intra-articular and extra-articular fractures treated with operative fixation. METHODS: A total of 627 distal radius fractures were treated over a 6-year period. Twenty-eight patients had volar rim fractures (type 23-B3, as classified by the Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA]), all treated with operative reduction and fixation using a volar buttress plate. Clinical outcome information including radiographs, Short Form-36 health survey, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire were collected at regular postoperative intervals. Patients with volar rim fractures were compared with patients who sustained other types of operatively managed distal radius fractures (OTA types 23-A, 23-B1/B2, and 23-C). RESULTS: The most common type of volar rim fracture consisted of a single large fragment (OTA 23-B3.2; 46%), followed by comminuted fractures (OTA 23-B3.3; 36%). Restoration of radiographic parameters was similar between groups except for an increased volar tilt in volar rim fractures compared with group 23-B1/B2. Active wrist and finger motion improved in all groups except for wrist extension, which was less in the 23-B1/B2 groups. The 23-B1/B2 group had the greatest pain and worst Short Form-36 scores. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores were similar and without differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients with volar rim distal radius fractures can expect a rapid return to function with minimal risk for complications and have outcomes similar to other types of operatively treated distal radius fractures. Further investigation of type 23-B fractures (23-B1/B2) is warranted owing to evidence of diminished outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic factors have been found to be predictors of outcome for other ailments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of patient education level on pain and disability after distal radius fracture. METHODS: A series of patients with distal radius fractures (n = 335) were enrolled into a prospective research registry. Standard demographic information was obtained from patients, including a five-value categorical education variable. After treatment with closed reduction, external fixation, or internal fixation patients were evaluated for pain, function (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [DASH]), range of motion (ROM), and grip strength at standard intervals until 12 months post-injury. A series of linear mixed effects models were developed to evaluate the relationship between time from injury and education level with each of the outcomes measured. RESULTS: Complete demographic and 12-month follow-up data were available on 227 patients (75 %). There were neither group differences in mode of injury, severity, nor treatment modality after stratification by education level. Mixed effects model analyses revealed a significant linear association between level of education and measured outcomes at each follow-up point. Overall, each increase in education level demonstrated a doubling of improvement in pain, ROM, grip strength, and DASH score. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome of distal radius fracture depends on acute care and follow-up rehabilitation; however, patient-related factors indicative of socioeconomic status are becoming increasingly relevant as predictors of outcome and should be considered by the orthopaedist.

PURPOSE: In order to identify predictors for hand stiff- ness following distal radius fractures and understand the consequences of this common clinical finding, we studied 260 patients. Our null hypothesis was that we would find no predictors of post injury hand stiffness. METHODS: Baseline demographics and injury character- istics were obtained at distal radius fracture presentation. Treatment and healing was documented. Stiffness was de- fined as tip to palm distance greater than 1 cm for any one finger. Outcome parameters obtained at regular intervals included wrist and hand range of motion, radiographs, vi- sual analog pain scales, and Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaires. RESULTS: Forty-nine of 260 patients (19%) patients were considered to be "stiff" by our criteria. Grip strength was weaker for stiff patients as well. Patient demographics were similar in both groups with the "stiff" cohort having a greater mean age, p = 0.05. There was no significant differ- ence in stiffness seen in operative cases versus nonoperative cases. Injury ulnar variance was 3.1mm (SD = 3.5) in the "stiff" cohort and 1.8 (SD = 2.9) in the "non-stiff" cohort (p= 0.02). Functional disability as measured by the DASH differed (p = 0.001) between stiff and non-stiff patients for both 6 month and 1 year follow-up time points. Stiff patients were more likely than non-stiff patients to have lower grip strength at 12-month post fracture (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Older patients who present with significant ulnar variance at injury are more likely to experience hand stiffness at some time during their recovery. The develop- ment of hand stiffness is associated with poorer functional outcome than those who do not develop stiffness.

OBJECTIVES: : The purpose of this study was to evaluate forearm rotation after volar plating of the distal radius fractures with and without pronator quadratus repair. DESIGN: : This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: : The study was conducted at an Academic Medical Center. PATIENTS: : Over a 5-year period, 606 patients with distal radius fractures (OTA classifications 23-A through 23-C) were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved, prospectively collected, distal radius database. One hundred and seventy-five patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with volar plating. Of these, 112 patients had complete 1-year follow-up (6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months) and were included in this study. INTERVENTION: : Volar plating of the distal radius was performed with pronator quadratus repair (group A), versus volar plating without pronator quadratus repair (group B). Surgeries in group A were performed by a fellowship trained hand surgeon utilizing volar plates from Depuy Orthopedics (Warsaw, IN), whereas the surgeries in group B were performed by a fellowship trained orthopedic trauma surgeon utilizing volar plates from Stryker (Mahwah, NJ). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: : Primary outcomes include forearm range of motion. Secondary outcomes include grip strength, pain levels, functional outcomes (DASH scores), radiographs, and complications. RESULTS: : Baseline and demographic characteristics of the patients were similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in mean pronation (P = 0.08) at 1 year. Among secondary analyses, radial deviation was significantly different (P = 0.03); however, pain (P = 0.13) and DASH scores (P = 0.14) were not. The only patient that requested plate removal had the pronator repaired (group A). CONCLUSIONS: : We conclude that there is no advantage in repairing the pronator quadratus during volar plating of distal radius fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PURPOSE: To report radiographic, clinical, and patient-based functional outcomes following contemporary operative treatment of patients who sustained an open distal radius fracture and compare them to a similar group of patients treated operatively for closed distal radius fractures. METHODS: Over five years, 601 patients with a distal radius fracture presented to our academic medical center, including one Level 1 trauma hospital, and were prospectively enrolled in an upper extremity trauma database. Patients with open distal radius fractures underwent irrigation, debridement, and operative fixation within 24 hours of presentation. Closed distal radius fractures requiring operative fixation were treated electively. Retrospective review of the database identified eighteen open fractures of the distal radius (11 type I, 6 type II, 1 type IIIa). The open fracture patients were individually matched with eighteen closed distal radius fracture patients who underwent surgical fixation based on age, sex, injury to dominant extremity, fracture pattern, and method of fracture fixation. Clinical, radiographic, patient- based functional outcomes, and complications were recorded at routine postoperative intervals. RESULTS: Follow-up was greater than 77% in both groups at all time points. The open and closed groups were similar in regards to age, gender, BMI, race, tobacco use, income, employment status, hand dominance, injury to dominant extremity, mechanism of injury, fracture classification, method of fracture fixation, and presence of concomitant injury. Postoperative complications and reoperation rates were similar between the open and closed groups. Union rates and radiographic alignment one year postoperatively were similar between the open and closed fracture groups. At final follow-up, range of motion parameters, grip strengths, DASH indices, and subjective pain scores were similar between both groups. DISCUSSION: Open distal radius fractures treated with early debridement and fixation achieved similar outcomes to surgically treated closed fractures of the distal radius when followed for a year or more postoperatively.

Polydactyly of the hand is a difficult problem and poses a unique challenge for the hand surgeon. The embryology of limb development is complex, leading to a host of different phenotypes of polydactyly. Polydactyly can occur in any digit and is described as preaxial, postaxial, and central, based on location. Classification systems exist for each of these locations, which guide treatment options. Surgical treatment needs to address the aesthetic and functional aspect of hand reconstruction. Careful consideration and planning of surgical treatment individualized to each patient is required to obtain the best possible outcome.

Extra-articular middle phalangeal neck fractures are uncommon fractures of the hand that are often difficult to treat. Surgery is indicated when closed reduction fails; 1 option is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Maintaining closed reduction while inserting K-wires is challenging. We present a new technique for percutaneous pinning of these fractures that was developed to address these issues. Our technique uses flexion of the interphalangeal joints during K-wire insertion to maintain fracture reduction and improve fixation.

OBJECTIVE:: To compare the efficacy of anesthetic type on clinical outcomes after operative treatment of distal radius fractures. DESIGN:: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING:: Academic medical center. PATIENTS:: One hundred eighty-seven patients with a distal radius fracture (OTA type 23) were identified within a registry of 600 patients. INTERVENTION:: Patients with operative distal radius fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a volarly applied plate and screws under regional or general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: Clinical, radiographic, and patient-based functional outcomes were recorded at routine postoperative intervals. Complications were recorded. RESULTS:: One hundred eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. There were no differences between the groups with regard to patient demographics or fracture types treated. At both 3 and 6 months post surgery, pain was diminished among those patients who received a regional block. Wrist and finger range of motion for patients who received regional versus general anesthesia was improved at all follow-up points. Patients who received regional anesthesia also had higher functional scores as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand at 3 months (P = 0.04) and 6 months (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION:: Patients who are candidates should be offered regional anesthesia when undergoing repair of a displaced distal radius fracture.