Faculty Bibliography

Abstract An 18-year-old Asian woman with a history of substance abuse presented to the Emergency Department with right-sided abdominal pain and hematuria of several months duration. Physical examination revealed right upper quadrant and suprapubic tenderness. Liver function tests were normal. Urinalysis showed: large blood, 30-50 red blood cells/high-powered field, and no bacteria. She underwent a CT of the abdomen and pelvis following oral and intravenous contrast.

Aluminium phosphide (AlP) is a highly toxic pesticide that inhibits cytochrome oxidase c and causes oxidative stress. Death results from refractory cardiogenic shock due to myocardial dysfunction. There is very little information regarding extracorporeal life support in severe AlP poisoning. Although several therapies are available, none are curative. We report on the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in a 24-year-old woman brought to our hospital after an intentional ingestion of a tablet of AlP (3 g), which caused refractory AlP-induced cardiogenic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The patient underwent gastric lavage with potassium permanganate, received sodium bicarbonate intravenously, and was admitted to the intensive care unit. Echocardiography at 36 h post ingestion showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <20 %. An IABP was inserted and the patient's vital signs stabilised. After eight days, the IABP was removed and on day 20, the patient's LVEF increased to 50 %. IABP was successfully used and may improve future prognoses for severely poisoned AlP patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. We encourage clinical toxicologists to examine this new treatment.

We read with interest the article by Maignan and colleagues1 regarding predictive factors for ICU admission in poisoned patients. Deliberate drug poisoning (DDP) is indeed a significant public health threat, particularly considering the current prescription drug overdose epidemic in the United States.2 To their credit, the authors acknowledge the limitations of their dataset with regard to 'toxicological anamnesis' as well as the issue of generalizability to other regions that do not routinely practice direct ICU admission that bypass the ED. However, we feel some aspects of the methodology deserve some comments with regard to the interpretation of their final model, particularly on the use of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) as a predictor and ICU admission as the endpoint in the study