Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: When managing a new neurologic deficit after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the surgeon is often preoccupied with determining the cause of the problem, requesting diagnostics tests, and deciding whether the patient should be surgically reexplored. The goal of this study was to analyze a series of perioperative neurologic events and to determine if careful analysis of their timing and mechanisms can predict which cases are likely to improve with reoperation. METHODS: A review of 2024 CEAs performed from 1985 to 1997 revealed 38 patients who manifested a neurologic deficit in the perioperative period (1.9%). These cases form the focus of this analysis. RESULTS: The causes of the events included intraoperative clamping ischemia in 5 patients (13.2%); thromboembolic events in 24 (63.2%); intracerebral hemorrhage in 5 (13.2%); and deficits unrelated to the operated artery in 4 (10.5%). Neurologic events manifesting in the first 24 hours after surgery were significantly more likely to be caused by thromboembolic events than by other causes of stroke (88.0% vs. 12.0%, P<.002); deficits manifesting after the first 24 hours were significantly more likely to be related to other causes. Of 25 deficits manifesting in the first 24 hours after surgery, 18 underwent immediate surgical reexploration. Intraluminal thrombus was noted in 15 of the 18 reexplorations (83. 3%); any technical defects were corrected. After the 18 reexplorations, in 12 cases there was either complete resolution of or significant improvement in the neurologic deficit that had been present (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Careful analysis of the timing and presentation of perioperative neurologic events after CEA can predict which cases are likely to improve with reoperation. Neurologic deficits that present during the first 24 hours after CEA are likely to be related to intraluminal thrombus formation and embolization. Unless another etiology for stroke has clearly been established, we think immediate reexploration of the artery without other confirmatory tests is mandatory to remove the embolic source and correct any technical problems. This will likely improve the neurologic outcome in these patients, because an uncorrected situation would lead to continued embolization and compromise

Thrombosis of the internal jugular vein is a rare entity with the potential for serious consequences. Most of the reported cases of jugular venous thrombosis have occurred in the presence of an indwelling venous catheter, an established hypercoagulable state, or in association with head and neck sepsis. This report presents a case of a patient in whom jugular venous thrombosis developed during the first trimester of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. Thromboembolism in these circumstances can be related to a condition known as the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The presentation of severe neck pain in pregnant women, especially in those who have undergone assisted reproduction procedures, should prompt evaluation by duplex scan to evaluate the jugular veins for thrombosis. Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice

The purpose of this study was to review a single-institution experience with the Endovascular Technologies [(EVT) Menlo Park, CA] transfemoral, endovascular system of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. This study was performed at a medical center participating in the phase 1 and phase 2 evaluations of the EVT device. We reviewed the 25 cases performed at our institution. The patient population consisted of 21 males (84%) and 4 females (16%), with a mean age of 73.4 years. A total of eight tube grafts (32%) and 17 bifurcated grafts (68%) were attempted. Twenty-two of the twenty-five grafts were successfully implanted endovascularly (88%). Implantation failures were due to tortuosity or inadequate caliber of the iliac arteries, or incorrect positioning of the graft. The results show that endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms is an appropriate treatment for selected patients. Conversions to open repair have decreased as experience has grown; careful patient selection can minimize the number of unsuccessful implantations. Patient selection and accurate technique can also minimize the number of endoleaks

OBJECTIVE: The ideal method of arterial reconstruction in operations for recurrent carotid disease after prior endarterectomy is unknown. The goal of this study was to review a series of carotid reoperations and to determine whether the surgical technique influenced the rate of perioperative stroke, late stroke, or secondary restenosis. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 82 carotid reoperations performed on 74 patients at our institution. RESULTS: The patient population included 39 men (52.7%) and 35 women (47.3%), with a mean age of 67.5 years. The indications for redo surgery included transient ischemic attack or amaurosis fugax in 35.3% of the patients, stroke in 6.1%, and asymptomatic restenosis (>80%) in 58.5%. Patch angioplasty with or without redo endarterectomy was used in 47 cases (57.3%), with saphenous vein in 26 (31.7%), Dacron in 15 (18.3%), and polytetrafluoroethylene in 6 (7.3%). Interposition grafting was used in 35 cases (42.7%), with saphenous vein in 9 (11.0%), Dacron in 10 (12.2%), and polytetrafluoroethylene in 16 (19.5%). The perioperative complications included three strokes (3.7%). There was a trend toward increased perioperative neurologic complications with interposition grafting when compared with patch angioplasty (8.6% vs 2.1%), although this did not reach statistical significance. Long-term clinical follow-up was obtained in all cases with a mean duration of 35 months, with follow-up duplex scanning performed in 89.2%. The late failures of redo surgery included four significant secondary restenoses and five total occlusions. There was a trend towards improved long-term results with interposition grafting as opposed to patch angioplasty. However, the cases in which reconstruction was performed with a vein had a significantly higher rate of late failures (stroke, secondary recurrent stenosis, or occlusion) than those in which reconstruction was performed with any prosthetic material (26.7% vs 2.3%; P =.002 by Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: The use of autologous material for redo carotid surgery in any configuration appears to significantly increase the rate of subsequent recurrent stenosis or total occlusion of the operated artery. The reason for this finding is unclear but may be related to both host and technical factors. Prosthetic material may be more durable in the long-term for redo carotid surgery. Interposition grafting for redo carotid surgery may increase the perioperative neurologic complication rate to some degree; however, this was not statistically significant in this series. Interposition grafting may be a more durable solution in long-term follow-up than redo endarterectomy and patch angioplasty. A longer follow-up period will be needed to confirm this conclusion

It has been suggested that general anesthesia is the preferred method for reoperative carotid surgery for several reasons, including: the difficulty of the reoperative dissection; the disease may extend unusually high into the internal carotid artery; and the reconstruction required may be more complex than a typical endarterectomy. The purpose of this study is to show that reoperative carotid surgery can be performed safely under regional anesthesia. The records of 109 reoperative carotid operations performed on 96 patients over the past 25 years were reviewed. Procedures performed under regional anesthesia were compared to those performed under general anesthesia with respect to patient characteristics, intraoperative courses, and perioperative results. Regional anesthesia was utilized in 79 operations (72.5%); 30 operations were performed with general anesthesia (27.5%). The two patient groups were essentially equivalent with regard to atherosclerotic risk factors, preoperative neurologic symptoms, and the prevalence of contralateral total occlusion. The etiologies for recurrent disease included recurrent atherosclerosis (50.4%), intimal hyperplasia (30.3%), and vein patch aneurysm (9.2%). The methods of reconstruction employed included saphenous vein patch (47.7%), vein interposition graft (11.9%), prosthetic patch (20.2%), and prosthetic graft (20.2%). Perioperative strokes occurred in one case performed under regional anesthesia (1.3%), and in two cases under general anesthesia (6.6%); this difference was not statistically significant. Reoperative carotid artery surgery can be performed under regional anesthesia safely in the majority of instances. The aforementioned theoretical factors in favor of general anesthesia could also lead to technical difficulties with intraarterial shunt insertion. Having the patient awake, even if just long enough to prove that the patient will tolerate carotid artery clamping, might simplify many of these operations by avoiding shunt insertion. Regional anesthesia should therefore be considered an acceptable option in cases of reoperative carotid surgery

Vena caval thrombosis has posed a surgical therapeutic challenge for many years. Historically, spiral vein grafts and synthetic materials used as prostheses have had variable results. The use of the stent may serve as a more promising alternative when used in the capacity to relieve caval obstruction. A case is reported in which a young woman with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome has exercise intolerance and associated hypotensive cardiovascular collapse caused by inferior vena caval thrombosis. Recanalization of her inferior vena cava was successfully achieved and subsequently maintained through the placement of two Wallstents across the lesion. Although most venous stenting procedures have thus far been used in the treatment of venous obstruction caused by malignancy, inferior vena cava stenting in this patient with inferior vena caval thrombosis and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome suggests that venous stenting might offer an alternative therapeutic modality in treating a broader spectrum of occlusive venous disease

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an advantage of thoracic over lumbar epidural narcotics for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. DESIGN: A prospective randomized study. SETTING: Subjects were inpatients at an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive lumbar or thoracic epidural narcotics. Group 1 (n = 26) had lumbar, and group 2 (n = 26) had thoracic epidural catheters placed preoperatively. All patients were monitored with pulmonary artery catheters and arterial catheters, and had general endotracheal anesthesia, in addition to epidural anesthesia with 2% lidocaine. All patients received 5 mg of epidural morphine after intubation. Pain scores were monitored hourly for 36 hours using a visual analog scale, and additional narcotics were given, depending on the level of pain. Complications caused by epidural narcotics were recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups as to the daily dose of narcotics or the time between narcotic doses. Hourly pain scores showed significant differences during hours 6, 7, 8, 20, 34, and 36, with pain scores being lower in group 1. There was no difference in the rate of complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage of thoracic over lumbar epidural analgesia using morphine in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: Although it has been widely accepted as the evidence supporting prophylactic carotid endarterectomy, aspects of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study have left unease among clinicians who must decide which individuals without symptoms should undergo surgery. Additional confusion has been created by the fact that the several large randomized trials investigating the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy have classified and analyzed different categories of carotid stenosis. In an effort to provide more information on the natural history of asymptomatic, moderate carotid artery stenosis (50% to 79%), we have reviewed data on approximately 500 arteries. METHODS: Records of our vascular laboratory from 1990 to 1992 were reviewed. We identified 425 patients with asymptomatic, moderate carotid artery stenosis; 71 patients had bilateral stenoses in this category, resulting in 496 arteries for study. RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up was 38 +/- 18 months. New ipsilateral strokes occurred in 16 (3.8%) patients. New ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks occurred in 25 (5.9%) patients. Documented progression of stenosis occurred in 48 (17%) of the 282 arteries for which a repeat duplex examination was available. Arteries that progressed to > 80% stenosis were significantly more likely to have caused strokes than those that remained in the 50% to 79% range (10.4% vs 2.1%, p < 0.02). Conversely, arteries that remained stable in the degree of stenosis were significantly more likely to have remained asymptomatic than those that progressed (92.7% vs 62.5%, p < 0.001). With life-table analysis the estimated cumulative ipsilateral stroke rate was 0.85% at 1 year, 3.6% at 3 years, and 5.4% at 5 years. The respective estimated cumulative transient ischemic attack rates were 1.9%, 5.5%, and 6.3%. The respective estimated cumulative rates for progression of stenosis were 4.9%, 16.7%, and 26.5%. Life-table comparison of ipsilateral stroke revealed a significantly higher cumulative rate among arteries that progressed in the degree of stenosis than among those that remained stable (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the low rate of permanent neurologic events in these cases, prophylactic carotid endarterectomy for the asymptomatic, moderately stenotic internal carotid artery cannot currently be recommended. The only factor that appears to predict increased risk for future stroke is progression of stenosis. Careful follow-up with serial repeat duplex examinations must be performed in these patients. Until there are widely accepted duplex parameters that can provide all clinicians with accurate identification of arteries with narrowing corresponding to 60% stenosis as defined by the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, all surgeons will need to be aware of specifically how their noninvasive laboratories are deriving their results. For the many laboratories that continue to use the University of Washington criteria, 80% should remain the level above which prophylactic carotid endarterectomy is warranted