Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: We determine the use of information gained with intraoperative biopsy and frozen section analysis of the apical soft tissue margin during nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A separate 2 to 3 mm. circumferential biopsy was obtained from the apical soft tissue margin, and was sent for frozen and permanent section analysis during radical retropubic prostatectomy in 95 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. A single pathologist examined the surgical and apical soft tissue margin specimens for evidence and extent of benign or malignant prostate tissue. Urinary continence was evaluated at catheter removal and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the patients 26% had positive surgical margins, of which 64% were positive apical margins. Permanent section of the apical soft tissue biopsy revealed no prostate in 39%, benign prostate in 54% and prostate cancer in 7% of patients. Because of the frozen section finding of adenocarcinoma in 3 patients, the apical soft tissue margin was further resected until the specimen was negative for malignancy. The apical soft tissue margin was the only positive margin site in 2 of these 3 patients. Positive surgical and apical margins, and percent tumor volumes greater than 26% on prostatectomy specimen had a significantly higher likelihood for positive apical soft tissue margins. The pathological finding of a positive apical margin on the surgical specimen had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 57%, 86%, 25% and 96%, respectively, for detecting prostate cancer on the apical soft tissue biopsy. Of the apical soft tissue biopsies 54% contained an element of benign prostatic tissue, although 92% of them contained benign tissue in less than 25% of the total specimen. Mean continence score in the men with and those without benign prostate tissue on apical soft tissue biopsy was 15.6 and 14.4, respectively (p = 0.15). The percent of men who required no protective pads for urinary continence at 3 months was 53% and 65% for those who had no prostate and those who had benign prostate tissue, respectively, in the apical soft tissue margin. CONCLUSIONS: Excising and submitting an additional 2 to 3 mm. of apical soft tissue margin for permanent section analysis after prostate removal during radical prostatectomy represent an effective method for decreasing residual prostate tissue. Attempts at maximizing urethral length when dividing the prostato-urethral junction likely increases the chance of leaving residual prostate without improving continence

This article discusses the basic elements of chemoprevention trial designs using cohorts of men following radical prostatectomy who either have prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure indicative of recurrence or are at high risk for recurrence (positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, positive lymph nodes, Gleason score of greater than or equal to 8, preoperative serum PSA less than 20 ng/mL). Two ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials with soy protein as intervention in these 2 populations are described. In the trial with men at high risk for recurrence, participants started intervention within 4 months after surgery and were followed for up to 2 years; primary endpoints were PSA failure rate and time-to-PSA failure. In the trial with men with PSA failure (PSA 0.1 to 2.0 ng/mL), participants received treatment for 8 months and the primary endpoint is rise in PSA over time. The strengths and limitations of these designs are discussed and interim experience using studies with soy protein as the intervention agent are summarized

BACKGROUND: The work-up of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary usually includes history, physical examination, radiographic imaging, tumor markers, and more recently molecular and genetic information. We report here on how the suggestion by family history of a BRCA1 mutation guided the diagnostic and therapeutic approach in a patient with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary. METHODS: BRCA1 mutation was screened for by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis. Primers for PCR amplification included selected BRCA1 exons 2, 110, 11L, 13, and 20. The PCR product was cloned into a PCRII vector and sequenced with a Sequenase Version 2.0 Sequencing Kit. RESULTS: Single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis suggested a mutation in the region of exon 20 and sequencing confirmed the presence of a germline mutation 5382insC. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates an unusual presentation of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary in a patient with a germline BRCA1 mutation, the use of a suspected germline mutation to guide the work-up and treatment, and finally the value of positron emission tomography scanning in the work-up of an unknown primary.

The tyrosine kinase receptor c-kit and its ligand [kit ligand (KL) or stem cell factor (SCF)] exert a broad range of biological activities during organogenesis and normal cell development. Recent studies have revealed that altered c-kit levels occur in a variety of malignancies and cancer cell lines. KL has also been shown to stimulate the growth of malignant cells, as well as to promote chemotaxis. We had previously reported expression of KL in stroma cells of normal human prostate. The present study was undertaken in order to analyze the patterns of expression of c-kit and KL in a well characterized set of prostatic tissues, including normal prostate (n=4), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (n=53) and adenocarcinoma (n=46) samples. The distribution of c-kit and KL proteins was studied by immunohistochemical analyses, while transcript levels were determined by in situ hybridization with specific RNA probes on a subset of the benign and malignant tissues referred above. In addition, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to determine levels of c-kit and KL expression in cultures of epithelial and stroma cells, as well as in the prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, DU145 and PC3. c-kit protein in normal prostate was exclusively detected in mast cells by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. However, c-kit transcripts, but not c-kit protein, were detected in low levels and with an heterogeneous pattern in basal epithelial cells of ducts and acini. c-kit in BPH was detected in epithelial cells in 9 of 53 (17%) specimens. c-kit protein expression in malignant epithelial cells was identified in 1 of 46 (2%) tumors. However, c-kit transcripts were detected in low levels by in situ hybridization in most of the tumors analyzed. KL protein and transcripts in normal prostate were detected in high levels in stroma cells. However, epithelial cells were unreactive for anti-KL antibody, but showed low levels of KL transcripts mainly in cells of the basal layer. Basal epithelial cells in hyperplastic glands showed KL expression in 13 of 53 (24%) specimens. KL protein in tumor cells was noted in 18 of 46 (39%) cases. c-kit transcripts were not found in normal prostate and in the 3 cancer cell lines analyzed by RT-PCR, however, it was present in cultured epithelial cells of BPH, and in cultures of stroma cells from both normal and BPH. The majority of cultured cell lines of epithelial and stromal origin displayed considerable levels of KL. In addition all prostate cell lines studied showed significant levels of KL transcripts. In summary, co-expression of c-kit and KL in a subset of BPH cases may suggest an autocrine mode of signaling. Data from this study reveals that altered patterns of c-kit and KL expression are associated with BPH and adenocarcinoma of prostate. It appears that KL induces mast cells proliferation and maturation and enhances their release of protease. This could explain the accumulation of mast cells at tumor sites, a phenomenon that was not observed in normal prostate or BPH samples.

In the hypertensive population, primary aldosteronism has been reported to have a prevalence of 0.1% to 2%, with the main causes being aldosterone-producing adenomas and bilateral hyperplasia. However, there is a third rare entity, called unilateral adrenal hyperplasia, that contributes to primary aldosteronism. Unilateral hyperplasia and primary aldosteronism are the subjects of this case review.

Benign proliferative nipple duct lesions (PNDLs) pose a diagnostic problem for clinicians and pathologists. Clinically, they may be associated with skin changes typically present in Paget's disease of the nipple. The identification of numerous scattered cells in the epidermis that are immunoreactive for low-molecular-weight cytokeratin may lead to further confusion with Paget's disease. We studied the nipple epidermis in nine cases of PNDL and compared them with 26 histologically normal nipples from mastectomy specimens. CAM 5.2 and anticytokeratin 7 (CK7) immunoreactive cells were identified in the epidermis of seven of nine nipples associated with PNDL. The cytokeratin-positive cells appeared cytologically benign and were dispersed singly (scattered in seven of seven cases and frequent in four of seven cases) or formed small aggregates with occasional tubular structures (three of seven cases) in the basal and middle layers of the epidermis. In two of seven cases, these epidermal immunoreactive cells showed continuity with the underlying PNDL, suggesting the spread or continuation of lesional cells to the epidermis. Dispersed single immunoreactive cells were identified in small numbers (scattered) in the basal layer of the epidermis in 12 of 26 normal nipples and more frequently in 1 of 12 cases. In all cases, the intraepidermal cells were negative for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Her-2/neu. We conclude that intraepidermal CAM 5.2 and anti-CK7 immunoreactive cells, which are normally present in the nipple epidermis, may proliferate and form aggregates when there is an underlying PNDL. The presence of these cells does not imply Paget's disease when the intraepidermal cells have a bland cytologic appearance, fail to overexpress Her-2/neu, and there is no carcinoma within the PNDL or elsewhere in the breast

Stromal hyalinization in ovarian clear cell carcinomas has been suggested to be caused by deposition of basement membrane (BM) material, but the biological and diagnostic significance of this finding remains unknown. The distribution of BM material in 17 primary ovarian clear cell carcinomas was examined semiquantitatively using hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections and immunohistochemistry with antibodies to laminin and type IV collagen. For comparison, other surface epithelial tumors, including 8 serous tumors of low malignant potential, 10 serous adenocarcinomas, 6 mucinous tumors of low malignant potential, 5 mucinous adenocarcinomas, 6 endometrioid carcinomas, 4 Brenner tumors, 1 transitional cell carcinoma, and 3 undifferentiated carcinomas, were examined. Stromal hyalinization was found in all 17 clear cell carcinomas and was immunoreactive for type IV collagen and laminin. Other types of surface epithelial tumor lacked these findings. In clear cell carcinoma, areas showing a papillary pattern tended to show abundant deposition regardless of nuclear grade, whereas in solid, tubular, or cystic areas, the deposition was more prominent in areas showing high-nuclear-grade features (grade 2 and 3) than in areas with low-nuclear-grade features (grade 1). Dense deposition of BM material recognized as stromal hyalinization on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections in primary ovarian clear cell carcinoma is a characteristic feature that is not seen in other ovarian surface epithelial tumors. This matrix production correlates with high-nuclear-grade features and papillary growth pattern

PURPOSE: Radical retropubic prostatectomy is often performed with preservation of the bladder neck. We examine the incidence of benign and malignant prostatic tissue at the bladder neck margin in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy with preservation of the bladder neck for clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 100 cases of radical retropubic prostatectomy with preservation of the bladder neck performed by a single surgeon (H. L.). A 2 mm. thick circumferential specimen was excised from the bladder neck, divided into 4 quadrants (anterior, posterior, right and left) and submitted for frozen section examination. The permanent sections from these bladder neck biopsies and the entire surgical specimens were analyzed by a single pathologist (J. M.). RESULTS: The frozen section diagnosis from the bladder neck biopsies were adenocarcinoma, benign prostatic tissue and no prostatic tissue in 3, 38 and 59 cases, respectively. The permanent section diagnosis of the bladder neck biopsies was adenocarcinoma, benign prostatic tissue and no prostatic tissue in 4, 57 and 39 cases, respectively. The sensitivity specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for examination of the surgical specimen to identify benign prostatic tissue was 67, 90, 90 and 65%, respectively. The bladder neck was re-biopsied because of the findings of adenocarcinoma and benign prostatic tissue in 3 and 8 cases, respectively. The initial bladder neck biopsy resulted in pathological down staging to pT2c in only 1 case. Repeat resection of the bladder neck in all cases with 10% or less benign prostatic tissue showed no prostatic tissue, whereas 50% of the cases with more than 10% benign prostatic tissue demonstrated residual benign prostatic tissue. Serum prostate specific antigen was undetectable immediately after radical retropubic prostatectomy in all cases with benign prostatic tissue only. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the bladder neck during radical retropubic prostatectomy does not significantly compromise total extirpation of the malignant process. Benign prostatic tissue at the bladder neck margin is relatively common. Examination of the surgical specimen has limited sensitivity, and negative and positive predictive values for the presence of benign prostatic tissue at the bladder neck margin. The impact of benign prostatic tissue as it relates to future malignant transformation is unknown. Submitting frozen section specimens from the bladder neck is reasonable for the younger man who may be at risk from benign prostatic tissue at the bladder neck margin

Adenovirus infection of the gastrointestinal tract in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is rarely reported, probably because of a lack of familiarity of most pathologists with diagnostic criteria during routine light microscopy and possible misidentification as cytomegalovirus infection. We studied colonoscopic biopsy specimens from 135 HIV-infected patients with clinically suspected cytomegalovirus colitis during a 4.5-year period to morphologically identify the presence of adenovirus infection. Immunohistochemical staining for adenovirus was performed for confirmation on all suspected cases. Adenovirus infected cells showed characteristic amphophilic or eosinophilic nuclear inclusions, predominantly affecting the surface epithelium and characteristically involving goblet cells. Sixteen cases showed morphologic features of adenovirus infection, all confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Twelve cases also showed cytomegalovirus infection, whereas 4 showed adenovirus alone. In 10 cases, adenovirus colitis was not recognized during initial routine histopathologic diagnostic evaluation. Adenovirus inclusions also were discovered in the stomach, the duodenum, and the liver in single cases. Conclusions are as follows: (1) Adenovirus colitis has been underdiagnosed at our institution and, we suspect, in general. (2) The morphologic features and nuclear inclusions of adenovirus colitis are characteristic and can be identified reliably by routine light microscopy. (3) Adenovirus infection also may be diagnosed morphologically in extracolonic sites, such as the stomach, the small intestine, and the liver. (4) Coinfection of adenovirus with cytomegalovirus and other agents is seen frequently, but, less frequently, adenovirus may be identified as a sole pathogen

We sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry using the TORDJI-22 MoAb (BioGenex, San Ramon, Calif), which is specific for the C-100 protein of the hepatitis C virus, compared with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of tissue for viral RNA. RT-PCR had been performed on 52 fixed tissue specimens. Immunohistochemistry was performed using prediluted antibody with the alkaline phosphatase/fast red (BioGenex) technique. Predigestion with Protease XXIV (BioGenex) and other procedures followed the manufacturer's protocols. Positive immunohistochemistry was narrowly defined as tightly clumped, perinuclear red granules in hepatocytes. Of the specimens, 28 were positive by RT-PCR. With RT-PCR as the standard of comparison, immunohistochemistry yielded a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 84%. Positive cells, when present, were usually very rare. With stringent criteria, immunohistochemistry with the TORDJI-22 monoclonal antibody is a very specific, fairly sensitive diagnostic test for hepatitis C virus in fixed liver tissues