Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Patients undergoing multilevel spine surgery are at risk for delayed extubation. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the impact of type and volume of intraoperative fluids administered during multilevel thoracic and/or lumbar spine surgery on postoperative extubation status. METHODS:Retrospective evaluation of medical records of patients ≥ 18 yr undergoing ≥ 4 levels of thoracic and/or lumbar spine fusions was performed. Patients were organized according to postoperative extubation status: immediate (IMEX; in OR/PACU) or delayed (DEX; outside OR/PACU). Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare IMEX and DEX groups. Volume, proportion, and ratios of intraoperative fluids administered were evaluated for the associated impact on extubation status. RESULTS:A total of 246 patients (198 IMEX, 48 DEX) were included. PSM analysis demonstrated that increased administration of non-cell saver blood products (NCSB) and increased ratio of crystalloid: colloids infused were independently associated with delayed extubation. With increasing EBL, IMEX had a proportionate reduction in crystalloid infusion (R = -0.5, P < .001), while the proportion of crystalloids infused remained relatively unchanged for DEX (R = -0.27; P = .06). Twenty-six percent of patients receiving crystalloid: colloid ratio > 3:1 had DEX compared to none of those receiving crystalloid: colloid ratio ≤ 3:1 (P = .009). DEX had greater cardiac and pulmonary complications, surgical site infections and prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stay (P < .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:PSM analysis of patients undergoing multilevel thoracic and/or lumbar spine fusion demonstrated that increased administration of crystalloid to colloid ratio is independently associated with delayed extubation. With increasing EBL, a proportionate reduction of crystalloids facilitates early extubation.

BACKGROUND:Limited data are available to objectively define what constitutes a "good" versus a "bad" recovery for operative cervical deformity (CD) patients. Furthermore, the recovery patterns of primary versus revision procedures for CD is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE:To define and compare the recovery profiles of CD patients undergoing primary or revision procedures, utilizing a novel area-under-the-curve normalization methodology. METHODS:CD patients undergoing primary or revision surgery with baseline to 1-yr health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores were included. Clinical symptoms and HRQL were compared among groups (primary/revision). Normalized HRQL scores at baseline and follow-up intervals (3M, 6M, 1Y) were generated. Normalized HRQLs were plotted and area under the curve was calculated, generating one number describing overall recovery (Integrated Health State). Subanalysis identified recovery patterns through 2-yr follow-up. RESULTS:Eighty-three patients were included (45 primary, 38 revision). Age (61.3 vs 61.9), gender (F: 66.7% vs 63.2%), body mass index (27.7 vs 29.3), Charlson Comorbidity Index, frailty, and osteoporosis (20% vs 13.2%) were similar between groups (P > .05). Primary patients were more preoperatively neurologically symptomatic (55.6% vs 31.6%), less sagittally malaligned (cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA]: 32.6 vs 46.6; T1 slope: 28.8 vs 36.8), underwent more anterior-only approaches (28.9% vs 7.9%), and less posterior-only approaches (37.8% vs 60.5%), all P < .05. Combined approaches, decompressions, osteotomies, and construct length were similar between groups (P > .05). Revisions had longer op-times (438.0 vs 734.4 min, P = .008). Following surgery, complication rate was similar between groups (66.6% vs 65.8%, P = .569). Revision patients remained more malaligned (cSVA, TS-CL; P < .05) than primary patients until 1-yr follow-up (P > .05). Normalized HRQLs determined primary patients to exhibit less neck pain (numeric rating scale [NRS]) and myelopathy (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association) symptoms through 1-yr follow-up compared to revision patients (P < .05). These differences subsided when following patients through 2 yr (P > .05). Despite similar 2-yr HRQL outcomes, revision patients exhibited worse neck pain (NRS) Integrated Health State recovery (P < .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite both primary and revision patients exhibiting similar HRQL outcomes at final follow-up, revision patients were in a greater state of postoperative neck pain for a greater amount of time.

S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) are indicated in patients with fixed, high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis or kyphosis secondary to a sacral fracture, who present with severe sagittal imbalance. Unlike lumbar PSOs, sacral osteotomies are rare, and there is a paucity of literature outlining techniques. Here, we present the indications, planning, technique, and outcomes for S1 PSOs.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE:The goals of this study were to (1) evaluate pre-operative bone quality assessment and intervention practice over time and (2) review the current evidence for bone evaluation in spine fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Deformity spine surgery has demonstrated improved quality of life in patients however its cost has made it controversial. If pre-operative bone quality can be optimized then potentially these treatments could be more durable however, at present, no clinical practice guidelines have been published by professional spine surgical organizations. METHODS:A retrospective cohort review was performed on patients who underwent a minimum five-level primary or revision fusion. Pre-operative bone quality metrics were evaluated over time from 2012 - 2017 to find potential trends. Sub-group analysis was conducted based on age, gender, pre-operative diagnosis, and spine fusion region. RESULTS:Patient characteristics including pre-operative rates of pseudarthrosis and junctional failure did not change. An increasing trend of physician bone health documentation was noted (p = 0.045) but changes in other metrics were not significant. A gender bias favored females who had higher rates of pre-operative DXA studies (p = 0.001), Vitamin D 25-OH serum labs (p = 0.005), Vitamin D supplementation (p = 0.022), calcium supplementation (p < 0.001), antiresorptive therapy (p = 0.016), and surgeon clinical documentation of bone health (p = 0.008) compared to men. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our spine surgeons have increased documentation of bone health discussions but this has not affected bone quality interventions. A discrepancy exists favoring females over males in nearly all pre-operative bone quality assessment metrics. Pre-operative vitamin D level and BMD assessment should be considered in patients undergoing long fusion constructs however the data for bone anabolic and resorptive agents has less support. Clinical practice guidelines on pre-operative bone quality assessment spine patients should be defined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Correction of cervical deformity (CD) often involves different types of osteotomies to address sagittal malalignment. This study assessed the relationship between osteotomy grade and vertebral level on alignment and clinical outcomes. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective review of a multi-center prospectively collected CD database. CD was defined as at least one of the following: C2-C7 Cobb >10°, cervical lordosis (CL) >10°, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) >4 cm, and chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. Patients were evaluated for level and type of cervical osteotomy. Results/UNASSIGNED:= 0.058) due to lever arm effect. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:CD patients undergoing osteotomies in the cervical and upper thoracic spine experienced improvement in TS--CL and C2 slope. In the upper thoracic spine, multiple minor osteotomies achieved similar alignment changes to major osteotomies at a single level, while a major osteotomy focused at T2 had the greatest overall impact in cervicothoracic and global alignment in CD patients.

OBJECTIVEProximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a structural complication of spinal fusion in 5%-61% of patients treated for adult spinal deformity. In nearly one-third of these cases, PJK is progressive and requires costly surgical revision. Previous studies have suggested that patient body habitus may predict risk for PJK. Here, the authors sought to investigate abdominal girth and paraspinal muscle size as risk factors for PJK.METHODSAll patients undergoing thoracolumbosacral fusion greater than 2 levels at a single institution over a 5-year period with ≥ 6 months of radiographic follow-up were considered for inclusion. PJK was defined as kyphosis ≥ 20° between the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and two supra-adjacent vertebrae. Operative and radiographic parameters were recorded, including pre- and postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence (PI), and absolute value of the pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (|PI-LL|), as well as changes in LL, |PI-LL|, and SVA. The authors also considered relative abdominal girth and the size of the paraspinal muscles at the UIV.RESULTSOne hundred sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. On univariate analysis, PJK was associated with a larger preoperative SVA (p < 0.001) and |PI-LL| (p = 0.01), and smaller SS (p = 0.004) and LL (p = 0.001). PJK was also associated with more positive postoperative SVA (p = 0.01), ΔSVA (p = 0.01), Δ|PI-LL| (p < 0.001), and ΔLL (p < 0.001); longer construct length (p = 0.005); larger abdominal girth-to-muscle ratio (p = 0.007); and smaller paraspinal muscles at the UIV (p < 0.001). Higher postoperative SVA (OR 1.1 per cm), smaller paraspinal muscles at the UIV (OR 2.11), and more aggressive reduction in |PI-LL| (OR 1.03) were independent predictors of radiographic PJK on multivariate logistic regression.CONCLUSIONSA more positive postoperative global sagittal alignment and smaller paraspinal musculature at the UIV most strongly predicted PJK following thoracolumbosacral fusion.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study at a single institution. OBJECTIVE:To analyze the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF) and bilateral minimally invasive (MIS) Wiltse approach TLIF (Wil-TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Several studies have compared Open TLIF to MIS TLIF, however, comparing the techniques using a large cohort of one-level TLIFs has not been fully explored. METHODS:We reviewed the charts of patients undergoing a single-level primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion between 2012 and 2017. The cases were categorized as Open TLIF (traditional midline exposure including lateral exposure of transverse processes) or bilateral paramedian Wiltse TLIF approach. Differences between groups were assessed by t-tests. RESULTS:227 patients underwent one-level primary TLIF (116 O-TLIF, 111 Wil-TLIF). There was no difference in age, gender, ASA or BMI between groups. Wil-TLIF had the lowest EBL (197 mL vs. 499 mL O-TLIF, p =  < .001), LOS (2.7 days vs. 3.6 days O-TLIF, p =  < .001), overall complication rate (12% vs. 24% O-TLIF, p = .015), minor complication rate (7% vs. 16% O-TLIF, p = .049), and 90-day readmission rate (1% vs. 8% O-TLIF, p = .012). Wil-TLIF was associated with the higher fluoroscopy time (83 sec vs. vs. 24 sec O-TLIF, p =  < .001). There was not a significant difference in operative time, intraoperative or neurological complications, extubation time, reoperation rate, or infection rate. CONCLUSIONS:In comparing Wiltse MIS TLIF to Open TLIF, the minimally invasive paramedian Wiltse approach demonstrated the lowest EBL, LOS, readmission rates and complications, but longer fluoroscopy times when compared to the traditional open approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3.

Study Design/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort study. Objective/UNASSIGNED:Factors that predict outcomes for adult cervical spine deformity (ACSD) have not been well defined. To compare ACSD patients with best versus worst outcomes. Methods/UNASSIGNED:This study was based on a prospective, multicenter observational ACSD cohort. Best versus worst outcomes were compared based on Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NP-NRS), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores. Results/UNASSIGNED:= .008). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Factors distinguishing best and worst ACSD surgery outcomes included patient, surgical, and radiographic factors. These findings suggest areas that may warrant greater awareness to optimize patient counseling and outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database. OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the evolution of surgical treatment strategies, complications, and patient-reported outcomes for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:ASD surgery is associated with high complication rates. Evolving treatment strategies may reduce these risks. METHODS:Adult patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2016 were analyzed (n = 905). Preoperative and surgical parameters were compared across years. Subgroup analysis of 436 patients with minimum two-year follow-up was also performed. RESULTS:From 2009 to 2016, there was a significant increase in the mean preoperative age (52 to 63.1, p < .001), body mass index (26.3 to 32.2, p = .003), Charlson Comorbidity index (1.4 to 2.2, p < .001), rate of previous spine surgery (39.8% to 53.1%, p = .01), and baseline disability (visual analog scale [VAS] back and leg pain) scores (p < .01), Oswestry Disability Index, and 22-item Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire scores (p < .001). Preoperative Schwab sagittal alignment modifiers and overall surgical invasiveness index were similar across time. Three-column osteotomy utilization decreased from 36% in 2011 to 16.7% in 2016. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion increased from 6.4% to 24.1% (p = .004), anterior lumbar interbody fusion decreased from 22.9% to 16.7% (p = .043), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion utilization remained similar (p = .448). Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in 2012 was 84.6%, declined to 58% in 2013, and rebounded to 76.3% in 2016 (p = .006). Tranexamic acid use increased rapidly from 2009 to 2016 (13.3% to 48.6%, p < .001). Two-year follow-up sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, and maximum Cobb angles were similar across years. Intraoperative complications decreased from 33% in 2010 to 9.3% in 2016 (p < .001). Perioperative (<30 days, <90 days) complications peaked in 2010 (42.7%, 46%) and decreased by 2016 (24.1%, p < .001; 29.6%, p = .007). The overall complication rate decreased from 73.2% in 2008-2014 patients to 62.6% in 2015-2016 patients (p = .03). Two-year health-related quality of life outcomes did not significantly differ across the years (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS:From 2009 to 2016, despite an increasingly elderly, medically compromised, and obese patient population, complication rates decreased. Evolving strategies may result in improved treatment of ASD patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level IV.

Fractures of the odontoid represent as much as 20% of cervical spine fractures in adults, and they are the most common spine fracture in patients over 80 years of age. Despite their prevalence, the management of these fractures remains highly controversial. In particular, there is much debate concerning the management of type II fractures, or fractures occurring about the waist of the odontoid. We will review the epidemiology, evaluation, management-both operative and non-operative-and outcomes of adults with type II odontoid fractures. We will particularly focus on debates concerning hard collar versus halo, anterior versus posterior surgery, the management of odontoid nonunions, as well as questions about risks and benefits of surgery in the very elderly.