Faculty Bibliography

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures make up 63% of all pelvic ring injuries. This fracture pattern is typically seen in older patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the ambulatory status of individuals sustaining LC1 fractures at long-term follow-up and what specific characteristics, if any, effect this status or functional outcomes. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Over a 2-year period, all pelvic ring injury at 2 hospitals within one academic institution was queried. One hundred sixty-one low-energy LC1 pelvic fractures were identified. Results/UNASSIGNED:= .010). Forty-three (86%) patients didn't use an assistive ambulatory device prior to sustaining the LC1 fracture. Seven (14%) patients utilized assistive devices both before and after the LC1 injury. Thirteen (26%) patients, who did not utilize assistive ambulatory devices prior to their injury, necessitated them at long-term follow-up. Discussion/UNASSIGNED:Surgeons should be aware of these associations, as they can implement early interventions aimed at patients at risk, for assistive device use, following LC1 pelvic fractures. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:More than a quarter of the patients sustaining an LC1 pelvic fracture continue to use an aid for ambulation at long-term follow-up. Older age, complications, and falls within 30 days of this injury are associated with the utilization of an assistive ambulatory device.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Non-traumatic stress fractures of the humerus are often related to a throwing motion. This type of humeral fracture is often due to uncoordinated muscular activity on the humeral shaft. These forces over time may contribute to mid-shaft humeral stress fractures, an injury often referred to as a "throwers fracture." The ultimate strength of bone is decreased when a screw hole is created, as in open reduction and internal fixation repairs (ORIF). Case Report/UNASSIGNED:This case study discusses a patient who underwent plate and screw fixation of a previous stress fracture of the humerus. He continued to remain active and competitive in collegiate baseball, playing the catcher position which leads to a recurrent stress fracture. A combination of low Vitamin D and stress-shielded bone likely resulted in the reinjury. Physicians treating patients with these injuries should be aware of the possibility of refracture if inciting factors are not modified. This case of a non-traumatic humeral shaft stress refracture, following ORIF, has not been described in the literature. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:The unusual case of a humeral stress refracture following ORIF is presented. A combination of low Vitamin D and stress-shielded bone likely resulted in the reinjury. Physicians treating patients with these injuries should be aware of the possibility of refracture if inciting factors are not modified.

BACKGROUND:The complication rate of locked plating for proximal humerus fractures remains stubbornly high. The purpose of this study was to determine if a learning curve exists with the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:We prospectively followed 161 consecutive patients with proximal humerus fractures treated by a single surgeon with locked plates from 2005 to 2016. Radiographic data, functional outcomes, and complications from the surgeon's first 81 patients were compared to the subsequent 80 patients. RESULTS:There was no statistical difference in the rates of complications (p = 0.29) or screw penetration (p = 0.19). There were no differences in DASH scores (p = 0.64 to 0.79) or tip-apex distance (p = 0.40). Head shaft angles were slightly smaller in patients treated earlier in the surgeon's career (p = 0.02). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:While surgeon experience is certainly a favorable quality, there does not appear to be a significant "learning curve" in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

OBJECTIVE:To compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) amongst patients with pelvic and/or lower extremity fractures directly admitted to our institution versus those transferred from an outside hospital for definitive management. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort SETTING:: Tertiary care orthopedic hospital PATIENTS:: 690 patients who received definitive care for a lower extremity fracture at our institution between 2010 and 2017. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Inter-facility transfer for definitive management of pelvic or lower extremity fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:VTE incidence, time to surgery RESULTS:: The interfacility transfer (TR) group was comprised of 126 patients and the direct admission (DA) group was comprised of 564 patients. TR patients had a significantly higher incidence of VTE compared to the DA group: 9.5% vs 0.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Time to surgery was also longer in the TR group compared to the DA group: 3.05 +/- 3.00 days vs. 2.16 +/- 2.42 days, respectively (p = 0.005). Demographics for TR and DA did not significantly differ with regards to age, gender, length of stay, or ASA score. In the TR group, no complete and explicit documentation regarding thromboprophylaxis administration while at the outside facility was found. CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing interfacility transfer for definitive management of pelvic and lower extremity fractures are at significantly increased risk for the development of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND:The incidence and risk factors of wound-healing complications following rotational ankle fracture surgery are well documented in the literature. However, there is a paucity regarding management options following these complications. The goal of this study was to provide a descriptive analysis of one surgeon's experience managing wound complications in patients who have undergone ankle fracture surgery. METHODS:A total of 215 patients who were operatively treated for an unstable ankle were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics, medical histories, initial injury characteristics, surgical interventions, and clinical follow-up were collected. Twenty-five of these patients developed postoperative wound problems. RESULTS:Of the original cohort of 215 patients, 25 (11.6%) developed wound-healing complications. Their average age was 53.6 ± 18.0 years; there were 12 males (48.0%). Connective tissue/inflammatory disease (odds ratio [OR] 3.9), cardiovascular disease (OR 3.6), and active smoking (OR 3.3) were associated with an increased likelihood of developing postoperative wound complications. With regard to injuries, open fractures (OR 17.9) had the highest likelihood of developing postoperative complications, followed by type 44-C (OR 2.8) and trimalleolar fractures (OR 2.0). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Wound complications following open treatment of ankle fractures occurred with an incidence of 11.6% in this series, of which only about half required operative intervention. A third of wounds were managed by orthopaedics in conjunction with plastic surgery. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:What patient characteristics and injury factors predict decreased knee range of motion (ROM) following operative management of tibial plateau fractures? DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Over 11 years, tibial plateau fractures at a single academic institution were prospectively followed. A total of 266 patients were included in this study. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical repair of tibial plateau fractures and secondary interventions due to arthrofibrosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) and range of motion (ROM) at 3-month, 6-month and long-term follow-up. Secondary outcomes were considered as the need for a subsequent procedure due to arthrofibrosis. RESULTS:At 3-month follow-up, the mean ROM was 113°. By long-term follow-up (mean=17 months), the mean ROM improved to 125°. Independent predictors of decreased knee ROM were the following: At 3-month follow-up, open fractures (P=0.047), application of a knee spanning external fixator (P=0.026), orthopaedic poly trauma (P=0.003), and tibial spine involvement (P=0.043). At long-term follow-up, non-Caucasian ethnicity (P=0.003), increasing age (P=0.003), and a deep infection (P=0.002). Ten patients (3.7%required a secondary procedure for arthrofibrosis. There was a significant improvement in the knee ROM (P<0.001) and functional outcomes (P=0.004) following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS:At long-term follow-up, independent predictors of decreased knee ROM were non-Caucasian ethnicity, increasing age, and sustaining a post-operative complication of a deep infection. Secondary interventions were reliable treatments for arthrofibrosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic level III.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the effect of osteonecrosis (ON) on the clinical and functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Over a 12-year period, patients were screened and identified on presentation to the emergency department or in the clinical office for inclusion in an institutional review board-approved registry. One hundred sixty-five patients with 166 proximal humerus fractures met inclusion criteria. Eight patients developed radiographic evidence of ON (4.8%). INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:Patients were divided into 2 cohorts; 1 cohort being those diagnosed with ON and the other cohort being those who were not. All patients were prospectively followed and assessed for clinical and functional outcomes at the latest follow-up visit (mean = 22.9 months) using the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand survey along with ranges of motion of the injured extremity. RESULTS:Average postoperative forward elevation for patients with ON was worse than those without ON (P = 0.002). Additionally, there was a significant difference in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at the latest follow-up between the 2 groups (P = 0.026). There was no difference in external rotation or mean length of follow-up between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the negative effects of ON after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Those who develop ON have poorer functional and clinical outcomes as compared with patients without ON. Consequently, the development of ON can be used as a predictor of poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Determine if a novel inpatient mortality risk assessment tool designed to be calculated in the emergency department (ED) setting can risk stratify patient reported functional outcomes and mortality at one year. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort SETTING:: Academic level one trauma center PATIENTS:: 685 patients >55 years old who were orthopaedic surgery consults or trauma surgery consults in the ED between 10/1/2014 and 9/30/2015. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Calculation of validated trauma triage score (STTGMA) using each patient's demographics, injury severity, and functional status MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: mortality, EQ-5D questionnaire, and percent return to baseline function since their hospitalization at one-year post hospitalization. RESULTS:45 (6.6%) patients died within the year following hospitalization. Of remaining 639 patients available for follow-up, 247 (38.7%) were successfully contacted. There was no observed difference between patients who were successfully contacted and those who were not. The mean STTGMA score was 2.1 ± 3.6%. Patients reported on average a 76.4 ± 27.5% return to baseline function. When comparing patients between risk groups, there was a significant difference in EQ-5D scores and percent return to baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows that high risk patients had pronounced decreased survival within the initial days after discharge compared to other cohorts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that patients identified with the STTGMA tool as having an increased risk of inpatient mortality following trauma correlate with poorer functional outcomes at one year. The STTGMA risk score is also a valuable tool to stratify risk of mortality up to one year following discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV, Prognostic.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Analyze the effectiveness of a BPCI (Bundle Payments for Care Improvement) initiative for patients who would be included in a future potential Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) bundle. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort SETTING:: Single Academic Institution PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:: Patients discharged with operative fixation of a hip or femur fracture (DRG codes 480-482) between 1/2015-10/2016 were included. A BPCI initiative based upon an established program for BPCI Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) was initiated for patients with hip and femur fractures in January 2016. Patients were divided into non-bundle (care before initiative) and bundle (care with initiative) cohorts. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Application of BPCI principles MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Length of stay, location of discharge, readmissions RESULTS:: 116 patients participated in the "institutional bundle," and 126 received care prior to the initiative. There was a trend towards decreased mean length of stay, (7.3 ± 6.3 days vs. 6.8 ± 4.0 days, p=0.457) and decreased readmission within 90 days (22.2% vs. 18.1%, p=0.426). The number of patients discharged home doubled (30.2% vs. 14.3%, p=0.008). There was no difference in readmission rates in bundle vs. non-bundle patients based on discharged home status; however, bundle patients discharged to SNF trended towards less readmissions than non-bundle patients discharged to SNF (37.3% vs. 50.6%, p=0.402). Mean episode cost reduction due to initiative was estimated to be $6,450 using Medicare reimbursement data. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the potential success of a BPCI initiative at one institution in decreasing post-acute care facility utilization and cost of care when used for a hip and femur fracture population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.