Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:A double-blind, randomized, controlled study was undertaken to determine whether combined use of interferon β-1a (IFN) 30 μg intramuscularly weekly and glatiramer acetate (GA) 20 mg daily is more efficacious than either agent alone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS:A total of 1,008 participants were randomized and followed until the last participant enrolled completed 3 years. The primary endpoint was reduction in annualized relapse rate utilizing a strict definition of relapse. Secondary outcomes included time to confirmed disability, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) score, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. RESULTS:Combination IFN+GA was not superior to the better of the single agents (GA) in risk of relapse. Both the combination therapy and GA were significantly better than IFN in reducing the risk of relapse. The combination was not better than either agent alone in lessening confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression or change in MSFC over 36 months. The combination was superior to either agent alone in reducing new lesion activity and accumulation of total lesion volumes. In a post hoc analysis, combination therapy resulted in a higher proportion of participants attaining disease activity-free status (DAFS) compared to either single arm, driven by the MRI results. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Combining the 2 most commonly prescribed therapies for multiple sclerosis did not produce a significant clinical benefit over 3 years. An effect was seen on some MRI metrics. In a test of comparative efficacy, GA was superior to IFN in reducing the risk of exacerbation. The extension phase for CombiRx will address whether the observed differences in MRI and DAFS findings predict later clinical differences.

An 81-year-old man with retinitis pigmentosa had severe, slowly progressive visual loss that began at age 20. Intermittent nystagmus was observed for 1 decade. Examination revealed severe retinal atrophy and periodic alternating nystagmus (PAN) that occurred only in darkness (video on the Neurology(R) Web site at www.neurology.org).

BACKGROUND:: In cases of progressive optic neuropathy, diagnostic uncertainty often persists despite extensive work-up. Optic nerve biopsy (ONB) can be considered, especially when visual decline of the affected or fellow eye ensues despite empiric therapy. We aimed to evaluate both diagnostic and therapeutic utilities of ONB based on the long-term experience at a tertiary care institution. METHODS:: This was a retrospective chart review of biopsies over 20 years at a single institution involving intrinsic or adherent optic nerve masses. Main outcome measures included the impact of tissue sampling on reaching a diagnosis and on guiding treatment. Secondary measures included vision in the eye of the ONB and the fellow eye. RESULTS:: Fifteen patients with a mean age of 51.7 +/- 17.4 years underwent biopsies. At the time of biopsy, visual acuity was no light perception in 8 (53%) eyes, light perception to counting fingers in 5 (33%), and 20/400 or better in 2 (13%). The fellow eye of 7 patients (47%) experienced some degree of sequential vision loss before biopsy. Seven specimens included en bloc biopsy of the nerve, 7 contained the dural sheath (usually with a portion of the optic nerve), and 1 only of the compressive mass. Six patients (40%) had tumors. Six of 8 inflammatory lesions biopsied required further clinical data to arrive at specific diagnoses. In one case, a clinical diagnosis could not be made. No patients experienced further vision loss in the fellow eye at last follow-up (median, 8 months). CONCLUSIONS:: In diverse circumstances of progressive optic neuropathy, ONB can be beneficial in establishing the diagnosis. ONB can help direct specific local or systemic treatment, particularly when infectious or inflammatory etiologies are identified. ONB, if considered early in the disease course, can potentially halt or prevent vision loss when the fellow eye is threatened.

ABSTRACT:: Crohn disease (CD) is primarily considered an inflammatory condition of the small and large intestine although associated extraintestinal inflammation is relatively common. Ocular manifestations are generally localized to the anterior chamber and ocular surface but rarely can involve the posterior pole, orbit, and optic nerve. We report a case of an otherwise healthy 42-year-old man who was diagnosed with CD after presenting with acute vision loss from optic perineuritis.

Due to the recent focus on concussion in sports, a number of tests have been developed to diagnose and manage concussion. While each test measures different brain functions, no single test has been shown to quickly and reliably assess concussion in all cases. In addition, most of the current concussion tests have not been validated by scientific investigation. This review identifies the pros and cons of the most commonly used noninvasive tests for concussion in order to provide a more complete picture of the resources that are available for concussion testing. The potential utility of research tools such as the head impact telemetry system, advanced magnetic resonance imaging protocols, and biomarkers are discussed in the context of the currently employed tools.

For 40 years, visual evoked cortical potentials (VEPs) have been used to aid in the diagnosis of demyelinating optic neuropathy.(1) Early studies demonstrated an increased latency of the positive peak normally seen at about 100 msec-the P100-in patients with optic neuritis.(1) Since the P100 often remains prolonged following recovery from the acute episode, the VEP is useful to detect optic nerve involvement in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS).(2) One might posit that the VEP would be useful in the identification of subclinical optic neuropathy, in which the demyelination is so mild as to give no abnormal physical examination findings.(3).

OBJECTIVE: Low-contrast letter acuity has demonstrated treatment effects for sustained visual loss in trials of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). To test new therapies that may involve neuroprotection and repair, it will be essential for outcome measures to detect improvement as well as loss of visual function. We determined the effects of natalizumab on the frequency and cumulative probability of visual improvement using low-contrast letter acuity a prespecified tertiary outcome measure in AFFIRM. METHODS: AFFIRM was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that evaluated efficacy and safety of natalizumab (n=627) vs. placebo (n=315) in relapsing-remitting MS. Binocular acuities were measured at low-contrast (1.25%, 2.5%) and high-contrast visual acuity (VA). Improvement was defined as 12-week sustained increases from baseline. Clinically meaningful change for primary analyses was pre-defined as 7-letter improvement for low-contrast acuity and 5-letter improvement for VA based upon previous studies. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, cumulative probabilities of sustained visual improvement were greater in the natalizumab group by 57% for 2.5% contrast (21.7% vs. 14.0%; HR=1.57; 95% CI: 1.11-2.22; P=0.012) and 39% for 1.25% contrast (32.5% vs. 25.0%; HR=1.39; 95% CI: 1.07-1.82; P=0.014). The 5- and 10-letter low-contrast assessments did not show treatment differences. High-contrast VA was insensitive to changes over time and treatment effects. CONCLUSION: Low-contrast letter acuity detected treatment effects on sustained visual improvement in patients with relapsing MS. The ability to detect visual improvement and loss makes low-contrast acuity an important measure for future trials assessing the impact of therapy on this outcome and the potential of a therapy for neuroprotection and repair.

Orbital apex and skull base masses often present with neuro-ophthalmic signs and symptoms. Though the localization of these syndromes and visualization of the responsible lesion on imaging is typically straightforward, definitive diagnosis usually relies on biopsy. Immunohistochemistry is important for categorization and treatment planning. IgG4-related disease is emerging as a pathologically defined inflammatory process that can occur in multiple organ systems. We present two patients with extensive inflammatory mass lesions of the central nervous system with immunohistochemistry positive for IgG4 and negative for ALK-1 as examples of meningeal based IgG4-related inflammatory pseudotumors. In both patients, there was treatment response to mycophenolate mofetil.