Faculty Bibliography

The epipodophyllotoxin derivatives etoposide and teniposide have been evaluated intermittently for possible use in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Conflicting studies suggest that variables such as dose and prior treatment have a major influence on outcome. Response rates ranged from 0% to 40% in five series with teniposide, and from less than a 10% overall response rate to greater than a 10% complete response rate in nine studies with etoposide. One study documented activity with oral etoposide. However, because all patients had received various prior chemotherapies, firm conclusions regarding the activity of etoposide could not be drawn. These results, and the expectation of synergy with etoposide and cisplatin, led to several studies that combined etoposide with platin compounds by the systemic and intraperitoneal (IP) routes. Various studies have used intravenous drug combinations of these agents in both previously treated and untreated patients. One study, which used carboplatin instead of cisplatin, reported only seven failures among 26 previously untreated patients. Conversely, the prominent toxicities reported by another study were discouraging, and responses did not exceed what might be expected from cisplatin alone. Studies of analogous combinations administered IP are ongoing. A favorable experience, which was initially reported by the University of California (San Diego group), is being confirmed by other investigators. This has prompted the incorporation of etoposide into first-line strategies. The pharmacologic advantage of etoposide by the IP route (related to its high protein binding) may provide appropriate dose intensity against IP disease while sparing systemic toxicities. Finally, systemic dose intensity with autologous bone marrow support indicates some promise for etoposide in combination with high-dose alkylating drugs.

Suggestions of a dose-response effect for cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer have contributed to the development of very high-dose cisplatin regimens (200 mg/m2 per cycle). We treated 53 eligible patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer with a combination of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin and 4 mg/m2 vinblastine, each given on days 1 and 8 of a 28-day cycle. We observed no complete response and 4 partial responses (8%). Median survival was 6 months. Toxicities of grade III or greater included leukopenia (11 cases), nausea/vomiting (6 cases), thrombocytopenia (2 cases), anemia (2 cases), and elevation of transaminase (1 case). Neurotoxicity has been reported to be a major problem in several other very high-dose cisplatin regimens. The low level of neurotoxicity observed in this study may be attributable to the median cumulative cisplatin dose of less than 600 mg/m2. This vinblastine/very high-dose cisplatin regimen showed minor activity against non-small-cell lung cancer. The level of activity did not surpass that of standard-dose (100 mg/m2 per cycle) cisplatin-containing regimens.

Doxorubicin is an essential component of the treatment of aggressive lymphoma, childhood solid tumors, bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and breast cancer and additional indications are emerging. On the other hand, daunorubicin has occupied the central position of interest in the treatment of acute leukemia. Epirubicin has a spectrum very similar to doxorubicin but lesser toxicity. The ability to protect against cardiotoxicity with ICRF-187 further enhances clinical interest in exploiting modifications in doze intensity to therapeutic advantage. Idarubicin has at least equivalent activity to daunorubicin and doxorubicin in leukemia. New areas of research in relation to anthracycline antibiotics include introduction of new the analogs, insight into mechanisms of resistance, the reversal of multidrug resistance in vitro, the protection of cardiac toxicity, and the study of other important biochemical reactions relevant to cytotoxicity. Orally active anthracyclines such as idarubicin and compounds which lack cross-resistance with the parent drugs or have other mechanisms for cytotoxicity are being developed. It is likely that these modifications will lead to an expanding therapeutic spectrum for these already widely useful drugs.

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (Floxuridine, FUdR, FdUrd) was evaluated in a phase I study at a starting level of 500 mg given on 1 day in 2 I 1.5% dialysate. Escalations within patients were allowed every other cycle. A total of 23 patients (age, 32-78 years) received 108 treatment courses. Local tolerance at all dose levels was excellent, with no cases of drug-related peritonitis being observed. Nausea and vomiting increased in severity in relation to dose and was universal at greater than 3,000 mg x 3 days. One patient each developed grade 1 mucositis as well as diarrhea at a dose of 3,000 mg x 3 days and leukopenia and thrombocytopenia at 5,000 mg x 3 days. Peritoneal fluid (PF) and plasma (PL) FdUrd profiles were monitored by an HPLC method in 13 subjects, with 7 being studied serially at 2-4 increment doses for up to 6 h. Profiles that exhibited apparent linear pharmacokinetics gave PF drug levels 2-4 logs higher than the PL counterparts, with the latter essentially declining in parallel to the former, indicating that the disposition of FdUrd from the peritoneal compartment is rate-determining. The mean terminal half-life for PF FdUrd was found to be 115 min and mean peritoneal clearance was 25 ml/min. The vast differences in drug levels and AUC found between the PF and the PL profiles suggests a high systemic clearance of FdUrd, which was confirmed in two patients receiving 2 g FdUrd by short i.v. infusion. A disproportionate increase in the plasma FdUrd levels and the corresponding AUC values was found with increasing dose, suggesting a disproportionate increase in the systemic partitioning of FdUrd when doses were escalated within a patient. Substantial levels of peritoneal 5-fluorouracil (FUra) were also detected in most of the subjects. Thus, FdUrd was found to have several desirable properties for i.p. administration: (1) a 2- to 4-log pharmacologic advantage. (2) the absence of local toxicities, and (3) a favorable antitumor spectrum and some evidence of antitumor effects in this phase I and pharmacology study. A 3,000-mg dose given in 2 1 1.5% dialysate for 3 consecutive days exhibited antitumor activity and produced no systemic toxicity except nausea and vomiting, which was controlled by antiemetics. This dose schedule is therefore recommended for phase II trials directed against small-volume disease in the peritoneal cavity, such as may be found in some stages of ovarian and gastrointestinal cancers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A phase I study of trimethylcolchicinic acid (TMCA) given orally once daily for 5 days every 3rd week was performed in 19 patients with advanced malignancies. Myelosuppression and mucositis were the major toxicities observed. Serum TMCA levels were monitored and appear to be useful in predicting toxicities. A partial response was seen in one lymphoma patient and stabilization of disease was noted in one patient each with prostatic and ovarian cancer.

A clinical trial was designed to find the maximally tolerated dose of weekly leucovorin (LV) that could be combined with 4 weeks of protracted infusion (PI) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) at a fixed dose of 200 mg/m2. A total of 36 patients with disseminated gastrointestinal malignancies were treated; 9 either progressed or died before receiving 4 weeks of treatment leaving 27 patients evaluable for toxicity and response. 5FU was given as a protracted infusion using an ambulatory infusion pump and indwelling venous access. LV doses included 20, 25, 50, and 75 mg/m2 given as an i.v. push at the time of weekly pump fill with 5FU. In all, 72% of the patients tolerated LV at 20 mg/m2 for 4 continuous weeks, whereas the higher doses required treatment rests prior to 4 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity at all doses was stomatitis. No significant myelosuppression was seen; diarrhea was infrequent. Overall, 40% of the patients with measurable cancer had partial responses. In view of evidence of biologic and therapeutic effects of these weekly doses of 20 mg/m2 LV with 200 mg/m2 5FU per day given as a protracted infusion over 4 weeks, phase II trials and multimodality studies for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies are being initiated at our institution using this dose and schedule.

Hypercalcemia is one of the most serious metabolic disorders associated with cancer. The incidence and clinical circumstances associated with hypercalcemia vary in different types of cancer. Hypercalcemia is the most frequent metabolic complication of breast cancer and is usually related to widespread osteolytic metastases; however, local and systemic humoral factors mediating bone resorption have been described. In some patients with breast cancer, hypercalcemia results from treatment with estrogens, antiestrogens, androgens, or progestins. Coexisting primary hyperparathyroidism rarely confounds the diagnosis. In patients with lung cancer, the incidence of hypercalcemia varies with histology and is often unrelated to bone metastases. Hypercalcemia may occur either late or early in the disease but is seldom a presenting symptom. In patients with cancers of the head and neck region, hypercalcemia is most often associated with advanced recurrent and terminal disease, presumably humorally mediated. In renal cell carcinoma, hypercalcemia is also an adverse prognostic indicator, commonly mediated by humoral factors. On the other hand, almost all patients with multiple myeloma have extensive osteolytic bone destruction and hypercalcemia is frequently a presenting symptom. Hypercalcemia is uncommon in most lymphomas; however, it is usually a prominent feature of adult T-cell lymphomas and also occurs in some large cell, diffuse B-cell lymphomas. Awareness of the setting in which hypercalcemia of malignancy occurs will lead to its prompt diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy.

One hundred thirty-three patients with advanced metastatic cancer were randomized to receive single-agent chemotherapy selected by either a medical oncologist or an in vitro capillary cloning system. Thirty-six of the 65 patients (55%) who were randomly assigned to selection of a drug by the clinician actually received a drug; these patients were able to be evaluated for clinical response. Of these 36 patients, one had a partial tumor response (3%). Only 19 of the 68 patients (28%) who were randomly assigned to selection of a drug by the capillary system actually received a drug; these patients were able to be evaluated for clinical response. Of these 19 patients, four (21%) had partial tumor responses. In the assessable patients (36 in the clinician's choice group, 19 in the capillary cloning group), the partial response rate was superior for drug selection by the capillary cloning system (P = .04). For all patients randomly assigned to a group (65 in the clinician's choice group, 68 in the capillary cloning group), the response rate was not significantly different (1.5% and 5.9%, respectively; P = .37). When overall survival rates for patients in the two groups were compared, there was no difference. We conclude that drug sensitivity testing in capillary tubes can improve the response rate for patients with advanced malignancies. This improved response rate, however, does not translate into improved survival times for these patients.