Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The ideal revascularization strategy (bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) for patients with cardiogenic shock in the setting of left main coronary artery disease is unknown. METHODS: The Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock Trial and Registry included 164 patients with left main disease who underwent revascularization. Although the standard of care at the time and the trial protocol recommended coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with left main disease, the revascularization strategy (79 coronary artery bypass graft surgery and 85 PCI) was individualized for each patient by site investigators. RESULTS: The median time from myocardial infarction to revascularization was 24.3 hours (interquartile range, 8.7 to 82.5 hours) in the surgical group and 7.4 hours (interquartile range, 3.7 to 19.5 hours) in the PCI group (p < 0.05). Overall 30-day survival with surgery in this setting was 54% (95% confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.69) and was significantly superior to the 14% (95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.35) in the PCI group (p <or= 0.001). When the left main was the infarct-related artery, the 30-day survival rate was 40% in the surgical group (n = 6) and 16% in the PCI group (n = 15; p = 0.03). Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.77; p = 0.006) and age (per 10 years, hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.08; p = 0.02) were independently associated with 30-day survival. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery appeared to provide a survival advantage over PCI at 30-day follow-up in patients with left main coronary artery disease. The impact of current PCI strategies on this subgroup is undetermined

AIM: The influence of metabolic syndrome (MS) on long-term mortality and morbidity in multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) is unclear. We studied the impact of MS on long-term outcomes in non-diabetic patients (NDM) with MV-CAD undergoing coronary revascularization in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial and registry. METHODS: BARI trial and registry patients were separated into those with diabetes (DM) and those without. NDM fulfilling the NCEP definition of MS were identified. Ten year follow-up data were obtained on mortality, MI and development of diabetes. The data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: In the BARI trial and registry 2962 NDM were identified. Of those, 510 patients had 3 or more components of the BARI-modified NCEP definition for MS, while 445 patients had 2 components of the definition and were classified as the 'mixed group'. Compared to patients without MS, both MS group (RR=3.2, p<0.0001) and the mixed group (RR=1.9, p=0.02) had a higher incidence of DM over the 10-year follow-up. Type 2 DM was found to be highly associated with 10-year mortality (RR=1.65, p<0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of death or MI at 5 and 10 years between NDM with or without MS. In multivariate analysis, the presence of MS was not associated with 10-year mortality in the BARI population (RR=0.93, p=0.62). CONCLUSION: In this BARI follow-up study, we have affirmed the role of MS in predicting the development of diabetes in NDM at baseline. The 10-year risk of mortality and MI was not greater in NDM with MS who had MV-CAD and underwent revascularization, compared to patients without MS. Further studies to evaluate MS patients with MV-CAD undergoing coronary revascularization are warranted