Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Cost effective implant selection in orthopedic trauma is essential in the current era of managed healthcare delivery. Both locking and non-locking plates have been utilized in the treatment of displaced fractures of the olecranon. However, locking plates are often more costly and may not provide superior clinical outcomes. The primary aim of the present study is to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of olecranon fractures treated with locked and non-locking plate and screw constructs while providing insight into the cost of various implants. METHODS:We performed a retrospective chart review of a single institution database identifying Mayo IIB type olecranon fractures treated surgically from 2003 to 2012. All fractures were treated with either a locked plate or a one-third tubular hook plate construct. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. Minimum 6-month follow-up was required. Outcomes were compared between fixation constructs, including rate of union, early failure, postoperative range of motion, and complication rates. Statistical analysis included Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and the Student's ttest for continuous variables. RESULTS:The one-third tubular construct was equivalent to locking plate constructs with respect to union, post-operative range of motion, and rates of complications. There were no early or late failures. Locking plates were associated with a relative cost increase of $1,263.50 compared to the one-third tubular hook plate per case. CONCLUSION:Surgeons should consider the cost of implants when treating Mayo IIB olecranon fracture. In this cohort, one-third tubular plates provided equivalent outcomes to locked plates with a notable decrease in cost.

BACKGROUND: To compare 30-day outcomes in patients treated for a distal femur (DF) fracture with plate fixation (PF) or intramedullary nail (IMN). METHODS: Differences in rates of any adverse events (AAE), serious adverse events (SAE), infectious complications, and mortality were explored between groups in the ACS-NSQIP database. RESULTS: There were 511 PF and 44 IMN patients. The PF group and IMN groups had similar rates of AAEs (p = 0.35), SAEs (p = 0.46), infectious complications (p = 1.00), and mortality (p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: DF fractures treated with IMN have equivalent short-term outcomes compared to those treated with PF.

PURPOSE: To compare and contrast postoperative complications in the geriatric population following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for (DF) fractures relative to femoral neck (FN) fractures. METHODS: Patients aged 65 years and older in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent ORIF for FN fractures or DF fractures from 2005 to 2012 were identified. Differences in rates of any adverse events (AAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), infectious complications, and mortality between groups were explored using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The DF cohort had a higher proportion of females (81.95% vs 71.35%, P < .001), were younger (79.41 +/- 7.93 vs 82.11 +/- 7.26 years old, P < .001), and had a lower age adjusted modified Charlson comorbidity index score (4.22 +/- 1.32 vs 4.49 +/- 1.35, P = .02). Cases with DF and FN did not differ in AAE (20.05% vs 20.20%, P = .94), SAE (12.03% vs 13.19%, P = .51), infectious complication (4.26% vs 4.22%, P = .97), hospital length of stay (7.32 +/- 6.73 days vs 7.02 +/- 10.67 days, P = .59), or mortality rates (4.51% vs 5.99%, P = .23). Multivariate analyses revealed that fracture type did not impact AAE (P = .28), SAE (P = .58), infectious complications (P = .83), or mortality (P = .85) rates. CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity and mortality of geriatric patients who sustain DF and FN fractures treated operatively were comparable. This information can be used when risk stratifying and prognosticating for elderly patients undergoing these procedures.

Application of the correct fixation construct is critical for fracture healing and long-term stability; however, it is a complex issue with numerous significant factors. This review describes a number of common fracture types and evaluates their currently available fracture fixation constructs. In the setting of complex elbow instability, stable fixation or radial head replacement with an appropriately sized implant in conjunction with ligamentous repair is required to restore stability. For unstable sacral fractures with vertical or multiplanar instabilities, "standard" iliosacral screw fixation is not sufficient. Periprosthetic femur fractures, in particular Vancouver B1 fractures, have increased stability when using 90/90 fixation versus a single locking plate. Far cortical locking combines the concept of dynamization with locked plating to achieve superior healing of a distal femur fracture. Finally, there is no ideal construct for syndesmotic fracture stabilization; however, these fractures should be fixed using a device that allows for sufficient motion in the syndesmosis. In general, orthopaedic surgeons should select a fracture fixation construct that restores stability and promotes healing at the fracture site, while reducing the potential for fixation failure.

Preoperative planning is an essential prerequisite for the success of orthopaedic procedures. Traditionally, the exercise has involved the written down, step by step "blueprint" of the surgical procedure. Preoperative planning of the technical aspects of the orthopaedic procedure has been performed on hardcopy radiographs using various methods such as copying the radiographic image on tracing papers to practice the planned inter - ventions. This method has become less practical due to variability in radiographic magnification and increasing implementation of digital imaging systems. Advances in technology along with recognition of the importance of surgical safety protocols resulted in widespread changes in orthopaedic preoperative planning approaches. Nowa - days, perioperative "briefings" have gained particular importance and novel planning methods have started to integrate into orthopaedic practice. These methods include using software that enables surgeons to perform preoperative planning on digital radiographs and to construct 3D digital models or prototypes of various orthopaedic pathologies from a patient's CT scans to practice preoperatively. Evidence-to-date suggests that preoperative planning and briefings are effective means of favorably influencing the outcomes of orthopaedic procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the timing, indications, and "success rates of secondary interventions, dynamization and exchange nailing, in a large series of tibial nonunions" (dynamization and exchange nailing are types of secondary interventions). SETTING: Retrospective multicenter analysis from level 1 trauma hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 194 tibia fractures that underwent dynamization or exchange nailing for delayed/nonunion. INTERVENTION: Records and radiographs to characterize demographic data, fracture type, and cortical contact after tibial nailing were gathered. The radiographic union score for tibias (RUST) and the timing of intervention and time to union were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was success of either intervention, defined as achieving union, with the need for further intervention defining failure. Other outcomes included RUST scores at intervention and union, and timing to intervention and union for both techniques. Two-tailed t tests and Fisher exact with P set at <0.05 for significance were used as indicated. RESULTS: A total of 194 tibia fractures underwent dynamization (97) or exchange nailing (97). No statistical differences were found between groups with demographic characteristics. The presence of a fracture gap (P = 0.01) and comminuted fractures (P = 0.002) was more common in the exchange group. The success rates of the interventions and RUST scores were not different when performed before versus after 6 months; therefore, data were pooled. The RUST scores at the time of intervention were not different for successful or failed dynamizations (7.13 vs. 7.07, P = 0.83) or exchanges (6.8 vs. 7.3, P = 0.37). Likewise, the time to successful versus failed dynamization (165 vs. 158 days, P = 0.91) or exchange nailing (224 vs. 201 days, P = 0.48) was not different. No cortical contact or a gap was a statistically negative factor for both exchange nails (P = 0.09) and dynamizations (P = 0.06). When combined, the success in the face of a gap was 78% versus 92% when no gap was present (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Previous literature has few reports of the success rates of secondary interventions for tibial nonunions. The indications for dynamization and exchange were similar. Comminuted fractures, and fractures with no cortical contact or "gap" present after intramedullary nailing, favored having an exchange nail performed over dynamization. Fracture gap was also found to be a negative prognostic factor for both procedures. Overall, this study demonstrates high rates of union for both interventions, making them both viable options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acute fractures, nonunions, and nonunions with bone defects or osteomyelitis often need bone graft to facilitate union. There are several factors to consider when it is determined that a bone graft is needed. These factors include the source of the bone graft (autograft vs. allograft), proper timing for placement of the bone graft, strategies to avoid further complications (particularly in the setting of osteomyelitis), and with the development of a variety of bone graft substitutes, whether alternatives to autograft are available and appropriate for the task at hand. Autograft bone has commonly been referred to as the "gold standard" of bone grafts, against which the efficacy of other grafts has been measured. The best timing for when to place a bone graft or substitute is also somewhat controversial, particularly after an open fracture or a potentially contaminated bed. The treatment of infected nonunions, particularly those that require a graft to facilitate healing, can be quite challenging. Typically, the infection is completely eradicated before placement of a bone graft, but achieving a sterile bed and the timing of a bone graft require strategic thinking and planning. This review outlines the benefits of autografts, the most suitable sites for harvesting bone grafts, the timing of bone graft procedures, the potential risks and benefits of grafting in the face of infection, and the currently available bone graft extenders.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and longitudinal improvement of patient reported sexual dysfunction following five common non pelvic orthopaedic traumatic conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data SETTING:: Academic Medical Center PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:: The functional status of 1,324 patients with acute proximal humerus fractures (n=104), acute distal radius fractures (n=396), acute tibial plateau fractures (n=118) acute ankle fractures (n=434), and chronic long bone fracture nonunions (n=272) was prospectively assessed at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post-treatment. Patient reported sexual dysfunction, acquired from validated functional outcomes surveys, was compared to overall patient reported functional outcome for each follow-up visit. Men and women were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Sexual dysfunction at the three month follow-up was reported in 31% of proximal humerus fracture patients, 32% of distal radius fracture patients, 47% of tibial plateau patients, 11% of ankle fracture patients, and 42% of long bone nonunions. By one year follow-up, greater than 80% of patients with all fracture types reported mild or no sexual dysfunction. Women reported a significantly higher degree of sexual dysfunction than men at six months (p=0.003) and twelve months follow-up (p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Following treatment of acute and chronic orthopaedic trauma conditions, a considerable number of patients experience sexual dysfunction, with women reporting more dysfunction than men. The results of this study should allow orthopaedic trauma surgeons to counsel patients regarding expectations of sexual function following traumatic orthopaedic conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This review summarizes symposium presentations from the OTA's Basic Science Focus Forum on care for osteoporotic fractures. The limitations of diaphyseal osteoporotic animal bone models are discussed, together with the potential benefits of using metaphyseal models to study osteoporotic fracture fixation constructs. Metaphyseal bone repair models provide better simulation of the most common osteoporotic fractures. Selection of an osteoporotic model for mechanical testing is also challenging. One should always thoroughly define the clinical problem to be addressed. The selected model should then be validated for behavior matched to known clinical behavior with known fixation configurations. The medical management of osteoporosis is directed at enhancing bone mass, improving bone quality, and lowering fracture risk. Medical strategies to achieve these goals are discussed. The medical strategy should include provision of an adequate calcium and vitamin D environment to facilitate well-mineralized bone and improve bone quality, prevent excessive bone resorption, and provide an anabolic stimulus to enhance bone formation. Atypical femur fractures continue to be a serious issue for the orthopaedic community. Risk factors, treatment modalities, and prevention strategies are discussed. A comprehensive strategy for the improved treatment of osteoporotic fractures must address both biological and mechanical issues and includes 4 specific approaches: (1) removal of inhibitors to bone healing; (2) introduction of bone healing stimulants; (3) modification of fracture fixation constructs; and (4) application of bone augmentation or substitutes. There is currently no optimal bone substitute. Substitutes should be chosen based on the most critical need when treating a particular fracture.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) and associated complications on cost, length of stay, and inpatient mortality after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an ankle fracture, and the implications of these variables during a time of health care payment reform. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, which includes all admissions to New York State hospitals from 2000 to 2011. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 58,748 patients were identified as having undergone the primary procedure of ORIF of the ankle (ICD-9-CM procedure code 79.36). INTERVENTION: ORIF of the ankle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost, length of stay, and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Of the 58,748 patients evaluated, 7501 (12.8%) had DM. Mean length of stay and total hospital charges were significantly greater for the DM cohort compared to the without DM cohort (P < 0.01). Patients with DM had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index scores and greater in-hospital mortality than patients without DM (both P < 0.01). Of the patients with diabetes, 1098/7501 had complicated diabetes mellitus (C-DM). Patients with C-DM stayed 2.4 days longer and were $6895 more costly than those with diabetes alone (both P < 0.01). Patients with C-DM also had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate than those with diabetes alone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes admitted to the hospital for ankle ORIF have more expensive hospital stays and higher in-hospital mortality rates than patients without diabetes. The presence of diabetic complications further increases these risks. These data will help provide risk-adjustment for future health care payment reform initiatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.