Faculty Bibliography

Objectives/UNASSIGNED:To quantify radiographic changes observed in humeral shaft frctures throughout course of treatment with functional bracing. Design/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort study. Setting/UNASSIGNED:Level 1 Trauma Center and affiliated Tertiary Care Center. Patients/UNASSIGNED:72 retrospectively identified patients with fracture of the humeral diaphysis. Intervention/UNASSIGNED:Application of functional brace with radiographs obtained immediately after brace application and at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 month follow-up.Main Outcome Measure: Fracture angulation, measured in the coronal and sagittal planes. Results/UNASSIGNED:522 radiographs from 72 patients were critically reviewed. All fractures were followed to healing. Sixty-six patients (92%) successfully healed their fractures with non-operative treatment. The average angulation on immediate post-brace X-ray was 12 degrees varus ad 7 degrees procurvatum. At final follow-up, average coronal angulation was 14 degrees and 4 degrees procurvatum. Fracture angulation changed a mean 2 degrees in the AP plane and 3 degrees in the sagittal plane over the course of care. Linear regression determined fracture angulation proceeds toward both varus and recurvatum at 0.01 degrees per day. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively heal with minimal change in angulation after brace application. If angulation on the post-brace radiograph is acceptable and there is no history of repeat trauma and no cosmetic deformity, radiographs may be utilized less frequently. Patients should be evaluated via history and physical exam at follow-up prior to the 6-week point, at which time regular radiographs (6 week, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month) should commence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Analyze the effectiveness of a BPCI (Bundle Payments for Care Improvement) initiative for patients who would be included in a future potential Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) bundle. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort SETTING:: Single Academic Institution PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:: Patients discharged with operative fixation of a hip or femur fracture (DRG codes 480-482) between 1/2015-10/2016 were included. A BPCI initiative based upon an established program for BPCI Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) was initiated for patients with hip and femur fractures in January 2016. Patients were divided into non-bundle (care before initiative) and bundle (care with initiative) cohorts. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Application of BPCI principles MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Length of stay, location of discharge, readmissions RESULTS:: 116 patients participated in the "institutional bundle," and 126 received care prior to the initiative. There was a trend towards decreased mean length of stay, (7.3 ± 6.3 days vs. 6.8 ± 4.0 days, p=0.457) and decreased readmission within 90 days (22.2% vs. 18.1%, p=0.426). The number of patients discharged home doubled (30.2% vs. 14.3%, p=0.008). There was no difference in readmission rates in bundle vs. non-bundle patients based on discharged home status; however, bundle patients discharged to SNF trended towards less readmissions than non-bundle patients discharged to SNF (37.3% vs. 50.6%, p=0.402). Mean episode cost reduction due to initiative was estimated to be $6,450 using Medicare reimbursement data. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the potential success of a BPCI initiative at one institution in decreasing post-acute care facility utilization and cost of care when used for a hip and femur fracture population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Determine if a novel inpatient mortality risk assessment tool designed to be calculated in the emergency department (ED) setting can risk stratify patient reported functional outcomes and mortality at one year. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort SETTING:: Academic level one trauma center PATIENTS:: 685 patients >55 years old who were orthopaedic surgery consults or trauma surgery consults in the ED between 10/1/2014 and 9/30/2015. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Calculation of validated trauma triage score (STTGMA) using each patient's demographics, injury severity, and functional status MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: mortality, EQ-5D questionnaire, and percent return to baseline function since their hospitalization at one-year post hospitalization. RESULTS:45 (6.6%) patients died within the year following hospitalization. Of remaining 639 patients available for follow-up, 247 (38.7%) were successfully contacted. There was no observed difference between patients who were successfully contacted and those who were not. The mean STTGMA score was 2.1 ± 3.6%. Patients reported on average a 76.4 ± 27.5% return to baseline function. When comparing patients between risk groups, there was a significant difference in EQ-5D scores and percent return to baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows that high risk patients had pronounced decreased survival within the initial days after discharge compared to other cohorts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that patients identified with the STTGMA tool as having an increased risk of inpatient mortality following trauma correlate with poorer functional outcomes at one year. The STTGMA risk score is also a valuable tool to stratify risk of mortality up to one year following discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV, Prognostic.

Sharps-related injuries represent a significant occupational hazard to orthopedic surgeons. Despite increased attention and targeted interventions, evidence suggests that the majority of incidents continue to go unreported. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence, attitudes, and factors that affect the reporting of sharps injuries among orthopedic surgery residents at a large academic teaching hospital in an effort to increase reporting rates and design effective interventions. This study administered an anonymous cross-sectional survey regarding intraoperative sharps exposures to current orthopedic house staff, with an 87% (54/62) response rate. Overall, 76% of surveyed residents (41/54) had at least one sharps exposure during residency. The majority of these incidents (55%) were never reported. The most common reason cited for not reporting was a "perception of low risk." Residents whose exposures were witnessed by others on the surgical team were more likely to report the incident (57% vs. 23%, p = 0.043), suggesting that peer pressure acts to improve reporting rates. While the implementation of a "needlestick hotline" and increased education has led to improved reporting rates at our institution, further improvements aimed at reducing unwitnessed incidents, and therefore unreported incidents, could comprise an increased emphasis on surgical team vigilance, positive peer pressure, the incorporation of sharps-specific surgical debriefing statements and anonymous tip lines.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:To aid implementing an ethics curriculum in an orthopaedic residency program, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) created 14 ethics scenarios. Because delivery of this curriculum could be burdensome, an online module-based curriculum might be optimal. METHODS:Two cohorts of orthopaedic residents participated: cohort I completed 14 online ethics modules converted from the 14 AAOS ethics scenarios. For each module, we gave a multiple-choice assessment immediately before the module, immediately afterward, and 3 months afterward. Cohort II completed only the 14-module assessments at similar time intervals without any educational content. RESULTS:Cohort I demonstrated improvement in 3-month postmodule assessment scores in 11 of the 14 modules, 3 of which had statistical differences in baseline scores for cohort I and cohort II. We observed no statistical difference in scores within cohort II on repeat testing. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that 11 of the 14 AAOS ethics scenarios, converted to online modules, teach ethical concepts to orthopaedic residents. Orthopaedic residency programs may find it valuable to engage their residents in the ethics scenarios created by the AAOS to complement their ethics curriculum.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess the role self-reported treatment for a psychiatric diagnosis may play in long-term functional outcomes after operatively managed tibial plateau fractures. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Over an 11-year period, patients were screened and identified on presentation to the emergency department or in the clinical office for inclusion in an IRB-approved registry. A total of 245 patients were included in the study. Twenty-one patients reported treatment for a psychiatric diagnosis. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical repair of tibial plateau fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:Patients were divided into 2 cohorts; 1 cohort being those who self-reported receiving treatment of a psychiatric diagnosis (PI); the other group being those who did not self-report receiving treatment of a psychiatric diagnosis (NPI). Three-month, 6-month, and long-term outcomes (mean = 18 months) were evaluated using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), pain scores, and postoperative complications (infection, VTE, nonunion, and necessity for secondary operations). RESULTS:Pain scores were higher in patients who self-reported receiving treatment for a psychiatric diagnosis (P = 0.012). Long-term functional outcomes as measured by the SFMA were demonstrated to be worse in patients who self-reported treatment for a psychiatric diagnosis (P = 0.034). No differences existed between groups in regards to postoperative complications. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that being treated for diagnosis of a mental health illness was an independent predictor of worse functional outcomes at long-term follow-up [B = 8.874, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.354-17.394, P = 0.041]. CONCLUSIONS:Mental health plays a crucial role in long-term outcomes after operative fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Patients who have been diagnosed with a mental health illness have significantly worse outcomes at long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:1) Demonstrate that a validated trauma triage score for middle-aged and geriatric patients could identify those at high risk for mortality within the first two days of hospitalization and 2) determine the cost of care for this cohort of patients DESIGN:: Prospective cohort study SETTING:: Single Level 1 Trauma Center PATIENTS:: Patients 55 years and older who were evaluated in the emergency department setting by Orthopaedics or who met American College of Surgeons Tier 1-3 criteria INTERVENTION:: Calculation of validated trauma triage score, Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA), using patient's demographic, injury severity, and functional statusMain Outcome Measurements: length of stay, inpatient mortality, time between presentation and time of death, and direct variable costs of hospitalization RESULTS:: A total of 1470 consecutive patients (mean age of 72.2±11.9 years) were enrolled in this study, 17 of whom expired within 48 hours of presentation to the emergency department. These patients had a significantly higher trauma triage score than the rest of the cohort with a score of 50.9%±37.2% vs. 3.3%±9.5%, p<0.001 indicating that they had a mean risk of inpatient mortality of over 50%. Mean total cost/day was much higher in the cohort of patients who died within 48 hours of admission compared to all other trauma patients ($49,367±$79,057 vs. $3,966±$2,897 (p=0.031)). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:To achieve value-based care in this high-risk cohort, targeted cost-savings while improving patient outcomes and/or expediting goals-of-care and end-of-life goals is necessary and the STTGMA score allows for stratification of these patients in both mortality risk and cost profile. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic, Level III.

Background /UNASSIGNED:Evaluation of resident physicians' communications skills is a challenging task and is increasingly accomplished with standardized examinations. There exists a need to identify the effective, efficient methods for assessment of communications skills. Objective /UNASSIGNED:We compared objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and direct observation as approaches for assessing resident communications skills. Methods /UNASSIGNED:We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of orthopaedic surgery resident physicians at a single tertiary care academic institution, using the Institute for Healthcare Communication "4 Es" model for effective communication. Data were collected between 2011 and 2015. A total of 28 residents, each with OSCE and complete direct observation assessment checklists, were included in the analysis. Residents were included if they had 1 OSCE assessment and 2 or more complete direct observation assessments. Results /UNASSIGNED: = .16), after adjusting for chance agreement. Conclusions /UNASSIGNED:Our results suggest that OSCE and direct observation tools provide different insights into resident communications skills (simulation of rare and challenging situations versus real-life daily encounters), and may provide useful perspectives on resident communications skills in different contexts.

BACKGROUND:Nondisplaced and minimally displaced fractures of the radial head and neck are common injuries, yet the role of physical therapy (PT) in their treatment is unclear. The aim of this trial was to assess the need for formal PT following a simple fracture of the radial head or neck. METHODS:Patients who had a nondisplaced or minimally displaced fracture of the radial head or neck and presented to 1 of 2 providers were enrolled prospectively between January 2014 and August 2016. Patients were randomized to receive outpatient PT or perform self-directed home exercise. The follow-up intervals were 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and at least 1 year. The outcome measures were Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores; pain; time to clinical healing; and range of motion. Demographic data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test. Independent-samples t tests were utilized to compare outcome measures. RESULTS:Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The average follow-up was 16.6 months. Twenty-five patients were randomized to a home-exercise cohort, and 26 patients were randomized to a formal-outpatient-PT cohort. There were no significant differences in demographics between cohorts. At 6 weeks, the home-exercise cohort had better function as indicated by a significantly lower mean DASH score compared with the PT cohort (p = 0.021). At 3 months, 6 months, and final follow-up, there were no significant differences between cohorts for any outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who performed home exercises after sustaining a nondisplaced or minimally displaced fracture of the radial head or neck demonstrated better early function at 6 weeks compared with patients who received formal PT. After 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in outcomes. These data suggest that prescribing PT for patients who have an isolated nondisplaced or minimally displaced fracture of the radial head or neck is not cost-effective and that instructing the patient to perform self-directed exercises will be followed by a similar outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.