Faculty Bibliography

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common complication following fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. PJK and proximal junctional failure (PJF) may lead to pain, neurological injury, reoperation, and increased healthcare costs. Efforts to prevent PJK and PJF have aimed to preserve or reconstruct the posterior spinal tension band and/or modifying instrumentation to allow for more gradual transitions in stiffness at the cranial end of long spinal constructs. We describe placement of an interlaminar fixation construct at the upper instrumented vertebra which may decrease PJK/PJF severity, and is placed with little additional operative time and minimal posterior soft tissue trauma.

BACKGROUND:Incentive spirometers were developed to facilitate sustained maximum inspiration. In addition to a slow-rising float that indicates volume displacement, the incentive spirometers includes a sensitive, rapid-fluttering flow indicator. Achieving the target inspiratory volume is believed to be the most important factor in successful incentive spirometers use. This investigation hypothesized that patients focus on the rapid fluttering of the flow indicator rather than volume float during incentive spirometers use. The effects of adjusting hand positioning to cover the flow indicator on inspiratory volumes were evaluated. METHODS:A randomized, prospective, counter-balanced crossover analysis of postoperative subjects was completed. In alternating assignment, the subjects were randomized to 1 of 2 study groups: (A) with the flow indicator covered first followed by the flow indicator standard exposed, and (B) with the flow indicator standard exposed first, followed by the flow indicator covered. The subjects were asked to perform 2 inhalations on their incentive spirometers in the first flow indicator condition: covered or the standard exposed. After a 2-min delay, the subjects were then asked to perform an additional 2 inhalations with the alternate flow indicator condition. The difference between mean inspiratory volumes under covered and standard exposed conditions was evaluated for all subjects, within and between groups. RESULTS:= .63). CONCLUSIONS:Covering the flow indicator during incentive spirometers significantly increased achieved inspiratory volumes. Increased volumes were generated, irrespective of flow indicator covering order, which strongly suggested that the covering effect was greater than any learning or condition order carry-over effects. Because achieving target inspiratory volumes is considered the most important factor in successful incentive spirometers use, these findings may have immediate applications for improving incentive spirometers protocols, patient education, and device design implications.

Atraumatic spinal emergencies often present a diagnostic and management dilemma for health care practitioners. Spinal epidural abscess, cauda equina syndrome, and spinal epidural hematoma are conditions that can insidiously present to outpatient medical offices, urgent care centers, and emergency departments. Unless a high level of clinical suspicion is maintained, these clinical entities may be initially misdiagnosed and mismanaged. Permanent neurologic sequela and even death can result if delays in appropriate treatment occur. A focused, critical review of 34 peer-reviewed articles was performed to identify current data about accurate diagnosis of spinal emergencies. This review highlights the key features of these 3 pathological entities with an emphasis on appropriate diagnostic strategy to intervene efficiently and minimize morbidity.

BACKGROUND:Incentive spirometers (IS) are commonly prescribed after various surgical procedures with the intended effect of reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Factors associated with correct use of IS by postoperative patients has not previously been studied. METHODS:A cross-sectional analysis of postoperative patients was completed to assess whether patients knew how to correctly inhale on their IS. For each patient, the following variables were collected: whether the device was within arm's reach of the patient, if the patient reported having used their IS, if they considered the IS to be helpful, and if they felt more confident using IS after a brief educational intervention was performed by study investigators. RESULTS:A total of 26.2% (11/42) of patients failed to use their IS correctly, and 38.1% (16/42) denied ever using the device in their postoperative care. Device location, perceived benefit, and previous use were identified as statistically significant determinants of successful use. Following a brief educational intervention by a physician, 73.8% (31/42) of patients were more confident in their ability to use IS during the remainder of their care. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:A substantial portion of postoperative patients failed to correctly utilize their IS. Device proximity to the patient, patient perspectives on potential benefits of IS, and previous use of the device may affect correct use. Patient education and optimization of device placement should be considered to increase compliance during IS implementation.

Despite largely unproven clinical effectiveness, incentive spirometry (IS) is widely used in an effort to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. The objective of the study is to evaluate the financial impact of implementing IS. The amount of time nurses and RTs spend each day doing IS-related activities was assessed utilizing an online survey distributed to the relevant national nursing and respiratory therapists (RT) societies along with questionnaire that was prospectively collected every day for 4 weeks at a single 10-bed cardiothoracic surgery step-down unit. Cost of RT time to teach IS use to patients and cost of nurse time spent reeducating and reminding patients to use IS were used to calculate IS implementation cost estimates per patient. Per-patient cost of IS implementation ranged from $65.30 to $240.96 for a mean 9-day step-down stay. For the 566 patients who stayed in the 10-bed step-down in 2016, the total estimated cost of implementing IS ranged from $36 959.80 to $136 383.36. Using national survey workload data, per-patient cost of IS implementation costed $107.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], $97.88-$116.98) for a hospital stay of 4.5 days. For the 9.7 million inpatient surgeries performed annually in the United States, the total annual cost of implementing postoperative IS is estimated to be $1.04 billion (95% CI, $949.4 million-$1.13 billion). The cost of implementing IS is substantial. Further efficacy studies are necessary to determine whether the cost is justifiable.

In this current area of value-based health care, it is important to consider both the effectiveness and the cost of an intervention. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been considered as an effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis and/or disc herniation that is refractory to conservative treatment. Other treatment options, such as posterior decompression and cervical disc replacement (CDR), are also effective for certain types of pathology. More recent studies have looked at the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.

Lumbar disc herniation is a prevalent condition in the general population that can cause disabling symptoms. The treatment of lumbar disc herniation, like many conditions of the spine, has come under increased scrutiny in this era of value-based health care delivery. In response, there has been an increase in cost-effectiveness research in this area. Studies have demonstrated that surgery is cost-effective for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation using a traditional open approach. Such research is limited for specific conservative treatment options as well as alternative surgical approaches to treating this condition, such as the minimally invasive approach.