Faculty Bibliography

Approximately half of all patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience cognitive impairment, most commonly with regard to new learning and memory. Cognitive dysfunction is a leading cause of disability in MS and it can have profound social and economic consequences for patients and their families.Research on treatment for cognitive impairment in MS is still in the early stages, as it is for most neurological conditions. The available disease-modifying therapies in MS may provide some modest benefit to cognition, but patients with MS clearly need better treatment for cognitive dysfunction. A number of studies have assessed symptomatic treatments of cognition in MS, and the results of these small, underpowered studies have been mixed. Regardless, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) have been the most promising class of medications tested in MS to date. Seven of eight studies on AChEIs have shown positive results, although it is difficult to assess their adequacy since only three of the studies have been published in peer reviewed journals, with the rest appearing only as abstracts. The earliest AChEI studies in MS examined physostigmine, but the short half-life and prominent adverse effects of this medication may have limited its use compared with other AChEIs. All of the more recent AChEI studies have used donepezil, which, from the limited data available to date, appears to have been relatively well tolerated among MS patients. The largest randomized controlled trial of donepezil included 69 subjects and found that donepezil improved verbal learning and memory compared with placebo during neuropsychological testing. That study also found that patients receiving donepezil were more likely to report memory improvement than those receiving placebo, and the study clinician also noted a cognitive benefit among those on donepezil as opposed to placebo.There are still many unanswered questions regarding the use of AChEIs in MS, including the effects of their long-term use in a chronic disease such as MS. On the whole, to date the research on AChEIs in MS must be considered preliminary, and it is premature to recommend the clinical use of this class of medications at the present time

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of three different doses of sustained-release fampridine in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHOD: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study recruited 206 participants at 24 centers in the United States and Canada. After a single-blind, 2-week placebo run-in, participants were randomly assigned to receive fampridine (10, 15, or 20 mg twice daily) or placebo for 15 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was percent change in walking speed based on the timed 25-foot walk. RESULTS: Trends for increased walking speed were consistent across dose groups vs placebo, but not significant, on the prospective analysis. An increase from baseline in lower extremity strength during the 12-week stable-dose period was seen in the groups receiving 10- and 15-mg doses, compared with placebo (p = 0.018 and 0.003). There were no significant changes in other secondary assessments. Post hoc analysis revealed subsets of participants in each dose group with walking speeds during the treatment period that were consistently faster than during the nontreatment period. There were significantly more 'consistent responders' in the drug-treated groups than in the placebo group (36.7% compared with 8.5%). Consistent responders showed significantly greater improvement in self-assessed ambulation on the 12-Item MS Walking Scale than did nonresponders. Fampridine was generally well tolerated. Severe and serious adverse events were more frequent at the highest dose. CONCLUSIONS: This phase 2 study suggests that a subgroup of patients, when treated with fampridine, experiences a clinically relevant improvement in walking ability, which is sustained for at least 14 weeks