Faculty Bibliography

Arteriovenous malformations of the brain are a considerable source of morbidity and mortality for patients who harbor them. Although our understanding of this disease has improved, it remains in evolution. Advances in our ability to treat these malformations and the modes by which we address them have also improved substantially. However, the variety of patient clinical and disease scenarios often leads us into challenging and complex management algorithms as we balance the risks of treatment against the natural history of the disease. The goal of this article is to provide a focused review of the natural history of cerebral arteriovenous malformations, to examine the role of stereotactic radiosurgery, to discuss the role of endovascular therapy as it relates to stereotactic radiosurgery, and to look toward future advances.

Object Estimating survival time in cancer patients is crucial for clinicians, patients, families, and payers. To provide appropriate and cost-effective care, various data sources are used to provide rational, reliable, and reproducible estimates. The accuracy of such estimates is unknown. Methods The authors prospectively estimated survival in 150 consecutive cancer patients (median age 62 years) with brain metastases undergoing radiosurgery. They recorded cancer type, number of brain metastases, neurological presentation, extracranial disease status, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, Recursive Partitioning Analysis class, prior whole-brain radiotherapy, and synchronous or metachronous presentation. Finally, the authors asked 18 medical, radiation, or surgical oncologists to predict survival from the time of treatment. Results The actual median patient survival was 10.3 months (95% CI 6.4-14). The median physician-predicted survival was 9.7 months (neurosurgeons = 11.8 months, radiation oncologists = 11.0 months, and medical oncologist = 7.2 months). For patients who died before 10 months, both neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists generally predicted survivals that were more optimistic and medical oncologists that were less so, although no group could accurately predict survivors alive at 14 months. All physicians had individual patient survival predictions that were incorrect by as much as 12-18 months, and 14 of 18 physicians had individual predictions that were in error by more than 18 months. Of the 2700 predictions, 1226 (45%) were off by more than 6 months and 488 (18%) were off by more than 12 months. Conclusions Although crucial, predicting the survival of cancer patients is difficult. In this study all physicians were unable to accurately predict longer-term survivors. Despite valuable clinical data and predictive scoring techniques, brain and systemic management often led to patient survivals well beyond estimated survivals.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection bed of a brain metastasis is an important treatment option. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with tumor progression after SRS of the resection bed of a brain metastasis and to evaluate patterns of failure for patients who eventually had tumor progression. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 120 patients who underwent tumor bed radiosurgery after an initial gross total resection. The mean imaging follow-up time was 55 weeks. The median margin dose was 16 Gy. Forty-seven patients (39.2%) underwent whole-brain radiation therapy before or shortly after SRS. RESULTS: Local tumor control was achieved in 103 patients (85.8%). Progression-free survival was 96% at 6 months, 87% at 12 months, and 74% at 24 months. Recurrence most commonly occurred deep in the cavity (65%) outside the planned treatment volume (PTV) margin (53%). PTV, cavity diameter, and a margin dose < 16 Gy significantly correlated with local failure. For patients with PTVs >/= 8.0 cm, local progression-free survival declined to 93% at 6 months, 83% at 12 months, and 65% at 24 months. Development or progression of distant metastases occurred in 40% of patients. Whole-brain radiation therapy was not associated with improved local control. CONCLUSION: Resection bed SRS for brain metastases provided excellent local control. The cavity PTV is predictive of tumor control. Because failure usually occurs outside the PTV, inclusion of a judicious 2- to 3-mm margin beyond the area of postoperative enhancement may be prudent. ABBREVIATIONS: ARE, adverse radiation effectPTV, planned treatment volumeSRS, stereotactic radiosurgeryWBRT, whole-brain radiation therapy.

To retrospectively evaluate the clinical benefit and imaging response of bevacizumab when used to treat refractory adverse radiation effects (ARE) after stereotactic radiosurgery. Twenty-nine patients with brain tumors or vascular malformations developed clinical and/or imaging evidence of ARE after SRS and were treated using bevacizumab. Patients received an average dose of 7.4 mg/kg over a mean of 5.7 weeks at a median of 16 months following SRS. Initial diagnosis, SRS dose, bevacizumab treatment protocols, magnetic resonance imaging T2/FLAIR and T1 paramagnetic contrast enhanced edema volumes were compared before and after bevacizumab administration. Ninety percent (18/20) with clinically symptomatic ARE had neurological improvement after bevacizumab therapy. Twenty-six patients had a decrease of 62 % of T2/FLAIR volumes and a 50 % decrease in magnetic resonance imaging intravenous contrast enhancement volumes. Two patients showed progression of the T2/FLAIR and contrast enhancement volumes. One patient had progression of post-Gd-enhancement but regression of T2/FLAIR volume. Symptoms recurred in 11 of the 20 patients after discontinuing therapy. Patients who experienced a return of enhancement received a lower marginal dose during SRS. Our experience provides additional evidence that bevacizumab reduces both symptoms and reactive imaging changes in patients with ARE. After SRS, refractory ARE unresponsive to initial corticosteroids or other agents may benefit from a bevacizumab trial. The necessary duration and optimum dose of therapy is unknown and provides a further impetus to conduct a prospective trial.

Intrinsic meningiomas of the superior sagittal sinus pose a significant technical challenge, particularly in the posterior two-thirds of the sinus. Resection is curative but frequently is not possible because of the involvement of critical vascular structures. Here, the authors present the case of a 49-year-old woman with a recurrent meningioma located exclusively in the posterior two-thirds of the sagittal sinus. The patient was treated with a margin dose of 12 Gy and a maximum dose of 24 Gy to the length of the tumor, which measured 16 cm. Five years after treatment, the tumor remains stable and the patient is symptom free. This case demonstrates the unique role that stereotactic radiosurgery can play in the management of meningiomas that are surgically unresectable and have no accepted form of treatment. To the authors' knowledge, 16 cm also represents the longest segment of tumor treated using stereotactic radiosurgery.