Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent nephrectomy for cystic renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using an institutional review board-approved database, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical, pathologic, radiologic, and oncologic outcome data of patients who received nephrectomy for a complex cystic renal mass. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were identified who received nephrectomy for a complex cystic lesion. Average age was 64 years. Thirty-nine (64%) patients were male. At the time of resection, 1 (1.6%), 3 (4.8%), 53 (86.8%), and 4 (6.5%) had a Bosniak category II, IIF, III, and IV cystic lesion, respectively. Nineteen (31.1%) patients were initially managed expectantly but underwent surgery because of progression of complexity on follow-up. Mean pathologic tumor size was 3.3 cm (range, 0.7-12 cm). Forty-eight (78.6%) of the lesions were found to be malignant. Thirty-seven (77.1%), 5 (10.4%), 4 (8.3%), and 2 (4.1%) were stage T1a, T1b, T2a, and T3a, respectively. Clear cell was the most common histologic subtype (44%), followed by papillary (21.3%), and unclassified RCC (4.9%). With a mean and median follow-up of 48.4 and 43.0 months, respectively, no patients developed a local or metastatic recurrence. All patients were alive at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our series with moderate follow-up, cystic RCCs do not appear to recur or progress regardless of size, histologic subtype, or grade. These findings suggest the malignant potential of cRCCs is significantly less than solid RCCs. Further investigation is required to determine if cRCCs should be classified and managed independently from solid RCCs.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate with both high spatial and temporal resolution via a combination of golden-angle radial k-space sampling, compressed sensing, and parallel-imaging reconstruction (GRASP), and to compare image quality and lesion depiction between GRASP and conventional DCE in prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty prostate cancer patients underwent two 3T prostate MRI examinations on separate dates, one using standard DCE (spatial resolution 3.0 x 1.9 x 1.9 mm, temporal resolution 5.5 sec) and the other using GRASP (spatial resolution 3.0 x 1.1 x 1.1 mm, temporal resolution 2.3 sec). Two radiologists assessed measures of image quality and dominant lesion size. The experienced reader recorded differences in contrast arrival times between the dominant lesion and benign prostate. RESULTS: Compared with standard DCE, GRASP demonstrated significantly better clarity of the capsule, peripheral/transition zone boundary, urethra, and periprostatic vessels; image sharpness; and lesion conspicuity for both readers (P < 0.001-0.020). GRASP showed improved interreader correlation for lesion size (GRASP: r = 0.691-0.824, standard: r = 0.495-0.542). In 8/20 cases, only GRASP showed earlier contrast arrival in tumor than benign; in no case did only standard DCE show earlier contrast arrival in tumor. CONCLUSION: High spatiotemporal resolution prostate DCE is possible with GRASP, which has the potential to improve image quality and lesion depiction as compared with standard DCE.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.