Faculty Bibliography

Home care workers played critical roles in meeting the complex medical and social needs of homebound adults during COVID-19, yet their contributions remain underappreciated. This study characterizes home care workers' roles during COVID-19 and examines how home care disruptions impacted homebound individuals and caregivers. Using a qualitative analysis of electronic medical records among a randomly sampled subset of homebound patients in a home-based primary care practice, we found that home care workers were essential in meeting existing and new needs of homebound individuals. Insufficient home care worker services, including unstable schedules and inadequate hours of paid care, became particularly disruptive, leading to risks for patients and their caregivers. Given their integral role on care teams, home care workers must be a policy focus to prepare for emergent situations and ensure that homebound individuals have access to high quality, stable home care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Identifying and meeting the needs of family and unpaid caregivers (hereafter, "caregivers") during home health (HH) can improve outcomes for patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). However, little is known regarding ADRD caregivers' perspectives on communication and support from the HH care team. The study objectives were to identify ADRD caregivers' common support needs during HH and preferences for addressing these needs, to inform future development of an assessment and support intervention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:We conducted semistructured key informant interviews with caregivers who had recently assisted a HH patient with ADRD (n = 27). Interview transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS:Caregivers identified four major support needs: assistance navigating insurance and service coverage, training on nursing tasks, referral to respite care, and information regarding ADRD disease progression. Caregivers described major barriers to communicating these needs, including never being directly asked about their needs and information discontinuity within the HH care team. Incorporating caregiver recommendations, we propose a new model of assessment and support in which the HH care team (a) proactively asks about caregiver needs, (b) presents available supportive resources, (c) solicits information regarding the patient's needs and routine, and (d) stores and shares this information within the medical record. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Findings reveal critical gaps in current patterns of support for ADRD caregivers during HH and suggest directions for an assessment and support intervention that explicitly queries caregivers on their capacity and needs, with content tailored to the HH setting.

IMPORTANCE:Home-delivered meals promote food security and independence among homebound older adults. However, it is unclear which of the 2 predominant modes of meal delivery, daily-delivered vs mailed (or drop-shipped) frozen meals, promotes community living for homebound older adults with dementia. OBJECTIVE:To assess the risk of nursing home admission within 6 months between homebound individuals receiving daily-delivered vs drop-shipped frozen meals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:This pilot, multisite, 2-arm, pragmatic clinical trial included older adults with self-reported dementia on waiting lists for meals at 3 Meals on Wheels (MOW) programs in Texas and Florida between April 7 and October 8, 2021, to assess time to nursing home placement. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomized to receive either meals delivered by an MOW driver or frozen meals that were mailed to participants' homes every 2 weeks. Participants received their assigned intervention for up to 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:The primary study outcome was days from randomization to a Minimum Data Set nursing home admission assessment within 6 months. Feasibility of conducting this type of study was examined by tracking enrollment, examining baseline characteristics, monitoring participants' intervention fidelity, measuring the proportion of participants linked with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data, and analyzing the primary study outcome. RESULTS:Among 325 eligible participants who were randomized, 243 enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 81 [8.0] years; 152 (62.6%) were female): 128 to the daily-delivered meals group and 115 to the drop-shipped frozen meals group; 119 participants (49.0%) lived alone. Among the total participants enrolled, 227 (93.4%) were linked deterministically to their CMS data; probabilistic methods were used to link the remaining 16 participants (6.6%). At 6 months from randomization, 160 participants (65.8%) were still receiving meals, and 25 (10.1%; 95% CI, 6.3%-14.0%) were admitted to a nursing home. After adjusting for sex, race and ethnicity, age, program, and living arrangement and the use of death as a censoring event, the adjusted log hazard ratio of nursing home placement between daily-delivered and drop-shipped frozen meals was -0.67 (95% CI, -1.52 to 0.19). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:This pilot randomized clinical trial demonstrated the feasibility of enrolling participants with self-reported dementia on waiting lists at MOW programs, linking their data, and evaluating outcomes. While this pilot study was not powered to detect meaningful, statistically significant differences in nursing home placement, its feasibility and initial results warrant exploration in a follow-on, adequately powered trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04850781.

Home health aides (HHAs) provide care to many adults with heart failure (HF) in the home. As the demand for HHAs increases, there is a need to promote HHAs' job satisfaction and retention. In this cross-sectional community-partnered study, we examined whether mutuality (e.g., quality of the HHA-patient relationship), is associated with job satisfaction among HHAs caring for adults with HF. Mutuality was assessed with the Mutuality Scale, which measures overall mutuality and its four domains (reciprocity, love and affection, shared pleasurable activities, and shared values). Our final sample of 200 HHAs was primarily female. The mean overall mutuality score was 2.92 out of 4 (SD 0.79). In our final model, overall mutuality and each of the four domains were associated with increased job satisfaction; however, only the shared pleasurable activities domain was significant (aPR: 1.15 [1.03-1.32]). Overall, mutuality may play a role in promoting job satisfaction among HHAs.

The purpose of this study was to conduct an evaluation of a home modification and repair pilot program implemented within Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors. This program enrolled patients via referral from the home-based clinical team between August 15, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Patient functional status and home modification and repair needs were assessed by a social worker and subsequent interventions were tracked. This study includes two separate, concurrent analyses: (1) descriptive analyses based on data on program enrollees, repairs, and costs and (2) provider perspectives on the program. The program enrolled 33 patients. The average spending per patient was $528. The clinical team found this program feasible to implement and helped reduce burnout. Future program implementation and expansion will require more investment in staffing to ensure timely needs assessment and service delivery, and the addition of an occupational therapist to better assess and meet patient functional needs.

INTRODUCTION:Home health (HH) may be an important source of care for those with early-stage/undiagnosed Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), but little is known regarding prevalence or predictors of incident ADRD diagnosis following HH. METHODS:Using 2010-2012 linked Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF) and HH assessment data for 40,596 Medicare HH patients, we model incident ADRD diagnosis within 1 year of HH via multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS:Among HH patients without diagnosed ADRD, 10% received an incident diagnosis within 1 year. In adjusted models, patients were three times more likely to receive an incident ADRD diagnosis if they had HH clinician-reported impaired overall cognition (compared to patients without reported impairment) and twice as likely if they were community-referred (compared to hospital-referred patients). DISCUSSION:There is a pressing need to develop tailored HH clinical pathways and protect access to community-referred HH to support community-living older adults with early-stage/undiagnosed ADRD.

OBJECTIVES:Describe use of home-based clinical care and home-based long-term services and supports (LTSS) using a nationally representative sample of homebound older Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN:Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:Homebound, community-dwelling fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries participating in the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study (n = 974). METHODS:Use of home-based clinical care [ie, home-based medical care, skilled home health services, other home-based care (eg, podiatry)] was identified using Medicare claims. Use of home-based LTSS (ie, assistive devices, home modification, paid care, ≥40 hours/wk of family caregiving, transportation assistance, senior housing, home-delivered meals) was identified via self or proxy report. Latent class analysis was used to characterize patterns of use of home-based clinical care and LTSS. RESULTS:Approximately 30% of homebound participants received any home-based clinical care and about 80% received any home-based LTSS. Latent class analysis identified 3 distinct patterns of service use: class 1, High Clinical with LTSS (8.9%); class 2, Home Health Only with LTSS (44.5%); and class 3, Low Care and Services (46.6% homebound). Class 1 received extensive home-based clinical care, but their use of LTSS did not meaningfully differ from class 2. Class 3 received little home-based care of any kind. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS:Although home-based clinical care and LTSS utilization was common among the homebound, no single group received high levels of all care types. Many who likely need and could benefit from such services do not receive home-based support. Additional work focused on better understanding potential barriers to accessing these services and integrating home-based clinical care services with LTSS is needed.