Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: To clarify the frequency and nature of ICG angiographic 'hot spots' seen in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS: A consecutive series of newly diagnosed patients with neovascular ARMD and fluorescein angiographic evidence of occult choroidal neovascularization (occult CNV) was imaged with ICG angiography. Eyes with ICG angiographic 'hot spots' were identified and further classified. A hot spot was defined as any area of abnormal hyperfluorescence, in the mid to late stages of ICG angiography, measuring less than 1 disk area in size. RESULTS: From a total of 190 patients (220 eyes) with neovascular ARMD, 30 patients and 34 eyes (16%) with hot spots were identified. Hot spots were noted to be of three distinct patterns: polypoidal choroidal neovascularization (polypoidal CNV) in 21 of 34 eyes, or 62%; retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) in 11 of 34 eyes, or 30%; and focal occult CNV in 2 of 34 eyes, or 8%. CONCLUSIONS: A focal area of intense hyperfluorescence or so-called hot spot seen on ICG angiography in neovascular ARMD is due to one of three possible forms of neovascularization: most frequently polypoidal CNV, less commonly RAP, and infrequently nonspecific, focal occult CNV. Since neovascular ARMD may be caused by different types of neovascularization, each with distinct clinical manifestations, natural course, visual prognosis, and response to treatment, it is important to identify the precise nature of hot spots to establish an accurate diagnosis and, when appropriate, a specific form of management

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of a patient with documented genetic mallatia leventinese who developed a classic choroidal neovascular membrane and underwent photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin (Visudyne; CIBA Vision Corp., Duluth, GA). DESIGN: Interventional case report. INTERVENTION: The patient underwent a complete ophthalmologic evaluation and fluorescein angiography. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and angiographic records were analyzed for evidence of changes in visual acuity, clinically evident subretinal fluid and the extent of fluorescein leakage from choroidal neovascularization (CNV). RESULTS: Three weeks after treatment, a fluorescein angiogram showed closure of the neovascular membrane, no evident subretinal fluid was seen, and visual acuity had improved from 20/60- to 20/40. Nine weeks after the application, fluorescein angiography demonstrated a microscopic hyperfluorescent spot at the site of the previously active CNV at which a small area of shallow subretinal fluid was observed, and visual acuity was 20/50. Thirty-four weeks after PDT, visual acuity was 20/60, subretinal fluid resolved, and fluorescein angiography did not show any further changes. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin may be considered as a possible treatment in patients with mallatia leventinese who develop classic CNV

PURPOSE: To study the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using verteporfin on the treatment of patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis (MCP), an uncommon disorder with no proven forms of therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of seven consecutive patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to MCP treated with PDT using verteporfin was performed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 7 patients (all myopic women) was 41.4 years. A mean of 1.86 treatments was performed, and the mean follow-up time was 10 months. Four of the seven patients were treated unsuccessfully with corticosteroids before referral for PDT. The mean improvement of visual acuity was 0.86 line; 3 patients (42.8%) had an improvement in visual acuity representing at least a halving of their visual angle, while the other 4 patients remained stable. There were no treatment-related side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this study were limited, the use of PDT was associated with stabilization or improvement of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to MCP. Further study of this treatment modality is indicated

PURPOSE: To study the effects of photodynamic therapy using verteporfin in the treatment of patients with subfoveal polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 16 consecutive patients with subfoveal PCV treated with photodynamic therapy using verteporfin was performed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients involved was 70.5 years. The mean follow-up time was 12 months. The visual acuity improved in 9 (56.3 %), remained the same in 5 (31.3 %), and decreased in 2 (12.5 %). The mean change in visual acuity was an improvement of 2.38 lines, a difference that was highly significant ( = 0.004). The change in visual acuity was negatively correlated with increasing age. The final visual acuity was positively correlated with initial acuity and negatively correlated with age. These results were confirmed by multiple linear regression. No patient had any lasting complication from the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Subfoveal PCV has no proven method of treatment. Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this pilot study were limited, the encouraging results and lack of complications suggest that further study is indicated

PURPOSE: To report the effects of photodynamic therapy using verteporfin in the treatment of patients with subfoveal idiopathic choroidal vascularization (CNV). DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: In a retrospective study, eight eyes of eight consecutive patients aged 55 years or younger with subfoveal idiopathic CNV treated with photodynamic therapy using verteporfin were evaluated. Visual acuity was considered to be improved if the visual angle was halved, while acuity was thought to be worse if the visual angle doubled. RESULTS: The eight patients included three men and five women with a mean (+/- SD) age of 34.6 (+/- 9.7) years (range 25-53 years). The mean follow-up time was 13.5 months. At the end of the follow-up period the visual acuity improved in five eyes (62.5%), remained unchanged in one (12.5%), and decreased in two (25%). The mean acuity improvement was 3.6 lines of Snellen acuity by the end of the follow-up period, a change that was statistically significant (P =.027, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No patient had any complication from the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is no widely accepted method for treating subfoveal idiopathic CNV and all previously investigated methods have had a significant number of serious side effects. Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this pilot study were limited, the encouraging results and lack of complications suggest that further study is indicated

Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy seems to be a distinct clinical entity that should be differentiated from other types of CNV associated with AMD and other known choroidal degenerative, inflammatory, and ischemic disorders. The principle abnormality seen in PCV, notably the branching vascular network and polypoidal structures at the borders of the lesion, seem to be unique to the disorder. In patients with serosanguineous detachment of the pigment epithelium, particularly in those with increased risk factors such as African American or Asian race, ICG should be performed to evaluate the choroidal vascular abnormality to establish a more definitive diagnosis. If the characteristic vascular lesion of PCV is seen, a conservative approach to management should be taken unless there is a persistent or progressive exudative change that threatens the central macula. In that event, there may be a rationale for photo-coagulation treatment of leaking aneurysmal or polypoidal components within the vascular lesion, but not the entire vascular complex. Photodynamic therapy seems to be a promising therapeutic modality, but randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of the PDT treatment in the management of these patients

Although these preliminary results on the use of antiangiogenesis drugs for the treatment of neovascular AMD appear promising, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trials are needed to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of such treatments. For example, the first antiangiogenesis drug tested in AMD, interferon alpha-2a, raised great enthusiasm. Indeed, interferon alpha-2a had been shown to be antiangiogenic in animal and in vitro models. It proved to be ineffective, however, in halting the progression of neovascular AMD in a double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial [28]. Another antivasogenesis drug tested in a phase 3 clinical trial is thalidomide [67]. Although the enrollment of patients is finished, the results are not yet known