Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: The safety and effects on hematocrit of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) were evaluated in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 1, 1997 and November 2, 1998, 305 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon (H. L.). Of these men 283 with a baseline hematocrit of less than 48% received 600 IU/kg. epoetin alfa 14 days (-14) and 7 days (-7) before radical retropubic prostatectomy. Hematocrit was measured at baseline on day -14, on day -7, just before anesthesia induction on day 0, immediately postoperatively and on the day of discharge home. The number of allogeneic units transfused, and all intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Mean hematocrit at baseline on day -14 and at induction on day 0 was 42.9% and 45.8%, respectively (p = 0.0001). The frequency of hematocrit decreasing, showing no change or increasing 0.1 to 1.9, 2.0 to 3.9 or greater than 4.0 hematocrit points was 16.5%, 0.5%, 23%, 22% and 38%, respectively. Of the men 17% had no increase in hematocrit. A weak correlation existed between baseline hematocrit and the erythropoietic response to epoetin alfa (r2 = 0.06). Mean change in hematocrit after treatment with epoetin alfa in the quartile baseline hematocrit groups 34.2 to 41.4, 41.5 to 43.2, 43.3 to 44.9 and 45.0 to 48.0 hematocrit points was 3.71, 2.45, 3.86 and 1.02 hematocrit points, respectively. Of the surgical candidates 22 (9.1%) achieved an induction hematocrit of greater than 51%. Of the 283 men receiving epoetin alfa 21 (7.4%) also received an allogeneic transfusion. The transfusion rate did not correlate with induction hematocrit. The only adverse cardiovascular event was an uncomplicated postoperative pulmonary embolus. CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study demonstrates that epoetin alfa given preoperatively in 2 doses of 600 IU/kg. is safe for significantly increasing hematocrit in men before radical retropubic prostatectomy. It is intuitive that the significant increase in hematocrit decreases the requirement for allogeneic blood transfusion

The aim of this study was to determine the expression of the endothelin receptor subtype mRNAs in human detrusor cultured smooth muscle cells using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH). First strand cDNA was made from human detrusor cultured smooth muscle cells total RNA and used for PCR with primers designed to amplify fragments of the ET(A) and ET(B) endothelin receptor subtype cDNA sequences. Subcloned fragments of the ET(A) and ET(B) endothelin receptor cDNAs were used to synthesize digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probes by in vitro transcription. COS-7 cells transfected with the ET(A) and ET(B) receptor cDNAs were used as positive control and to confirm the absence of cross-hybridization due to sequence homology. Both ET(A) and ET(B) receptor mRNAs were detected by RT-PCR analysis. By ISH, both ET(A) and ET(B) receptor subtype mRNAs were detected. However, ET(A) signal was much more intense than ET(B) signal. These results indicate that mRNAs for both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors are expressed in detrusor smooth muscle cells of human urinary bladder. The ET(A) receptor is the predominant detrusor ET receptor.

In the hypertensive population, primary aldosteronism has been reported to have a prevalence of 0.1% to 2%, with the main causes being aldosterone-producing adenomas and bilateral hyperplasia. However, there is a third rare entity, called unilateral adrenal hyperplasia, that contributes to primary aldosteronism. Unilateral hyperplasia and primary aldosteronism are the subjects of this case review.

Men with clinically localized prostate cancer and their physicians are faced with the management decision of radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or watchful waiting. Who is the best candidate for radical prostatectomy? Is cure the only relevant outcomes parameter? Does age make a difference? Are imaging studies necessary? This review provides answers, step-by-step, in the decision-making process.

PURPOSE: We determine whether site specific labeling of sextant prostate biopsy cores predicts the site of extracapsular extension in a radical prostatectomy specimen, thereby justifying increased cost of pathological evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 1997, 407 radical prostatectomies were performed at our institution by a single surgeon (H. L.). Surgical specimens showing extracapsular extension were examined by a single pathologist (J. M.) to identify the site of extension. Several different methods of submitting transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy cores were used since the majority of cases did not undergo biopsy at our institution. In 243 cases sextant biopsies were labeled right versus left. Of these cases 103 specimen cores were individually labeled. The ability of the positive biopsy core location to predict the location of extracapsular extension in the surgical specimen was determined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the ability of biopsy core characteristics, including Gleason score, percentage of cancer in the core, core location and number of positive cores in the specimen, to predict the site of extracapsular extension. A similar analysis was performed for the 243 cases with right versus left core labeling. RESULTS: The positive predictive value was 8.9+/-2.2% for a single positive core to identify the location of extracapsular extension correctly in the individually labeled core cases. The absence of cancer in a sextant biopsy had a negative predictive value of 96.9+/-1.4%. The overall sensitivity was 59.4+/-3.8% for a positive biopsy core. In the right versus left core cases the positive predictive value was 12.9+/-3.0% with a sensitivity of 85.1+/-3.2%. In an individual core Gleason score 8 or greater and/or cancer in more than 50% of tissue enhanced the positive predictive value but not to a clinically useful level. Multivariate logistic regression identified Gleason score, number of positive ipsilateral cores and base position of the positive biopsy as the most predictive variables for the site of extracapsular extension. CONCLUSIONS: When submitting biopsy specimens by individually labeled core or right versus left core, the positive predictive value of an individual positive core for the location of extracapsular extension is not sufficient to guide the surgical decision to spare or excise a neurovascular bundle. Therefore, the clinical information provided by individually labeled or right versus left core labeling does not justify the increased associated costs