Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:bangas01
Increasing inclusion of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease in cardiovascular clinical trials
Mathew, Roy O; Bangalore, Sripal; Sidhu, Mandeep S; Fleg, Jerome L; Maddux, Franklin W
PMID: 29571453
ISSN: 1523-1755
CID: 3001602
What Ever Happened to Cardioprotection With β-Blockers? [Editorial]
Messerli, Franz H; Suter, Thomas; Bangalore, Sripal
PMID: 29545007
ISSN: 1942-5546
CID: 2993102
Device Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Is Related to Patient and Procedural Characteristics but Not to Duration of Postimplantation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
Pracon, Radoslaw; Bangalore, Sripal; Dzielinska, Zofia; Konka, Marek; Kepka, Cezary; Kruk, Mariusz; Kaczmarska-Dyrda, Edyta; Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Joanna; Bujak, Sebastian; Solecki, Mateusz; Pskit, Agnieszka; Dabrowska, Agnieszka; Sieradzki, Bartosz; Plonski, Andrzej; Ruzyllo, Witold; Witkowski, Adam; Demkow, Marcin
BACKGROUND:Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage occlusion is a worrisome finding with little knowledge about when to expect it and how to prevent it. This study sought to investigate correlates of DRT after left atrial appendage occlusion, its time of diagnosis, and particularly, association with postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:=0.77). CONCLUSIONS:In this real-world series, DRT was observed early, late, and very late after left atrial appendage occlusion. It was related to patient and procedural characteristics but not to postimplantation dual antiplatelet therapy duration.
PMID: 29463510
ISSN: 1941-7632
CID: 2963322
More SPRINT controversy
Messerli, F H; Bangalore, S; Rimoldi, S F
PMID: 29117465
ISSN: 1365-2796
CID: 2962932
Changing definition of hypertension in guidelines: how innocent a number game?
Messerli, Franz H; Rimoldi, Stefano F; Bangalore, Sripal
PMID: 29324999
ISSN: 1522-9645
CID: 2906392
Visit-to-visit variability of lipid measurements as predictors of cardiovascular events
Waters, David D; Bangalore, Sripal; Fayyad, Rana; DeMicco, David A; Laskey, Rachel; Melamed, Shari; Barter, Philip J
BACKGROUND:Higher visit-to-visit variability in risk factors such as blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol are associated with an increase in cardiovascular (CV) events. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to determine whether variability in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride levels predicted coronary and CV events in a clinical trial population with known coronary disease. METHODS:We assessed intraindividual variability in fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-cholesterol measurements among 9572 patients in the Treating to New Targets trial and correlated the results with coronary events over a median follow-up of 4.9Â years. RESULTS:In the fully adjusted Cox model, 1 standard deviation of average successive variability, defined as the average absolute difference between successive values, was associated with an increased risk of a coronary event for HDL-cholesterol (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.21, PÂ <Â .0001), for triglycerides (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, PÂ =Â .0005), and for LDL-cholesterol (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.19, PÂ <Â .0001). Similar results were found for the 3 other measures of variability, standard deviation, coefficient of variability, and variability independent of the mean. Similar results were seen for CV events, stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Higher variability in triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol, but not HDL-cholesterol, was predictive of incident diabetes. The correlation among the variability of the 3 lipid measurements was weak. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Visit-to-visit variability in fasting measurements of HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol are predictive of coronary events, CV events, and for triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol variability, incident diabetes. The mechanisms accounting for these associations remain to be determined.
PMID: 29310989
ISSN: 1933-2874
CID: 2906552
Meta-Analysis Comparing Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy to Prevent Recurrent Cryptogenic Stroke
Ando, Tomo; Holmes, Anthony A; Pahuja, Mohit; Javed, Arshad; Briasoulis, Alenxandros; Telila, Tesfaye; Takagi, Hisato; Schreiber, Theodore; Afonso, Luis; Grines, Cindy L; Bangalore, Sripal
New evidence suggests that closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) plus medical therapy (MT; antiplatelet or anticoagulation) is superior to MT alone to prevent recurrent cryptogenic stroke. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared PFO closure plus MT with MT alone in patients with cryptogenic stroke. The efficacy end points were recurrent stroke, transient ischemia attack, and death. The safety end points were major bleeding and newly detected atrial fibrillation. Trials were pooled using random effects and fixed effects models. A trial sequential analysis was performed to assess if the current evidence is sufficient. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for pooled estimates of risk. Five randomized controlled trials (3,440 patients) were included. Mean follow-up was 4.1 years. PFO closure reduced the risk of recurrent stroke by 58% (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.91, p = 0.03). The number needed to treat was 38. The cumulative Z-line crossed the trial sequential boundary, suggesting there is adequate evidence to conclude that PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent stroke by 60%. PFO closure did not reduce the risk of transient ischemia attack (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.15, p = 0.21), mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.60, p = 0.45), or major bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.20, p = 0.93); it did increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (RR 4.69, 95% CI 2.17 to 10.12, p <0.0001).
PMID: 29306484
ISSN: 1879-1913
CID: 2906622
Lowering the Thresholds of Diseases: Is Anyone Still Healthy? [Editorial]
Messerli, Franz H; Bangalore, Sripal
PMID: 29325633
ISSN: 1558-3597
CID: 2905492
Meta-Analysis of Culprit-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease
Bangalore, Sripal; Toklu, Bora; Stone, Gregg W
Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) have compared a strategy of routine multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed either as a single procedure or as staged procedures to culprit-only PCI. All of these trials have been underpowered for clinical end points. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCT comparing multivessel PCI with culprit-only PCI in patients with STEMI and MVD. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite rate of death or MI. Other efficacy outcomes included death, MI, and repeat revascularization. Safety outcomes were contrast-associated acute kidney injury, stroke, and major bleeding. Pairwise direct comparison and mixed-treatment comparison network meta-analyses were performed. Eleven trials that enrolled 3,150 patients with a total of 5,296 patient-years of follow-up were included. In direct comparison meta-analysis, single-procedure multivessel PCI was associated with a reduction in the risk of death or MI (rate ratio [RR] = 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37 to 0.73; p <0.001), due to less death (RR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.02; p = 0.06) and MI (RR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.69; p <0.0001) compared with culprit-only PCI. No heterogeneity (I2 = 0) was present between studies. In contrast, staged multivessel PCI did not significantly reduce death or MI compared with culprit-only PCI. Both multivessel PCI strategies reduced the risk of repeat revascularization without significant differences in safety outcomes. Results were consistent in the mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that single-procedure multivessel PCI may be the preferred strategy in patients with STEMI and MVD.
PMID: 29304995
ISSN: 1879-1913
CID: 2899482
Trends in cardiovascular risk factor and disease prevalence in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery
Smilowitz, Nathaniel R; Gupta, Navdeep; Guo, Yu; Beckman, Joshua A; Bangalore, Sripal; Berger, Jeffrey S
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Cardiovascular risk factors are prevalent in the population undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Changes in perioperative cardiovascular risk factor profiles over time are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate national trends in cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. METHODS:Adults aged ≥45 years old who underwent non-cardiac surgery were identified using the US National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2013. The prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity and chronic kidney disease) and ASCVD (coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease and prior stroke] were evaluated over time. RESULTS:A total of 10 581 621 hospitalisations for major non-cardiac surgery were identified. Between 2008 and 2013, ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors and ASCVD were present in 44.5% and 24.3% of cases, respectively. Over time, the prevalence of multiple (≥2) cardiovascular risk factors increased from 40.5% in 2008-2009 to 48.2% in 2012-2013, P<0.001. The proportion of patients with coronary artery disease (17.2% in 2004-2005 vs 18.2% in 2012-2013, P<0.001), peripheral artery disease (6.3% in 2004-2005 vs 7.4% in 2012-2013, P<0.001) and prior stroke (3.5% in 2008-2009 vs 4.7% 2012-2013, P<0.001) also increased over time. The proportion of patients with a modified Revised Cardiac Risk Index score ≥3 increased from 6.6% in 2008-2009 to 7.7% in 2012-2013 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Among patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, the burden of cardiovascular risk factors and the prevalence of ASCVD increased over time. Adverse trends in risk profiles require continued attention to improve perioperative cardiovascular outcomes.
PMCID:6102124
PMID: 29305561
ISSN: 1468-201x
CID: 2899442