Faculty Bibliography

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) remain a poorly understood phenomenon for both patients and their physicians. Recent work has begun to focus on the possible psychological underpinnings of this diagnosis, but few studies have focused on specific emotional pathologies. This study sought to investigate the impact of a specific emotional measure: self-reported fear sensitivity. Three patient groups (patients with PNES, patients with epilepsy, and healthy volunteers) were administered the Modified Fear Survey Schedule, along with other neuropsychological batteries. As expected, the PNES and epilepsy cohorts demonstrated elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and comorbid psychiatric conditions. The PNES group independently exhibited a statistically significant higher level of fear sensitivity compared with both patients with epilepsy and healthy volunteers. This fear-specific trait was independent of other comorbid psychological factors or psychiatric conditions. These results suggest that patients with PNES exhibit disproportionately elevated fear sensitivity on self-report measures when compared with patients with epilepsy. This finding may reflect an elevated internal 'setpoint' for appraising the intensity of emotional settings

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of several new antiepileptic drugs, about one third of patients with epilepsy are not seizure free on medication. Improvement in this situation might lie in drugs that are currently in development. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Some new antiepileptic drugs are modifications of those already available, referred to in this Rapid Review as evolutionary drugs. These modifications of existing drugs are developed to improve effectiveness, often by increasing tolerability. Other drugs work by new mechanisms and are usually discovered through screening of animal models. WHERE NEXT? The large number of drugs currently in clinical trials provides a measure of hope for patients whose epilepsy is not controlled with currently available medication. In the future, this range of antiepileptic drugs will probably increase because of the use of new animal models, discovery of new basic mechanisms of epileptogenesis, acceleration of proof of principle studies in people, and development of new methods of drug delivery

A unifying definition of refractory epilepsy has been hotly debated but, to date, has not been agreed upon. Evidence from clinical trials indicates that some patients actually are not refractory, as many will partially respond to add-on treatment or will worsen when antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are removed. There are several important issues relating to the assessment of AED response that routinely have not been addressed in the determination of treatment responsiveness, such as incorporating baseline seizure severity, including partial response rather than solely an all-or-none response, and the consideration of variability in response over time

Some epilepsy patients quickly develop resistance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). We report a case of a patient with refractory epilepsy with daily seizures who initially responded to levetiracetam daily therapy, but then returned to baseline seizure frequency. However, when levetiracetam was given once weekly, the patient had significantly fewer seizures on the day of and after administration. These results suggest a useful treatment strategy for patients with refractory epilepsy who have developed resistance to AEDs