Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: To clarify the frequency and nature of ICG angiographic 'hot spots' seen in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS: A consecutive series of newly diagnosed patients with neovascular ARMD and fluorescein angiographic evidence of occult choroidal neovascularization (occult CNV) was imaged with ICG angiography. Eyes with ICG angiographic 'hot spots' were identified and further classified. A hot spot was defined as any area of abnormal hyperfluorescence, in the mid to late stages of ICG angiography, measuring less than 1 disk area in size. RESULTS: From a total of 190 patients (220 eyes) with neovascular ARMD, 30 patients and 34 eyes (16%) with hot spots were identified. Hot spots were noted to be of three distinct patterns: polypoidal choroidal neovascularization (polypoidal CNV) in 21 of 34 eyes, or 62%; retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) in 11 of 34 eyes, or 30%; and focal occult CNV in 2 of 34 eyes, or 8%. CONCLUSIONS: A focal area of intense hyperfluorescence or so-called hot spot seen on ICG angiography in neovascular ARMD is due to one of three possible forms of neovascularization: most frequently polypoidal CNV, less commonly RAP, and infrequently nonspecific, focal occult CNV. Since neovascular ARMD may be caused by different types of neovascularization, each with distinct clinical manifestations, natural course, visual prognosis, and response to treatment, it is important to identify the precise nature of hot spots to establish an accurate diagnosis and, when appropriate, a specific form of management

PURPOSE: To study the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using verteporfin on the treatment of patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis (MCP), an uncommon disorder with no proven forms of therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of seven consecutive patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to MCP treated with PDT using verteporfin was performed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 7 patients (all myopic women) was 41.4 years. A mean of 1.86 treatments was performed, and the mean follow-up time was 10 months. Four of the seven patients were treated unsuccessfully with corticosteroids before referral for PDT. The mean improvement of visual acuity was 0.86 line; 3 patients (42.8%) had an improvement in visual acuity representing at least a halving of their visual angle, while the other 4 patients remained stable. There were no treatment-related side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this study were limited, the use of PDT was associated with stabilization or improvement of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to MCP. Further study of this treatment modality is indicated

PURPOSE: To study the effects of photodynamic therapy using verteporfin in the treatment of patients with subfoveal polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 16 consecutive patients with subfoveal PCV treated with photodynamic therapy using verteporfin was performed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients involved was 70.5 years. The mean follow-up time was 12 months. The visual acuity improved in 9 (56.3 %), remained the same in 5 (31.3 %), and decreased in 2 (12.5 %). The mean change in visual acuity was an improvement of 2.38 lines, a difference that was highly significant ( = 0.004). The change in visual acuity was negatively correlated with increasing age. The final visual acuity was positively correlated with initial acuity and negatively correlated with age. These results were confirmed by multiple linear regression. No patient had any lasting complication from the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Subfoveal PCV has no proven method of treatment. Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this pilot study were limited, the encouraging results and lack of complications suggest that further study is indicated

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between corticosteroid use and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). DESIGN: A prospective, case-controlled study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: A consecutive series of patients with acute manifestations of CSC and a control group matched for age, race, and gender were recruited between January 2000 and July 2000. METHODS: A detailed clinical history was taken, and fundus examination with slit-lamp biomicroscopy was performed on all patients. Fluorescein angiography was obtained on the study patients. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients was recruited. Twenty-six patients (52%) had a history of exogenous steroid use, including oral, intravenous, intranasal, and intraarticular administration. Two additional patients had a history of endogenous hypercortisolism (Cushing's syndrome). In a matched control group, eight patients (18%) had a history of steroid use. The difference in corticosteroid exposure between study patients and controls was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: History of corticosteroid use or Cushing's syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: This study is consistent with previous reports associating steroid use with CSC. It identifies corticosteroids as a significant risk factor for the development of acute, exudative macular manifestation and implicates hypercortisolism as a factor in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Several forms of corticosteroid administration were observed to be a risk factor for CSC. Accordingly, susceptible patients in need of corticosteroids should be advised of the risk of developing acute manifestations of CSC

PURPOSE: To report the effects of photodynamic therapy using verteporfin in the treatment of patients with subfoveal idiopathic choroidal vascularization (CNV). DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: In a retrospective study, eight eyes of eight consecutive patients aged 55 years or younger with subfoveal idiopathic CNV treated with photodynamic therapy using verteporfin were evaluated. Visual acuity was considered to be improved if the visual angle was halved, while acuity was thought to be worse if the visual angle doubled. RESULTS: The eight patients included three men and five women with a mean (+/- SD) age of 34.6 (+/- 9.7) years (range 25-53 years). The mean follow-up time was 13.5 months. At the end of the follow-up period the visual acuity improved in five eyes (62.5%), remained unchanged in one (12.5%), and decreased in two (25%). The mean acuity improvement was 3.6 lines of Snellen acuity by the end of the follow-up period, a change that was statistically significant (P =.027, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No patient had any complication from the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is no widely accepted method for treating subfoveal idiopathic CNV and all previously investigated methods have had a significant number of serious side effects. Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this pilot study were limited, the encouraging results and lack of complications suggest that further study is indicated

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to whether a common causal entity is responsible for multifocal choroiditis (MFC) and multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS). It is commonly known that patients with MEWDS can later develop manifestations of MFC, but the reverse is rarely seen. PURPOSE: To report cases of MEWDS in patients previously diagnosed with MFC. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Four female patients 29 to 34 years old. METHODS: The charts of four patients with acute unilateral onset of MEWDS and evidence of previous MFC were examined retrospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Photographic and angiographic interpretation of fundus appearance. RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis with typical MEWDS, one patient had a documented previous episode of acute MFC; one patient had previous bilateral choroidal neovascularization associated with discrete, posterior atrophic scars; and two patients had peripheral discrete chorioretinal pigmented lesions and peripapillary atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: MEWDS may occur after MFC. Now that both directions of disease progression, MFC to MEWDS and MEWDS to MFC, have been well documented, it is likely that there is a common host susceptibility between these two distinct clinical diseases, if not a common pathogenesis