Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the role of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in assessing cardiovascular prognosis in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Although stress CMR is excellent for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD, the prognostic value of stress CMR has been less well described. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and metaRegister of Controlled Trials were searched for stress CMR studies with >6 months of prognostic data. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and a composite outcome of cardiovascular death or MI during follow-up. Summary effect estimates were generated with random-effects modeling, and annualized event rates were assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (14 vasodilator, 4 dobutamine, and 1 that used both) involved a total of 11,636 patients with a mean follow-up of 32 months. Patients had a mean age of 63 +/- 12 years, 63% were male, and 26% had previous MI; mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 61 +/- 12%; and late gadolinium enhancement was present in 29% and ischemia in 32%. Patients with ischemia had a higher incidence of MI (odds ratio [OR]: 7.7; p < 0.0001), cardiovascular death (OR: 7.0; p < 0.0001), and the combined endpoint (OR: 6.5; p < 0.0001) compared with those with a negative study. The combined outcome annualized events rates were 4.9% for a positive versus 0.8% for a negative stress CMR (p < 0.0001), 2.8% versus 0.3% for cardiovascular death (p < 0.0001), and 2.6% versus 0.4% for MI (p < 0.0005). The presence of late gadolinium enhancement was also significantly associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: A negative stress CMR study is associated with very low risk of cardiovascular death and MI. Stress CMR has excellent prognostic characteristics and may help guide risk stratification of patients with known or suspected CAD.

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor, an oral, direct, reversibly binding, P2Y12 receptor antagonist, is approved for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with ACS. In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor was associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel. A subanalysis of PLATO trial data identified a geographic region interaction (p = 0.045), indicating reduced efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in North American patients. This effect could be due to chance, but may be explained by an interaction of ticagrelor with high aspirin doses, which are commonly used in the United States. In patients taking low-dose maintenance aspirin, ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in decreasing cardiovascular events regardless of the geographic region. A proposed hypothetical mechanism for the interaction between ticagrelor and higher aspirin dose is linked to the level of P2Y12 inhibition and the potential prothrombotic effects of high-dose aspirin through the suppression of prostacyclin. A review of data regarding aspirin use for secondary prevention of events in ACS demonstrated that low aspirin doses (75 to 160 mg/day) are consistently favored for short- and long-term use because of the lack of a dose-response relationship between increasing aspirin dose and improved efficacy, and a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding with increasing aspirin dose. The use of low aspirin doses reflects good clinical practice and is encouraged in current guidelines.