Faculty Bibliography

ABSTRACTPURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Systemic, immune, and target therapies are growing in use in the management of metastatic cancers. The aim of this review was to describe up-to-date published data on the safety and tolerability of metastasis-directed hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) when combined with newer systemic, immune, and targeted therapies and to provide suggested strategies to mitigate potential toxicities in the clinical setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS/UNASSIGNED:A comprehensive search was performed for the time period between 1946 and August 2021 using predetermined keywords describing the use of noncentral nervous system palliative RT with commonly used targeted systemic therapies on PubMed and Medline databases. A total of 1022 articles were screened, and 130 met prespecified criteria to be included in this review. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:BRAF and MEK inhibitors are reported to be toxic when given concurrently with RT; suspension 3 days and 1 to 2 days, respectively, prior and post-RT is suggested. Cetuximab, erlotinib/gefitinib, and osimertinib were generally safe to use concomitantly with conventional radiation. But in a palliative/hypofractionated RT setting, suspending cetuximab during radiation week, erlotinib/gefitinib 1 to 2 days, and osimertinib ≥2 days pre- and post-RT is suggested. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors such as bevacizumab reported substantial toxicities, and the suggestion is to suspend 4 weeks before and after radiation. Less data exist on sorafenib and sunitinib; 5 to 10 days suspension before and after RT should be considered. As a precaution, until further data are available, for cyclin-dependent kinase 4-6 inhibitors, consideration of suspending treatment 1 to 2 days before and after RT should be given. Ipilimumab should be suspended 2 days before and after RT, and insufficient data exist for other immunotherapy agents. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab are generally safe to use in combination with RT, but insufficient data exist for other HER2 target therapy. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Suggested approaches are described, using up-to-date literature, to aid clinicians in navigating the integration of newer targeted agents with hypofractionated palliative and/or ablative metastatic RT. Further prospective studies are required.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:The objective of this study was to determine the toxicities and outcomes of patients with spinal metastasis treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to 25 Gy in 5 fractions. METHODS AND MATERIALS/UNASSIGNED:Data were extracted from an institutional tumor registry for patients with spinal metastasis who were treated with EBRT to 25 Gy in 5 fractions to their spinal lesion(s). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses to determine local control and overall survival (OS) were employed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .014) were significant predictors for better OS. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our single-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with spinal metastasis suggested that palliative EBRT to 25 Gy in 5 fractions is safe, with a low toxicity profile and minimal risk for myelopathy with an achievable dose maximum to the spinal cord and cauda equina ≤27 Gy (equivalent total dose in 2-Gy fractions ≤50 Gy), and it may provide durable palliation and local control in cases where stereotactic body radiation therapy may not be indicated.

Palliative care and radiation therapy have played an expanding role in the management of patients with advanced cancers. Recent advances in our understanding of oligometastatic disease have led to increasing demand for familiarity with ablative techniques. Recognizing the demands of hospitalized patients for rapid access to care, we created an inpatient radiation oncology consult service (IROC) with consolidated expertise in palliative radiation and ablative techniques. In this quality improvement cohort study, we analyzed inpatient radiation oncology consults placed before and after IROC implementation and found that IROC led to increased delivery of specialty care and decreased hospital length of stay (median 8 days v 7 days, P = .005). This difference was most pronounced for patients for whom radiation therapy was indicated (14.5 v 11 days, P = .007). Our institutional experience demonstrates the value of recognizing metastatic disease as a distinct discipline and providing rapid access to palliative treatments for patients with advanced malignancies.

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:Aggressive pituitary tumors that have progressed following temozolomide have limited treatment options. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and immunotherapy may have a complementary role in the management of these tumors. METHODS:We provide follow-up data on a previously reported patient with a hypermutated recurrent tumor. The patient in this report provided written informed consent for tumor sequencing and review of medical records on an institutional review board-approved research protocol (NCT01775072). RESULTS:Lu-DOTATATE, the patient had a partial response with a 61% reduction in volume of the target lesion. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography.

PURPOSE:We examined the characteristics of breast cancer patients with oligometastases (OM) treated with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) to identify factors associated with local progression, distant metastasis progression, time to subsequent therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed a single-institution database of patients treated with radiotherapy between 2008 and 2018 and identified 79 patients who received SABR to OM. Twenty-seven patients had genetic testing of metastatic tumors using an institutional targeted sequencing platform. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and competing risk models were used to compare clinical and genetic correlates with outcomes. RESULTS:Median follow-up was 50 months (IQR: 29-66) with 67% of patients alive at the last follow-up. Of the 65% of patients who progressed, 82% progressed outside of the radiation field, 18% experienced local failure, and 80% had oligoprogression. Median OS was 86 months (IQR: 29-66), and PFS was 33 months (IQR: 10-38). Less than 5 years from diagnosis to SABR and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were associated with worse OS. Advanced T stage, any prior chemotherapy, and TNBC were associated with worse PFS. Alterations in CEBPB, RB1, TBX3, PTEN, and CDK4 were associated with worse survival outcomes. CONCLUSION:Long-term systemic disease control and survival can be achieved with SABR for oligometastatic breast cancer. Hormone receptor-positive patients with a long disease interval from initial diagnosis and limited systemic progression history may be ideal for SABR to all sites of disease.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) alone is not active in mismatch repair-proficient (MMR-P) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), nor does radiotherapy (RT) alone result in objective systemic benefit. However, combined RT plus ICI can induce systemic anti-tumor immunity in pre-clinical and clinical models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/METHODS:In this single-center, phase II study, patients with chemotherapy-refractory MMR-P mCRC received durvalumab 1500 mg plus tremelimumab 75 mg every 4 weeks plus RT. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in non-irradiated lesions. Treatment and efficacy were correlated with peripheral immune cell profiles. RESULTS:We enrolled 24 patients, and report outcomes after a median follow up of 21.8 (range: 15.9 to 26.3) months. The ORR was 8.3% (2 patients) (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0% to 27.0%). The median progression-free survival was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.7 to 1.9) months, median overall survival was 11.4 (95% CI, 10.1 to 17.4) months. Twenty five percent of patients (n=6) had treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events. We observed increased circulating CD8+ T lymphocyte activation, differentiation, and proliferation in patients with objective response. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This combination of RT plus ICI study did not meet the prespecified end point criteria to be considered worthwhile for further study. However, rare instances of systemic immune augmentation and regression in non-irradiated lesions were observed (an abscopal response). Combination durvalumab and tremelimumab plus RT is feasible in MMR-P mCRC with a manageable safety profile. Further studies of novel immunotherapy combinations, and identification of biomarkers predictive of abscopal response are warranted.

The concept of oligometastatic disease has evolved substantially over the past decade. During this time, there has been a transition from retrospective and single-arm prospective studies to randomized evidence suggesting a benefit of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in the setting of limited metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. These trials had constraints and were thus limited in the strength of their conclusions, but led to several other ongoing randomized trials examining the role of LCT. These studies span various disease states (synchronous oligometastatic vs oligoprogressive), the scope of histologies included, and in how they define oligometastases. In addition, parallel biologic work is attempting to integrate relevant biomarkers and molecular classifications, with the ultimate goal of more precisely defining oligometastases and triaging patients to appropriate care. Finally, consensus guidelines have been initiated that provide a framework for designing future studies and for maintaining consistency across analyses that will facilitate the interpretation of results. This review describes the prior randomized data, the limitations therein, and future directions of clinical and preclinical studies that highlight the emerging paradigms for treatment of this select patient cohort.

BACKGROUND:/Objectives: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) metastatic to the leptomeninges is a rare and lethal event. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) research is limited in PDAC, and insights into clinical descriptors, possible disease predictors, and treatment strategies is necessitated. METHODS:Memorial Sloan Kettering databases were queried with Institutional Review Board approval to identify patients with LMD and PDAC treated between January 2000 and June 2020. Medical record review was used to abstract clinical, genomic, pathologic, and radiographic data. Overall survival was calculated from date of PDAC diagnosis to date of death. Previously published literature on LMD from PDAC was reviewed. RESULTS:Four patients with LMD from PDAC were identified, two males and two females. Age at diagnosis ranged from 57 to 68 years. All four patients had predominant lung metastasis and a relatively low burden of intra-abdominal disease. Somatic testing indicated alterations typical of PDAC and no PDAC defining pathogenic germline mutations were identified. An extended clinical course prior to LMD diagnosis was observed in all patients, ranging from 16 to 148 months. Upon diagnosis of LMD, three patients elected for supportive care and one patient received a limited course of craniospinal radiation. The median survival following diagnosis of LMD was 1.6 months (range 0.5-2.8 months). CONCLUSIONS:LMD from PDAC is a rare occurrence that may be more frequent in patients with lung metastasis and/or a more indolent clinical course. Following diagnosis of LMD, prognosis is poor, and survival is short. New treatment strategies for this manifestation of PDAC are needed.