Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: In our experience, many of our schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine request the newer atypical antipsychotic agents in order to eliminate the weekly blood monitoring. However, there are few guidelines available to clinicians interested in switching patients successfully treated with clozapine to olanzapine. METHOD: The goal of this study was to collect preliminary data on the safety, clinical effectiveness, and predictors of response of switching clozapine patients to olanzapine. In an open trial, 19 patients receiving clozapine were switched to olanzapine. RESULTS: Eight (42%) of 19 patients were considered responders. Seven patients decompensated seriously enough to require hospitalization. All 7 of these patients were restabilized on clozapine treatment in the hospital, and olanzapine was discontinued. In an additional 4 patients, clinical status worsened, and clozapine doses were titrated upwards and olanzapine was slowly discontinued. Overall, mean total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores increased significantly from baseline to final assessment (p = .02). Responders had been treated for a significantly shorter period of time with clozapine prior to the switch compared to nonresponders (p = .04) and were receiving a lower dose of clozapine (p = .05). The final olanzapine dose did not differ between responders and nonresponders. All responders have remained on olanzapine treatment and are stable. CONCLUSION: In this open trial, the crossover from clozapine to olanzapine was generally well tolerated and resulted in a successful transition for 8 of the 19 patients. However, mean scores on the total BPRS and negative symptom and depressive symptom subscales significantly increased. Caution must be taken in determining which patients may benefit from the switch to olanzapine because of the risk of decompensation and hospitalization. Because this was an open trial, these findings require replication in a controlled trial.

Ninety patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-III-R criteria participated in this double-blind, exploratory, dose-ranging trial. After a single-blind washout period of 4 to 7 days, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four fixed doses of the new antipsychotic, ziprasidone 4 (N = 19), 10 (N = 17), 40 (N = 17), or 160 (N = 20) mg/day or haloperidol 15 mg/day (N = 17) for 4 weeks. A dose-response relationship among ziprasidone groups was established for improvements in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) score (p = 0.002) but not in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score (p = 0.08). The intent-to-treat analysis of mean changes from baseline in the BPRS total, BPRS Psychosis core, and CGI-S scores demonstrated that ziprasidone 160 mg/day was comparable with haloperidol in reducing overall psychopathology and positive symptoms and was superior to ziprasidone 4 mg/day. Despite the small sample size and short duration of the trial, the improvement in CGI-S with both ziprasidone 160 mg/day and haloperidol 15 mg/day was statistically significantly greater than with ziprasidone 4 mg/day (p = 0.001 andp = 0.005, respectively). The percentage of patients classified as responders on both the BPRS total (> or = 30% improvement) and CGI-Improvement (score of 1 or 2) scales in the ziprasidone 160 mg/day group was similar to that in the haloperidol group and nonsignificantly greater than that in the ziprasidone 4 mg/day group. On all assessments of clinical efficacy, the improvements associated with ziprasidone 4 mg/day, 10 mg/day, and 40 mg/day were similar. Concomitant benztropine use at any time during the study was less frequent with ziprasidone 160 mg/day (15%) than with haloperidol (53%). Haloperidol was associated with a sustained hyperprolactinemia, unlike ziprasidone, where only transient elevations in prolactin that returned to normal within the dosing interval were observed. Ziprasidone was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups. The results of this study suggest that ziprasidone 160 mg/day is as effective as haloperidol 15 mg/day in reducing overall psychopathology and positive symptoms of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder but has a lower potential to induce extrapyramidal symptoms

The excitatory amino acids, glutamate and aspartate, are of interest to schizophrenia research because of their roles in neurodevelopment, neurotoxicity and neurotransmission. Recent evidence suggests that densities of glutamatergic receptors and the ratios of subunits composing these receptors may be altered in schizophrenia, although it is unclear whether these changes are primary or compensatory. Agents acting at the phencyclidine binding site of the NMDA receptor produce symptoms of schizophrenia in normal subjects, and precipitate relapse in patients with schizophrenia. The improvement of negative symptoms with agents acting at the glycine modulatory site of the NMDA receptor, as well as preliminary evidence that clozapine may differ from conventional neuroleptic agents in its effects on glutamatergic systems, suggest that clinical implications may follow from this model. While geriatric patients may be at increased risk for glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity, very little is known about the specific relevance of this model to geriatric patients with schizophrenia.

Clozapine, used in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia resistant to other neuroleptic medication, is metabolized by the hepatic microsomal system to demethyl-clozapine and clozapine-N-oxide. Changes in clozapine serum concentrations have been documented after initiation of therapy with medications known to induce or inhibit liver microsomal enzymes. These interactions are of clinical importance when diminished efficacy or increased toxic effects of clozapine therapy occur. A 34-year-old schizophrenic man had increased clozapine serum concentrations, leukocytosis, and adverse effects as a result of concomitant erythromycin therapy given for suspected lower respiratory tract infection. Symptoms included somnolence, difficulty in coordination and ambulation, slurred speech, disorientation, and incontinence. The symptoms resolved after treatment with clozapine and erythromycin were discontinued, and treatment with clozapine was gradually resumed.

Although low levels of social support have been related to mortality from coronary heart disease, little is known about the role of social support among Mexican Americans. The authors therefore examined the relationship between social support and long-term survival in the Corpus Christi Heart Project. They developed a social support scale that used data collected during in-hospital interviews of 292 Mexican Americans and 304 non-Hispanic Whites who survived a myocardial infarction for more than 28 days. The scale incorporated three measures: marital status; if not married, whether living alone; and whether advised to seek help. During an average follow-up period of 43 months, 115 participants died. Survival following myocardial infarction was greater for those with high or medium social support than for those with low social support. With age, gender, ethnicity, education, employment, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia included in a proportional hazards regression model, the relative risk of mortality was 1.89 (95% CI, 1.20-2.97) for those with low social support. But when the two ethnic groups were analyzed separately, low social support was no longer a significant predictor of mortality for non-Hispanic Whites, whereas for Mexican Americans, the relative risk of mortality was 3.38 (95% CI, 1.73-6.62) for those with low social support.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of D-cycloserine added to clozapine were assessed and compared with previous results for D-cycloserine plus conventional neuroleptics. METHOD: Ten schizophrenic outpatients receiving clozapine entered consecutive 2-week trials of placebo and D-cycloserine at 5, 15, 50, and 250 mg/day. Clinical evaluations were videotaped and scored by a rater blind to the sequence of assessments. RESULTS: There was a significant dose effect of D-cycloserine on scores on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS); the 50-mg dose produced a mean 21% increase in SANS score. The patients had significantly higher baseline serum glutamate concentrations than the patients receiving typical neuroleptics in the previous trial. Baseline glutamate level and change in glycine level significantly correlated with response of negative symptoms to 50-mg D-cycloserine. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement of negative symptoms with D-cycloserine previously observed in patients receiving typical neuroleptics did not occur in patients treated with clozapine.

BACKGROUND: Some treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients improve enough to remain out of the hospital but continue to have significant positive or negative symptoms. METHOD: The goal of this study was to assess the safety and potential efficacy of risperidone as an adjunct for schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine. In an open 4-week trial involving 12 DSM-III-R-diagnosed patients, the addition of risperidone to clozapine was well tolerated and did not affect serum clozapine concentrations significantly. RESULTS: Total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores and subscales measuring positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and depressive symptoms were significantly reduced from baseline. Ten of 12 participants had a 20% or greater reduction in the total BPRS score. CONCLUSION: In this open trial, the addition of risperidone to clozapine was well tolerated and produced significant reduction of symptoms, suggesting that this may be a useful clinical approach. Because this was an open trial, the improvement we observed must be replicated in a controlled trial.

Following a 2-week placebo lead-in, schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to fluoxetine 20 mg/day or placebo added to depot neuroleptic for a 6-week, double blind trial. All patients had received a stable dose of depot neuroleptic for at least 6 months and did not meet criteria for depression. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6. Scores on the negative symptom subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were significantly lower at week 6, controlling for baseline scores, in patients receiving fluoxetine (n = 20) compared to patients receiving placebo (n = 21). Measures of psychosis, depression, global functioning and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) did not differ between groups at week 6. Fluoxetine administration was associated with a mean 65% increase in serum fluphenazine concentrations in 15 patients and a mean 20% increase in serum haloperidol concentrations in three patients. The change in negative symptoms at week 6 did not correlate with serum concentrations of fluoxetine or norfluoxetine, but did inversely correlate with S-norfluoxetine, an active stereoisomer of fluoxetine. For these chronically ill patients, fluoxetine significantly improved negative symptoms and did not worsen EPS, despite causing substantial elevation in serum concentrations of neuroleptics.

OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a dose-finding study of D-cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of the glutamate receptor, added to conventional neuroleptics for schizophrenic patients with prominent negative symptoms. METHOD: Nine patients with schizophrenia completed consecutive 2-week trials of placebo and four doses of D-cycloserine. Clinical assessments were videotaped and were scored by a rater who was blind to temporal sequence. RESULTS: D-Cycloserine at a dose of 50 mg/day produced a significant reduction (mean = 21%, SD = 28%) in negative symptoms and significantly improved reaction time as measured by Sternberg's Item Recognition Paradigm, a test mediated in part by prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary evidence suggests that D-cycloserine may improve negative symptoms and cognitive deficits over a narrow dose range when added to conventional antipsychotic agents.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the relationships among CSF concentrations of substrates of mitochondrial energy metabolism, neuroleptic medication, and neurological side effects. METHOD: CSF was obtained from 25 patients with schizophrenia; seven were unmedicated and 11 had tardive dyskinesia. CSF concentrations of four substrates of mitochondrial energy metabolism (Krebs cycle)--alanine, aspartate, lactate, and pyruvate--were determined. Tardive dyskinesia was measured with the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), and parkinsonism was measured with the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale. RESULTS: CSF concentrations of alanine were significantly elevated in the medicated patients when tardive dyskinesia status was controlled for. CSF aspartate concentrations were significantly elevated in patients with tardive dyskinesia when medication status was controlled for and were significantly correlated with total scores on the AIMS. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with a model linking neuroleptic-induced neurological side effects with impairment of mitochondrial energy metabolism, possibly mediated by inhibition of complex 1 of the electron transport chain.