Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: Hypogastric artery (HA) occlusion during aortic aneurysm repair has been associated with considerable morbidity. We analyzed the consequences of interrupting one or both HAs in the standard surgical or endovascular treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms (AIAs). METHODS: From 1992 to 2000, 154 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 66), iliac aneurysms (n = 28), or AIAs (n = 60) required interruption of one (n = 134) or both (n = 20) HAs as part of their endovascular (n = 107) or open repair (n = 47). Endovascular treatment was performed with a variety of industry- or surgeon-made grafts in combination with coil embolization of the HAs. The standard surgical techniques included oversewing or excluding the origins of the HAs and extending the prosthetic graft to the external iliac or femoral artery. RESULTS: There were no cases of buttock necrosis, ischemic colitis requiring laparotomy, or death when one or both HAs were interrupted. Persistent buttock claudication occurred after 16 (12%) of the unilateral and 2 (11%) of the bilateral HA interruptions. Impotence occurred in 7 (9%) of the unilateral and 2 (13%) of the bilateral HA interruptions. Minor neurologic deficits of the lower extremity were observed in 2 (1.5%) of the patients with unilateral HA interruption. CONCLUSIONS: Although HA flow should be preserved if possible, selective interruption of one or both HAs can usually be accomplished safely during endovascular and open repair of anatomically challenging AIAs. We believe other comorbid factors such as shock, distal embolization, or the failure to preserve collateral branches from the external iliac and femoral arteries may have contributed to the morbidity in other reports of HA interruption

OBJECTIVE: Carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting (CBAS) has generated controversy and widely divergent opinions about its current therapeutic role. To resolve differences and establish a unified view of CBAS' present role, a consensus conference of 17 experts, world opinion leaders from five countries, was held on November 21, 1999. METHODS: These 17 participants had previously answered 18 key questions on current CBAS issues. At the conference these 18 questions and participants' answers were discussed and in some cases modified to determine points of agreement (consensus), near consensus, (prevailing opinion), or divided opinion (disagreement). RESULTS: Conference discussion added two modified questions, placing a total of 20 key questions before the participants, representing four specialties (interventional radiology, seven; vascular surgery, six; interventional cardiology, three; neurosurgery, one). It is interesting that consensus was reached on the answers to 11 (55%) of 20 of the questions, and near consensus was reached on answers to 6 (30%) of 20 of the questions. Only with the answers to three (15%) of the questions was there persisting controversy. Moreover, both these differences and areas of agreement crossed specialty lines.Consensus Conclusions: CBAS should not currently undergo widespread practice, which should await results of randomized trials. CBAS is currently appropriate treatment for patients at high risk in experienced centers. CBAS is not generally appropriate for patients at low risk. Neurorescue skills should be available if CBAS is performed. When cerebral protection devices are available, they should be used for CBAS. Adequate stents and technology for performing CBAS currently exist. There were divergent opinions regarding the proportions of patients presently acceptable for CBAS treatment (<5% to 100%, mean 44%) and best treated by CBAS (<3% to 100%, mean 34%). These and other consensus conclusions will help physicians in all specialties deal with CBAS in a rational way rather than by being guided by unsubstantiated claims

Neurologic deficits secondary to embolic events have been the most significant concern regarding carotid bifurcation stenting. Experimental studies utilizing human carotid plaques have shown that embolic particles were released from all specimens. In addition, transcranial Doppler studies have confirmed the fact that multiple emboli are released during each case. Preliminary experiences with the use of cerebral protection devices for carotid stenting have shown encouraging results with embolic particles recovered from each case, although these experiences have also revealed some of the down sides of its use. The present article provides the rationale for routine use of these protection devices and also reviews various protection devices, some of which are currently undergoing clinical trials

BACKGROUND: This article described a 7-year experience with endovascular graft for the tratment of aortoiliac aneurysms and other arterial lesions. METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-two grafts of various types have been placed in 283 patients. RESULTS: Short and mid-term results in these patients suggest that endovascular grafts may provide better treatment for central artery injuries and some iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms, particularly in high-risk patients and those with previous aortoiliac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In other circumstance, long-term evaluation will be required to determine the effectiveness and limitations of these endovascular grafts

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm (EAIA) repair uses substantial fluoroscopic guidance that requires considerable radiation exposure. Doses were determined for a team of three vascular surgeons performing 47 consecutive EAIA repairs over a 1-year period to determine whether this exposure constitutes a radiation hazard. METHODS: Twenty-nine surgeon-made aortounifemoral devices and 18 bifurcated devices were used. Three surgeons wore dosimeters (1) on the waist, under a lead apron; (2) on the waist, outside a lead apron; (3) on the collar; and (4) on the left ring finger. Dosimeters were also placed around the operating table and room to evaluate the patient, other personnel, and ambient doses. Exposures were compared with standards of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). RESULTS: Total fluoroscopy time was 30.9 hours (1852 minutes; mean, 39.4 minutes per case). Yearly total effective body doses for all surgeons (under lead) were below the 20 mSv/y occupational exposure limit of the ICRP. Outside lead doses for two surgeons approximated recommended limits. Lead aprons attenuated 85% to 91% of the dose. Ring doses and calculated eye doses were within the ICRP exposure limits. Patient skin doses averaged 360 mSv per case (range, 120-860 mSv). The ambient (> 3 m from the source) operating room dose was 1.06 mSv/y. CONCLUSIONS: Although the total effective body doses under lead fell within established ICRP occupational exposure limits, they are not negligible. Because radiation exposure is cumulative and endovascular procedures are becoming more common, individuals performing these procedures must carefully monitor their exposure. Our results indicate that a team of surgeons can perform 386 hours of fluoroscopy per year or 587 EAIA repairs per year and remain within occupational exposure limits. Individuals who perform these procedures should actively monitor their effective doses and educate personnel in methods for reducing exposure

OBJECTIVE: To report a new management approach for the treatment of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. METHODS: This approach includes hypotensive hemostasis, minimizing fluid resuscitation, and allowing the systolic blood pressure to fall to 50 mmHg. Under local anesthesia, a transbrachial guidewire was placed under fluoroscopic control in the supraceliac aorta. A 40-mm balloon catheter was inserted over this guidewire and inflated only if the blood pressure was less than 50 mmHg, before or after the induction of anesthesia. Fluoroscopic angiography was used to determine the suitability for endovascular graft repair. When possible, a prepared, 'one-size-fits-most' endovascular aortounifemoral stented PTFE graft was used, combined with occlusion of the contralateral common iliac artery and femorofemoral bypass. If the patient's anatomy was unsuitable for endovascular graft repair, standard open repair was performed using proximal balloon control as needed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms (18 aortic, 7 iliac) were managed using this approach. Balloon inflation for proximal control was required in nine of the 25 patients. Twenty patients were treated with endovascular grafts. Five patients required open repair. The ruptured aneurysm was excluded in all 25 patients; 23 survived. Two deaths occurred in patients who received endovascular grafts with serious comorbidities. The surviving patients who received endovascular grafts had a median hospital stay of 6 days, and the preoperative symptoms resolved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hypotensive hemostasis is usually an effective means to provide time for balloon placement and often for endovascular graft insertion. With appropriate preparation and planning, many if not most patients with ruptured aneurysms can be treated by endovascular grafts. Proximal balloon control is not required often but may, when needed, be an invaluable adjunct to both endovascular graft and open repairs. The use of endovascular grafts and this approach using other image-guided catheter-based adjuncts appear to improve treatment outcomes for patients with ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms

PURPOSE: Techniques for managing the distal anastomoses of aortofemoral and iliofemoral endovascular grafts are described. METHODS: Over a 2(1/2)-year period 46 endovascular grafts were successfully placed to treat severe iliac artery occlusive disease. Endovascular grafts were anchored proximally in the distal aorta or iliac arteries with Palmaz balloon-expandable stents. The distal anastomoses were performed with the use of open, sutured anastomotic techniques. In contrast to stented distal anastomoses, these techniques allowed us to (1) treat occlusive lesions extending from the distal aorta to below the inguinal ligament, (2) terminate endovascular grafts in the groin where stents are contraindicated, (3) vary the distal anastomotic site depending on the local pattern of disease, and (4) standardize the preinsertion length of the endovascular graft. RESULTS: Two distal perianastomotic stenoses and one graft occlusion were detected postoperatively in 11 bypass grafts that had distal anastomoses sewn endoluminally without an overlying patch angioplasty. Only one perianastomotic stenosis was found among 35 anastomoses performed with other techniques. There were no significant differences in primary and secondary patency between grafts originating in the distal aorta or iliac arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-sewn distal anastomoses can simplify the insertion of endovascular grafts used for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. These anastomoses permit tailoring of the graft according to the patients' pattern of disease and eliminate the need to precisely measure the length of the graft preoperatively. In addition, because a distal stent is not required, endovascular grafts can be safely terminated in the groin instead of the external iliac artery where disease progression can lead to graft failure. Finally, endovascular distal anastomoses should be closed with a patch or the hood of a more distal bypass graft to prevent perianastomotic stenoses or occlusions in the postoperative period