Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:segevd01
Evolving Impact of COVID-19 on Transplant Center Practices and Policies in the United States
Boyarsky, Brian J; Ruck, Jessica M; Chiang, Teresa Po-Yu; Werbel, William A; Strauss, Alexandra T; Getsin, Samantha N; Jackson, Kyle R; Kernodle, Amber B; Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E; Baker, Talia B; Al Ammary, Fawaz; Durand, Christine M; Avery, Robin K; Massie, Allan B; Segev, Dorry L; Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline M
In our first survey of transplant centers in March 2020, >75% of kidney and liver programs were either suspended or operating under restrictions. To safely resume transplantation, we must understand the evolving impact of COVID-19 on transplant recipients and center-level practices. We therefore conducted a six-week follow-up survey May 7-15, 2020, and linked responses to the COVID-19 incidence map, with a response rate of 84%. Suspension of live donor transplantation decreased from 72% in March to 30% in May for kidneys and from 68% to 52% for livers. Restrictions/suspension of deceased donor transplantation decreased from 84% to 58% for kidneys and from 73% to 42% for livers. Resuming transplantation at normal capacity was envisioned by 83% of programs by August 2020. Exclusively using local recovery teams for deceased donor procurement was reported by 28%. Respondents reported caring for a total of 1166 COVID-19-positive transplant recipients; 25% were critically ill. Telemedicine challenges were reported by 81%. There was a lack of consensus regarding management of potential living donors or candidates with SARS-CoV-2. Our findings demonstrate persistent heterogeneity in center-level response to COVID-19 even as transplant activity resumes, making ongoing national data collection and real-time analysis critical to inform best practices.
PMID: 32918766
ISSN: 1399-0012
CID: 5126692
Eplet mismatches associated with de novo donor-specific HLA antibody in pediatric kidney transplant recipients
Charnaya, Olga; Jones, June; Philogene, Mary Carmelle; Chiang, Po-Yu; Segev, Dorry L; Massie, Allan B; Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline
BACKGROUND:Optimizing amino acid (eplet) histocompatibility at first transplant decreases the risk of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development and may improve long-term graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTR). We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric KTR and their respective donors to identify eplets most commonly associated with dnDSA formation. METHODS:Eplet mismatch analysis was performed in a cohort of 125 pediatric KTR-donor pairs (2006-2018). We determined the prevalence of each eplet mismatch and quantified the percentage of exposed patients who developed dnDSA for each mismatched eplet. RESULTS:Recipient median age was 14 (IQR 8-17) years with a racial distribution of 42% Black, 48% Caucasian, and 5.6% Middle-Eastern. Median eplet load varied significantly by recipient race, Black 82 (IQR 58-98), White 60 (IQR 44-81) and Other 66 (IQR 61-76), p = 0.002. Forty-four percent of patients developed dnDSA after median 37.1 months. Compared to dnDSA- patients, dnDSA+ patients had higher median eplet load, 64 (IQR 46-83) vs. 77 (IQR 56-98), p = 0.012. The most common target of dnDSA were eplets expressed in HLA-A*11 and A2 in Class I, and HLA-DQ6 and DQA5 in Class II. The most commonly mismatched eplets were not the most likely to result in dnDSA formation. CONCLUSIONS:In a racially diverse population, only a subset of eplets was linked to antibody formation. Eplet load alone is not a sufficient surrogate for eplet immunogenicity. These findings illustrate the need to optimize precision in donor selection and allocation to improve long-term graft outcomes. Graphical Abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
PMCID:8602732
PMID: 34100108
ISSN: 1432-198x
CID: 5127272
Interventions to Preserve Cognitive Functioning Among Older Kidney Transplant Recipients
Chu, Nadia M; Segev, Dorry; McAdams-DeMarco, Mara A
Purpose of Review/UNASSIGNED:To summarize the research on effective interventions for preserving cognitive function and prevent cognitive decline in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who are undergoing dialysis and/or kidney transplantation (KT). Recent Findings/UNASSIGNED:Among ESKD patients undergoing hemodialysis, exercise training has been administered through home-based and intradialytic interventions. Additionally, one pilot study identified intradialytic cognitive training, electronic brain games, as an intervention to preserve cognitive function among patients undergoing hemodialysis. Fewer studies have investigated interventions to preserver cognitive function among KT recipients. To date, the only randomized controlled trial in this population identified B-vitamin supplements as an intervention to preserve cognitive function. The evidence from these trials support a short-term benefit of cognitive and exercise training as well as B-vitamin supplementation among patients with ESKD. Future studies should: 1) replicate these findings, 2) identify interventions specific to KT candidates, and 3) investigate the synergistic impact of both cognitive and exercise training. Summary/UNASSIGNED:Cognitive prehabilitation, with cognitive and/or exercise training, may be novel interventions for KT candidates that not only reduces delirium risk and long-term post-KT cognitive decline but also prevents dementia.
PMCID:7992368
PMID: 33777649
ISSN: 2196-3029
CID: 5127072
Donor-transmitted cancer in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review
Eccher, Albino; Girolami, Ilaria; Motter, Jennifer Danielle; Marletta, Stefano; Gambaro, Giovanni; Momo, Rostand Emmanuel Nguefuet; Nacchia, Francesco; Donato, Paola; Boschiero, Luigino; Boggi, Ugo; Lombardini, Letizia; Cardillo, Massimo; D'Errico, Antonietta; Neil, Desley; Segev, Dorry Lidor; Zaza, Gianluigi
The transmission of cancer from a donor organ is a rare event but has important consequences. Aim of this systematic review was to summarize all the published evidence on cancer transmission in kidney recipients. We reviewed published case reports and series describing the outcome of recipients with donor-transmitted cancer until August 2019. A total of 128 papers were included, representing 234 recipients. The most common transmitted cancers were lymphoma (n = 48, 20.5%), renal cancer (42, 17.9%), melanoma (40, 17.1%), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 13, 5.6%), neuroendocrine cancers comprising small cell lung cancer (n = 11, 4.7%) and choriocarcinoma (n = 10, 4.3%). There was a relative lack of glioblastoma and gastrointestinal cancers with only 6 and 5 cases, respectively. Melanoma and lung cancer had the worst prognosis, with 5-years overall survival of 43% and 19%, respectively; while renal cell cancer and lymphomas had a favorable prognosis with 5-years overall survival of 93 and 63%, respectively. Metastasis of cancer outside the graft was the most important adverse prognostic factor. Overall reporting was good, but information on donors' cause of death and investigations at procurement was often lacking. Epidemiology of transmitted cancer has evolved, thanks to screening with imaging and blood tests, as choriocarcinoma transmission have almost abolished, while melanoma and lymphoma are still difficult to detect and prevent.
PMCID:7701067
PMID: 32535833
ISSN: 1724-6059
CID: 5126462
Integrated Risk Assessment Versus Age-Specific GFR Thresholds for Living Donor Candidate Evaluation [Editorial]
Lentine, Krista L; Levey, Andrew S; Segev, Dorry L
PMID: 32229776
ISSN: 1534-6080
CID: 5126252
Metabolic, cardiovascular, and substance use evaluation of living kidney donor candidates: US practices in 2017
Garg, Neetika; Lentine, Krista L; Inker, Lesley A; Garg, Amit X; Rodrigue, James R; Segev, Dorry L; Mandelbrot, Didier A
We surveyed US transplant centers to assess practices regarding the evaluation and selection of living kidney donors based on metabolic, cardiovascular, and substance use risk factors. Our companion article describes renal aspects of the evaluation. Response rate was 31%. Compared with 2005, programs have become more accepting of hypertensive candidates: 65% in 2017% vs 41% in 2005 consider candidates with hypertension well controlled with 1 medication. One notable exception is black hypertensive candidates, who are frequently excluded regardless of severity. The most common body mass index (BMI) cutoff remains 35 kg/m2 , and fewer programs now consider candidates with BMI >40 kg/m2 . A 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test of ≥140 mg/dL remains the most common criterion for exclusion of prediabetic candidates. One quarter to one third of programs exclude based on isolated cardiac abnormalities, such as mild aortic stenosis; a similar proportion consider these candidates only if older than 50 years. Cigarette or marijuana smoking are infrequently criteria for exclusion, although 45% and 37% programs, respectively, require cessation 4 weeks prior to surgery. In addition to providing an overview of current practices in living kidney donor evaluation, our study highlights the importance of research evaluating outcomes with various comorbidities to guide practice.
PMID: 32342601
ISSN: 1600-6143
CID: 5126292
The kidney evaluation of living kidney donor candidates: US practices in 2017
Garg, Neetika; Lentine, Krista L; Inker, Lesley A; Garg, Amit X; Rodrigue, James R; Segev, Dorry L; Mandelbrot, Didier A
We surveyed US transplant programs to assess practices used to assess kidney health in living kidney donor candidates in 2017; the response rate was 31%. In this report, we focus on the kidney; a companion piece focuses on the metabolic and cardiovascular aspects of candidate evaluation. Compared to 2005, programs have become more stringent in accepting younger candidates and less stringent in accepting older candidates. The 24-hour creatinine clearance remains the mainstay for kidney function assessment, with 74% continuing to use a value below 80Â mL/min/1.73Â m2 for exclusion and 22% using age-based criteria. ApoL1 genotyping is obtained routinely or selectively by 45%, half of which use the high-risk genotype as an absolute exclusion criterion. For history of symptomatic stones, 49% accept if there is no current radiographic evidence of stones and urine profile is low risk, 80%-95% consider candidates with unilateral asymptomatic stones, but only 33%-48% consider if stones are bilateral. In addition, 14% use the risk assessment tool developed by Grams et al routinely for decision-making, and 42% use it sometimes. Also, 57% reported not having yet determined a risk threshold for acceptable postdonation risk above which candidates are excluded. Contemporary practice variation underscores the need for better evidence to guide the donor selection process.
PMID: 32342620
ISSN: 1600-6143
CID: 5126302
The first increase in live kidney donation in the United States in 15 years
Al Ammary, Fawaz; Yu, Yifan; Ferzola, Alexander; Motter, Jennifer D; Massie, Allan B; Yu, Sile; Thomas, Alvin G; Crews, Deidra C; Segev, Dorry L; Muzaale, Abimereki D; Henderson, Macey L
The first sustained increase in live kidney donation in the United States in 15 years was observed from 2017 to 2019. To help sustain this surge, we studied 35 900 donors (70.3% white, 14.5% Hispanic, 9.3% black, 4.4% Asian) to understand the increase in 2017-2019 vs 2014-2016 using Poisson regression. Among biologically related donors aged <35, 35-49, and ≥50 years, the number of donors did not change across race/ethnicity but increased by 38% and 29% for Hispanic and black ≥50. Among unrelated donors <35, 35-49, and ≥50, white donors increased by 18%, 14%, and 27%; Hispanic donors <35 did not change but increased by 22% and 35% for 35-49 and ≥50; black donors <35 declined by 23% and did not change for 35-49 and ≥50; Asian donors did not change. Among kidney paired donors <35, 35-49, and ≥50, white donors increased by 42%, 50%, and 68%; Hispanic donors <35 and 35-49 increased by 36% and 55% and did not change for ≥50; black donors did not change; Asian donors <35 did not change but increased by 107% and 82% for 35-49 and ≥50. The increase in donation was driven predominantly by unrelated and paired white donors. Donation among unrelated black individuals should be promoted.
PMCID:8717834
PMID: 32524764
ISSN: 1600-6143
CID: 5126452
Induction immunosuppression and the risk of incident malignancies among older and younger kidney transplant recipients: A prospective cohort study
Wang, Lingyu; Motter, Jennifer; Bae, Sunjae; Ahn, JiYoon B; Kanakry, Jennifer A; Jackson, John; Schnitzler, Mark A; Hess, Gregory; Lentine, Krista L; Stuart, Elizabeth A; Segev, Dorry L; McAdams-DeMarco, Mara
BACKGROUND:Older (≥65) KT recipients differ from their younger counterparts in their immune response to immunosuppression (IS) and may have a different risk of malignancy after receiving induction. METHODS:We identified 66 700 adult KT recipients treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (n = 40 443) or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) (n = 26 327) induction (1/1/1999-12/31/2014) using USRDS/Medicare data. We estimated the risk of first-diagnosed post-KT malignancy associated with induction (ATG vs. IL-2RA) using Cox proportional hazard models. We then tested whether these risks differed between older and younger recipients (Wald test for interaction). Models incorporated inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: = 0.01) between younger (HR = 1.18; 95%CI:1.08-1.29) and older (HR = 1.01; 95%CI:0.93-1.09) recipients. CONCLUSIONS:Compared with IL-2RA induction, ATG was associated with elevated post-KT malignancy risk but only among younger recipients. Transplant centers may need to tailor induction IS for younger recipients to mitigate malignancy risk.
PMCID:8503780
PMID: 33048385
ISSN: 1399-0012
CID: 5126752
The Tangible Benefits of Living Donation: Results of a Qualitative Study of Living Kidney Donors
Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E; Robin, Miriam; Saha, Amrita; Eno, Anne; Lifshitz, Romi; Waldram, Madeleine M; Getsin, Samantha N; Chu, Nadia M; Al Ammary, Fawaz; Segev, Dorry L; Henderson, Macey L
The framework currently used for living kidney donor selection is based on estimation of acceptable donor risk, under the premise that benefits are only experienced by the recipient. However, some interdependent donors might experience tangible benefits from donation that cannot be considered in the current framework (ie, benefits experienced directly by the donor that improve their daily life, well-being, or livelihood).
PMCID:7665258
PMID: 33204824
ISSN: 2373-8731
CID: 5126802