Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:oermae01

Total Results:

158


Trials and Tribulations: Responses of ChatGPT to Patient Questions About Kidney Transplantation

Xu, Jingzhi; Mankowski, Michal; Vanterpool, Karen B; Strauss, Alexandra T; Lonze, Bonnie E; Orandi, Babak J; Stewart, Darren; Bae, Sunjae; Ali, Nicole; Stern, Jeffrey; Mattoo, Aprajita; Robalino, Ryan; Soomro, Irfana; Weldon, Elaina; Oermann, Eric K; Aphinyanaphongs, Yin; Sidoti, Carolyn; McAdams-DeMarco, Mara; Massie, Allan B; Gentry, Sommer E; Segev, Dorry L; Levan, Macey L
PMID: 39477825
ISSN: 1534-6080
CID: 5747132

The Evolution of Pediatric Spine Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications From 1902 to 2023

Mir, Jamshaid M; Kurland, David B; Cheung, Alexander T M; Liu, Albert; Shlobin, Nathan A; Alber, Daniel; Rai, Sumedha; Jain, Vasvi; Rodriguez-Olaverri, Juan C; Anderson, Richard C E; Lau, Darryl; Kondziolka, Douglas; Oermann, Eric K
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Pediatric spine surgery has evolved considerably over the past century. No previous study conducted a bibliometric analysis of the corpus of pediatric spine surgery. We used big data and advanced bibliometric analyses to evaluate trends in the progression of pediatric spine surgery as a distinct field since the beginning of the 20th century. METHODS:A Web of Science query was designed to capture the representative corpus of pediatric spine literature. Statistical and bibliometric analyses were performed using various Python packages and the Bibliometrix R package. RESULTS:The collection, published from 1902 to 2023, comprised a total of 11 861 articles from 61 journals and 32 715 unique authors. The overall growth rate annually for publications was 5.08%. An upsurge in publications was seen in the 1980s, after the advent of specialty and subspecialty journals. Illustratively, over 90% of all articles pertaining to pediatric spine surgery were published in the past 3 decades. International and domestic collaboration also increased exponentially over this time period. Reference publication year spectroscopy allowed us to identify 75 articles that comprise the historical roots of modern pediatric spine surgery. There was a recent lexical evolution of topics and terms toward alignment, outcomes, and patient-centric terms. Coauthorship among under-represented groups increased since 1990, but remains low, with disparities persisting across journals. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This comprehensive bibliometric analysis on the corpus of pediatric spine surgery offers insight into the evolving landscape of research, authorship, and publication trends over the past century. Advancements in the understanding of the natural history and technology have led the field to become increasingly outcomes focused, all of which have been fueled by pioneering authors. While diversity among authors improves, under-representation of various groups continues to persist, indicating a critical role for further outreach and promotion.
PMCID:11783662
PMID: 39959902
ISSN: 2834-4383
CID: 5866242

Predicting STA-MCA Anastomosis Success: Insights from FLOW 800 Hemodynamics [Letter]

Sangwon, Karl L; Oermann, Eric K; Nossek, Erez
PMID: 39307270
ISSN: 1878-8769
CID: 5766452

Hospitalization and Hospitalized Delirium Are Associated With Decreased Access to Kidney Transplantation and Increased Risk of Waitlist Mortality

Long, Jane J; Hong, Jingyao; Liu, Yi; Nalatwad, Akanksha; Li, Yiting; Ghildayal, Nidhi; Johnston, Emily A; Schwartzberg, Jordan; Ali, Nicole; Oermann, Eric; Mankowski, Michal; Gelb, Bruce E; Chanan, Emily L; Chodosh, Joshua L; Mathur, Aarti; Segev, Dorry L; McAdams-DeMarco, Mara A
BACKGROUND:Kidney transplant (KT) candidates often experience hospitalizations, increasing their delirium risk. Hospitalizations and delirium are associated with worse post-KT outcomes, yet their relationship with pre-KT outcomes is less clear. Pre-KT delirium may worsen access to KT due to its negative impact on cognition and ability to maintain overall health. METHODS:Using a prospective cohort of 2374 KT candidates evaluated at a single center (2009-2020), we abstracted hospitalizations and associated delirium records after listing via chart review. We evaluated associations between waitlist mortality and likelihood of KT with hospitalizations and hospitalized delirium using competing risk models and tested whether associations differed by gerontologic factors. RESULTS: < 0.001), with those aged ≥65 having a 61% lower likelihood of KT. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hospitalization and delirium are associated with worse pre-KT outcomes and have serious implications on candidates' access to KT. Providers should work to reduce preventable instances of delirium.
PMID: 39498973
ISSN: 1399-0012
CID: 5766752

Economics and Equity of Large Language Models: Health Care Perspective

Nagarajan, Radha; Kondo, Midori; Salas, Franz; Sezgin, Emre; Yao, Yuan; Klotzman, Vanessa; Godambe, Sandip A; Khan, Naqi; Limon, Alfonso; Stephenson, Graham; Taraman, Sharief; Walton, Nephi; Ehwerhemuepha, Louis; Pandit, Jay; Pandita, Deepti; Weiss, Michael; Golden, Charles; Gold, Adam; Henderson, John; Shippy, Angela; Celi, Leo Anthony; Hogan, William R; Oermann, Eric K; Sanger, Terence; Martel, Steven
Large language models (LLMs) continue to exhibit noteworthy capabilities across a spectrum of areas, including emerging proficiencies across the health care continuum. Successful LLM implementation and adoption depend on digital readiness, modern infrastructure, a trained workforce, privacy, and an ethical regulatory landscape. These factors can vary significantly across health care ecosystems, dictating the choice of a particular LLM implementation pathway. This perspective discusses 3 LLM implementation pathways-training from scratch pathway (TSP), fine-tuned pathway (FTP), and out-of-the-box pathway (OBP)-as potential onboarding points for health systems while facilitating equitable adoption. The choice of a particular pathway is governed by needs as well as affordability. Therefore, the risks, benefits, and economics of these pathways across 4 major cloud service providers (Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Oracle) are presented. While cost comparisons, such as on-demand and spot pricing across the cloud service providers for the 3 pathways, are presented for completeness, the usefulness of managed services and cloud enterprise tools is elucidated. Managed services can complement the traditional workforce and expertise, while enterprise tools, such as federated learning, can overcome sample size challenges when implementing LLMs using health care data. Of the 3 pathways, TSP is expected to be the most resource-intensive regarding infrastructure and workforce while providing maximum customization, enhanced transparency, and performance. Because TSP trains the LLM using enterprise health care data, it is expected to harness the digital signatures of the population served by the health care system with the potential to impact outcomes. The use of pretrained models in FTP is a limitation. It may impact its performance because the training data used in the pretrained model may have hidden bias and may not necessarily be health care-related. However, FTP provides a balance between customization, cost, and performance. While OBP can be rapidly deployed, it provides minimal customization and transparency without guaranteeing long-term availability. OBP may also present challenges in interfacing seamlessly with downstream applications in health care settings with variations in pricing and use over time. Lack of customization in OBP can significantly limit its ability to impact outcomes. Finally, potential applications of LLMs in health care, including conversational artificial intelligence, chatbots, summarization, and machine translation, are highlighted. While the 3 implementation pathways discussed in this perspective have the potential to facilitate equitable adoption and democratization of LLMs, transitions between them may be necessary as the needs of health systems evolve. Understanding the economics and trade-offs of these onboarding pathways can guide their strategic adoption and demonstrate value while impacting health care outcomes favorably.
PMID: 39541580
ISSN: 1438-8871
CID: 5753562

Assessing superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis patency using FLOW 800 hemodynamics

Sangwon, Karl L; Nguyen, Matthew; Wiggan, Daniel D; Negash, Bruck; Alber, Daniel A; Liu, Xujin Chris; Liu, Albert; Rabbin-Birnbaum, Corinne; Sharashidze, Vera; Baranoski, Jacob; Raz, Eytan; Shapiro, Maksim; Rutledge, Caleb; Nelson, Peter Kim; Riina, Howard; Russin, Jonathan; Oermann, Eric K; Nossek, Erez
OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to investigate the use of indocyanine green videoangiography with FLOW 800 hemodynamic parameters intraoperatively during superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery to predict patency prior to anastomosis performance. METHODS:A retrospective and exploratory data analysis was conducted using FLOW 800 software prior to anastomosis to assess four regions of interest (ROIs; proximal and distal recipients and adjacent and remote gyri) for four hemodynamic parameters (speed, delay, rise time, and time to peak). Medical records were used to classify patients into flow and no-flow groups based on immediate or perioperative anastomosis patency. Hemodynamic parameters were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Principal component analysis was used to identify high risk of no flow (HRnf) and low risk of no flow (LRnf) groups, correlated with prospective angiographic follow-ups. Machine learning models were fitted to predict patency using FLOW 800 features, and the a posteriori effect of complication risk of those features was computed. RESULTS:A total of 39 cases underwent STA-MCA bypass surgery with complete FLOW 800 data collection. Thirty-five cases demonstrated flow after anastomosis revascularization and were compared with 4 cases with no flow after revascularization. Proximal and distal recipient speeds were significantly different between the no-flow and flow groups (proximal: 238.3 ± 120.8 and 138.5 ± 93.6, respectively [p < 0.001]; distal: 241.0 ± 117.0 and 142.1 ± 103.8, respectively [p < 0.05]). Based on principal component analysis, the HRnf group (n = 10) was characterized by high-flow speed (> 75th percentile) in all ROIs, whereas the LRnf group (n = 10) had contrasting patterns. In prospective long-term follow-up, 6 of 9 cases in the HRnf group, including the original no-flow cases, had no or low flow, whereas 8 of 8 cases in the LRnf group maintained robust flow. Machine learning models predicted patency failure with a mean F1 score of 0.930 and consistently relied on proximal recipient speed as the most important feature. Computation of posterior likelihood showed a 95.29% chance of patients having long-term patency given a lower proximal speed. CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that a high proximal speed measured in the recipient vessel prior to anastomosis can elevate the risk of perioperative no flow and long-term reduction of flow. With an increased dataset size, continued FLOW 800-based ROI metric analysis could be used to guide intraoperative anastomosis site selection prior to anastomosis and predict patency outcome.
PMID: 39151199
ISSN: 1933-0693
CID: 5727032

Transparency in Artificial Intelligence Reporting in Ophthalmology-A Scoping Review

Chen, Dinah; Geevarghese, Alexi; Lee, Samuel; Plovnick, Caitlin; Elgin, Cansu; Zhou, Raymond; Oermann, Eric; Aphinyonaphongs, Yindalon; Al-Aswad, Lama A
TOPIC/UNASSIGNED:This scoping review summarizes artificial intelligence (AI) reporting in ophthalmology literature in respect to model development and validation. We characterize the state of transparency in reporting of studies prospectively validating models for disease classification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:Understanding what elements authors currently describe regarding their AI models may aid in the future standardization of reporting. This review highlights the need for transparency to facilitate the critical appraisal of models prior to clinical implementation, to minimize bias and inappropriate use. Transparent reporting can improve effective and equitable use in clinical settings. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Eligible articles (as of January 2022) from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL were independently screened by 2 reviewers. All observational and clinical trial studies evaluating the performance of an AI model for disease classification of ophthalmic conditions were included. Studies were evaluated for reporting of parameters derived from reporting guidelines (CONSORT-AI, MI-CLAIM) and our previously published editorial on model cards. The reporting of these factors, which included basic model and dataset details (source, demographics), and prospective validation outcomes, were summarized. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Thirty-seven prospective validation studies were included in the scoping review. Eleven additional associated training and/or retrospective validation studies were included if this information could not be determined from the primary articles. These 37 studies validated 27 unique AI models; multiple studies evaluated the same algorithms (EyeArt, IDx-DR, and Medios AI). Details of model development were variably reported; 18 of 27 models described training dataset annotation and 10 of 27 studies reported training data distribution. Demographic information of training data was rarely reported; 7 of the 27 unique models reported age and gender and only 2 reported race and/or ethnicity. At the level of prospective clinical validation, age and gender of populations was more consistently reported (29 and 28 of 37 studies, respectively), but only 9 studies reported race and/or ethnicity data. Scope of use was difficult to discern for the majority of models. Fifteen studies did not state or imply primary users. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Our scoping review demonstrates variable reporting of information related to both model development and validation. The intention of our study was not to assess the quality of the factors we examined, but to characterize what information is, and is not, regularly reported. Our results suggest the need for greater transparency in the reporting of information necessary to determine the appropriateness and fairness of these tools prior to clinical use. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
PMCID:11000111
PMID: 38591048
ISSN: 2666-9145
CID: 5725702

Longitudinal deep neural networks for assessing metastatic brain cancer on a large open benchmark

Link, Katherine E; Schnurman, Zane; Liu, Chris; Kwon, Young Joon Fred; Jiang, Lavender Yao; Nasir-Moin, Mustafa; Neifert, Sean; Alzate, Juan Diego; Bernstein, Kenneth; Qu, Tanxia; Chen, Viola; Yang, Eunice; Golfinos, John G; Orringer, Daniel; Kondziolka, Douglas; Oermann, Eric Karl
The detection and tracking of metastatic cancer over the lifetime of a patient remains a major challenge in clinical trials and real-world care. Advances in deep learning combined with massive datasets may enable the development of tools that can address this challenge. We present NYUMets-Brain, the world's largest, longitudinal, real-world dataset of cancer consisting of the imaging, clinical follow-up, and medical management of 1,429 patients. Using this dataset we developed Segmentation-Through-Time, a deep neural network which explicitly utilizes the longitudinal structure of the data and obtained state-of-the-art results at small (<10 mm3) metastases detection and segmentation. We also demonstrate that the monthly rate of change of brain metastases over time are strongly predictive of overall survival (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.18-1.38). We are releasing the dataset, codebase, and model weights for other cancer researchers to build upon these results and to serve as a public benchmark.
PMCID:11408643
PMID: 39289405
ISSN: 2041-1723
CID: 5720652

ChatGPT Solving Complex Kidney Transplant Cases: A Comparative Study With Human Respondents

Mankowski, Michal A; Jaffe, Ian S; Xu, Jingzhi; Bae, Sunjae; Oermann, Eric K; Aphinyanaphongs, Yindalon; McAdams-DeMarco, Mara A; Lonze, Bonnie E; Orandi, Babak J; Stewart, Darren; Levan, Macey; Massie, Allan; Gentry, Sommer; Segev, Dorry L
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:ChatGPT has shown the ability to answer clinical questions in general medicine but may be constrained by the specialized nature of kidney transplantation. Thus, it is important to explore how ChatGPT can be used in kidney transplantation and how its knowledge compares to human respondents. METHODS:We prompted ChatGPT versions 3.5, 4, and 4 Visual (4 V) with 12 multiple-choice questions related to six kidney transplant cases from 2013 to 2015 American Society of Nephrology (ASN) fellowship program quizzes. We compared the performance of ChatGPT with US nephrology fellowship program directors, nephrology fellows, and the audience of the ASN's annual Kidney Week meeting. RESULTS:Overall, ChatGPT 4 V correctly answered 10 out of 12 questions, showing a performance level comparable to nephrology fellows (group majority correctly answered 9 of 12 questions) and training program directors (11 of 12). This surpassed ChatGPT 4 (7 of 12 correct) and 3.5 (5 of 12). All three ChatGPT versions failed to correctly answer questions where the consensus among human respondents was low. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Each iterative version of ChatGPT performed better than the prior version, with version 4 V achieving performance on par with nephrology fellows and training program directors. While it shows promise in understanding and answering kidney transplantation questions, ChatGPT should be seen as a complementary tool to human expertise rather than a replacement.
PMCID:11441623
PMID: 39329220
ISSN: 1399-0012
CID: 5714092

Localization of protoporphyrin IX during glioma-resection surgery via paired stimulated Raman histology and fluorescence microscopy

Nasir-Moin, Mustafa; Wadiura, Lisa Irina; Sacalean, Vlad; Juros, Devin; Movahed-Ezazi, Misha; Lock, Emily K; Smith, Andrew; Lee, Matthew; Weiss, Hannah; Müther, Michael; Alber, Daniel; Ratna, Sujay; Fang, Camila; Suero-Molina, Eric; Hellwig, Sönke; Stummer, Walter; Rössler, Karl; Hainfellner, Johannes A; Widhalm, Georg; Kiesel, Barbara; Reichert, David; Mischkulnig, Mario; Jain, Rajan; Straehle, Jakob; Neidert, Nicolas; Schnell, Oliver; Beck, Jürgen; Trautman, Jay; Pastore, Steve; Pacione, Donato; Placantonakis, Dimitris; Oermann, Eric Karl; Golfinos, John G; Hollon, Todd C; Snuderl, Matija; Freudiger, Christian W; Heiland, Dieter Henrik; Orringer, Daniel A
The most widely used fluorophore in glioma-resection surgery, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), is thought to cause the selective accumulation of fluorescent protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in tumour cells. Here we show that the clinical detection of PpIX can be improved via a microscope that performs paired stimulated Raman histology and two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy (TPEF). We validated the technique in fresh tumour specimens from 115 patients with high-grade gliomas across four medical institutions. We found a weak negative correlation between tissue cellularity and the fluorescence intensity of PpIX across all imaged specimens. Semi-supervised clustering of the TPEF images revealed five distinct patterns of PpIX fluorescence, and spatial transcriptomic analyses of the imaged tissue showed that myeloid cells predominate in areas where PpIX accumulates in the intracellular space. Further analysis of external spatially resolved metabolomics, transcriptomics and RNA-sequencing datasets from glioblastoma specimens confirmed that myeloid cells preferentially accumulate and metabolize PpIX. Our findings question 5-ALA-induced fluorescence in glioma cells and show how 5-ALA and TPEF imaging can provide a window into the immune microenvironment of gliomas.
PMID: 38987630
ISSN: 2157-846x
CID: 5699002